What's new

Is India Building Thermonuclear Weapons?

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
A new uranium enrichment facility is fueling concerns that India is intent on building thermonuclear weapons.

By Zachary Keck

June 21, 2014

India may be embarking on a covert uranium enrichment project aimed at producing thermonuclear weapons, a number of sources have recently speculated.

This week, Reuters reported that analysts at IHS Jane’s believe that the uranium enrichment facility at the Indian Rare Metals Plant is able to produce about twice as much weapons-grade uranium as New Delhi will need to fuel its nuclear powered ballistic missile submarines in the future.

“Taking into account all the enriched uranium likely to be needed by the Indian nuclear submarine fleet, there is likely to be a significant excess,” said Matthew Clements, editor of IHS Jane’s Intelligence Review, according to Reuters. “One potential use of this would be for the development of thermonuclear weapons.”

The report goes to explain that it has made this assessment based on new commercial satellite images of the Mysore-based facility in southern India. These images revealed a new uranium hexafluoride plant that would significantly increase the uranium enrichment capacity of the plant. Specifically, India would be able to produce about 160 kilos of uranium enriched to 90 percent levels, about double the amount it needs to power its submarine fleet. The plant is expected to become operational sometime next year.

The plant’s excess uranium—which is enough to make about five nuclear bombs—could be used to produce thermonuclear weapons. Reuters explains: “By blending the uranium with its existing stock of plutonium, India could develop thermonuclear weapons that have a more complex detonation process and greater force than simpler weapons.”

This assessment has been seconded by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). In a recent research brief, SIRPI noted, “A new unsafeguarded gas centrifuge facility appears to be under construction at the Rare Metals Plant near Mysore. India’s expanded centrifuge enrichment capacity has been motivated by plans to build new naval propulsion reactors, but the potential excess capacity could also signify its intent to move towards thermonuclear weapons by blending the current plutonium arsenal with uranium secondaries.”

China already has thermonuclear weapons and, given that India usually measures its strategic deterrent against China’s arsenal, this would likely be Delhi’s rationale for seeking a thermonuclear capability. Pakistan does not have any thermonuclear weapons, however, and Pakistan officials are already warning that India’s acquisition of them would lead to a nuclear arms race that Islamabad does not want.

Thermonuclear weapons have far more destructive power than nuclear bombs that rely solely on nuclear fission. As the Union of Concerned Scientists explain, thermonuclear weapons “derive their explosive energy from the combined power of nuclear fission and fusion. An initial fission reaction generates the high temperatures needed to trigger a secondary—and much more powerful—fusion reaction.” The yield on the first U.S. thermonuclear weapon was roughly 10 megatons or 10,000 kilotons.

India claims that the first device it detonated in its 1998 nuclear tests, Shakti I, was a two-stage thermonuclear weapon that ignited successfully and produced a forty-five kiloton yield (0.045 megaton), which was considerably below the two hundred kiloton yield expected. However, most foreign analysts believe this figure was highly inflated by India and many doubt that the thermonuclear device even successes ignited the second, fusion stage of the explosion. The view that the thermonuclear test failed is also held by former senior level Indian scientists.

As a result, if India does build more thermonuclear devices it could be tempted to conduct more nuclear tests to ensure their reliability.

Is India Building Thermonuclear Weapons? | The Diplomat
 
I wonder why US experts would publicly state that India's thermonuclear tests were not successful? Was there a ploy/plot that involved the US and others wanting to gather more information on yield and other parameters?
 
BARC�s tritium production efforts included experiments by scientists from the Saha Institute for Nuclear Physics, who investigated striking Lithium-6 targets with a proton beam at the Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre in Calcutta. Striking Lithium-6 targets creates tritium, a key nuclear weapon component. However, instead of pursuing the Lithium-6 experiments, BARC scientists developed a process to extract tritium from heavy water. The first Detritiation Pilot-Plant, which extracts high-purity tritium built up in Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) by using a liquid phase catalytic exchange process, was completed in 1992. Although the technology is new, India has the capability to build a tritium extraction plant at each of its PHWRs, and could produce up to 2,400 curies of tritium per megawatt of generating capacity. These plants would give New Delhi more than enough tritium to build a large atomic arsenal.
 
India already possesses, if there is a doubt then India can test again to prove it, as India is not a signatory of CTBT.

Please do proceed :D

India already has the capability to produce HEU. This news is more like no news. Plant is probably for enrichment of nuclear fuel for their newly built power plants.
 
I wonder why US experts would publicly state that India's thermonuclear tests were not successful? Was there a ploy/plot that involved the US and others wanting to gather more information on yield and other parameters?
What about the Indian scientist who claimed it was not success? He was an eminent scientist.
 
Bhai log what is the difference between thermonuclear bomb and normal nuclear bomb ?


In Normal Nuclear bomb, the nucleus of a a molecule like uranium etc is bombard with neutron to break it. The weight of 2 broken part is less than the original one. The lost weight is converted into energy as per the equation of E= MC^2. Since value of C (Velocity of light) is very high, the quantum energy released is very high from even a small mass.

In TN bomb, 2 small molecules of Hydrogen isotopes are fused. The resultant Helium molecules has lower weight than 2 original Hydrogen isotopes weight. Rest of mass is converted in energy. Here the loss of mass is high, so release of energy is also high. How ever fusing here requires a huge amont of energy. It is right now not possible to fuse them without the huge energy generated by Nuclear bomb. So In TN bomb, normal nuclear bomb is used as the primary device to cause fusion which is much more powerful than original first blast. TN weapon is basically a 2 stage device containing fission and fusion both.

I hope this will be helpful to you to understand the difference.
 
India would be able to produce about 160 kilos of uranium enriched to 90 percent levels, about double the amount it needs to power its submarine fleet. The plant is expected to become operational sometime next year.


This simply mean that we can produce fissile meterial to build 40 20 to 40 KT devices every year (4 K G Per bomb) . Unless we have full submarine fleet, till next decade, we shall be able to produce about 8 to 10 hydrogen bombs as Per the article (Since we will be able to produce 5 Hydrogen Bombs after earmarking half of the fuel of future submarine fleet)

The plant’s excess uranium—which is enough to make about five nuclear bombs—could be used to produce thermonuclear weapons. Reuters explains: “By blending the uranium with its existing stock of plutonium, India could develop thermonuclear weapons that have a more complex detonation process and greater force than simpler weapons

India has a target of making 3 types of Bombs

1) 40 KT Fission
2) 200 KT TN
3) 1 MT TN

These bombs will be fitted on Agni MIRV in some where between 5 to 11. India is Planning an SS 18 types of missile.
 
Back
Top Bottom