What's new

Japan-Russia islands dispute: fears tensions are dragging in US and China as jets scramble

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
Japan-Russia islands dispute: fears tensions are dragging in US and China as jets scramble
  • Sharp increase in Russian military planes approaching Japanese airspace prompted Tokyo to scramble jets 35 times in June alone
  • Experts say Russian activities are meant not only as a signal to Tokyo over the Northern Territories/Kurils dispute, but as a show for domestic audiences and a gauge of US opinion

Julian Ryall and Maria Siow
Published: 7:00am, 11 Aug, 2021

e92835fa-f9c2-11eb-aa37-9736ba6f9b4b_972x_100604.jpeg



Japan’s fighter aircraft have been scrambled to respond to a sharp increase in Russian military planes approaching Japanese airspace north of Hokkaido in recent weeks, as tensions escalate over a disputed island chain.

Experts say that Moscow’s activities are meant not only as a message to Tokyo in its long-running territorial dispute over the islands – referred to as the Northern Territories by Japan and the Southern Kurils by Russia – but as a show of strength for a domestic audience.

They also believe the Russian flights are aimed at gauging Washington’s position on the dispute, amid concerns that what was once a bilateral issue between Moscow and Tokyo is swiftly evolving into a multilateral one concerning the United States and China, too.

In a recent commentary for the East Asia Forum website, Andrey Gubin, an associate professor with the Far Eastern Federal University in Vladivostok, said the context around the dispute, which has proved intractable since the conclusion of World War II in 1945, had changed.

“Rising US-Russia, US-China and Japan-China tensions are badly affecting the security environment in Northeast Asia”, he wrote.

Soviet troops invaded and occupied the southern part of Sakhalin and the Northern Territories/Southern Kuril Islands as World War II ended and ever since then Moscow has refused Tokyo’s demands that the territory be returned to Japanese control. As a result, the two governments have yet to sign a formal peace treaty ending the war.

Japan Air Self-Defence Force (ASDF) jets were scrambled to intercept Russian aircraft on 35 occasions in June, the highest figure since the defence ministry started releasing monthly statistics in April 2020 and more than the 23 times they were scrambled to counter Chinese aircraft in the same period.

It is the first time the ASDF has deployed more planes to counter Russian aircraft than to face Chinese threats to the far south of the Japanese archipelago for nine months.

The increase in incidents off northern Hokkaido can in part be linked to Russian military exercises that are expected to continue until the end of August – and which the Japanese government has said it “cannot accept” as the drills are taking place on an island that Tokyo insists is Japanese territory that has been illegally occupied by Russia since 1945 – but there are other factors behind the increase too, say analysts.

Testing the US
Yakov Zinberg, a professor of East Asian studies at Tokyo’s Kokushikan University, believes Moscow first openly signalled its discontent at Japan when Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told students at a university in Vladivostok on July 8 that Russia did not consider itself to be in dispute with Japan over the sovereignty of the islands.

“That was a very unusual and unexpected comment for him to make because clearly there is a dispute and this signals a return to the hard-line position that we saw under the Soviet Union,” he said.

Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin subsequently visited the disputed islands in late July and announced that Russia was open to joint economic development with other countries, including Japan, with the possible introduction of tariff and tax exemptions for companies that set up operations on the islands.

“Russia is testing the reactions of the US as it is of the opinion that Japan does not have an independent position on foreign affairs and just does what the US orders it to do,” he said. “So [Russian President Vladimir Putin] wants to know what [US President Joe Biden will do about the islands.”

The US administration has stated unequivocally that the security agreement with Japan covers the East China Sea
islands that are disputed with Beijing, which refers to them as the Diaoyu archipelago, but Washington has remained non-committal in Japan’s dispute with Russia, Zinberg pointed out.

Putin appeared to be testing the resolve of the US on the Northern Territories, he said, and would “feel safer if the US continues to ignore the issue”.

Putin said in June he was ready to discuss a peace treaty with Japan and that the two nations shared strategic interests in the region, a comment that was perceived as far more conciliatory than previous positions.

Yet there is little likelihood of Russia simply handing over the disputed islands as they would provide ideal locations for radar and anti-aircraft and anti-shipping missiles – either Japanese or American – in the straits that Russian warships need to traverse to enter the Pacific from their Far East base at Vladivostok.

Domestic audience
Taking a firm line on the islands was also calculated to win the ruling United Russia Party support in the general election scheduled to take place in September, Zinberg said.

“Putin’s party has seen its popularity fall in recent months, especially in the Far East, where the communists and Vladimir Zhirinovsky [the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia] are particularly strong,” he said. “So Lavrov and Mishustin visiting is designed to show that the government is not afraid of other countries in the region and that it is committed to investing in the islands.”

James Brown, an associate professor of international relations specialising in Russian affairs at the Tokyo campus of Temple University, said Moscow was unhappy that what it saw as progress under former Japanese Prime Minister
Shinzo Abe had stagnated under the present leader, Yoshihide Suga.

“Russia is unhappy and is expressing its dissatisfaction by showing that if Japan chooses to take a harder line, then Russia can in turn make things more difficult for Japan as well,” he said.

The sharp increase in aircraft scrambles was one manifestation of that, he said, and Russia had “the ability to dial up or down the pressure”.


China’s stance shifting?
An added complication for Japan is the belief that Beijing has shifted its stance on the dispute. Last month, after Japan protested against Mishustin’s visit to the island, a journalist with the nationalist tabloid Global Timesasked if Beijing had any comments, at a regular foreign ministry briefing.

Spokesperson Zhao Lijian replied that it was a bilateral issue between Russia and Japan but added: “At the same time, it is China’s consistent belief that the outcomes of the victorious anti-fascist war should be earnestly respected and upheld.”

The comment led to speculation that while China had previously supported Japan’s claims to the islands, Zhao’s quoting of Moscow’s description of World War II as the “victorious anti-fascist war” was a sign that Beijing was now siding with Russia.

“This is a warning to Japan that this is something that Beijing could do and it’s a message, a warning to Tokyo against taking a tough stance on China in other areas, and particularly over Taiwan,” Brown said.


Japan has in recent months backed US statements on Taiwan’s security, while Tokyo’s recent defence white paper for the first time explicitly identified Taiwan as an area of strategic concern to Japan.

“By stepping into the Northern Territories dispute, China is telling Japan that it needs to be careful,” Brown said. “But I don’t think that they will clearly back Russia at the moment, simply because as soon as they do they have played that card. If they instead keep it as a more vague threat, then it’s pressure that they can apply again and again.

“It’s a useful lever until they pull it,” he added.

Victor Zhikai Gao, chair professor at Soochow University, said Zhao’s comments were the first time China had made it clear that it did not view the dispute purely as a territorial matter between Russia and Japan.

He said China instead saw Russia’s claim on the islands as an outcome of World War II and that Tokyo should honour the obligations that came with its unconditional surrender.

Gao, who is also the vice-president of the Beijing-based think tank the Centre for China and Globalisation, said Japan’s obligations also required it not to take up arms against the war’s victors, including China.

One reason behind the “significant shift” in China’s stance on the islands was Japan’s recent suggestion that it would come to the defence of Taiwan in the event of a war, Gao added.

 
Last edited:
. . .
Japan: China must be carved up like in good old imperial times
Also Japan: Nooo China cant just recognize Russias victory over Japanese imperialists!
 
.
If a war broke out between Russia and Japan, will US and China try to get involved?
 
. .
But Japan doesn't have an independent foreign policy, it has to do what US orders it to do, how pathetic.
It's basically a US colony. They even pay annual tribute to the US troops there, as per article of surrender, Japan cannot take up arms against China, but it seems they forgot about WW2.
 
.
The last time Japan barely won against Russia, and suffered heavier casualties, took South Sakhalin from Russia. This time Russia is far better armed and don't have an outdated absolute monarchy. Japan won't be able to beat Russia this time.

 
.
These southern kuril Islands are very strategic and a joint Russian and Chinese naval base there can ruin all the pacific plans of the US and its puppets.
 
.
I guess Russia has forgotten all about the Russo-Japanese war. Not to worry as in the past the US is at hand to formulate the next humiliating treaty and force it down Russian throats.

I guess those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.. :lol:
 
.
I guess Russia has forgotten all about the Russo-Japanese war. Not to worry as in the past the US is at hand to formulate the next humiliating treaty and force it down Russian throats.

I guess those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.. :lol:

wake up from your wet dreams. Russia has even more nukes than the us, no one will be forcing anything on them.
 
.
wake up from your wet dreams. Russia has even more nukes than the us, no one will be forcing anything on them.

So Russia will use nukes if it loses a war to Japan? I don't think so :lol:
The Russians may call upon the US once more to negotiate terms of armistice as was done in the past with the treaty of portsmouth.
 
.
So Russia will use nukes if it loses a war to Japan? I don't think so :lol:
The Russians may call upon the US once more to negotiate terms of armistice as was done in the past with the treaty of portsmouth.

of course they would. they literally said so.


any attacks that threatens the russian state will see nukes heading your way. and russia, right now, considered the kurils to be russian.

never mind that japan is in no position to defeat the russians this time around, not alone anyhow. even if japan takes the kurils(a jupiter sized if), that doesn't end the war, the russia mainland is still there,the war isnt going end until you conquer moscow(good luck, you'll desperately need it).


the japanese, since their surrendered in ww2, has been built to be a support force for the americans, this means they are very good at certain things, such as ASW since their job was to bottleneck the soviet pacific fleet, but are relatively terrible in others, such as amphibious invasions and they lack any real force projects capabilities. this works fine for them since all their plans involve either supporting americans or getting american support.
 
.
I guess Russia has forgotten all about the Russo-Japanese war. Not to worry as in the past the US is at hand to formulate the next humiliating treaty and force it down Russian throats.

I guess those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.. :lol:

Russia took South Sakhalin and Kurils from Japan in WW2. While it is true Russia was weak during absolute monarchy, but after absolute monarchy Russia is far more powerful.
 
.
of course they would. they literally said so.


any attacks that threatens the russian state will see nukes heading your way. and russia, right now, considered the kurils to be russian.

never mind that japan is in no position to defeat the russians this time around, not alone anyhow. even if japan takes the kurils(a jupiter sized if), that doesn't end the war, the russia mainland is still there,the war isnt going end until you conquer moscow(good luck, you'll desperately need it).


the japanese, since their surrendered in ww2, has been built to be a support force for the americans, this means they are very good at certain things, such as ASW since their job was to bottleneck the soviet pacific fleet, but are relatively terrible in others, such as amphibious invasions and they lack any real force projects capabilities. this works fine for them since all their plans involve either supporting americans or getting american support.

nah Russia isn't going to use nukes on Japan. Japan has humiliated Russia in the past I wouldn't rule them out. Given sufficient motivation, time to plan and execute an offensive campaign Japan is capable of defeating the Russians near her homeland. But then I don't think Japan is looking for a fight. Not sure why Russia is ratcheting tensions, may be Putin is just bored.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom