What's new

Islamists destroy 15th-century Timbuktu mosque

Hindu temple remains in Qutub minar.
800px-Sanctuary_adjoining_Quwwat_ul-Islam_mosque%2C_showing_material_from_Hindu_or_Jain_temple%2C_Qutb_Minar_complex.jpg


DSC02524.JPG


IMG_5458.JPG

qutb2.JPG

814691970_jK8XX-L.jpg
 
There is no central moral authority we already went through this and in Islam the only one who can make the claim to this is a Caliph and no Muslim will try to make a claim to that title without proper support from multiple Islamic states. Also our country would not want someone like that to come up. It is because you are not Muslim so you wouldn't understand.

This is about Islamic law.
Islam is against any church like hierarchy, what we have is a collection of scholars (Ulema) who have specialized in studying Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh). A global council of these experts represented by every Muslim community, can collectively reach decisions. There is no theological or organizational hierarchy like Church system in Islam, there was never one in history and there is no need for one in the future. Essentially it is a more democratic consensus based system, rather than a top down hierarchy. Individual states can enforce the decisions taken by this council to train Mullah's/Imams.
Then do not complain if:

1) A small group of Islamic religinionists make pronouncements and take actions that they claim to be in the interests of the muslims at large, aka the 'ummah', and that you do not like those pronouncements and actions. The reality is that in any hierarchy, the central authority, legal and/or moral, is always comprised of a small group of individuals. We have very few generals and admirals but plenty of soldiers. We have only one President or Prime Minister and either are assisted by a Cabinet or by assorted Ministers to manage the country.

Did al-Qaeda claimed to speak and act on behalf of al-Qaeda? No. That organization claimed to speak and act on behalf of ALL the muslims. Whether the ummah reject it or not is beside this point.

2) The non-muslims believe those pronouncements and actions to be representative of how the muslims in their communities and in the world believe. We are not responsible for your theology but we must respond to how you behave among us, whether you are majority or the minority.

Your demands for yourself and for us are contradictory. On the one hand, you advocate the need for self management, but when the best and proven alternative is presented to you, you deny its necessity, no matter how long or short term it may be. We do not care if you want to install a permanent fixture like 'The Vatican'. We want you to create a moral authority that does not contain moral (not theological) conflicts among yourselves to better police your members.

The destruction of the Buddha statues and these latest religious structures that have been deemed 'insulting to Islam' will benefit only one group: the muslims. Think about it. For all of your pious condemnations, ultimately, the removal of physical reminders of past cultures that includes their own religions is one necessary act and step to rid one small part of the world of anything non-Islamic. And that is something all muslims have good cause to celebrate, even behind closed doors. Already one of you in this discussion have dismissed these structures as nothing more than worthless housing relics.

So they're being practical, and not hateful? :undecided:
Yup. For now, he is just too cowardly to come out and advocate forced expulsion of non-muslims.
 
Timbuktu tomb destroyers pulverise Islam's history

By Pascal Fletcher
Tue Jul 3, 2012 12:06pm EDT
(Reuters) - The al Qaeda-linked Islamist fighters who have used pick-axes, shovels and hammers to shatter earthen tombs and shrines of local saints in Mali's fabled desert city of Timbuktu say they are defending the purity of their faith against idol worship.

But historians say their campaign of destruction in the UNESCO-listed city is pulverising part of the history of Islam in Africa, which includes a centuries-old message of tolerance.

"They are striking at the heart of what Timbuktu stands for ... Mali and the world are losing a lot," Souleymane Bachir Diagne, a professor at New York's Columbia University and an expert on Islamic philosophy in Africa, told Reuters.

Over the last three days, Islamists of the Ansar Dine rebel group which in April seized Mali's north along with Tuareg separatists destroyed at least eight Timbuktu mausoleums and several tombs, centuries-old shrines reflecting the local Sufi version of Islam in what is known as the "City of 333 Saints".

For centuries in Timbuktu, an ancient Saharan trading depot for salt, gold and slaves which developed into a famous seat of Islamic learning and survived occupations by Tuareg, Bambara, Moroccan and French invaders, local people have worshipped at the shrines, seeking the intercession of the holy individuals.

This kind of popular Sufi tradition of worship is anathema to Islamists like the Ansar Dine fighters - Defenders of the Faith - who adhere to Salafism, which is linked to the Wahhabi puritanical branch of Sunni Islam found in Saudi Arabia.

"A Salafi would say that creating a culture of saints is akin to idol-worshipping," Diagne said. Unlike Christianity, where the clergy formally confers sainthood, the veneration of "saints" in various, non-Wahhabi, strands of Islam largely arises from popular reverence for pious historical figures.

Rejecting a wave of outrage inside and outside Mali against the shrine destructions, an Ansar Dine spokesman in Timbuktu, Sanda Ould Boumama, defiantly told French radio RFI at the weekend that the actions were in line with the group's aim of installing sharia Islamic law across all of divided Mali.

"Human beings cannot be elevated higher than God ... When the Prophet entered Mecca, he said that all the mausoleums should be destroyed. And that's what we're repeating," Boumama said.

In what she called a "cry from the heart" for world help to halt the destruction, Malian Culture Minister Diallo Fadima Toure told a UNESCO World Heritage Committee meeting in St. Petersburg on Sunday that Ansar Dine's depredations had "nothing to do with Islam, a religion of peace and tolerance".

"Are we just going to let this go and stand and watch? Today this is happening in Mali, tomorrow where will it be?".

"CRIME AGAINST HISTORY"

Experts are comparing the Timbuktu tomb destructions to similar attacks against Sufi shrines by hardline Salafists in Egypt and Libya in the past year. The attacks also recall al Qaeda attacks on Shi'ite shrines in Iraq in the past decade and the 2001 dynamiting by the Taliban of two 6th-century statues of Buddha carved into a cliff in Bamiyan in central Afghanistan.

"It's against everybody and everything," said University of Cape Town Professor Shamil Jeppie, an expert on Timbuktu who co-edited with Diagne a 2008 study, "The Meanings of Timbuktu", on the city's priceless archaeology and ancient manuscripts.

Mali's government in the capital Bamako about 1,000 km (600 miles) south has condemned the attacks, but is powerless to halt them after its army was routed by rebels in April. It is still struggling to bolster a return to civilian rule after a March 22 coup that emboldened the rebel uprising further north.

Some believe the tomb-wrecking onslaught by Ansar Dine, which is led by Tuareg chieftain turned Salafist Iyad Ag Ghali, may have been directly triggered by UNESCO's decision on Thursday to accept the Mali government's urgent request to put Timbuktu on a list of endangered World Heritage sites.

"That is meaningless to Ansar Dine; what is UNESCO to them?" said Jeppie. Just as northern Nigerian Islamist militants are carrying out bloody bombings and shootings under the name Boko Haram (which broadly means "Western education is sinful"), so Ansar Dine's fighters may see UNESCO as an emblem of Western heresy.

"They are not scholars; they are foot soldiers," added Jeppie, adding they were probably unaware that Timbuktu, which was an alluring mirage of exoticism and remoteness for 19th-century European explorers, represented multiple and varied layers of Islamic tradition deposited like sand over centuries.

Its long history had tracked the turbulent rise and fall of the great African empires of Ghana, Mali and Songhai.

"Timbuktu was sacked many times before," said Jeppie.

"But we have had no events of destruction of monuments, mosques and tombs. It never happened before."

The UNESCO ambassadors meeting in St. Petersburg on Tuesday joined Malian Culture Minister Toure in appealing to global governments and organisations and "all people of goodwill" to act to prevent the prevent the destruction of the Timbuktu monuments by "vandals".

"We consider this action to be a crime against history," the appeal said.

UNESCO's World Heritage Committee called on the agency's director general, Irina Bokova, who has already roundly condemned the Timbuktu damage, to create a special fund to help Mali preserve its cultural patrimony from attack. It asked UNESCO members and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation OIC.L to provide financial resources for this fund.

PURITY OVER POPULARITY?

Just as gold-hungry 19th-century European travellers who first cast eyes on Timbuktu were disappointed to find, not glittering minarets and palaces, but a desert-rimmed cluster of dun-coloured homes and mosques, so some observers might view the city's mausoleums and tombs as modest when compared with the architectural opulence of, say, Rome or Athens or Damascus.

The rectangular local mausoleums mimic the desert earthen architecture of the city's still imposing and renowned Sankore, Sidi Yahya and Djingarei-ber mosques, the latter Timbuktu's oldest, built in mud-brick and wood in 1325.

"They are mud structures, nothing fancy at all," said Columbia University's Diagne - and so the more easily reduced to dust by the pick-axes and shovels of the Ansar Dine combatants.

But rather than visual splendour, it is what the tombs represent for Africa's history, and especially the history of Islam in Africa, than concerns historians and scholars.

They make the point that relatively few physical vestiges remain of the great Sahelian empire states that flourished and then died out centuries ago, and the damage inflicted in Timbuktu will reduce that archaeological heritage further.

They are scratching their heads as to why Ansar Dine and its well-armed allies, who hijacked a separatist uprising by local Tuareg MNLA rebels following the March coup in the Malian capital Bamako, would risk offending local sensibilities by destroying revered shrines in occupied cities like Timbuktu.

"They are more worried about purity than about being unpopular", is the explanation Diagne offers.

Scholars are also fretting about the fate of tens of thousands of ancient and brittle manuscripts, some from the 13th century, housed in libraries and private collections in Timbuktu. Academics say these prove Africa had a written history at least as old as the European Renaissance.

Days after the rebels took Timbuktu, local academics, librarians and citizens were hiding away the manuscripts to stop them being damaged or looted.

Jeppie said researchers had since fled the city. Some collectors had smuggled their rarest documents out to Bamako.

Diagne said the biggest fear was that historic manuscripts and artefacts would become the object of looting and trafficking for profit - just another trading commodity in the trackless Sahara, where trafficking in drugs, arms and migrants has replaced the old caravans of slaves, salt and gold.

He found it deeply ironic that the Ansar Dine tomb destroyers, who said they were upholding the name of Islam, were ignoring and denying through their acts the rich layered history and geographical spread of this great global religion.

Noting the role Sufi believers played in spreading Islam beyond its Arabian heartland, Diagne said: "If it had not been for the Sufi orders, Islam would have been a local religion."

Timbuktu tomb destroyers pulverise Islam's history | Reuters
 
I'm glad you bought that up I was hoping you would. How would you classify Anders Behring Breivik.
Not insane. What Breivik did was not out of random neurons firing through his brain. It came from a deliberate dissertation of facts that he gathered for himself, that he knew that under the current laws he lived under that what he wanted to do is criminal, that it would be morally abhorrent to most, and that he would either go to jail or die for it, in other words, he viewed himself as a martyr for his cause.

and 72 as well. I got question. Do they get 72 per incidence or only 72 regardless amount of work?
I think the latter. If it is per incidence, there would be much more of these acts. There would be no suicide bombers because each mission is effectively a one-way affair and we want to maximize as much benefits in the afterlife as possible, right? Further, if it is per incident, we would have serious cases of jealousy in the afterlife because there would be the inevitable unequal dispensation of benefits. Who is to say there are no jealousy now because some suicide bombers killed more infidels than others but get the same amount of benefit?
 
Pakistani morons can justify any stupidity around the world with Babri mosque. I think they are trained to think that way.

Only retarded bharatis would think of it as a justification...






U disrespectful fool.
 
If they go about unconventional way of tearing down building, well than let it be.

I wonder how many bleeding heart idi*ts on this thread knew that these structures were even there ?
 
lets take an example of turkey, they are more successful than all of the other muslim countries. you are talking about true islam, which islam? the shia, the wahabi? the ahlal sunnah? that is itself cause for friction.

Irrelevant, it doesn't matter who is right shia, wahabi, sunni that is up to God. You said that religion in government causes problems and I said the problem is not that they are using religion in government because the truth is they are NOT. Also sure Turkey is successful but they too have had problems, how many military coups have they had again?

If they go about unconventional way of tearing down building, well than let it be.

I wonder how many bleeding heart idi*ts on this thread knew that these structures were even there ?

You can probably count them on one hand.

Only retarded bharatis would think of it as a justification...






U disrespectful fool.

Why does there have to people like you on this forum that turn every thread into Pakistan vs India? Give it a break gosh.
 
If they go about unconventional way of tearing down building, well than let it be.

I wonder how many bleeding heart idi*ts on this thread knew that these structures were even there ?

Any one with a little interest in history will know where Timbuktu is. What I cannot believe is the inherent need for you guys to defend the action.
 
Back
Top Bottom