What's new

It's a Great lie to State that "Suu Kyi has NO power to stop Genocide!"

Banglar Bir

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
7,805
Reaction score
-3
Country
United States
Location
United States
It's a Great Lie to say that "Suu Kyi has NO power to stop Genocide!"
It%2527s%2Ba%2Bgreat%2Blies%2Bto%2Bsay%2Bthat%2B%2522Suu%2BKyi%2Bhas%2BNO%2Bpower%2Bto%2Bstop%2BGenocide%25E2%2580%25A6.jpeg

Wynston Lawrence
RB Opinion
October 12, 2017
Today so many people are giving reasons to mislead international communities that Suu has no power to stop Genocide or Ethnic Cleansing against Rohingya ethnic in Burma.

Their excuses were the Army who have had control defence forces of Burma. It's true that the Army has rights to propose three Ministers but the President has the rights to reject anyone and order the Army to propose another candidate. Well known fact is that Army took forcibly 25% of MPs in legislative power but Suu has more than enough MPs to propose any bill and enact any law, except the Constitution, without partnership with any political parties or the Army's MPs. All of following facts are what she can do according to the current Burmese laws and regulations.

1) She has an authority to recognise Rohingya as one of the indigenous ethnic groups of Burma according to the 1982 Burmese Citizenship Law and reinstate their rights. She no need to change the Law. She can do within weeks like her MPs had enacted the law to create her state counsellor position in 2016 within weeks.
Please note that Rohingya have been recognised as an indigenous ethnic group in the period of Democratic civilian U Nu government. Prime Minister U Nu also recognised Mayu District as autonomic region for Rohingya.
This Mayu district was directly administered by Central Government. Unfortunately, Dictator General Ne Win became in power 1962.
He later abolished Rohingya ethnic rights and autonomic District in his authoritarian rule.

2) She can form a large Emergency Immigration Team to process million of citizenship applications made by Rohingya ethnic.
Please note that if they have been recognised as indigenous ethnic group according to above-mentioned Act, Rohingya people will become native citizens of Burma if they can prove that they belong to Rohingya ethnic.
This may take some times but she can do within one year because of the previous dictatorship governments have already collected paramount datas for so many years, especially from 1974-2015. It's worthy to mention here that the previous President, ex-General Thein Sein admitted as "After we make ground investigation, there are nothing new comers from Bangladesh (after Burmese independent)." This interview was with VOA Burmese News.

And his immigration minister, ex-General Khin Yee also challenged the public who has doubts that there are illegal immigrants from Bangladesh, they should come and check anytime. He told in interview with RFA Burmese News. He also pointed out that in Rakhine state, most of immigration officers and employees are Rakhine Buddhist ethnic."

He was right in this issue as there's no single ethnic Rohingya Muslim officer in immigration department. Rakhine authorities, they even have detail lists for animals that were owned by Rohingya ethnic. Suu can mobilise all available officers from every part of Burma to implement this mission. She can request technical and financial assistances from UN and INGO agencies.

3) She has more than enough MPs in Burmese Parliament to propose a bill of Racial Discrimination Act and vote to become a law of Burma. If this Act becomes active Law within one month, she can defeat any racists, religious bigots and trouble makers legally.

All of the Judges and lawyers of Burma are within her authority. It's true that she has no direct power over police forces and the Army but she can defeat them, if they create any minor problems, with the supports of lawyers, judges, political activists, NGO, INGO, international governments, UN and most importantly her largest supporters, the People.

4) She has power to make new an agreement with Bangladesh government to bring back all of the Rohingya refugees who have fled from ancestral home lands, Mayu District to Bangladesh because of Ethnic Cleansing. She announced that she will use an old agreement that was made by her enemies, previous dictator General Than Shwe government. She can do this within three months.

5) She has power to grant visas to the members of UN Facts Finding Mission to investigate human rights violations in Burma. They will investigate whether these violations are amounted to Ethnic Cleansing or NOT. This can be done within days.

6) She has power to give permission to National and International medias to go Rakhine state. She should respect freedom of press and allow them freely. But journalists need to agree any risks they may face from insurgents are totally depending on their own choices. She can give order to Minister of Home Affairs to provide security to journalists. If Minister is not agree, she has power to replace him via her puppet President.

7) She also has absolute power to allow any INGOs and NGOs to do their humanitarian works in Rakhine state and allow them to go freely within state. She need to lift any rules that were giving troubles to these agencies such as they need to apply repeated permissions to help who are in needs. She may face some troubles from Buddhist Rakhine who are very hostile to INGO and NGO although they have received more than fair shares from those organisations. But she can get supports from Police forces and media to enforce Rules of Laws. She can also do this within days.

8) She may face some protests for these implementations but she can persuade most of the people with short speech. Today there are a lot of rallies to express their standing with Suu. These will help her a lot. Some people need to be taken as seriously along with Police forces, local administrations, her MPs and part's members, democratic Saffron monks, medias and so on.

9) As she has no power to control the Army, she should agree to talk with ARSA insurgents for peace agreement. ARSA recently released a statement on Twitter, they are ready talk with Suu Kyist Administration for ceasefire.
She should not give full authority to Zaw Htay to speak on the behalf of her administration regarding with this issue. Zaw Htay is ex-militant and political critics have suspects regarding with his integrity, attitudes and background. He should be immediately replaced with someone who has reputation, skills and post democratic activist.

10) She should also conclude some portions of Rohingya ethnic leaders as Rakhine ethnic leaders in the Implementation Committee for the recommendations of Kofi Annan commission.
In conclusion, she can do most of the above-mentioned facts in short period of times if she is honest and free from racism as well as religious bigotry.
Wynston Lawrence is Political Analyst and Human Rights Activist based in Western Australia.
Follow on twitter @LawrenceWynston
http://www.rohingyablogger.com/2017/10/its-great-lies-to-say-that-suu-kyi-has.html
 
.
12:00 AM, October 14, 2017 / LAST MODIFIED: 12:39 PM, October 14, 2017
Myanmar military's murderous melodrama
rohingya_crisis_14.jpg

Rohingya people run towards Bangladesh after a gunshot was heard on the Myanmar side and smoke rises in the vicinity of Rohingya villages. PHOTO: Soe Zeya Tun/Reuters
Nizamuddin Ahmed
Myanmar has based its entire brutal, shameless operation on unarmed Rohingya civilian men, women and children, on the vaunted single incident of August 25 when reportedly, and not corroborated by any independent authority or news agency, extremists attacked simultaneously more than 30 police posts and an army base in Rakhine State along the border with Bangladesh. If true, suffice to conclude that Myanmar's intelligence is in dire straits.

It befuddles the mind how many activists and how much time would have been necessary on the side of the “insurgents” to plan and execute such a wide-ranging stealth operation, stretched over several miles. According to experts, the manpower on the attacking side would have to be in the thousands, and amazingly, no Myanmar intelligence agency had an inkling of a clue.
Therefore, one cannot simply blow away the conspiracy theory that indeed the attacks on army posts were carried out by the Myanmar army and/or their cohorts, so as to level the blame on the Rohingyas for the meticulously planned ethnic cleansing. The result: Over half a million innocent Rohingyas, many riddled with bullet, machete and burn wounds, seeking refuge in Bangladesh.

The Myanmar military said (on August 25 that) about 150 Rohingyas attacked an army base in Taung Bazar village in Buthidaung township. Therefore, attacking thirty installations would require about 5,000 attackers. (Myanmar) Military sources told Reuters (in Yangon) they estimate 1,000 insurgents took part in the offensive.
Where were they trained?
Where did they set up camp?
Is it possible that none on the side of the Myanmar military or police could see any one of them? Where did the thousands of insurgents vanish?
Given the gruesome attack on the civilian population they purportedly support, and the 59 insurgents they lost on day one, it was natural that the insurgents would retaliate, or try to make some noise, a patka here and an arson attack there, but it is baffling they went absolutely silent.


In another development, a Myanmar army online statement claimed that a mass grave with bodies of 28 Hindus including several children, allegedly slain by Rohingya Muslim militants, had been discovered on September 24 in Myanmar's restive northern Rakhine State. The same source claimed the following day (September 25) that bodies of another 17 Hindus were discovered.

According to the Myanmar military, ARSA (Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army) elements killed the villagers a month ago on August 25, the same day the group raided police outposts. So, there would actually have to be more insurgents. The disinterred bodies were on display for the press (local and foreign). Why should month-old dead bodies be kept unburied or cremated for two days for the chaperoned press to see on September 27? They are hard to keep even for a couple of hours.

Even if it is assumed that the insurgents killed the Hindus, would it not have been easier for the so-called insurgents to set alight dead bodies rather than taking the time and trouble to dig graves for so many and bury the bodies?
The entire story stinks (pun not intended) of an attempt by the ruthless Myanmar junta to fan religious sentiments among Hindus (particularly in India).
Incidentally, VOA Burmese could not confirm this account, nor was it possible to verify separate allegations that the military was involved in massacring the Hindus.

Myanmar's appetite for isolation and cocoon comfort has not died down despite the country being forced to cede to international pressure in 2011, ending nearly 50 years of military rule, well almost. It took another four years to have a general election that gave the ever-so-silent Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy (NLD) a landslide victory.
Ardently certain that a boba has no enemy, she bizarrely took office as Nidhiram Sardar, sans sword or shield. Any other leader striving for democracy would have refused the status she has been enjoying since April last year as state counsellor (a position similar to prime minister) when it appears state power lies somewhere else in the barracks. Or, is her “helplessness” also a ploy, as she covertly carries out her hate-Rohingya schema?

What democratic country in the world today would want to lay landmines under the supervision of a Nobel Peace Prize laureate?
This concept is older than World War II, and it is hilarious (and grossly alarming) at a time when the Third is actually being fought over Tweets by Tom in Washington and Jerry in Pyongyang.
There is no precedence of revoking a Nobel Prize, but hey Oslo! Would you not do so if it was revealed that a winner in say physics or chemistry or literature was post-award found to have cheated somewhere, sometime?
Since we have never had a war-mongering Nobel laureate, peace at that, there is always the cause for a first time.

USA, the EU and some other countries, upset as they are with Mynamar military's madness and its government's collusion, are closer this October to applying various economic, diplomatic and military sanctions against Myanmar.
The heinous booby traps laid along the border to kill returning citizens (men, women and children) with internationally banned antipersonnel landmines should pave the way to accelerate embargoes.

According to Tirana Hassan, Amnesty International's Crisis Response Director, reacting in early September, “This is another low in what is already a horrific situation in Rakhine State. The Myanmar military's callous use of inherently indiscriminate and deadly weapons at highly trafficked paths around the border is putting the lives of ordinary people at enormous risk.”

Myanmar chose to be isolated for half a century. The world watched in amusement from a distance because its military was a terror within the country, but dormant to the outside. The same military would be foolish to assume that today's united people of the world and the conscientious societies would tolerate its idiosyncrasies for long, especially after cold-blooded murder when thousands of innocents have been uprooted from their homesteads and country.
Dr Nizamuddin Ahmed is a practising architect at Basha Bari Ltd., a Commonwealth Scholar and a Fellow, a Baden-Powell Fellow Scout Leader, and a Major Donor Rotarian.
http://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/chintito-1995/myanmar-militarys-murderous-melodrama-1475974
 
.
It's a Great Lie to say that "Suu Kyi has NO power to stop Genocide!"
It%2527s%2Ba%2Bgreat%2Blies%2Bto%2Bsay%2Bthat%2B%2522Suu%2BKyi%2Bhas%2BNO%2Bpower%2Bto%2Bstop%2BGenocide%25E2%2580%25A6.jpeg

Wynston Lawrence
RB Opinion
October 12, 2017
Today so many people are giving reasons to mislead international communities that Suu has no power to stop Genocide or Ethnic Cleansing against Rohingya ethnic in Burma.

Their excuses were the Army who have had control defence forces of Burma. It's true that the Army has rights to propose three Ministers but the President has the rights to reject anyone and order the Army to propose another candidate. Well known fact is that Army took forcibly 25% of MPs in legislative power but Suu has more than enough MPs to propose any bill and enact any law, except the Constitution, without partnership with any political parties or the Army's MPs. All of following facts are what she can do according to the current Burmese laws and regulations.

1) She has an authority to recognise Rohingya as one of the indigenous ethnic groups of Burma according to the 1982 Burmese Citizenship Law and reinstate their rights. She no need to change the Law. She can do within weeks like her MPs had enacted the law to create her state counsellor position in 2016 within weeks.
Please note that Rohingya have been recognised as an indigenous ethnic group in the period of Democratic civilian U Nu government. Prime Minister U Nu also recognised Mayu District as autonomic region for Rohingya.
This Mayu district was directly administered by Central Government. Unfortunately, Dictator General Ne Win became in power 1962.
He later abolished Rohingya ethnic rights and autonomic District in his authoritarian rule.

2) She can form a large Emergency Immigration Team to process million of citizenship applications made by Rohingya ethnic.
Please note that if they have been recognised as indigenous ethnic group according to above-mentioned Act, Rohingya people will become native citizens of Burma if they can prove that they belong to Rohingya ethnic.
This may take some times but she can do within one year because of the previous dictatorship governments have already collected paramount datas for so many years, especially from 1974-2015. It's worthy to mention here that the previous President, ex-General Thein Sein admitted as "After we make ground investigation, there are nothing new comers from Bangladesh (after Burmese independent)." This interview was with VOA Burmese News.

And his immigration minister, ex-General Khin Yee also challenged the public who has doubts that there are illegal immigrants from Bangladesh, they should come and check anytime. He told in interview with RFA Burmese News. He also pointed out that in Rakhine state, most of immigration officers and employees are Rakhine Buddhist ethnic."

He was right in this issue as there's no single ethnic Rohingya Muslim officer in immigration department. Rakhine authorities, they even have detail lists for animals that were owned by Rohingya ethnic. Suu can mobilise all available officers from every part of Burma to implement this mission. She can request technical and financial assistances from UN and INGO agencies.

3) She has more than enough MPs in Burmese Parliament to propose a bill of Racial Discrimination Act and vote to become a law of Burma. If this Act becomes active Law within one month, she can defeat any racists, religious bigots and trouble makers legally.

All of the Judges and lawyers of Burma are within her authority. It's true that she has no direct power over police forces and the Army but she can defeat them, if they create any minor problems, with the supports of lawyers, judges, political activists, NGO, INGO, international governments, UN and most importantly her largest supporters, the People.

4) She has power to make new an agreement with Bangladesh government to bring back all of the Rohingya refugees who have fled from ancestral home lands, Mayu District to Bangladesh because of Ethnic Cleansing. She announced that she will use an old agreement that was made by her enemies, previous dictator General Than Shwe government. She can do this within three months.

5) She has power to grant visas to the members of UN Facts Finding Mission to investigate human rights violations in Burma. They will investigate whether these violations are amounted to Ethnic Cleansing or NOT. This can be done within days.

6) She has power to give permission to National and International medias to go Rakhine state. She should respect freedom of press and allow them freely. But journalists need to agree any risks they may face from insurgents are totally depending on their own choices. She can give order to Minister of Home Affairs to provide security to journalists. If Minister is not agree, she has power to replace him via her puppet President.

7) She also has absolute power to allow any INGOs and NGOs to do their humanitarian works in Rakhine state and allow them to go freely within state. She need to lift any rules that were giving troubles to these agencies such as they need to apply repeated permissions to help who are in needs. She may face some troubles from Buddhist Rakhine who are very hostile to INGO and NGO although they have received more than fair shares from those organisations. But she can get supports from Police forces and media to enforce Rules of Laws. She can also do this within days.

8) She may face some protests for these implementations but she can persuade most of the people with short speech. Today there are a lot of rallies to express their standing with Suu. These will help her a lot. Some people need to be taken as seriously along with Police forces, local administrations, her MPs and part's members, democratic Saffron monks, medias and so on.

9) As she has no power to control the Army, she should agree to talk with ARSA insurgents for peace agreement. ARSA recently released a statement on Twitter, they are ready talk with Suu Kyist Administration for ceasefire.
She should not give full authority to Zaw Htay to speak on the behalf of her administration regarding with this issue. Zaw Htay is ex-militant and political critics have suspects regarding with his integrity, attitudes and background. He should be immediately replaced with someone who has reputation, skills and post democratic activist.

10) She should also conclude some portions of Rohingya ethnic leaders as Rakhine ethnic leaders in the Implementation Committee for the recommendations of Kofi Annan commission.
In conclusion, she can do most of the above-mentioned facts in short period of times if she is honest and free from racism as well as religious bigotry.
Wynston Lawrence is Political Analyst and Human Rights Activist based in Western Australia.
Follow on twitter @LawrenceWynston
http://www.rohingyablogger.com/2017/10/its-great-lies-to-say-that-suu-kyi-has.html
Bangladesh can prove herself by liberating Rohangya Land(Rakhine). I think BD may take Rohangya as well as their land. Take this matter to UN.
 
.
Bangladesh can prove herself by liberating Rohangya Land(Rakhine). I think BD may take Rohangya as well as their land. Take this matter to UN.

This is what will happen eventually but may take a few years.
 
.
Why wait...declare war on Myanmar...you have you ummah support...right?

Two reasons:

1. BD must 100% convince world Myanmar really wanted to cleanse them all along and this "terrorism" is just an excuse for it.

2. BD air-defence and air-force will take a quantum leap by 2020.

If BD decides to take Rohingya land, tiny Myanmar will be fighting a nation 3 times larger in populations and 3.5X GDP. China will sit back and do nothing.
Make no mistake, Myanmar will not be allowed to get away with this.
 
Last edited:
.
Two reasons:

1. BD must 100% convince world Myanmar really wanted to cleanse them all along and this "terrorism" is just an excuse for it.

2. BD air-defence and air-defence will take a quantum leap by 2020.

If BD decides to take Rohingya land, tiny Myanmar will be fighting a nation 3 times larger in populations and 3.5X GDP. China will sit back and do nothing.
Make no mistake, Myanmar will not be allowed to get away with this.
Firstly BD had lost the opportunity(if any) to make the rohingya issue global...and what ever work has been done has lost traction in the international media..
China will never allow a war against Myanmar...bcos it's a vital cog in OBOR! It will never lose it over any thing!!
 
.
Firstly BD had lost the opportunity(if any) to make the rohingya issue global...and what ever work has been done has lost traction in the international media..
China will never allow a war against Myanmar...bcos it's a vital cog in OBOR! It will never lose it over any thing!!

China won't even cut economic or military links with BD dude.
BD will only taken Northern Arakan and so Chinese oil/gas pipeline will not be affected.
Myanmar will be made to understand the consequences of messing with a much larger nation.
 
.
China won't even cut economic or military links with BD dude.
BD will only taken Northern Arakan and so Chinese oil/gas pipeline will not be affected.
Myanmar will be made to understand the consequences of messing with a much larger nation.
I don't think BD army has enough experience in armed conflict...
And China would not allow communist and Buddhist state to go down(if it ever happens) to a Islamic state...this will only spur up Uighur resistance!
 
.
Why not Pakistan and Bangladesh attack Myanmar to save muslims?

or just talking
 
.
I don't think BD army has enough experience in armed conflict...
And China would not allow communist and Buddhist state to go down(if it ever happens) to a Islamic state...this will only spur up Uighur resistance!

China will not fight for Myanmar, even if BD invades the whole if it as BD is a friendly country lol
You are aware that US wanted a base in BD but BD said no as it did not want to upset China?
Only reason why it fought in Korea was that it did not want US troops on it's border.
You need to take a course in geopolitics.
 
.
China will not fight for Myanmar, even if BD invades the whole if it as BD is a friendly country lol
You are aware that US wanted a base in BD but BD said no as it did not want to upset China?
Only reason why it fought in Korea was that it did not want US troops on it's border.
You need to take a course in geopolitics.
Lol...who said China will fight for any one? It will certainly stop BD from getting into war with Myanmar! Bcoz bd is a glorified Chinese colony.
 
.
Suu Kyi: We are holding talks on the return of those who are in Bangladesh
Tribune Desk
Published at 01:41 AM October 13, 2017
2017-09-14T143035Z_639281505_RC175358F040_RTRMADP_3_MYANMAR-ROHINGYA-SUUKYI-copy-690x450.jpg

'Those who return from Bangladesh would need to be resettled and development must be brought to Rakhine to achieve durable peace'
Myanmar’s de facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi has said that her government is holding talks with Bangladesh on the return of “those who are now in Bangladesh.”

She gave no details, but officials suggested that these refugees would need to provide residency documents, which few have, reports New York Times
.

In a televised address on Thursday, she also called for national unity, saying she has created a committee that will oversee all international and local assistance in violence-struck Rakhine State, said the New York Times report.

More than 520,000 Rohingya have fled from the state to neighbouring Bangladesh since August 25, when security forces responded to attacks by insurgents with a broad crackdown on the long-persecuted minority, which the UN has called a “textbook ethnic cleansing.”

New York Times reports that Suu Kyi acknowledged in her speech that Myanmar was facing widespread criticism over the refugee crisis, and called for unity in tackling the problem.


Myanmar’s Buddhist majority denies that the Rohingya, mostly Muslims, are a separate ethnic group and regards them as illegal migrants from Bangladesh, although many families have lived in Myanmar for generations.

Suu Kyi did not use the word “Rohingya” in her speech on Thursday, but referred to several other ethnic minorities by name. She also stayed away from mentioning the brutal persecution of the Rohingya carried out by the Myanmar security forces.

The Nobel Peace Prize laureate and former political prisoner has been widely criticised for not speaking out on behalf of the Rohingya while Myanmar officials deny the “ethnic cleansing.”

She said in her speech that those who return from Bangladesh would need to be resettled, without providing details, and that development must be brought to Rakhine to achieve durable peace, reports New York Times.

It quoted Suu Kyi as saying that she would head the new committee, the “Union Enterprise for Humanitarian Assistance, Resettlement and Development in Rakhine,” and that it would coordinate all efforts to create a “peaceful and developed Rakhine state.”

The Myanmar government has tightly restricted access to Rakhine for international aid groups and journalists.

Suu Kyi also said her government has invited UN agencies, financial institutions such as the World Bank, and others to help develop Rakhine.
http://www.dhakatribune.com/world/south-asia/2017/10/13/suu-kyi-holding-talks-return-bangladesh/
 
.
Lol...who said China will fight for any one? It will certainly stop BD from getting into war with Myanmar! Bcoz bd is a glorified Chinese colony.

And how will China do that? China is not
providing economic and military assistance to BD for nothing you know.
BD will do what is in it's interest and Myanmar
will be taught a lesson they will never forget.
 
.
Lol...who said China will fight for any one? It will certainly stop BD from getting into war with Myanmar! Bcoz bd is a glorified Chinese colony.

Bullshit. China surround BD from three sides?
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom