What's new

Iran's long range air defence system- Sayyad 3

.
talash 3 has been produced in good numbers and deployed already...

https://www.armyrecognition.com/sep...ash_3_air_defence_system_to_western_iran.html
better not to use foreign links.
original news:
قرارگاه پدافندهوایی از اعزام تجهیزات موشکی جدید به غرب کشور خبر داد + جزئیات

Iran never unveiled an air defense system as Talash1, 2 or 3, only missiles were unveiled, the reason is that talash is the name of the projects not an air defense system.
today if I ask what's the radar of Talash 1, 2 or 3, you will have no answer, even though now, we have Iranian radars.

in fact talash 3 was integration of S200 system with Sayyad 2 missile, later they said S200 has been removed by utilizing the Sayyad 3 missile.

nonetheless, the only thing which we know about talash3 is that it's a long range high altitude air defense system with Sayyad 3 missile.
 
.
Instead of transferring artilery rocket/missile tech to Syria which are somewhat easy to be taken out from air like the previous bombing of production facilities by israel, Iran could have transferred tech like its S200-longrange sam copies to Syria even these current ones are more difficult to produce by her allies. Syria can somewhat protect long range systems by its Buk batteries. Buk proved to be useful as well so if there are variants of it like for example Raad sam more can be transferred to Syria to protect the airspace even Syria can't produce these.

You know difficulties arise when Syria tries to procure to its own control more modern sam items like S300+ from her other allies because of israeli-Usa pressure over them.
 
. . .


Good news as last time after the usa missile salvo after chemical false flag Russia offered S300 but they were not delivered. The conflict of israeli attack on Iranian facilities in Syria and Iran's retaliation to golan heights possibly without negotiationg with Syrian authorities and acting autonomously gave the israeli planned excuse to putin not to transfer S300 as well as creating rift between Iran and Syria. This was Irans mistake of acting without thinking if Syria was not included and israel can repeat these types of attacks inside Syria. You should learn to not to be guided by emotional reactions but stop and think then take action. Otherwise It will be like pushing your buttons to make you do what they want and for israel to beat Iran easily.


Also transferring aircraft from air would be easier but large equipment like sam systems going there on the ground will be prone to israeli air attacks as they are inside Iraq and Syria. Iraq can be convinced to allow Iranian fighter escort aircraft to protect the ground deliveries. Another additional option is it can be declared now that in case israeli intrusion is detected since israel has nuclear cruise missiles Iran has the right to use the option to intercept the threats outside its own airspace like Iraqi airspace. F14s escorted with smaller aircraft can do the job with long range air to air missiles(phoenix copies) without entering too much inside Iraq. Also sam equipment traveling on the ground towards Syria needs to be continiously protected with low altitude sam systems and separated to batches with enough distance between them in case israel flies low to strike the cargo on the ground. Iran must have thought by now about these types of issues otherwise it would be a foolish mistake.

Also about the upcoming Idlib operation that usa is very much against. You know if Syrian air defense is not strengthened enough as well as other measures like immediate evidence which was mentioned in other forum topics(proving all helicopters are grounded by gps+video records, airplane flight data recorded by ground radar+ strikes video recorded by airplane and airplane needs to use all of its pylons after every takeoff each strike video recorded. If it cant strike all targets it needs to empty remaining pylons bombing empty areas and video record them) to disprove potential false flag chemical attacks, chlorine/sarin barrels will be detonated the 1st day operation starts and in the 2nd day usa will launch its remaining cruise missiles and putin will "unwantedly" accept nofly zones on the 3rd day.
 
.
Good news as last time after the usa missile salvo after chemical false flag Russia offered S300 but they were not delivered. The conflict of israeli attack on Iranian facilities in Syria and Iran's retaliation to golan heights possibly without negotiationg with Syrian authorities and acting autonomously gave the israeli planned excuse to putin not to transfer S300 as well as creating rift between Iran and Syria. This was Irans mistake of acting without thinking if Syria was not included and israel can repeat these types of attacks inside Syria. You should learn to not to be guided by emotional reactions but stop and think then take action. Otherwise It will be like pushing your buttons to make you do what they want and for israel to beat Iran easily.


Also transferring aircraft from air would be easier but large equipment like sam systems going there on the ground will be prone to israeli air attacks as they are inside Iraq and Syria. Iraq can be convinced to allow Iranian fighter escort aircraft to protect the ground deliveries. Another additional option is it can be declared now that in case israeli intrusion is detected since israel has nuclear cruise missiles Iran has the right to use the option to intercept the threats outside its own airspace like Iraqi airspace. F14s escorted with smaller aircraft can do the job with long range air to air missiles(phoenix copies) without entering too much inside Iraq. Also sam equipment traveling on the ground towards Syria needs to be continiously protected with low altitude sam systems and separated to batches with enough distance between them in case israel flies low to strike the cargo on the ground. Iran must have thought by now about these types of issues otherwise it would be a foolish mistake.

Also about the upcoming Idlib operation that usa is very much against. You know if Syrian air defense is not strengthened enough as well as other measures like immediate evidence which was mentioned in other forum topics(proving all helicopters are grounded by gps+video records, airplane flight data recorded by ground radar+ strikes video recorded by airplane and airplane needs to use all of its pylons after every takeoff each strike video recorded. If it cant strike all targets it needs to empty remaining pylons bombing empty areas and video record them) to disprove potential false flag chemical attacks, chlorine/sarin barrels will be detonated the 1st day operation starts and in the 2nd day usa will launch its remaining cruise missiles and putin will "unwantedly" accept nofly zones on the 3rd day.

Nice sharing of views and information. Credit goes to defence.pk
 
.
read these two articles
http://jangaavaran.ir/سامانه-های-پدافندی-خانواده-رعد/

http://jangaavaran.ir/موشک-های-پدافندی-خانواده-صیاد/

The optical searching and following is important in the case of high jamming and when enemy attack with anti radar missiles.
images


Yemenis also with same tactic and use optic lenzes tried to shot down Saudi and Emarati jets

Iran will not turn on all of its radars at first round of attacks.
They will turn on them base on info then fire and turn off it again
 
.
^

Iran has so many radars, some of which are using unique long range frequencies that the enemy has little enemy of trying to jam them all. Iran's integrated air defence systems is extremely potent.
 
.
^

Iran has so many radars, some of which are using unique long range frequencies that the enemy has little enemy of trying to jam them all. Iran's integrated air defence systems is extremely potent.
RQ-170 hunting prove that to all of the world.
 
. .
RQ-170 hunting prove that to all of the world.
but hermes 450 launched by israel reached all the way into iran near natanz in 2014 showed big gaps in radar...

they said just following it to see where it wanted to go but i don't believe it.
 
.
but hermes 450 launched by israel reached all the way into iran near natanz in 2014 showed big gaps in radar...

they said just following it to see where it wanted to go but i don't believe it.

That Hermes was being tracked from the beginning:


 
.
That Hermes was being tracked from the beginning:


i don't believe them. they still cannot say which country it was even launched from! and if they knew about it for so long they should have brought it down like they supposedly did for rq 170 instead of just shoot it down
 
.
i don't believe them. they still cannot say which country it was even launched from! and if they knew about it for so long they should have brought it down like they supposedly did for rq 170 instead of just shoot it down

well bro,There was a video showing images of the UAV when it was early phase of it's journey in our airspace. Also, it was clearly launched from Azerbaijan, they hinted at it but did not want to escalate the escalate the situation it seems. They stated exactly how long the UAV was in Iranian air space, they were tracking it. If the UAV was in fully autonomous mode, I doubt they have been able to hack it like they did others.

But anyway, the northern part of the country probably did not have much coverage in the past, they probably sorted that out by now.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom