What's new

Japan expected to join Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

Edison Chen

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
2,933
Reaction score
11
Country
China
Location
Japan
Japan is likely to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank within a few months, according to the country’s ambassador to Beijing, a move that would see Tokyo break ranks with Washington and leave the US as the only big holdout.

Masato Kitera told the Financial Times he agreed with Japanese business leaders’ belief that the country would sign up to the China-led development bank by June.

“The business community woke up late, but now they have mounted a big campaign for the AIIB which appears to be very effective,” Mr Kitera said.

The $50bn AIIB has proved a flashpoint for international alliances, with Washington increasingly rattled as traditional allies — starting with the UK and including South Korea and Australia in recent days — break ranks.

A Japanese move to join the bank would be a reversal of rhetoric and, for China, the biggest coup yet given the fractious relationship between the two Asian powers. Japan also has strong links to the rival Asian Development Bank, the head of which it traditionally appoints, and has in the past questioned the need for a new bank.

Barely two weeks ago, the cabinet secretary rowed back on more positive comments from Taro Aso, the finance minister.

“We are cautious about joining,” said Yoshihide Suga, chief cabinet secretary. “Minister Aso’s position is the same.”

The China-led development bank dominated discussions at the annual conference of China’s Boao Forum over recent days and has become a gauge both of China’s growing clout in international economic and financial matters and the corresponding decline of US influence.

Representatives of virtually every country in attendance at Boao also pledged support for the institution.

Japan would have to weigh up various factors before making a decision to break with the US on the issue, not least the finalisation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, one of the biggest trade deals in history, and a visit by Mr Abe to Washington next month.

No country was seen to be as supportive of the US position as Japan — in part because many officials in both countries saw the AIIB as a direct challenge to the Japanese-controlled Asian Development Bank.

But Japanese executives look on China’s ambitious plans to help build infrastructure in the region as a huge business opportunity, as well as a chance to help repair frayed relations.

This month, for example, a group of Mitsubishi Group executives based in China met Jin Liqun, who will run the infrastructure bank, to offer their support. Mr Jin, once a senior official at the ADB, is a familiar face to many Japanese. They say they have confidence, in part because of his participation, that the bank will adhere to best practice.

Neither the ADB nor other multilateral financial institutions have anything like the resources necessary to finance Asia’s infrastructure needs. And beyond Japan, the region lacks private sector institutions such as insurers with deep enough pockets to fund such large, long-term projects, while new capital requirements discourage banks from doing so.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/40b0fff8-d6ae-11e4-97c3-00144feab7de.html#axzz3VsiPGMOT
 
. .
Japan is likely to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank within a few months, according to the country’s ambassador to Beijing, a move that would see Tokyo break ranks with Washington and leave the US as the only big holdout.

Masato Kitera told the Financial Times he agreed with Japanese business leaders’ belief that the country would sign up to the China-led development bank by June.

“The business community woke up late, but now they have mounted a big campaign for the AIIB which appears to be very effective,” Mr Kitera said.

The $50bn AIIB has proved a flashpoint for international alliances, with Washington increasingly rattled as traditional allies — starting with the UK and including South Korea and Australia in recent days — break ranks.

A Japanese move to join the bank would be a reversal of rhetoric and, for China, the biggest coup yet given the fractious relationship between the two Asian powers. Japan also has strong links to the rival Asian Development Bank, the head of which it traditionally appoints, and has in the past questioned the need for a new bank.

Barely two weeks ago, the cabinet secretary rowed back on more positive comments from Taro Aso, the finance minister.

“We are cautious about joining,” said Yoshihide Suga, chief cabinet secretary. “Minister Aso’s position is the same.”

The China-led development bank dominated discussions at the annual conference of China’s Boao Forum over recent days and has become a gauge both of China’s growing clout in international economic and financial matters and the corresponding decline of US influence.

Representatives of virtually every country in attendance at Boao also pledged support for the institution.

Japan would have to weigh up various factors before making a decision to break with the US on the issue, not least the finalisation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, one of the biggest trade deals in history, and a visit by Mr Abe to Washington next month.

No country was seen to be as supportive of the US position as Japan — in part because many officials in both countries saw the AIIB as a direct challenge to the Japanese-controlled Asian Development Bank.

But Japanese executives look on China’s ambitious plans to help build infrastructure in the region as a huge business opportunity, as well as a chance to help repair frayed relations.

This month, for example, a group of Mitsubishi Group executives based in China met Jin Liqun, who will run the infrastructure bank, to offer their support. Mr Jin, once a senior official at the ADB, is a familiar face to many Japanese. They say they have confidence, in part because of his participation, that the bank will adhere to best practice.

Neither the ADB nor other multilateral financial institutions have anything like the resources necessary to finance Asia’s infrastructure needs. And beyond Japan, the region lacks private sector institutions such as insurers with deep enough pockets to fund such large, long-term projects, while new capital requirements discourage banks from doing so.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/40b0fff8-d6ae-11e4-97c3-00144feab7de.html#axzz3VsiPGMOT



:cheers:

:yay:

:dance3:


japan-china-flag[1].jpg


:lol: nihonjin can now have a nice sleep


:D
 
.
Apparently after receiving a call from USA for the time being Japan not gonna join the bank.So much for Japan being independent and having a say .
 
.
Good that Japan can make its own future and decision.
 
. .
Sadly still a lose for Japan, it will not be a founding member now.
Still would be ironic if US becomes one and Japan got left behind.

US backs China-led AIIB ahead of joining deadline - The Economic Times
US backs China-led AIIB ahead of joining deadline

BEIJING: The US today hinted at joining the China-sponsored Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) before the deadline tomorrow saying it is looking forward to cooperating with the new bank which most US allies have joined disregarding its objections.
 
.
. .
Sadly still a lose for Japan, it will not be a founding member now.
Still would be ironic if US becomes one and Japan got left behind.

US backs China-led AIIB ahead of joining deadline - The Economic Times
US backs China-led AIIB ahead of joining deadline

BEIJING: The US today hinted at joining the China-sponsored Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) before the deadline tomorrow saying it is looking forward to cooperating with the new bank which most US allies have joined disregarding its objections.

LOL, this is messed up.
 
.
Obama called Xi

Obama-- "Can you let me have some face? The AIIB saga is humiliating me!"

Xi-- "We are gracious, how about letting at least one of your close allies not to join to prove you still have some power?"

Obama --" Ok, fine."

Xi--" We will ask Japan not to join first."

Xi calling Abe

Xi: sorry pal but we have to drop you now
Abe: but we still applied within deadline
Xi: your master just replaced your seat
 
.
AIIB is replacing BRICS development bank.

BRICS bank is full of contest for leadership and conflict of rules making, since each member has equal share, it seems like a fair deal, but its founding and operating process is seriously delayed. Both China, Russia and India are competing for the headquarter location, and other rules that favors themselves. So we can sit there talking talking talking, and nothing could be done. The essential difference is AIIB is using RMB, the BRICS is using Dollars as financial tools. I'm not optimistic about BRICS.
 
.
AIIB is replacing BRICS development bank.

BRICS bank is full of contest for leadership and conflict of rules making, since each member has equal share, it seems like a fair deal, but its founding and operating process is seriously delayed. Both China, Russia and India are competing for the headquarter location, and other rules that favors themselves. So we can sit there talking talking talking, and nothing could be done. The essential difference is AIIB is using RMB, the BRICS is using Dollars as financial tools. I'm not optimistic about BRICS.

i thought it would be in Shanghai the BRICS bank. Anyway AIIB is stealing the spotlight so i would place my bet om this one
 
.
i thought it would be in Shanghai the BRICS bank. Anyway AIIB is stealing the spotlight so i would place my bet om this one

Yes, it is in Shanghai, I mean, they once competed for the location, but Russia and India failed, because we made a compromise, let Indians to be the 1st president. Of course, AIIB is catching more attention, as it involves so many members. Also the AIIB and China's "One belt One road" are combo weapons to promote RMB internationalization and challenge Western's dominance on financial system. It benefits China the most.
 
.
... U.S of A will follow to join AIIB, u can trust me !
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom