It worked: Indian army diverts troops manning LOC in Kashmir- to LAC in Ladahk

[Joe Shearer]

Topic shifting. You had too withdraw troops from our border. Win for us

Ah, there's still XV Corps (intact) and XVI Corps (intact). Did you know that before you started going cock-a-doodle-do? Or do you think a 700,000 strong Army can handle anything the size of XVI Corps?

Major General Niranjan Prasad .
1962 war was also infamous so that the commission report is still secret .

Are you sure of your facts? Major General Niranjan Prasad was Major General in 1962 itself; he didn't get promoted in 1965. There was no political supersession of the chief; it started with Chaudhuri, and ended with Chaudhuri. As far as the Henderson Brooks-Bhagat Report is concerned, it is available on the Internet.

I am sorry but your argument is not clear.

But we have confidence .
May be there is a political favouritism.
But in critical dept PM Modi wont play with politics .
Only merit is allowed .And most of his men are good as professional .Only few incompetent in less critical sector

He just did. Superseding two good officers to bring in one who has proved to be quite useless.

Forget the military. Can you name a single competent minister in the Modi Cabinet other than Gadkari?

What good relations sirji?
Nepal rulers was already on Chinese pay roll even before NDA govt .
Previous govt spectacularly failed in checking these kind of issues .
Probably didnt had time because they were busy with corruption.
Remember the diplomatic whirlwind during Khurshid time.

There is no so called good relation in this modern world .Everyone is in their for profit .
Only the peace prevails when you sufficient power on your own

You haven't addressed the issue. It is only your supposition that the Nepal administration was on the Chinee payroll. There were no bad relations with Nepal previously, were there? We did not have border clashes like Doklam or the present incidents with the PLA. The people of Bangladesh did not hate us, nor did our government make public statements against Bangladeshis. We were not faced by a Chinese takeover of Sri Lanka. The Pakistanis were not campaigning world-wide against us. It is a 180 degree record of failure.

 

[ZAC1]

2 div size force moved to ladakh as per news

 

[GumNaam]

no guarantees of survival & fantashtik chai from either Pakistan or China for the indians...

sincere advice to all the indian soldiers...SURRENDER & LIVE!

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Among all this, It's quite funny that all the talks from India of attacking Azad Kashmir and gilgit baltistan have evoparated in thin air.

 

[Type59]

Ah, there's still XV Corps (intact) and XVI Corps (intact). Did you know that before you started going cock-a-doodle-do? Or do you think a 700,000 strong Army can handle anything the size of XVI Corps?



Are you sure of your facts? Major General Niranjan Prasad was Major General in 1962 itself; he didn't get promoted in 1965. There was no political supersession of the chief; it started with Chaudhuri, and ended with Chaudhuri. As far as the Henderson Brooks-Bhagat Report is concerned, it is available on the Internet.

I am sorry but your argument is not clear.



He just did. Superseding two good officers to bring in one who has proved to be quite useless.

Forget the military. Can you name a single competent minister in the Modi Cabinet other than Gadkari?



You haven't addressed the issue. It is only your supposition that the Nepal administration was on the Chinee payroll. There were no bad relations with Nepal previously, were there? We did not have border clashes like Doklam or the present incidents with the PLA. The people of Bangladesh did not hate us, nor did our government make public statements against Bangladeshis. We were not faced by a Chinese takeover of Sri Lanka. The Pakistanis were not campaigning world-wide against us. It is a 180 degree record of failure.

No matter how you spin it. Chinese know your generals will not shoot, hence they are probing and occupying IOK. Importantly your intelligence agencies were distracted by Pakistan. I suspect you have limited intelligence capabilities inregards to chinese. Sadly, America did not warn you guys. Thry wont expose their assets to potential discovery, in attempt to aid you guys.

 

[Joe Shearer]

No matter how you spin it. Chinese know your generals will not shoot, hence they are probing and occupying IOK. Importantly your intelligence agencies were distracted by Pakistan. I suspect you have limited intelligence capabilities inregards to chinese. Sadly, America did not warn you guys. Thry wont expose their assets to potential discovery, in attempt to aid you guys.

I notice you didn't answer my question, but went to tap-dance around the Moon.

 

[Type59]

I notice you didn't answer my question, but went to tap-dance around the Moon.

Were not playing pokemon, comparing troop numbers, tanks, planes and so on. I made my point India is distracted.

 

[GumNaam]

of india had to move troops from the loc to the lac, that's indicative of the fact that india has run of its troop reserves & is far overstretched to the extent that it to remove troops from a front that is well known to the indians for cross infiltration...india's end game is heating up!

 

[Joe Shearer]

Were not playing pokemon, comparing troop numbers, tanks, planes and so on. I made my point India is distracted.

You seem to have missed the point, not made one.

India has two adversaries, and has resources to deal with both of them. The leadership of those resources is also differentiated; it is not the same set of the usual suspects rushing from one place to another.

If you spent more time on learning the realities of military dispositions and less on Pokemon, I would not be writing this post.

 

[SrNair]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/wap.bu...-war-history-makes-amends-115082601143_1.html
Willy jeep an embarassment


Surely a lot of them.I know you cant accept because of idealogy .But efficiency is efficiency .
Amit Shah ,notorious for an ideal eyes.But his dept demands such kind of person especially in India.
Piyush Goel ,the man is AIR in CA .Nitin Gadkari even our CM concedes about him.

Of course Modi dont allow anyone to go above him .But then you have experts there to give enough support .
Nirmala Sitharaman which is an absolute diappointment is one example.


Nope.
Why there was an issue between Nepal and Rajiv Gandhi ?
Neighbours are just neighbours only .
And they only cares about their profit .
China has more money than India and can offer them the same .

Only in India we allows illegals to flow from other nations and have people supports for it .
Keep them an arm distance no need to give any extra advantage to them

Ah, there's still XV Corps (intact) and XVI Corps (intact). Did you know that before you started going cock-a-doodle-do? Or do you think a 700,000 strong Army can handle anything the size of XVI Corps?



Are you sure of your facts? Major General Niranjan Prasad was Major General in 1962 itself; he didn't get promoted in 1965. There was no political supersession of the chief; it started with Chaudhuri, and ended with Chaudhuri. As far as the Henderson Brooks-Bhagat Report is concerned, it is available on the Internet.

I am sorry but your argument is not clear.



He just did. Superseding two good officers to bring in one who has proved to be quite useless.

Forget the military. Can you name a single competent minister in the Modi Cabinet other than Gadkari?



You haven't addressed the issue. It is only your supposition that the Nepal administration was on the Chinee payroll. There were no bad relations with Nepal previously, were there? We did not have border clashes like Doklam or the present incidents with the PLA. The people of Bangladesh did not hate us, nor did our government make public statements against Bangladeshis. We were not faced by a Chinese takeover of Sri Lanka. The Pakistanis were not campaigning world-wide against us. It is a 180 degree record of failure.