What's new

It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition

Larry Silverstein Bought WTC Months Before 9/11: He Got $4.55 Billion Insurance For The Buildings!
https://realitieswatch.com/larry-si...ths-911-got-4-55-billion-insurance-buildings/

World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein "fortuitously" took out terrorism insurance just months before the 9/11 attacks.
World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein bought terrorism insurance two months before 9/11, then collected double its value on the grounds that there were two attacks.
http://www.snopes.com/wtc-terrorism-insurance/

 
Hi,

Read about the conquest of Chengiz Khan of the muslim empire---. Your answer will determine if you have the ability to see the truth or not.
Oldy, probably I know more than what you know about Chengiz Khan. What point you're tying to prove out of that?
 
Oldy, probably I know more than what you know about Chengiz Khan. What point you're tying to prove out of that?

Youngman,

You think you do---. If you did---then you would not have written those comments. The proof is in your writing.

Learn something---you won't gain anything by arguing with me---. I have already told you what you need to do.
 
Youngman,

You think you do---. If you did---then you would not have written those comments. The proof is in your writing.

Learn something---you won't gain anything by arguing with me---. I have already told you what you need to do.
I'll gain if you be logical with your argument. I can see you're just trying to hide behind your old age and so called knowledge.
 
Last edited:
Main target of US is Pakistan.... OBL (the CIA kid), is no more in Afghanistan but US/UK still have military cities right next to Pakistan border and there's lot more to it.


9/11
playground or the basic theme for attacking china through afghanistan pakistan or stop they way any how russia was gaining its own strenthg after the hit in afghanistan.Russian secretly started agreements with muslim countries.so it was also not bear able to usa.

i agree with this line
do you mean in the form of isis?
yes i agree in the form of isis.

but US/UK still have military cities right next to Pakistan border and there's lot more to it



it is just my opinion

you are great in these MR @BATMAN
 
It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition

http://educateinspirechange.org/alt...-journal-concludes-911-controlled-demolition/

15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of theEuropean Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts aneditorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.

The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report, and we suggest our readers – especially the skeptics – read it in its entirety.

One of the most important testimonies on the collapse of the World Trade Towers that was brought to attention in the study comes from the head structural engineer of the towers, John Skilling. It is apparently not enough for skeptics to take the findings of thousands of architects and engineersseriously, but should a skeptic choose not to at least consider the expertise of one of the men who built the WTC towers, then they are purposefully remaining blind.

Every sort of catastrophe that can happen to a high-rise building has to be taken into consideration during the design and construction processes, including the impact of an airplane. According to a 1993report from The Seattle Times, the Trade Towers were analyzed years ago, after concern was raised over a case where an airplane hit the Empire State Building. It was concluded at the time that the Trade Towers could withstand the impact of a Boeing 707.

In a statement made to The Seattle Times by Skilling:

We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side, however back in those days people didn’t think about terrorists very much.” He continues, “Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane)would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. The building structure would still be there. However, I’m not saying that properly applied explosives – shaped explosives – of that magnitude could not do a tremendous amount of damage. I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it.”

As stated in the study: “In other words, Skilling believed the only mechanism that could bring down the Twin Towers was controlled demolition.” It should be pointed out, as well, that a steel-framed high-rise building has never completely collapsed from fire. And yet on September 11, 2001, three buildings supposedly collapsed in this manner, one of which wasn’t even hit by a plane.

It was on this latter point that the authors concluded their study. They state:

It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists.”

This article (European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition) is a free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and AnonHQ.com.

Controlled Demolition Expert on 9/11:


Old Bs. Falsely accredited to esj. Explicitly denied by esi. Debunked!
 
Just follow the links in your own post, and You will find the following.

View attachment 415925

It's just amazing the lengths conspiracy theorists will go to try and give some hint of authenticity. You know things have hit a new low when they try to say it was published in some Journal and the journal people themselves have to put out a disclaimer saying it is all BS.
 
It's just amazing the lengths conspiracy theorists will go to try and give some hint of authenticity. You know things have hit a new low when they try to say it was published in some Journal and the journal people themselves have to put out a disclaimer saying it is all BS.
@BATMAN certainly deserves a negative rating for this thread.
The thread should be deleted. @WebMaster
 
Let's continue folks..... state your remarks on video below:
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom