What's new

ISPR: Responds to allegation of judge against ISI interference in elections

is it me or indians have got a boner over this? Other than select few liberals and pro tooi journos no one else is buying it.
 
Well im also against what justice said but fact is a 3rd my do interfear in politics i in past which harmed us alot PMLN MQM are the biggest examples but if interfearance is goo DC for pak idont have any issue but what past we seen it was not good examples we see so yes we are against any interfearance

I think interfearance should be limited to which is good for all pak citizens not only for army

All ISPR said was to look into the allegations. How is that interference?

This "Fauji Sazish" smells so similar to the "Yahoodi Sazish" I hear about from mullahs. Same exact mentality.

One man with a gun can control 100 without one.

Copying and pasting random English quotes that have no relevance to the discussion proves what exactly?
 
So how should the proceedings work if there are no proofs?
DRONE ATTACKS --JUSTICE WITHOUT PROOFS...

BESIDES THIS --- HAVE YOU EVER SEEN AMERCIAN EMBASSY IN ISLAMABAD..........60 ACRES
OF WHICH 20 ACRE,S IS ENCROCHMENT-- ILLEGAL- THEY EVEN BUILD A HOTEL IN ITS COMPOUND
the last hearing on September 21, 2015, the bench, headed by Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan.....THEN NOTHIN,, TILL NOW
A STATE WITHIN STATE---------- A STATE ABOVE THE STATE
 
He himself corrupt person to save himself from ongoing corruption case he played this card to blackmail judiciary and agencies but fool don't know he dig his own grave. His next place will be next cell to N.S.
problem is we all have double standard there is another judge who hear nawaz petition in islamabd court also have corruption charges..He is nephew of PTI candidate but nothing is happening against him..Yes shaukat aziz is biased should not be in the bench but so do the other judge who was called from vacation ....
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom