What's new

J&K militancy turning into lucrative business: EU group

Flintlock

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
6,176
Reaction score
0
News Update:

J&K militancy turning into lucrative business: EU group

Agencies
Posted online: October 03, 2007 at 1433

A European group monitoring Jammu and Kashmir has said militancy had turned into a lucrative business in the state with criminals taking advantage of the troubled situation were indulging in extortion and abduction in the name of the so-called ‘movement’.

The Belgian Association for Solidarity with Jammu and Kashmir, in its recent report, has said criminals were taking advantage of the troubled situation in the state.

"They are abducting people for money, raping, murdering, extorting money from businessperson, using mafia practices under the movement. Militancy is a lucrative industry," the report, submitted to the European Union and the United Nations during the recent session of the sub-commission on human rights, said.

The report, prepared by Association President Paul Beersmans after his visit to Jammu and Kashmir and meeting every shade of opinion including political leaders, separatists and government functionaries, has also asked Pakistan to stop cross-border terrorism and infiltration, end sending money, ammunition and weapons and stop giving training to militants.

"As long as Pakistan supports terrorism openly or covertly, there cannot be peace in Jammu and Kashmir. Without peace there cannot be a solution," the 20-page report said.

Beersmans also advised that composite dialogue between India and Pakistan must continue. "The process is slow and one should not expect a short-term solution. This can only bereached through small steps," it said.
 
Wherever there is unrest, the criminals take over!
 
thats obvious. in the north-east ULFA used to get funding by terrorising local communities into paying them tax.

Its the same case with militants anywhere. They need to terrorise communities to get funding and shelter
 
"As long as Pakistan supports terrorism openly or covertly, there cannot be peace in Jammu and Kashmir. Without peace there cannot be a solution," the 20-page report said.

yup, a very neutral view presented by "Paul Beersman" there. Pakistan supports the bulk of the movement in Kashmir demanding plebiscite. Obviously this guy can't distinguish between support for anarchists and support for a legitimate political demand. If he'd done his research he'd realize the people of Kashmir are more fearful of the Indian Army's terrorism. Abductions, rapes, torture sounds more like what the Indian Army are doing according to this neutral video..

Islam Killing of Kashmir - Kashmir Muslims Human Rights Indian Army

But money pays. I find it ironic that none of these reports even mention about the plebiscite (which India has prevented) and the wishes of the people.
 
yup, a very neutral view presented by "Paul Beersman" there. Pakistan supports the bulk of the movement in Kashmir demanding plebiscite. Obviously this guy can't distinguish between support for anarchists and support for a legitimate political demand. If he'd done his research he'd realize the people of Kashmir are more fearful of the Indian Army's terrorism. Abductions, rapes, torture sounds more like what the Indian Army are doing according to this neutral video..

Islam Killing of Kashmir - Kashmir Muslims Human Rights Indian Army

But money pays. I find it ironic that none of these reports even mention about the plebiscite (which India has prevented) and the wishes of the people.

Check the resolution.

Plebiscite after Pak withdraws troops!

BTW, wasn't one of the problems with the Pak CJ of the missing persons of Pakistan?
 
I don't have much time to answer this, but i'll do so in a few days, perhaps start a new thread over it.

You're correct, UN resolutions did ask Pak to wthdraw troops first, and that is exactly what happened. The precise UN resolution asked Pak to START withdrawing troops, and then UNCIP would proceed to the next stage. Everything was going smoothly until India decided that 18,000 troops as mentioned in the UNCIP resolution was not enough. I will prove it. Don't worry, i've made a note of it to put this matter to rest on here once and for all.
 
I don't have much time to answer this, but i'll do so in a few days, perhaps start a new thread over it.

You're correct, UN resolutions did ask Pak to wthdraw troops first, and that is exactly what happened. The precise UN resolution asked Pak to START withdrawing troops, and then UNCIP would proceed to the next stage. Everything was going smoothly until India decided that 18,000 troops as mentioned in the UNCIP resolution was not enough. I will prove it. Don't worry, i've made a note of it to put this matter to rest on here once and for all.


Did Pakistan withdraw or start withdrawing it troops?

Ah, this world is indeed blind!

What about the "missing persons" of Pakistan that got the CJ so worked up about? do a research on that too. We are told that they were secretly handed over to the US for goo amount of money!
 
Back
Top Bottom