Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
then why we wasted time on f-16 and have too much fun with congressmen ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what about MARTIN BEAKER PILOT EJECTION SEATS.......??????Firstly, Pakistan isn't really paying much from its own pocket for the F-16s. The money is coming through past and future FMF and nothing else, local funds are going towards JF-17 and other programs.
Second, the JF-17 Block-III would possess a number of technological capabilities that will put it ahead of the PAF's Block-52+/MLU in some key respects. For example, the AESA radar would give the JF-17 enhanced resistence to EW, and HMD/S with HOBS AAM isn't something our F-16s would have (unless we get AIM-9X). It might not fully compete in terms of range and payload, but in terms of core technology, there's no reason why it couldn't be as good if not better than the F-16 Block-52+.
No it won't. No it won't. No it won't. No it won't. No it won't. No it won't.No it won't. No it won't. No it won't. No it won't.
And if it is going to be equal to F-16 please give PAF a shout. Cancel buying anymore F-16s as that is waste of money.
What about them ?And what about MARTIN BEAKER PILOT EJECTION SEATS.......??????
he meant to say any substitute fro them or further blocks will use the same.What about them ?
Martin baker is the leading manufacturing company in ejection seat tech. Why would you go anywhere else?he meant to say any substitute fro them or further blocks will use the same.
My take as well. Not to mention that the JF-17 is tasked by PAF for different purposes than the F-16.Here in this statement, JF will be upgraded to which variant of 16 ?
I think he doesn't have clue about F-16 either.
I also think the PAF will begin upgrading the Block-52s in the 2020s. If loaded up with a modern Northrop Grumman AESA radar, new Lockheed Martin pods, next-gen EW/ECM, and - hopefully - AIM-9X and AIM-120D. Factor in new on-board avionics along with the Block-52's range and payload advantages, and you have a hell of a fighter.My take as well. Not to mention that the JF-17 is tasked by PAF for different purposes than the F-16.
I wonder if the dear minister has any professionally technical background let alone military aviation.Facepalm. Sometimes i think we should start our own newspaper to deal with these dumbwits.
News paper is a good idea...Facepalm. Sometimes i think we should start our own newspaper to deal with these dumbwits.
lol what you want a " lightweight, single-engine, multi-role combat aircraft " with under 20 million price limitations ???ROFL ROFL ROFL ..OK am serious ...ha ha ha ha
OK now people compare a piece of metal with a 4th gen fighter aircraft
u said like after modifications of Honda city car is equal to Bugatti veyron
u just upgrade jf-17 to air-to-air refuelling capability,
improved avionics, enhanced load carrying capacity,
data link, and electronic warfare capabilities. [& what about the body ,engine , RAM Coting ?????
hmm hmm
You forget to mention IRST which will give ability to JFT for passive tracking........., and IFR probe which will give JFT in-flight refueling capability via Il78 Tankers .........Firstly, Pakistan isn't really paying much from its own pocket for the F-16s. The money is coming through past and future FMF and nothing else, local funds are going towards JF-17 and other programs.
Second, the JF-17 Block-III would possess a number of technological capabilities that will put it ahead of the PAF's Block-52+/MLU in some key respects. For example, the AESA radar would give the JF-17 enhanced resistence to EW, and HMD/S with HOBS AAM isn't something our F-16s would have (unless we get AIM-9X). It might not fully compete in terms of range and payload, but in terms of core technology, there's no reason why it couldn't be as good if not better than the F-16 Block-52+.