Iran penetration in United States Central Command - footage captured by the US drones

[TheImmortal]

The fact remains that Iraq kicked the US out of the country and aligned itself mostly with Iran.

So when ISIS started rolling through Iraq, the US purposely sat on its hands to punish iraq for not allowing a permanent US presence on Iraqi soil. They were very slow to help the Iraqi government. They probably also extracted some concessions in order to help Iraq.

This doesn’t show any conspiracy, merely geopolitics at work. Any major power would probably do the same thing in order to extract concessions (in order to help) and to punish the weaker country for refusing to comply with demands.

The world of geopolitics is nasty.

 

[mohsen]

The fact remains that Iraq kicked the US out of the country and aligned itself mostly with Iran.

So when ISIS started rolling through Iraq, the US purposely sat on its hands to punish iraq for not allowing a permanent US presence on Iraqi soil. They were very slow to help the Iraqi government. They probably also extracted some concessions in order to help Iraq.

This doesn’t show any conspiracy, merely geopolitics at work. Any major power would probably do the same thing in order to extract concessions (in order to help) and to punish the weaker country for refusing to comply with demands.

The world of geopolitics is nasty.

1.Naturally, any elected government in Iraq will have good relations with Iran.

2.U.S leaved Iraq, not because of it's government, but because of heavy costs imposed by anti-US movements in Iraq (they call them Iran-backed militants), the more they would stay, would further help the growth of anti-US movements, and it was in favor of Iran and against U.S interests.

3.U.S plans for middle east is splitting its countries into smaller race-based states, this way they could impose their policies easier, it's a not a conspiracy theory but a fact, they even published a map of their favorite new middle east!

4.U.S created ISIS, and when this group was rolling in Iraq, U.S was even politically supporting them as innocent rebels with righteous demands! and even refused to deliver the F16s to Iraq expressing the concern that Iraq would use them against these righteous men.

5.The only reason that U.S decided to change it's policies and help Iraq was Iranian influential help in Iraq, quick victories by pro-Iran militants made it clear that ISIS will be defeated in no time, but the aftermath of it would be a country filled by anti-US anger and fully under control of pro-Iran forces, so to reduce this influence, they had no choice but to reverse their policies against Iraq's government.

6. U.S is still looking after their new middle east plan, their support for Kurds in Iraq and Syria is along the same policy, as usual, the only obstacle against their policies is one word, Iran.

 

[xyxmt]

They did nothing due to hands beng tied by politics, under Obama and their former chief of staff Dempsey they were very slow to counter IS. Except for defending Kurds they didn't help Iraq much. That doesn't mean they support IS as they later on intensified bombing campaigns against them. But it fits the Islamic Republic of Iran's narrative that the US supports IS and loads of people will fall for it.

No other country in this world has resources/experience/and know how to create, manage and control these kind of groups. If someone thinks US is against ISIS, Talibans and AQ then they are pure fools.