I am not going to defend Pakistan's theocratic path; there is a section of Pakistanis, some on this forum, including me, who believe that the real Pakistan, per M.A. Jinnah, was never meant to be a theocracy. Too bad he died too soon after Pakistan's birth.
I'd give Israel credit for 'returning' Sinai desert in return for a major strategic gain by getting the largest (and perhaps most powerful) Arab nation to make peace with Israel. I will also say that Israeli Arabs don't have it too bad, despite some discriminations. And I am quite sympathetic to Israeli Jews to live in peace and to even be catalyst for changes in the region.
But the fact that Israel not only holds on to the land in W. Bank but is also basically gobbling it up makes me believe that the it was always a desired goal. Well, let's suppose it was NOT the original goal, then why not return the land per Kerry's speech? Actions speak louder than the words. And today, per Kerry, Israel stands 'virtually alone' in a world with around 200 nations when it comes to the Settlements.
The Settlements are, pure and simply, a landgrab and slow ethnic cleansing. They are a crime against humanity. The hope is to 'transfer' the W. Bank Palestinians to Jordan or Egypt by compensating them or make them suffer so much they'd decide to leave on their own.