About these points:
- The US Secretary of State Pompeo met the top Chinese Deep State folks at the Bagram Air Base in Afganistan a couple of days back. The message from the US Deep State is clear: "We'll pull out the pin. Put your affairs in line with our expectations. Forget about your game plans concocted in collusion with Britain, France, Italy etc. And, forget about the help from the Families - Rothschilds, Rockefellers etc. All have been served with a "two weeks" notice."
- Pompeo also didn't forget to mention the $ amount planned for the libel lawsuits to be tabled against China w.r.t. the coronavirus pandemic.
Why would a meeting (if the meeting ever took place) between the U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo and the top of the Chinese Deep State be attended by a Turkish journalist?
I do not see how neither the U.S. or China would benefit from this.
And if the journalist was not present but has retrieved this information from his 'sources', I do not think that they are Americans or Chinese. Maybe some Afghan source told him that there was a meeting between the U.S. and China. And if that is true, then I do not think that Afghans were allowed at this meeting. So, the Afghan source might only know about a meeting taking place, but I do not think that the source knows what was discussed during the meeting.
Therefore, I do not think that this is accurate.
About this point:
- The British PM Johnson and Prince Charles are down. The Queen and the PM-in-attendance want to mend their differences with the US Deep State. A known enemy is better than an unknown friend.
Based on what does the journalist assume that the U.K. wants to mend their differences with the U.S. Deep State? Since when did they have any differences? And what are these differences then?
Does the journalist answer these questions (I do not understand Turkish) ?
About this point:
- The British establishment is now after the Chinese compensation too.
There is one think tank from the U.K., The Henry Jackson Society, that has released a report named 'CORONAVIRUS COMPENSATION? ASSESSING CHINA’S POTENTIAL CULPABILITY AND AVENUES OF LEGAL RESPONSE' where the think tank identifies 'ten possible legal avenues by which the wider world can pursue China for the damages inflicted by its response (or lack of) to the COVID-19 outbreak. Policymakers may wish to pursue them for two reasons.'
Source of the report:
https://henryjacksonsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Coronavirus-Compensation.pdf
So, the think tank itself does not plan to sue China.
And one think tank that releases a report on the legal possibilities for policy makers IF they wish to sue China is not the same as the whole 'British establishment is now after Chinese compensation too' as was written in the original post.
About this point:
- The Spanish PM has asked for another Marshal plan for the Europeans. The chicken are back to the Rooster, no matter how sadistic it is.
That Spain is asking for another Marshall Plan from the U.S. is not correct. Spain, however, does want a European Union wide Marshall Plan. It will not be paid by the U.S. but by the Member States of the European Union.
So, the chickens are not back to the rooster.
