IS JUNAGARH (INDIA) BAsically part of PAkistan..???

[Zain Malik]

​

 

[T90TankGuy]

Sure!!! so is HYD , didn't you know that?

 

[Sulman Badshah]

yes .. Nawab of Junagadh annexed his state into pakistan at that time ..

 

[Hellfire]

yes .. Nawab of Junagadh annexed his state into pakistan at that time ..

Annexed????

There is perversion of history in Pakistan I agree, but this is amazing!!!!

@jbgt90 add mohiuddinpur too to the list ... had 10 Muslim families and 04 Hindu .....

 

[suresh1773]

​

Please translate the OP in English

 

[Prince of Dorne]

Yes it was, but we took it like a boss

 

[Hassan Guy]

Who?

 

[Cookie Monster]

Why start such threads. It'll only attract trolls from both sides. There will be no constructive discussion. Mods need to close this ASAP.

 

[Kaniska]

Why start such threads. It'll only attract trolls from both sides. There will be no constructive discussion. Mods need to close this ASAP.

Spot on...We should make a policy to stop creating a thread about partition history of India and Pakistan....So much of hatred in last 70 years....Partition is painful for some and good for people like me if i keep it aside the loss of human life....But how long we will keep on discussing the same thing for ever...

 

[Cookie Monster]

Spot on...We should make a policy to stop creating a thread about partition history of India and Pakistan....So much of hatred in last 70 years....Partition is painful for some and good for people like me if i keep it aside the loss of human life....But how long we will keep on discussing the same thing for ever...

Although it happened rather tragically but there's no harm in discussing it. Just like we discuss WWI, WWII and other major events. There's lessons to be learned. The reason I'm saying that it shouldn't be discussed here is bcuz it wouldn't be "DISCUSSED". There will just be jingoistic ppl from both sides chest thumping and d*ck measuring.

I wouldn't mind a good thorough discussion where nationalistic feelings are kept aside and logic prevails. But sadly that wouldn't happen here.

 

[randaam janmam]

yes .. Nawab of Junagadh annexed his state into pakistan at that time ..

Just like the ruler of Kashmir acceded to India?

(BTW it's accession, not annexation.)

 

[ali_raza]

would have been great if we had it

 

[Dem!god]

जिसकी लाठी उसकी भैंस ।।।

 

[Imad.Khan]

My take on this is that we should always consider the will of the people when deciding things, The majority of the people living in Junagarh are hindus that are happy to be part of India. So why should they be pushed to be part of a country that they don't want to be part of. Its that simple in my mind.

Just as much as "basically" Pakistan is a part of India.

If you check the history you will find that there was no such country called India before the British came, there were moments where some areas of current India were part of Muslim Persian rulers and moments where they were under Muslim Pukhtoon rulers. Also there are moments in history where some areas of current Pakistan and Afghanistan were under Sikh rulers, but never before the British were all the areas of current Pakistan and India a united country.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

My take on this is that we should always consider the will of the people when deciding things, The majority of the people living in Junagarh are hindus that are happy to be part of India. So why should they be pushed to be part of a country that they don't want to be part of. Its that simple in my mind.



If you check the history you will find that there was no such country called India before the British came, there were moments where some areas of current India were part of Muslim Persian rulers and moments where they were under Muslim Pukhtoon rulers. Also there are moments in history where some areas of current Pakistan and Afghanistan were under Sikh rulers, but never before the British were all the areas of current Pakistan and India a united country.

India and Pak were under common empires for many times throughout history including the ones you mentioned besides Mauryans, Guptas etc. Anyway, the whole concept of a nation is pretty recent. There were no nations before the 1700s. What holds true for India holds true for the whole world.

Anyway that comment of mine was only a troll response to a troll thread, so dont take it too seriously.