Filthy Filistini Hamas terrorist do you know the cost of single missile fired by Iron dome ?? If they are safe that doesn't mean you don't fire rockets on Tel Aviv, Dimona or Jerusalem. Intent is very much there but you lack in capability. How many rockets have you fired till now ??
If you know the response of Israel then why do you provoke them eveytime ??I guess just to grab world attention by showing pics of dead bodies.
Tonight also Hamas has said that it will fire more rockets, why don't you ask them to stop first ??
Once again Hindu genius, no rockets were fired except when Israeli missiles bombarded Gaza. Hamas isn't the problem. It is Israel. If it is Hamas as you say which began attacking Israel unprovoked and then Israel responded as you say show us sources and facts. Instead of empty slogans and unsupported assertions.
You see, even if we pull out all out troops, remove settlements, open the international border. Palestinians and their supporters will still claim they are occupied. No matter that the international law clearly says the opposite:
Art. 42.
Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army.
The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.
UN: We still consider Gaza “occupied” by Israel « View from Geneva
Is Gaza Still Occupied and Why Does It Matter?
“Occupation” is a
legal designation of an international nature.
Israel’s occupation of Gaza continues to the present day because (a) Israel continues to exercise
“effective control” over this area, (b) the conflict that produced the occupation has not ended, and (c) an occupying state cannot unilaterally (and without international/diplomatic agreement) transform the
international status of occupied territory except, perhaps, if that unilateral action terminates all manner of effective control.
Sui Generis Nonsense
The irony of Israel’s assertion that Gaza is no longer occupied can be best appreciated when one considers Israel’s earlier position that Gaza and the West Bank were not occupied in 1967. Israeli officials claimed that the status of these areas was
sui generis because, at the time of conquest, they were controlled by but not sovereign to Egypt and Jordan, respectively. “Occupation,” according to Israel, only pertains to areas that were recognized sovereign territory of the displaced states. Hence the premise, never accepted by the international community, was: no sovereignty, therefore no occupation. Rather, Israel insisted that Gaza and the West Bank were “administered” territory. The other premise of the original “not occupied” position was that Israel could lay claim to all or parts of these lands because they compose the remainder of
Eretz Israel to which the Jewish people have historic and/or biblical rights.
.................
Territory that was militarily conquered remains occupied until sovereignty supplants foreign control. As long as the Gaza Strip is non-sovereign, it is occupied, and as long as it is occupied its relationship to Israel continues to be governed by international humanitarian law (IHL), which forms part of the laws of war. In addition to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, these laws include the Hague Regulations of 1907 and the Geneva Conventions Additional Protocols I and II of 1977. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, which governs territories militarily conquered by a foreign government, the civilian population who resides there is legally designated “protected persons.”
.......................