Jerusalem attack: Four dead after lorry driver rams soldiers

[Ryuzaki]

A driver has killed four people in Jerusalem by ramming a lorry into a group of Israeli soldiers, in what police say was a terrorist attack.

Medics at the scene said three women and one man, all in their twenties, were killed and at least 13 more were wounded.

"It is a terrorist attack, a ramming attack," police spokeswoman Luba Samri told Israeli radio.

She said the attacker was shot dead by soldiers from the group.

Images from the scene showed a lorry with bullet holes riddled across the windscreen.

A bus driver who witnessed the incident told Israeli radio that the driver ploughed into the group before reversing over victims.

Israel's police chief Roni Alsheich told reporters the attacker was from an Arab neighbourhood in east Jerusalem.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middl...social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook

 

[Saif al-Arab]

In the eyes of Palestinians this attack was aimed at occupiers and can be considered justified from that point of view.

Israel must stop building illegal settlements in the West Bank, end the blockade of Gaza and withdraw from illegally occupied land in Palestine. As well as return the Golan Heights to Syria.

It is unfortunate that young people (young soldiers) must die but this is entirely Israel's own doing and that of its politicians that are elected by the Israeli people.

If Israelis want to live in a safe and peaceful country they should vote for politicians who support the two-state solution and the above that I mentioned.

That would not solve all problems but most of them.

The Arab world almost unanimously agreed to the Arab Peace Initiative back in 2002 (so far the best proposal to solving this age-old conflict) but Israel of course rejected this plan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Peace_Initiative

So Israel is not interested in a two-state solution and as long as this is the case such attacks will continue.

 

[Mansoon]

In the eyes of Palestinians this attack was aimed at occupiers and can be considered justified from that point of view.

Israel must stop building illegal settlements in the West Bank, end the blockade of Gaza and withdraw from illegally occupied land in Palestine. As well as return the Golan Heights to Syria.

It is unfortunate that young people (young soldiers) must die but this is entirely Israel's own doing and that of its politicians that are elected by the Israeli people.

If Israelis want to live in a safe and peaceful country they should vote for politicians who support the two-state solution and the above that I mentioned.

That would not solve all problems but most of them.

Of course terrorism is justified by the Arabs. Just not Israeli response to terrorism. Then they call it persecution

 

[SSGcommandoPAK]

Good work brave driver kill the occupiers ! They are not Terrorists rather Freedom Fighters as they are not targetting Civilians .

Footage of the incident !

 

[Saif al-Arab]

Of course terrorism is justified by the Arabs. Just not Israeli response to terrorism. Then they call it persecution

Norwegian, Arabs in this case specifically Palestinian Arabs, do not occupy Jewish land forcefully nor have they established their national state in another people's territory.

Nor did Arabs persecute Jews systematically or denied them basic rights let alone travelled to Europe (Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Hungary etc.) to set up an Arab state there because the first Neolithic settlers of Europe who brought agriculture with them to modern-day Europe were originally from the Arab world and show the greatest genetic affinity to modern-day Arabs. This is as much as an valuable claim as the claim of Ashkenazi Jews to Jerusalem and Israel/Palestine.

You might not know this but almost 2/3 of all Israeli Jews are Jews from Arab countries or partially of Arab/Mizrahi Jewish ancestry.

So when Hamas and other Palestinians in tiny Gaza fire a few firecrackers (that's what it is essentially compared to Israel's arsenal) and kill at most 2-3 people if none at all, it is appropriate/not an overreaction to carpet bomb an neighborhood in Gaza killing almost 1000 civilians?

This attack was aimed at soldiers, not civilians. This is a legitimate action from the point of view of Palestinians.

Similar to how people in Kashmir view attacks on Indian forces as legitimate and numerous other areas of the world.

Also peace is always the preferable solution and I do not advocate for war or conflict anywhere but what I wrote in post 1 is hardly nonsense.

 

[hussain0216]

Apartheid occupying soldiers being taught a lesson

 

[thesolar65]

Now again IAF F-16s will again be Airborne. Why do they invite it?

 

[Mansoon]

Now again IAF F-16s will again be Airborne. Why do they invite it?

F-35 you mean?

 

[hussain0216]

Now again IAF F-16s will again be Airborne. Why do they invite it?

You mean they should accept apartheid occupation even though the U.N security council resolutions as well as international law supports the Palestinians right to the land snd statehood

 

[thesolar65]

F-35 you mean?

well, may be. They will think this is a perfect situation to test it.

 

[Serpentine]

Of course terrorism is justified by the Arabs. Just not Israeli response to terrorism. Then they call it persecution

You need to check definition of terrorism in a dictionary, then you can have a moral lecture about it. Attacking uniformed soldiers who have occupied your land is NOT terrorism.

 

[CBU-105]

 

[Beyonder]

4 IDF Terrorists died..good riddance...

 

[New World]

Norwegian, Arabs in this case specifically Palestinian Arabs, do not occupy Jewish land forcefully nor have they established their national state in another people's territory.

Nor did Arabs persecute Jews systematically or denied them basic rights let alone travelled to Europe (Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Hungary etc.) to set up an Arab state there because the first Neolithic settlers of Europe who brought agriculture with them to modern-day Europe were originally from the Arab world and show the greatest genetic affinity to modern-day Arabs. This is as much as an valuable claim as the claim of Ashkenazi Jews to Jerusalem and Israel/Palestine.

You might not know this but almost 2/3 of all Israeli Jews are Jews from Arab countries or partially of Arab/Mizrahi Jewish ancestry.

So when Hamas and other Palestinians in tiny Gaza fire a few firecrackers (that's what it is essentially compared to Israel's arsenal) and kill at most 2-3 people if none at all, it is appropriate/not an overreaction to carpet bomb an neighborhood in Gaza killing almost 1000 civilians?

This attack was aimed at soldiers, not civilians. This is a legitimate action from the point of view of Palestinians.

Similar to how people in Kashmir view attacks on Indian forces as legitimate and numerous other areas of the world.

Also peace is always the preferable solution and I do not advocate for war or conflict anywhere but what I wrote in post 1 is hardly nonsense.

You need to check definition of terrorism in a dictionary, then you can have a moral lecture about it. Attacking uniformed soldiers who have occupied your land is NOT terrorism.

Don't replay him..He is a false Flagger. He is bharatiii..

 

[Kuwaiti Girl]

This was probably carried out by ISIS.