What's new

ISIS poster girl from the UK stripped of citizenship! Shamima not welcome

waz

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
21,159
Reaction score
91
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Shamima Begum, who joined the Islamic State group in Syria aged 15, is to lose her UK citizenship.

Whitehall sources said it was possible to strip the 19-year-old of British nationality as she was eligible for citizenship of another country.

Her family's lawyer, Tasnime Akunjee, said they were "disappointed" with the decision and were considering "all legal avenues" to challenge it.

Ms Begum, who left east London in 2015, had said she wanted to return home.

She was found in a Syrian refugee camp last week after reportedly leaving Baghuz - IS's last stronghold - and gave birth to a son at the weekend.

In an interview with the BBC on Monday, Ms Begum said she never sought to be an IS "poster girl" and now simply wished to raise her child quietly in the UK.

ITV News obtained the letter sent to Ms Begum's mother, asking her to inform her daughter of the decision.

Bangladesh link
Under the 1981 British Nationality Act, a person can be deprived of their citizenship if the home secretary is satisfied it would be "conducive to the public good" and they would not become stateless as a result.

Ms Begum said she travelled to Syria with her sister's UK passport but it was taken from her when she crossed the border.

She is believed to be of Bangladeshi heritage but when asked by the BBC, she said did not have a Bangladesh passport and had never been to the country.

On the question of Ms Begum's son, a child born to a British parent before they are deprived of their citizenship would still be considered British.

While it would theoretically be possible for the UK to then remove citizenship from the child, officials would need to balance their rights against any potential threat they posed.

_105643916_begum_pa.jpg


A Home Office spokesman said: "In recent days the home secretary has clearly stated that his priority is the safety and security of Britain and the people who live here."

He said the department did not comment on individual cases but decisions to remove citizenship were "based on all available evidence and not taken lightly".

Lord Carlile, a former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, said that if Ms Begum's mother was a Bangladeshi national - as is believed to be the case - under Bangladesh law Ms Begum would be too.

Dal Babu, a former Metropolitan Police chief superintendent and friend of Ms Begum's family, said they were "very surprised" by what seemed to be a "kneejerk reaction" by the Home Office.

Stressing that Ms Begum had never been to Bangladesh, Mr Babu said: "It seems to be a bizarre decision and I'm not entirely sure how that will stand up legally."

Islamic State has lost most of the territory it once controlled, but between 1,000 and 1,500 militants are believed to be left in a 50 sq km (20 sq mile) near Syria's border with Iraq.

Mr Javid told MPs earlier this week that more than 100 dual nationals had already lost their UK citizenship after travelling in support of terrorist groups.

Last year, two British men, accused of being members of an IS cell dubbed "The Beatles" were stripped of their citizenship after being captured in Syria.

'Willing to rehabilitate'
Ms Begum has said she does not regret travelling to Syria and was partly inspired by videos of fighters beheading hostages, as well as by videos showing "the good life" under IS.

However, she said she did not agree with everything the group had done.

"I actually do support some British values and I am willing to go back to the UK and settle back again and rehabilitate and that stuff," she told the BBC.

She admitted she was "shocked" by the 2017 Manchester Arena attack, which killed 22 people and was claimed by IS.

"I do feel that is wrong. Innocent people did get killed," she said.

But she also compared the attack to military assaults on Syria, saying: "It's one thing to kill a soldier, it's fine, it's self-defence.

"But to kill people like women and children just like the women and children in Baghuz who are being killed right now unjustly by the bombings - it's a two-way thing really because women and children are being killed back in the Islamic State right now.

"It's kind of retaliation. Their justification was that it was retaliation so I thought, okay, that is a fair justification."

Robbie Potter, who was seriously injured in the attack while he waited for his children in the foyer of Manchester Arena, said he felt "angry" and sickened by Ms Begum's comments.

"People have lost their kids, their family members. How must they feel seeing this, that we would even consider bringing someone else back?

"Let her come and meet the victims and people who lost their kids. If that's the way she wants it. Would she go in a room with them and see what their justification is?"

Ms Begum left the UK with two school friends, Kadiza Sultana and Amira Abase in February 2015. Ms Sultana is thought to have died when a house was blown up, and the fate of Ms Abase is unknown.

Ms Begum gave birth to a baby boy last weekend, having previously lost two children.

Her husband, a Dutch convert to Islam, is thought to have surrendered to a group of Syrian fighters about two weeks ago.

Ms Begum has the right to appeal the Home Office's decision.



Oh my bleeding heart....


You reap what you sow my dear. ISIS can't provide now? Knocking on the UK's door? Sorry love no wants to answer...

By the way just a little tip, I wouldn't go to Bangladesh with Auntie Hasina around, she don't like your type much.

images
 
Is it me or some British Muslims are being tricked into becoming anti state actors.
But what I heard is that she was married 3 times to Isis linked men but she is so young.
 
You reap what you sow my dear
You bet.

ISIS can't provide now? Knocking on the UK's door? Sorry love no wants to answer...
The galls of her. Suck on Islamic State now you b*iatch. Live your dream. She has a lid by some terrorist and now wants my tax money to support her child in UK.
 
You bet.

The galls of her. Suck on Islamic State now you b*iatch. Live your dream. She has a lid by some terrorist and now wants my tax money to support her child in UK.

Oh she wants it all brother, but I thought she said she was going to heaven on earth, what happened? A bunch of hairy, neanderthals with a single brain cell between couldn't provide? What a surprise......
 
Oh she wants it all brother, but I thought she said she was going to heaven on earth, what happened? A bunch of hairy, neanderthals with a single brain cell between couldn't provide? What a surprise......
I just hope she does not win at the courts. I understand her family will appeal. At least this will be a lesson to others. I particularly enjoy the fact that the man who revoked her citizenship is fellow British Pakistani - Home Secretary Sajid Javid. Well done boss!

upload_2019-2-19_23-13-37.jpeg
 
She's still young and there's time for her to change her views. Many people who returned to the UK from ISIS changed their views after seeing the reality there first hand. I guess losing citizenship isn't really earth shattering, sure life in bangladesh may be hard but she got off lucky compared to what Muslim women went through at the hands of the Assad regime.

I don't like the way how some Muslims are gleeful about this though. I wouldn't like if my teenage sister was brainwashed by a bunch of scumbags online and this was the result. If she has only been a housewife as she says then she really hasn't done too much wrong with her own hands.

I just hope she does not win at the courts. I understand her family will appeal. At least this will be a lesson to others. I particularly enjoy the fact that the man who revoked her citizenship is fellow British Pakistani - Home Secretary Sajid Javid. Well done boss!

View attachment 540474

He's not a actually boss, he's a bit of scumbag for the other things he does and says. Be level headed here before you start singing praises of bad men just because they made a decision you agree with (and one which I'm sure he will benefit from politically more than anything else).
 
This is a clear violation of her basic human rights, Shame on UK regime:

Right to a Nationality and Statelessness

The Right to a Nationality
The right to a nationality is a fundamental human right. It implies the right of each individual to acquire, change and retain a nationality.

International human rights law provides that the right of States to decide who their nationals are is not absolute and, in particular, States must comply with their human rights obligations concerning the granting and loss of nationality.

Arbitrary Deprivation of Nationality
The right to retain a nationality corresponds to the prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of nationality. Arbitrary deprivation of nationality, therefore, effectively places the affected persons in a more disadvantaged situation concerning the enjoyment of their human rights because some of these rights may be subjected to lawful limitations that otherwise would not apply, but also because these persons are placed in a situation of increased vulnerability to human rights violations.

International Legal Framework
The right to a nationality is recognized in a series of international legal instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the Convention on the Nationality of Married Women, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. The issue of nationality is also regulated in the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons and the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees.

An explicit and general prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of nationality can be found in numerous international instruments. In particular, it is worth noting that article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights explicitly provides that no one should be arbitrarily deprived of his or her nationality. The General Assembly, in its resolution 50/152, also recognized the fundamental nature of the prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of nationality.

Statelessness
The 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons defines "stateless person" as “a person who is not considered as a national by any State under the operation of its law.” The exact number of stateless people is not known, but UNHCR estimates that there are at least 10 million globally. In addition to violations of their right to a nationality, stateless persons are subject to several other human rights violations. States shall introduce safeguards to prevent statelessness by granting their nationality to persons who would otherwise be stateless and are either born in their territory or are born abroad to one of their nationals.States shall also prevent statelessness upon loss or deprivation of nationality.

The Right to a Nationality and the Human Rights Council
The Human Right Council has addressed the enjoyment of the right to a nationality and the avoidance of statelessness in several resolutions on “Human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality”:

Past reports
OHCHR Work on the Right to a Nationality and on Statelessness
Through several of its field presences, OHCHR provides technical advice on nationality laws and policies so they are in agreement with international human rights standards.

In particular with respect to the right of women to a nationality, OHCHR advocates for reform of nationality laws that discriminate against women and impact on the enjoyment of rights of their children and spouses. OHCHR report to the Human Rights Council on “discrimination against women on nationality-related matters” (A/HRC/23/23) examines how women in certain countries do not enjoy equal rights with men to acquire, change and retain their nationality and are also not allowed to transfer nationality to their children or spouses on the same basis, which very often results in statelessness. It analyses the negative impact of discriminatory nationality laws on the enjoyment of women’s rights and the rights of their children and spouses, and also includes best practices and other measures to eliminate discrimination against women in nationality laws. The report provides a comprehensive framework for pledges and action towards the full implementation of States’ human rights obligations in the area of equal nationality rights. An expert workshop to discuss best practises to promote women's equal nationality rights in law and in practice was organized in May 2017.

OHCHR supports UNHCR Campaign to End Statelessness. OHCHR is a member of the Coalition on Every Child's Right to a Nationality.

Documents:

Regional Expert Meeting on the Human Rights of Stateless Persons in the Middle East and North Africa (PDF)

https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Pages/Nationality.aspx
 
Lmao as if.

Imo they should take her in and jail her for life, but ensure that her kid is raised in a functioning family. Her child shouldn't have to pay for her sins.

But she is though. She's 19 and if she lives a natural life then she has many years to go.

I believe life in jail is too harsh a punishment for stupidity. I agree with a potential 6-10 year sentence for her. Yeh I agree that her child should be given to her grandparents rather than her. If she has taken part in torture or executions then I would approve of harsher measures. For example, I have no problem in her husband potentially being sentenced to death because he was an actual fighter.
 
His a politician. Need I say more. Yes, he is a sly, scheming scumbag. But better Sajid Javid then Steven Goldsberg or Ram Patel. For son of a migrant from Pakistan he has done good.

I don't who know steven or ram are but I would prefer a white guy over Sajid. People are choc ices tend to much harsher on their fellow brown man than white politicians are.

Well he's done good career wise but I don't really care. In getting to where he is, he has practically sold out his beliefs which is not a very good thing at all. We shouldn't view him as a model to follow or a man to praise.
 
Back
Top Bottom