What's new

Iran welcomes Syria deal, urges political solution

Madali

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 28, 2015
Messages
2,717
Reaction score
23
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Iran, a close ally and military backer of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, welcomed a U.S.-Russian deal for a truce in Syria, saying on Sunday the conflict should be ended through politics.

The agreement, by the powers that back opposing sides in the five-year-old war, promises a nationwide truce from sundown on Monday, improved access for humanitarian aid and joint military targeting of hardline Islamist groups.

"Iran supports any ceasefire and peace plan to end the humanitarian crisis in Syria or limit it that involves a political solution ... based on the Syrian people's votes," said Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Jaberi Ansari, quoted by the state news agency IRNA.

"Iran has always believed that there is no military solution to the Syrian crisis and that it should be resolved through peaceful means," he added.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-security-syria-iran-idUSKCN11H0B7
 
Iran isn't part of the solution, it is part of the problem.
 
If they don't break with Al Qaeda, US and Turkey need to cut off all their funding.
 
If they don't break with Al Qaeda, US and Turkey need to cut off all their funding.
This conflict is now more than just Al Qaeda(which is just a small tiny fraction of groups operating there) or even ISIS.
There are just too many groups/actors now involved. So it's quite a complex situation. With no easy solution.
Moreover, to be honest, I don't for once even believe this deal will change much. The conflict will carry on. This deal is just a short term solution, a time for actors to rest abit and arm themselves more/fill their tank before carrying on with the war. Lol The only solution (though too late) will be a transition period where Assad will step down and make way for selecting a new lease, but that won't happen as Assad will never agree, even if Russia wants him to go. :taz:

We already said several times it's the only viable solution in the long-term

Russia Accepts Assad must go: U.K foreign secretary
boris-johnson.jpg

Boris Johnson says Syrian opposition plans show a gradual transition is possible
World Bulletin / News Desk
Bashar al-Assad must be ousted as part of any peace deal in Syria, Boris Johnson has said in his first public remarks on the issue since becoming U.K. foreign secretary.

Johnson said it was the Syrian president’s “killing machine, his barrel bombs and, in the end, his fight for personal political survival” that had caused the 400,000 deaths estimated by the United Nations in the country.

He added “even” Russia accepted the need for transition in Syria’s political leadership.
107797267_British_Foreign_Secretary_Boris_Johnson_fromt_row_2L_and_Chief_Negotiator_for_the_Syrian_O-medium_trans++igD1FP7dh-IbmJ01imzv7EYMapKPjdhyLnv9ax6_too.jpg

Boris Johnson, the Foreign Secretary, met Riad Hijab, (front row, 2nd from right), the leader of an opposition alliance, and Arab foreign ministers at the Foreign Office. Earlier, Mr Hijab presented a plan for post-Assad Syria. CREDIT: AFP


Johnson made the comments in a newspaper column published ahead of meeting in London on Wednesday of the Syrian High Negotiations Committee, which represents opposition groups in Syria.

He wrote in The Times: “There will be people meeting in London who have direct experience of running Syria but who utterly reject the Assad-style police state. They want to create a new country in which there are checks and balances in government and in which the rights of women and minorities are respected.

“Their ambition is to ensure a safe space, free from extreme, to which migrants can return. Above all, the High Negotiations Committee does not represent the victory of one sectarian group over another or the transfer of power from one faction in Syria to another.”

Johnson said the case for political transition in Syria was so widely held that “even the Russians have accepted it”.

But, he said, they were still keeping Assad in power because of concerns over what happens after he leaves.

Wednesday’s Syrian High Negotiations Committee meeting will propose a “gradual transition”, Johnson said.

“First there is to be a six-month negotiating phase between the regime and the opposition, accompanied by a total cease-fire and full humanitarian access across the country,” he wrote.

“Next there is to be an 18-month period in which Syria is to be governed by a transitional body. This, crucially, would be a mixture of opposition figures and representatives of the current government and of civil society.”

His comments came just months after he wrote a Daily Telegraph column in March 2016, when he was still London mayor, praising Assad and Russia for liberating the ancient city of Palmyra from ISIL.


http://www.worldbulletin.net/russia...ia-accepts-assad-must-go-uk-foreign-secretary

Thing is, as far as Assad remains in power for foreseeable future, this war will continue no matter the circumstances. His presence is the one which feeds all the agendas of those who are determined to wreak havoc.:bounce:
 
Who says that Turkey and the US are on the same page? The US is desperate for a deal with Russia because they know they have lost on all fronts. The US is in no position to make any demands. Putin and her allies are calling the shots. As for the truce, bombs are raining in Syria as we speak. The truce holds no meaning. Assad is going to remain in power despite American displeasure. Besides, the US is very divided on Syria and we will have to wait for the elections. If Trump becomes the next president the US will worship Putin.
 
Last edited:
This conflict is now more than just Al Qaeda(which is just a small tiny fraction of groups operating there) or even ISIS.
There are just too many groups/actors now involved. So it's quite a complex situation. With no easy solution.
Moreover, to be honest, I don't for once even believe this deal will change much. The conflict will carry on. This deal is just a short term solution, a time for actors to rest abit and arm themselves more/fill their tank before carrying on with the war. Lol The only solution (though too late) will be a transition period where Assad will step down and make way for selecting a new lease, but that won't happen as Assad will never agree, even if Russia wants him to go. :taz:

We already said several times it's the only viable solution in the long-term

Russia Accepts Assad must go: U.K foreign secretary
boris-johnson.jpg

Boris Johnson says Syrian opposition plans show a gradual transition is possible
World Bulletin / News Desk
Bashar al-Assad must be ousted as part of any peace deal in Syria, Boris Johnson has said in his first public remarks on the issue since becoming U.K. foreign secretary.

Johnson said it was the Syrian president’s “killing machine, his barrel bombs and, in the end, his fight for personal political survival” that had caused the 400,000 deaths estimated by the United Nations in the country.

He added “even” Russia accepted the need for transition in Syria’s political leadership.
107797267_British_Foreign_Secretary_Boris_Johnson_fromt_row_2L_and_Chief_Negotiator_for_the_Syrian_O-medium_trans++igD1FP7dh-IbmJ01imzv7EYMapKPjdhyLnv9ax6_too.jpg

Boris Johnson, the Foreign Secretary, met Riad Hijab, (front row, 2nd from right), the leader of an opposition alliance, and Arab foreign ministers at the Foreign Office. Earlier, Mr Hijab presented a plan for post-Assad Syria. CREDIT: AFP


Johnson made the comments in a newspaper column published ahead of meeting in London on Wednesday of the Syrian High Negotiations Committee, which represents opposition groups in Syria.

He wrote in The Times: “There will be people meeting in London who have direct experience of running Syria but who utterly reject the Assad-style police state. They want to create a new country in which there are checks and balances in government and in which the rights of women and minorities are respected.

“Their ambition is to ensure a safe space, free from extreme, to which migrants can return. Above all, the High Negotiations Committee does not represent the victory of one sectarian group over another or the transfer of power from one faction in Syria to another.”

Johnson said the case for political transition in Syria was so widely held that “even the Russians have accepted it”.

But, he said, they were still keeping Assad in power because of concerns over what happens after he leaves.

Wednesday’s Syrian High Negotiations Committee meeting will propose a “gradual transition”, Johnson said.

“First there is to be a six-month negotiating phase between the regime and the opposition, accompanied by a total cease-fire and full humanitarian access across the country,” he wrote.

“Next there is to be an 18-month period in which Syria is to be governed by a transitional body. This, crucially, would be a mixture of opposition figures and representatives of the current government and of civil society.”

His comments came just months after he wrote a Daily Telegraph column in March 2016, when he was still London mayor, praising Assad and Russia for liberating the ancient city of Palmyra from ISIL.


http://www.worldbulletin.net/russia...ia-accepts-assad-must-go-uk-foreign-secretary

Thing is, as far as Assad remains in power for foreseeable future, this war will continue no matter the circumstances. His presence is the one which feeds all the agendas of those who are determined to wreak havoc.:bounce:
Calling for Assad to step down but leaving the regime intact as many countries are calling for is unrealistic. Assad IS the regime. It all collapses without him.
Kofi Annan's original plan called for Assad to stay as president but devolve the power to his deputy. That to me seems a good idea.
 
Last edited:
Calling for Assad to step down but leaving the regime intact as many countries are calling for is unrealistic. Assad is the regime. It all collapses without him.
Kofi Annan's original plan called for Assad to stay as president but devolve the power to his deputy. That to me seems a good idea.

Nothing is going to happen with regards to Assad. He is going to remain in power and the Russians are going to make sure of that. There is not going to be a power transition. This has been the case from day one and nothing is going to change in the future. Russia would be crazy to remove their favorite henchman.

The US is too late with offering their solutions now. Russia and other actors are going to decide the outcome. This is evident because even the US has accepted Russian control in Syria.
 
Last edited:
If they don't break with Al Qaeda, US and Turkey need to cut off all their funding.
This conflict is now more than just Al Qaeda(which is just a small tiny fraction of groups operating there) or even ISIS.
There are just too many groups/actors now involved. So it's quite a complex situation. With no easy solution.
Moreover, to be honest, I don't for once even believe this deal will change much. The conflict will carry on. This deal is just a short term solution, a time for actors to rest abit and arm themselves more/fill their tank before carrying on with the war. Lol The only solution (though too late) will be a transition period where Assad will step down and make way for selecting a new lease, but that won't happen as Assad will never agree, even if Russia wants him to go. :taz:

We already said several times it's the only viable solution in the long-term

Russia Accepts Assad must go: U.K foreign secretary
boris-johnson.jpg

Boris Johnson says Syrian opposition plans show a gradual transition is possible
World Bulletin / News Desk
Bashar al-Assad must be ousted as part of any peace deal in Syria, Boris Johnson has said in his first public remarks on the issue since becoming U.K. foreign secretary.

Johnson said it was the Syrian president’s “killing machine, his barrel bombs and, in the end, his fight for personal political survival” that had caused the 400,000 deaths estimated by the United Nations in the country.

He added “even” Russia accepted the need for transition in Syria’s political leadership.
107797267_British_Foreign_Secretary_Boris_Johnson_fromt_row_2L_and_Chief_Negotiator_for_the_Syrian_O-medium_trans++igD1FP7dh-IbmJ01imzv7EYMapKPjdhyLnv9ax6_too.jpg

Boris Johnson, the Foreign Secretary, met Riad Hijab, (front row, 2nd from right), the leader of an opposition alliance, and Arab foreign ministers at the Foreign Office. Earlier, Mr Hijab presented a plan for post-Assad Syria. CREDIT: AFP


Johnson made the comments in a newspaper column published ahead of meeting in London on Wednesday of the Syrian High Negotiations Committee, which represents opposition groups in Syria.

He wrote in The Times: “There will be people meeting in London who have direct experience of running Syria but who utterly reject the Assad-style police state. They want to create a new country in which there are checks and balances in government and in which the rights of women and minorities are respected.

“Their ambition is to ensure a safe space, free from extreme, to which migrants can return. Above all, the High Negotiations Committee does not represent the victory of one sectarian group over another or the transfer of power from one faction in Syria to another.”

Johnson said the case for political transition in Syria was so widely held that “even the Russians have accepted it”.

But, he said, they were still keeping Assad in power because of concerns over what happens after he leaves.

Wednesday’s Syrian High Negotiations Committee meeting will propose a “gradual transition”, Johnson said.

“First there is to be a six-month negotiating phase between the regime and the opposition, accompanied by a total cease-fire and full humanitarian access across the country,” he wrote.

“Next there is to be an 18-month period in which Syria is to be governed by a transitional body. This, crucially, would be a mixture of opposition figures and representatives of the current government and of civil society.”

His comments came just months after he wrote a Daily Telegraph column in March 2016, when he was still London mayor, praising Assad and Russia for liberating the ancient city of Palmyra from ISIL.


http://www.worldbulletin.net/russia...ia-accepts-assad-must-go-uk-foreign-secretary

Thing is, as far as Assad remains in power for foreseeable future, this war will continue no matter the circumstances. His presence is the one which feeds all the agendas of those who are determined to wreak havoc.:bounce:
 
Their is only 1 diffrence here Sir A.Thinker .......shiitties as you call them are not Muslims ..by any means check any 1 ... the answer will be yours ....misconception no 1 created no 1......How many more never know ...but i is 4 sure ..Never Check any as a Musqlim .....otherwise every time ......can be your retine like shaking hands or saying hello .......rest is all pass ...
 
Calling for Assad to step down but leaving the regime intact as many countries are calling for is unrealistic. Assad IS the regime. It all collapses without him.
Kofi Annan's original plan called for Assad to stay as president but devolve the power to his deputy. That to me seems a good idea.
Might be a good idea, howoever, Assad want agree even to this deal. Lol
That's the problem with cult of personality. Leaders who act as if the country is their personal belonging where everything revolves around them always spell disaster for the country at some point in time, it's the case with many Arab/muslim countries and African dictators. One person leadership will always bring instability at some point in time(especially if the so called indispensable leader hasn't created strong institutions in his country fearing they will challenge their hold on power) they like creating an aura to make people believe without them the country will seize to exist and they are indispensable to the country. Some will even claim they are the only one who can rule the country. Lol So this dictators will stop at nothing just to remain in power, even if it means that total destruction of their country :agree:. Same with many African despots.
As they say: Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
 
Meanwhile Saudi-funded Ahrar al-Sham terrorists who are closely allied to Al-qaeda in Syria have rejected any ceasefire. It's time to rain hell on them and clean these cockroaches from Syria or force them to submission. This is a good opportunity now that they have rejected ceasefire.
 
Meanwhile Saudi-funded Ahrar al-Sham terrorists who are closely allied to Al-qaeda in Syria have rejected any ceasefire. It's time to rain hell on them and clean these cockroaches from Syria or force them to submission. This is a good opportunity now that they have rejected ceasefire.
I should remind u that Daraya was part of the March ceasefire (explicitly confirmed by Russian officials). There was no any Nusra or ISIS there. Yet Daraya was most crazy bombed and ethnically cleansed than any other place in Syria.

Same tactics Russian followed in Chechnya: they signed ceasefire with some village and then bombed it into dust.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom