ISIL advances in Libya's Misrata

[Falcon29]

You are pro trump despite knowing his pure hatred for Muslims?

I prefer him, for a cultural revolution he will inspire, and his mentality/approach. Trump does not share actual hatred of Muslims. And if you believe so, then it is no more or less than any other candidate or political establishment in the West. Would you prefer a candidate who gives lip service to Muslim world, but partakes in policies that are detrimental for Muslims, or a candidate, who some view as loud, that espouses policies that enable Muslim world to improve themselves and be free from 'nation building' agenda?

Trump has stated he respects Muslim culture, and doesn't prefer to enforce Western way of life unto Muslim nations, unlike other neocons and so called 'democrats'. He can put a pause an immigration, I'm not sure how that has anything to do with you or bothers you. He has said nothing that offends Muslims, you can't just look at the candidate statement and come to conclusions. Look at their support bases. Trump's support base is one that echoes an 'America First' agenda. Observe his base, you will see consistent majority has no fascination with interfering in the Muslim world on a large scale. Look at base of other candidates, like Ted Cruz or democrats, they absolutely believe in interfering heavily but also enforcing their way of life on the Muslim world.

Democrats especially are this way, they make Muslims concede a lot, before they pretend to view you as ordinary and good people. They make you concede much of your religion, culture, and political independence, and of course they are friendly as long as you walk that line.

A coup against who????? The democratically elected parliament which supports him or against terrorists militia men who used to kidnap parliament members and terroris them+you are not bashing the MB for taking power using their militias from a democratically parliament! !!!!!!

MB came into power democratically, then other militias were trying to destabilize situation, Parliament tried getting them under control, it did not support him, and instead he went attacked it, overthrew the government. And is now relying on Egyptian, UAE, Saudi, Jordanian, British, French and US military and financial support to sustain this coup. Otherwise he would not succeed. Cut it out with attributing this foreign intervention with 'support of people' nonsense. He has support of foreigners who want to keep the Arab world reliant on the West and obedient to Israel.

 

[Zibago]

I prefer him, for a cultural revolution he will inspire, and his mentality/approach. Trump does not share actual hatred of Muslims. And if you believe so, then it is no more or less than any other candidate or political establishment in the West. Would you prefer a candidate who gives lip service to Muslim world, but partakes in policies that are detrimental for Muslims, or a candidate, who some view as loud, that espouses policies that enable Muslim world to improve themselves and be free from 'nation building' agenda?

Trump has stated he respects Muslim culture, and doesn't prefer to enforce Western way of life unto Muslim nations, unlike other neocons and so called 'democrats'. He can put a pause an immigration, I'm not sure how that has anything to do with you or bothers you. He has said nothing that offends Muslims, you can't just look at the candidate statement and come to conclusions. Look at their support bases. Trump's support base is one that echoes an 'America First' agenda. Observe his base, you will see consistent majority has no fascination with interfering in the Muslim world on a large scale. Look at base of other candidates, like Ted Cruz or democrats, they absolutely believe in interfering heavily but also enforcing their way of life on the Muslim world.

Democrats especially are this way, they make Muslims concede a lot, before they pretend to view you as ordinary and good people. They make you concede much of your religion, culture, and political independence, and of course they are friendly as long as you walk that line.

He hinted restrictions on Muslims inside the US and a more Hawkish policy of grand operation against our nukes

Well the American candidate i was slightly impressed by was Sanders he was the only guy who did not demonise Muslims and didnot have a track record of burning functional countries to the ground

 

[Falcon29]

He hinted restrictions on Muslims inside the US and a more Hawkish policy of grand operation against our nukes

Well the American candidate i was slightly impressed by was Sanders he was the only guy who did not demonise Muslims and didnot have a track record of burning functional countries to the ground

There are no more or less restrictions on Muslims with him or not, sir. Don't pay attention to that stuff, the situation is perfectly fine for Muslims in the US. Sanders is wolf in sheep clothing, his policy wouldn't be any different than Obama's policy, and overall American foreign policy which seeks to keep the Middle East from reaching anywhere near its full potential. Trump is the only that is different, and his track record also backs that. His policy won't change with Pakistan, he just says something to appeal to some voters, and you don't believe that anyone has influence on your nuclear arsenal. Give it time and you will see, he's the best option for the Middle East. It will force Arabs into becoming more self independent and give them break from foreign meddling. It will also put a pause on Globalism. Which is going to bring interesting changes to Europe that I look forward to seeing.

 

[Hell NO]

MB came into power democratically, then other militias were trying to destabilize situation

No MBs lost the elections
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-18880908
http://world.time.com/2012/07/10/why-the-islamists-are-not-winning-in-libya/

the elected internationaly recognised parliament is running Lybia from the areas under hafters control so no the support him and the operation he started was against armed militias who tried to force themselves even kidnapping some parliament members.
The only ones that committed a coup were the militias+MB because they tried to take the power from the elected parliament.

 

[Falcon29]

No MBs lost the elections
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-18880908
http://world.time.com/2012/07/10/why-the-islamists-are-not-winning-in-libya/

the elected internationaly recognised parliament is running Lybia from the areas under hafters control so no the support him and the operation he started was against armed militias who tried to force themselves even kidnapping some parliament members.
The only ones that committed a coup were the militias+MB because they tried to take the power from the elected parliament.

Libya Condemns Rogue General's Attack on Parliament

Libya's army chief ordered the deployment of Islamist-led militias to the capital Tripoli on Monday in response to the storming of parliament by forces loyal to a renegade ex-general. The move paves the way for a possible showdown between rival militia fighters.

Meanwhile, the revolt against Islamists who dominate Libyan politics threatened to spiral into an outright battle for power after an elite army unit, the Special Forces, joined the uprising Monday.

The commander of the Special Forces has announced his support for retired General Khalifa Haftar and his National Libyan Army. His forces have been fighting militants for months in Benghazi, Libya's second largest city.

Forces apparently loyal to former Army Chief of Staff Khalifa Haftar said they suspended parliament Sunday after earlier leading a military assault against lawmakers, directly challenging the legitimacy of the country's weak central government three years after the overthrow of dictator Muammar Gadhafi.

Libya's interim government condemned the attack on parliament and largely ignored the declaration by the general's group.

For hours after the attack on Sunday, fighting took place around the road to Tripoli's airport and its southern outskirts between Haftar’s forces and Islamist militiamen.
.....
http://www.voanews.com/content/renegade-libyan-general-suspends-parliament/1917392.html

Which parliament did they take power from? Does not seem like the parliament you mention was supporting Hifter led alliance.

 

[Aramagedon]

ISIL advances in Libya's Misrata

Key crossroads and villages seized by ISIL along southern coast, prompting deployment of militiamen to counter assaults.


Advances by the Islamic State of the Iraq and Levant (ISIL) group along the southern coast of Libya's third largest city of Misrata have prompted armed groups in the city to deploy militiamen to counter the offensive.

The mobilisation came on Friday after ISIL took over the Abu Grein crossroads, which lies 120 kilometres south of Misrata where the highway along Libya's Mediterranean coast meets the main road south into the desert interior.

In a statement, ISIL said it captured five villages along the coast on Thursday in an advance from their stronghold in the city of Sirte 140 kilometres to the east., the SITE Intelligence Group reported.

ISIL captured Sirte in June last year and has since transformed it into a training camp for Libyan and foreign fighters.

Misrata hospital said it had received eight dead and 105 wounded after ISIL's assaults, without specifying whether they were all security force personnel or also included civilians.

The head of the Misrata military council, Ibrahim Bel-Rajab, said he had ordered all brigades under his command to head to Abu Grein without delay, Libya's LANA news agency reported.

"Numerous armed vehicles of ISIL have been spotted in this area," he said.

The developments came as the UN-backed unity government in Tripoli announced the formation of a new military command to take charge of the battle against ISIL.

The group is estimated to have around 5,000 fighters in Libya, and is trying to attract hundreds more.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/05/clone.of.isil-advances-libya-misrata-1605061835501.html
@jamahir @2800 @django

Bad news.

-------------

I prefer trump over other candidates cause trump is naive and on the other hand other candidates like clinton are badly fox.

Also I believe he will give less piggyback to israelis and Saudis.

 

[Zibago]

Bad news.

-------------

I prefer trump over other candidates cause trump is naive and on the other hand other candidates like clinton are badly fox.

Also I believe he will give less piggyback to israelis and Saudis.

Not really he is even more pro Israel than George Bush

 

[Aramagedon]

Not really he is even more pro Israel than George Bush

Well but I think clinton is worse anyway.

 

[Zibago]

Well but I think clinton is worse anyway.

Its between a known threat and an unknown threat atleast we will have an idea what clinton is upto and act accordingly

 

[saiyan0321]

And the world doesn't give a damn. ISIL from their stronghold in sirte are marching forward and taking territories as they move forward and the world doesn't care that they have crossed the red sea and are creating a territorial control in a country in northern Africa. One again wonders where this war on terror is heading and what was its purpose. After so many wars, trillions of dollars wasted and millions of lives lost the terrorists are only spreading forward ad nations are being eradicted in their wake...

This war on terror has been a complete failure as it has only helped in tease terrorism.

Now Libya is under severe civil war and Isis is making sure that they become a force there.. The world must wake up and tackle this threat before this gets out of hand.