Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
John McCain a war criminal, not a war hero
By Eli Stephens
Jul 21, 2015
back in 2005:
Bombing a light-bulb factory, a civilian target, is a war crime. McCain, obviously, didn’t select the target, he was just following orders, but that doesn’t exonerate him any more than any other soldier who follows an illegal order. According to Amnesty International this particular violation of the Geneva Convention (bombing civilian targets) is actually official U.S. military doctrine:
“Military advantage may involve a variety of considerations, including the security of the attacking force. … Economic targets of the enemy that indirectly but effectively support and sustain the enemy’s war-fighting capability may also be attacked.”
“War is a clash of opposing wills. … While physical factors are crucial in war, the national will and the leadership’s will are also critical components of war. The will to prosecute or the will to resist can be decisive elements. … Strategic attack objectives often include producing effects to demoralize the enemy’s leadership, military forces, and population, thus affecting the adversary’s capability to continue the conflict.”
Both of these statements, taken from different U.S. military manuals and documents, represent direct violations of the Geneva Convention (and, it should be noted, well before the advent of George W. Bush).
But McCain didn’t just carry out such illegal orders himself, he willingly voiced support for them, specifically during the 1999 war against Yugoslavia when “water systems, power and heating plants, hospitals, universities, schools, apartment complexes, senior citizens’ homes, bridges, factories, trains, buses, radio and TV stations, the telephone system, oil refineries, embassies, marketplaces and more were deliberately destroyed by U.S./NATO planes in a ruthless 10-week bombing campaign.”
For reference, here is Article 54 of the Geneva convention:
“It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove, or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies, and irrigation works, for the specific purpose of denying them for their sustenance value to the civilian population or to the adverse Party, whatever the motive, whether in order to starve out civilians, to cause them to move away, or for any other motive.”
McCain, and the entire U.S. political and military establishment, also supported the wholesale bombing of Iraq’s water purification plants during the first Gulf War. And this was no ordinary war crime, it was a planned genocide. Documents released in 2000 revealed that the U.S. had studied in detail all aspects of Iraq’s water system, had planned a strategy for preventing Iraq from reconstructing that system (via sanctions), and knew in advance that “this could lead to increased incidences, if not epidemics of disease.” Indeed it did, with more than half a million Iraqi children dead as a result, one of the greatest war crimes in history, carried out by the next generation of U.S. pilots who followed John McCain, and with John McCain’s full-throated support.
John McCain—war criminal then, war criminal now, war criminal forever. To be clear, he is far from the only one currently, or previously, serving in the U.S. government or U.S. military. But, at the moment, he is the only one for whom the entire ruling class, with the lone exception of Donald Trump, is rushing to assure the American public that he was a war hero, before the truth gets more closely examined.
https://www.liberationnews.org/john-mccain-war-criminal-not-war-hero/
Sen. John McCain’s complicated moral legacy on torture
The late Republican senator was a strong moral voice against torture. But his willingness to compromise his principles tarnished that legacy.
By Jennifer Williams@jenn_ruthjennifer@vox.com Aug 25, 2018, 8:33pm EDTSHARE
Senator John McCain (R-AZ), who died of brain cancer on Saturday at the age of 81, was perhaps the strongest moral voice against torture in all of American politics — yet it was not an untainted voice.
His willingness to compromise his principles for the sake of politics at the height of the post-9/11 torture debate substantially weakened its power and ultimately tarnished his moral legacy.
McCain was brutally tortured by the North Vietnamese during the five and a half years he spent in captivity as a prisoner of war, from 1967 to 1973. The experience not only shaped his own personal views on both the immorality and ineffectiveness of torture, but also endowed him with a level of credibility and moral authority on the subject that few others could match.
When it came to light that, in the wake of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, George W. Bush’s administration had authorized the use of torture on detainees, McCain, then a powerful Republican senator, took a stand that few others in his party would.
He forcefully spoke out against the use of waterboarding and other so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” when the Bush administration and other Republicans tried to argue they weren’t torture. “It is not a complicated procedure. It is torture,” he said of waterboarding.
But when it came time to fight for actual legislation to force the Bush administration’s hand and ban the use of these methods once and for all, McCain was far less courageous. Rather than stick to his principles, he sold them out for politics — and effectively allowed the Bush administration not only to continue torturing people, but also to get away with it scot-free.
Here’s the story of how McCain, one of the most vocal opponents of torture, capitulated for political gain, right when his voice was needed the most — and why his later attempts to atone for his sins was too little, too late.
How McCain’s experience in Vietnam shaped his views on torture
McCain was a US Navy pilot during the Vietnam War. On October 26, 1967, his plane was shot down during a bombing mission over Hanoi. He ejected, breaking both arms and his right leg in the process, and parachuted down into a lake, where he was rescued by North Vietnamese villagers.
A photo taken October 26, 1967, shows US Navy pilot John McCain being rescued from Hanoi’s Truc Bach lake by several Hanoi residents after his Navy warplane was downed by Northern Vietnamese army during the Vietnam War.
AFP/Getty Images
His captors sent him to Hanoi’s notorious Hỏa Lò Prison, nicknamed the “Hanoi Hilton,” where he was held for five-and-a-half years.
For two of those years, he was kept in solitary confinement. In an unflinching first-person account of his experience that he wrote just two months after returning home, McCain described what it was like:
I was not allowed to see or talk to or communicate with any of my fellow prisoners. My room was fairly decent-sized—I’d say it was about 10 by 10. The door was solid. There were no windows. The only ventilation came from two small holes at the top in the ceiling, about 6 inches by 4 inches. The roof was tin and it got hot as hell in there. The room was kind of dim—night and day—but they always kept on a small light bulb, so they could observe me. I was in that place for two years.
He also detailed the physical and psychological abuse he suffered for two years during his captivity:
They bounced me from pillar to post, kicking and laughing and scratching. After a few hours of that, ropes were put on me and I sat that night bound with ropes. Then I was taken to a small room.... For the next four days, I was beaten every two to three hours by different guards. My left arm was broken again and my ribs were cracked.
They wanted a statement saying that I was sorry for the crimes that I had committed against North Vietnamese people and that I was grateful for the treatment that I had received from them. [...]
I held out for four days. Finally, I reached the lowest point of my 5½ years in North Vietnam. I was at the point of suicide, because I saw that I was reaching the end of my rope.
I said, O.K., I’ll write for them.
He broke. He signed a statement confessing that he was a “black criminal” and an “air pirate,” among other things.
“I felt just terrible about it,” he recalled. “I kept saying to myself, ‘Oh, God, I really didn’t have any choice.’ I had learned what we all learned over there: Every man has his breaking point. I had reached mine.”
That lesson — that torture would eventually make a person willing to confess to anything, whether it was true or not — was one he wouldn’t soon forget.
A photo taken in 1967 shows US Navy pilot John McCain being examined by a North Vietnamese doctor.
AFP/Getty Images
When he returned home to America in 1973, the then-36-year-old McCain was greeted as a war hero. He met President Richard Nixon. He became a celebrity. And soon after, he launched a political career that would take him to the highest levels of power in the US government.
US Navy pilot John McCain Is welcomed by President Richard Nixon upon McCain’s release from five-and-a-half years as a POW during the Vietnam War, on May 24, 1973, in Washington, DC.
Getty Images
McCain spoke out forcefully against torture — but capitulated when push came to shove
On November 1, 2005, the Washington Post published a damning article revealing the existence of a secret worldwide detention and interrogation program run by the CIA.
Less than a month later, McCain pushed through an amendment to the 2006 Defense Authorization Bill that restricted US military interrogators to only using methods listed in the US Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation.
That excluded all those “enhanced interrogation techniques” like waterboarding, sleep deprivation, forced stress positions, electric shock, and the other forms of torture that the administration had been so fond of using on detainees.
McCain sold it as a major victory against torture.
“We’ve sent a message to the world that the United States is not like the terrorists. We have no grief for them, but what we are is a nation that upholds values and standards of behavior and treatment of all people, no matter how evil or bad they are,” McCain said at the time.
What the bill conveniently left out, however, was anything about restricting CIA interrogatorsto using only Army Field Manual-approved techniques. And since it was the CIA — and not the military — that was torturing detainees as a matter of official policy, that loophole rendered the bill essentially meaningless.
In turns out that McCain’s bill had initially called for restricting all US personnel — including the CIA — to just the Army Field Manual-approved techniques.
But as CNN reported at the time, the Bush White House balked at that, claiming that “the bill would otherwise limit presidential ability to protect Americans from a terrorist attack,” CNN reported. The president threatened to veto the bill unless it included an exemption for the CIA.
McCain resisted adding in such an exemption. But he compromised: The final bill that was signed into law banned all US personnel from engaging in “cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment” of detainees — yet it only explicitly restricted the military to the Field Manual techniques.
And since the Bush administration had long been arguing that waterboarding and the other methods didn’t count as “cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment,” the CIA was therefore free to keep using them.
McCain admitted a few years later that the 2005 bill “deliberately excluded the CIA” and “allowed the CIA to retain the capacity to employ alternative interrogation techniques.”
Alternative interrogation techniques. Like waterboarding. Which he says is torture.
But that wasn’t all.
McCain — under pressure from the White House — also added in language that included legal protections for US government personnel who had engaged in “the authorized interrogation of a terrorist suspect.”
In other words, people who were just following orders they believed to be lawful when they tortured detainees could use that as a legal defense, and the government would provide them with legal counsel.
(You might recognize this as the same legal defense some Nazis tried to use at the Nuremberg war crimes trials after World War II — a legal defense the Allied forces rejected.)
In 2008, McCain — who was then running to be the Republican nominee for president — got a second chance.
That year, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) proposed an amendment to restrict CIA interrogators to only using the techniques approved in the Army Field Manual. Once again, the Bush administration fought back, threatening to veto it.
The morning the bill came up for a vote in the Senate, McCain again called waterboarding “torture and illegal.” It seemed that McCain would finally stand up for his principles and join Feinstein in trying to stop the use of waterboarding and other torture methods once and for all.
But when the vote was called later that afternoon, McCain voted against the bill, saying that he still was against torture, but believed the CIA should have access to more interrogation techniques than those in the Army Field Manual. (Remember, he once felt fine limiting CIA officers to those techniques; his original 2006 torture ban did so before it was watered down.)
When it still passed despite his no vote, he called on President Bush to veto it.
Less than a month later, President Bush publicly endorsed McCain as the GOP nominee for president in a ceremony in the Rose Garden. Three days later, Bush vetoed the bill.
US President George W. Bush shakes hands with Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) after Bush endorsed McCain for the GOP nomination at the Rose Garden on, March 5, 2008.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
McCain’s attempt at redemption was too little, too late
When President Donald Trump announced veteran CIA officer Gina Haspel as his pick to be the next director of the CIA earlier this year, McCain voiced concern over her role in the agency’s torture program during the Bush administration.
Haspel oversaw one of the Bush administration’s most notorious “black sites” — secret prisons the CIA set up around the world to hold and torture suspected terrorists away from the prying eyes of lawyers, human rights groups, and the American public — in Thailand.
She was also directly involved in the destruction of nearly 100 videotapes documenting the CIA’s brutal interrogation and torture of two prisoners, Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, at that black site.
CIA operatives there subjected Zubaydah and al-Nashiri to waterboarding, “walling” (slamming them repeatedly into walls), sleep deprivation, nudity, and being held in confined spaces (including a wooden box the size of a coffin) for hours at a time.
Haspel didn’t officially take charge of the black site until after Zubaydah’s interrogation was over. But she was in charge during al-Nashiri’s interrogation.
Gina Haspel (center), nominee for Director of Central Intelligence Agency, testifies at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee on May 9, 2018.
Xinhua/Ting Shen via Getty Images
When Trump announced Haspel’s nomination, though McCain was in the hospital thousands of miles away in Arizona undergoing treatment for brain cancer, he penned a letter to Haspelasking her to explain in detail her exact role in the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation” program.
“Over the course of your career with the intelligence community, you have served in positions of responsibility that have intersected with the CIA’s program of so-called ‘enhanced interrogation techniques,’” McCain wrote. He continued:
These techniques included the practice of waterboarding, forced nudity and humiliation, facial and abdominal slapping, dietary manipulation, stress positions, cramped confinement, striking, and more than 48 hours of sleep deprivation. We now know that these techniques not only failed to deliver actionable intelligence, but actually produced false and misleading information. Most importantly, the use of torture compromised our values, stained our national honor, and threatened our historical reputation.
He then provided a list of 12 highly specific questions that he asked her to provide answers to in writing, including “Did you ever impose, direct, or oversee the use of ‘enhanced interrogation techniques,’ including the use of waterboarding.”
It’s unclear whether she ever provided those written answers to McCain, but she did have the opportunity to address those same questions during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee. McCain was still in Arizona undergoing medical treatment; he did not attend the hearing in person.
But he still heard what she had to say. And her answers did not assuage his concerns. After her testimony, McCain issued a statement urging his fellow senators to vote against her nomination.
“I believe Gina Haspel is a patriot who loves our country and has devoted her professional life to its service and defense,” he wrote. “However, Ms. Haspel’s role in overseeing the use of torture by Americans is disturbing. Her refusal to acknowledge torture’s immorality is disqualifying.”
The Senate voted 54 to 45 to confirm her anyway.
Gina Haspel (left) is sworn in as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency by Vice President Mike Pence alongside President Trump and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during a ceremony at CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia, on May 21, 2018.
Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
If things had gone a little differently, Haspel could have ended up sitting behind bars instead of sitting in the director’s chair at CIA headquarters.
But in 2006, McCain co-authored the Military Commissions Act. As he recounted later, he and his co-authors “wrote into the legislation that no one who used or approved the use of these interrogation techniques before its enactment should be prosecuted.”
In other words, people like Gina Haspel.
In April 2009, the Obama administration followed McCain’s advice, announcing that it would not seek to prosecute CIA officers who had tortured people, as long as they had acted in accordance with the rules laid out by the Bush administration Justice Department.
McCain supported the decision.
“We need to put this behind us,” he told CBS’s Face the Nation shortly after the announcement. “We need to move forward.… We need a united nation, not a divided one.”
By Eli Stephens
Jul 21, 2015
back in 2005:
Bombing a light-bulb factory, a civilian target, is a war crime. McCain, obviously, didn’t select the target, he was just following orders, but that doesn’t exonerate him any more than any other soldier who follows an illegal order. According to Amnesty International this particular violation of the Geneva Convention (bombing civilian targets) is actually official U.S. military doctrine:
“Military advantage may involve a variety of considerations, including the security of the attacking force. … Economic targets of the enemy that indirectly but effectively support and sustain the enemy’s war-fighting capability may also be attacked.”
“War is a clash of opposing wills. … While physical factors are crucial in war, the national will and the leadership’s will are also critical components of war. The will to prosecute or the will to resist can be decisive elements. … Strategic attack objectives often include producing effects to demoralize the enemy’s leadership, military forces, and population, thus affecting the adversary’s capability to continue the conflict.”
Both of these statements, taken from different U.S. military manuals and documents, represent direct violations of the Geneva Convention (and, it should be noted, well before the advent of George W. Bush).
But McCain didn’t just carry out such illegal orders himself, he willingly voiced support for them, specifically during the 1999 war against Yugoslavia when “water systems, power and heating plants, hospitals, universities, schools, apartment complexes, senior citizens’ homes, bridges, factories, trains, buses, radio and TV stations, the telephone system, oil refineries, embassies, marketplaces and more were deliberately destroyed by U.S./NATO planes in a ruthless 10-week bombing campaign.”
For reference, here is Article 54 of the Geneva convention:
“It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove, or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies, and irrigation works, for the specific purpose of denying them for their sustenance value to the civilian population or to the adverse Party, whatever the motive, whether in order to starve out civilians, to cause them to move away, or for any other motive.”
McCain, and the entire U.S. political and military establishment, also supported the wholesale bombing of Iraq’s water purification plants during the first Gulf War. And this was no ordinary war crime, it was a planned genocide. Documents released in 2000 revealed that the U.S. had studied in detail all aspects of Iraq’s water system, had planned a strategy for preventing Iraq from reconstructing that system (via sanctions), and knew in advance that “this could lead to increased incidences, if not epidemics of disease.” Indeed it did, with more than half a million Iraqi children dead as a result, one of the greatest war crimes in history, carried out by the next generation of U.S. pilots who followed John McCain, and with John McCain’s full-throated support.
John McCain—war criminal then, war criminal now, war criminal forever. To be clear, he is far from the only one currently, or previously, serving in the U.S. government or U.S. military. But, at the moment, he is the only one for whom the entire ruling class, with the lone exception of Donald Trump, is rushing to assure the American public that he was a war hero, before the truth gets more closely examined.
https://www.liberationnews.org/john-mccain-war-criminal-not-war-hero/
Sen. John McCain’s complicated moral legacy on torture
The late Republican senator was a strong moral voice against torture. But his willingness to compromise his principles tarnished that legacy.
By Jennifer Williams@jenn_ruthjennifer@vox.com Aug 25, 2018, 8:33pm EDTSHARE
Senator John McCain (R-AZ), who died of brain cancer on Saturday at the age of 81, was perhaps the strongest moral voice against torture in all of American politics — yet it was not an untainted voice.
His willingness to compromise his principles for the sake of politics at the height of the post-9/11 torture debate substantially weakened its power and ultimately tarnished his moral legacy.
McCain was brutally tortured by the North Vietnamese during the five and a half years he spent in captivity as a prisoner of war, from 1967 to 1973. The experience not only shaped his own personal views on both the immorality and ineffectiveness of torture, but also endowed him with a level of credibility and moral authority on the subject that few others could match.
When it came to light that, in the wake of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, George W. Bush’s administration had authorized the use of torture on detainees, McCain, then a powerful Republican senator, took a stand that few others in his party would.
He forcefully spoke out against the use of waterboarding and other so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” when the Bush administration and other Republicans tried to argue they weren’t torture. “It is not a complicated procedure. It is torture,” he said of waterboarding.
But when it came time to fight for actual legislation to force the Bush administration’s hand and ban the use of these methods once and for all, McCain was far less courageous. Rather than stick to his principles, he sold them out for politics — and effectively allowed the Bush administration not only to continue torturing people, but also to get away with it scot-free.
Here’s the story of how McCain, one of the most vocal opponents of torture, capitulated for political gain, right when his voice was needed the most — and why his later attempts to atone for his sins was too little, too late.
How McCain’s experience in Vietnam shaped his views on torture
McCain was a US Navy pilot during the Vietnam War. On October 26, 1967, his plane was shot down during a bombing mission over Hanoi. He ejected, breaking both arms and his right leg in the process, and parachuted down into a lake, where he was rescued by North Vietnamese villagers.
A photo taken October 26, 1967, shows US Navy pilot John McCain being rescued from Hanoi’s Truc Bach lake by several Hanoi residents after his Navy warplane was downed by Northern Vietnamese army during the Vietnam War.
AFP/Getty Images
His captors sent him to Hanoi’s notorious Hỏa Lò Prison, nicknamed the “Hanoi Hilton,” where he was held for five-and-a-half years.
For two of those years, he was kept in solitary confinement. In an unflinching first-person account of his experience that he wrote just two months after returning home, McCain described what it was like:
I was not allowed to see or talk to or communicate with any of my fellow prisoners. My room was fairly decent-sized—I’d say it was about 10 by 10. The door was solid. There were no windows. The only ventilation came from two small holes at the top in the ceiling, about 6 inches by 4 inches. The roof was tin and it got hot as hell in there. The room was kind of dim—night and day—but they always kept on a small light bulb, so they could observe me. I was in that place for two years.
He also detailed the physical and psychological abuse he suffered for two years during his captivity:
They bounced me from pillar to post, kicking and laughing and scratching. After a few hours of that, ropes were put on me and I sat that night bound with ropes. Then I was taken to a small room.... For the next four days, I was beaten every two to three hours by different guards. My left arm was broken again and my ribs were cracked.
They wanted a statement saying that I was sorry for the crimes that I had committed against North Vietnamese people and that I was grateful for the treatment that I had received from them. [...]
I held out for four days. Finally, I reached the lowest point of my 5½ years in North Vietnam. I was at the point of suicide, because I saw that I was reaching the end of my rope.
I said, O.K., I’ll write for them.
He broke. He signed a statement confessing that he was a “black criminal” and an “air pirate,” among other things.
“I felt just terrible about it,” he recalled. “I kept saying to myself, ‘Oh, God, I really didn’t have any choice.’ I had learned what we all learned over there: Every man has his breaking point. I had reached mine.”
That lesson — that torture would eventually make a person willing to confess to anything, whether it was true or not — was one he wouldn’t soon forget.
A photo taken in 1967 shows US Navy pilot John McCain being examined by a North Vietnamese doctor.
AFP/Getty Images
When he returned home to America in 1973, the then-36-year-old McCain was greeted as a war hero. He met President Richard Nixon. He became a celebrity. And soon after, he launched a political career that would take him to the highest levels of power in the US government.
US Navy pilot John McCain Is welcomed by President Richard Nixon upon McCain’s release from five-and-a-half years as a POW during the Vietnam War, on May 24, 1973, in Washington, DC.
Getty Images
McCain spoke out forcefully against torture — but capitulated when push came to shove
On November 1, 2005, the Washington Post published a damning article revealing the existence of a secret worldwide detention and interrogation program run by the CIA.
Less than a month later, McCain pushed through an amendment to the 2006 Defense Authorization Bill that restricted US military interrogators to only using methods listed in the US Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation.
That excluded all those “enhanced interrogation techniques” like waterboarding, sleep deprivation, forced stress positions, electric shock, and the other forms of torture that the administration had been so fond of using on detainees.
McCain sold it as a major victory against torture.
“We’ve sent a message to the world that the United States is not like the terrorists. We have no grief for them, but what we are is a nation that upholds values and standards of behavior and treatment of all people, no matter how evil or bad they are,” McCain said at the time.
What the bill conveniently left out, however, was anything about restricting CIA interrogatorsto using only Army Field Manual-approved techniques. And since it was the CIA — and not the military — that was torturing detainees as a matter of official policy, that loophole rendered the bill essentially meaningless.
In turns out that McCain’s bill had initially called for restricting all US personnel — including the CIA — to just the Army Field Manual-approved techniques.
But as CNN reported at the time, the Bush White House balked at that, claiming that “the bill would otherwise limit presidential ability to protect Americans from a terrorist attack,” CNN reported. The president threatened to veto the bill unless it included an exemption for the CIA.
McCain resisted adding in such an exemption. But he compromised: The final bill that was signed into law banned all US personnel from engaging in “cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment” of detainees — yet it only explicitly restricted the military to the Field Manual techniques.
And since the Bush administration had long been arguing that waterboarding and the other methods didn’t count as “cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment,” the CIA was therefore free to keep using them.
McCain admitted a few years later that the 2005 bill “deliberately excluded the CIA” and “allowed the CIA to retain the capacity to employ alternative interrogation techniques.”
Alternative interrogation techniques. Like waterboarding. Which he says is torture.
But that wasn’t all.
McCain — under pressure from the White House — also added in language that included legal protections for US government personnel who had engaged in “the authorized interrogation of a terrorist suspect.”
In other words, people who were just following orders they believed to be lawful when they tortured detainees could use that as a legal defense, and the government would provide them with legal counsel.
(You might recognize this as the same legal defense some Nazis tried to use at the Nuremberg war crimes trials after World War II — a legal defense the Allied forces rejected.)
In 2008, McCain — who was then running to be the Republican nominee for president — got a second chance.
That year, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) proposed an amendment to restrict CIA interrogators to only using the techniques approved in the Army Field Manual. Once again, the Bush administration fought back, threatening to veto it.
The morning the bill came up for a vote in the Senate, McCain again called waterboarding “torture and illegal.” It seemed that McCain would finally stand up for his principles and join Feinstein in trying to stop the use of waterboarding and other torture methods once and for all.
But when the vote was called later that afternoon, McCain voted against the bill, saying that he still was against torture, but believed the CIA should have access to more interrogation techniques than those in the Army Field Manual. (Remember, he once felt fine limiting CIA officers to those techniques; his original 2006 torture ban did so before it was watered down.)
When it still passed despite his no vote, he called on President Bush to veto it.
Less than a month later, President Bush publicly endorsed McCain as the GOP nominee for president in a ceremony in the Rose Garden. Three days later, Bush vetoed the bill.
US President George W. Bush shakes hands with Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) after Bush endorsed McCain for the GOP nomination at the Rose Garden on, March 5, 2008.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
McCain’s attempt at redemption was too little, too late
When President Donald Trump announced veteran CIA officer Gina Haspel as his pick to be the next director of the CIA earlier this year, McCain voiced concern over her role in the agency’s torture program during the Bush administration.
Haspel oversaw one of the Bush administration’s most notorious “black sites” — secret prisons the CIA set up around the world to hold and torture suspected terrorists away from the prying eyes of lawyers, human rights groups, and the American public — in Thailand.
She was also directly involved in the destruction of nearly 100 videotapes documenting the CIA’s brutal interrogation and torture of two prisoners, Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, at that black site.
CIA operatives there subjected Zubaydah and al-Nashiri to waterboarding, “walling” (slamming them repeatedly into walls), sleep deprivation, nudity, and being held in confined spaces (including a wooden box the size of a coffin) for hours at a time.
Haspel didn’t officially take charge of the black site until after Zubaydah’s interrogation was over. But she was in charge during al-Nashiri’s interrogation.
Gina Haspel (center), nominee for Director of Central Intelligence Agency, testifies at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee on May 9, 2018.
Xinhua/Ting Shen via Getty Images
When Trump announced Haspel’s nomination, though McCain was in the hospital thousands of miles away in Arizona undergoing treatment for brain cancer, he penned a letter to Haspelasking her to explain in detail her exact role in the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation” program.
“Over the course of your career with the intelligence community, you have served in positions of responsibility that have intersected with the CIA’s program of so-called ‘enhanced interrogation techniques,’” McCain wrote. He continued:
These techniques included the practice of waterboarding, forced nudity and humiliation, facial and abdominal slapping, dietary manipulation, stress positions, cramped confinement, striking, and more than 48 hours of sleep deprivation. We now know that these techniques not only failed to deliver actionable intelligence, but actually produced false and misleading information. Most importantly, the use of torture compromised our values, stained our national honor, and threatened our historical reputation.
He then provided a list of 12 highly specific questions that he asked her to provide answers to in writing, including “Did you ever impose, direct, or oversee the use of ‘enhanced interrogation techniques,’ including the use of waterboarding.”
It’s unclear whether she ever provided those written answers to McCain, but she did have the opportunity to address those same questions during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee. McCain was still in Arizona undergoing medical treatment; he did not attend the hearing in person.
But he still heard what she had to say. And her answers did not assuage his concerns. After her testimony, McCain issued a statement urging his fellow senators to vote against her nomination.
“I believe Gina Haspel is a patriot who loves our country and has devoted her professional life to its service and defense,” he wrote. “However, Ms. Haspel’s role in overseeing the use of torture by Americans is disturbing. Her refusal to acknowledge torture’s immorality is disqualifying.”
The Senate voted 54 to 45 to confirm her anyway.
Gina Haspel (left) is sworn in as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency by Vice President Mike Pence alongside President Trump and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during a ceremony at CIA Headquarters in Langley, Virginia, on May 21, 2018.
Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
If things had gone a little differently, Haspel could have ended up sitting behind bars instead of sitting in the director’s chair at CIA headquarters.
But in 2006, McCain co-authored the Military Commissions Act. As he recounted later, he and his co-authors “wrote into the legislation that no one who used or approved the use of these interrogation techniques before its enactment should be prosecuted.”
In other words, people like Gina Haspel.
In April 2009, the Obama administration followed McCain’s advice, announcing that it would not seek to prosecute CIA officers who had tortured people, as long as they had acted in accordance with the rules laid out by the Bush administration Justice Department.
McCain supported the decision.
“We need to put this behind us,” he told CBS’s Face the Nation shortly after the announcement. “We need to move forward.… We need a united nation, not a divided one.”
