Iran on brink of nuclear capability -IAEA

[longbrained]

IAEA cant do a damn thing. It is controlled by Israel from behind the scene. IAEA is basically a spy agency working for Israel inspecting other countries installation and giving all info to them. That is why Pakistan has always been wary of the IAEA.

 

[nirreich]

IAEA cant do a damn thing. It is controlled by Israel from behind the scene. IAEA is basically a spy agency working for Israel inspecting other countries installation and giving all info to them. That is why Pakistan has always been wary of the IAEA.

IAEA is far from being under Israel's influence, in fact IAEA constantly demands that Israel be also under inspection while Israel refuses. The former DG IAEA, Albaradai, always attacked Israel and deliberately avoided harsher approach against Iran, in spite Israeli and Americans' request.

 

[T-Rex]

IAEA is far from being under Israel's influence, in fact IAEA constantly demands that Israel be also under inspection while Israel refuses. The former DG IAEA, Albaradai, always attacked Israel and deliberately avoided harsher approach against Iran, in spite Israeli and Americans' request.

IAEA's 'constant demand' for putting israel in its list is a drama to gain some credibility. IAEA is a pocket organization of the US, it cannot do anything without the consent of the US government. The so-called 'requests' by the US are designed to fool the not so-clever Arabs .

 

[nirreich]

IAEA's 'constant demand' for putting israel in its list is a drama to gain some credibility. IAEA is a pocket organization of the US, it cannot do anything without the consent of the US government. The so-called 'requests' by the US are designed to fool the not so-clever Arabs .

Satisfactory for you, the IAEA never was and never will be able to prevent a country to develop nuclear weapons - like India, North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, etc.

So, IAEA really serves your agenda. If I were you, I would be one of the most advocate supporters of IAEA for its incompetence.

 

[T-Rex]

Satisfactory for you, the IAEA never was and never will be able to prevent a country to develop nuclear weapons - like India, North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, etc.

So, IAEA really serves your agenda. If I were you, I would be one of the most advocate supporters of IAEA for its incompetence.

"IAEA serves my agenda!!!!!!!" now, that's interesting. I advocate disbanding such a 'useful' organization. Do you? I don't think so.

 

[nirreich]

"IAEA serves my agenda!!!!!!!" now, that's interesting. I advocate disbanding such a 'useful' organization. Do you? I don't think so.

I would like an IAEA which can prevent rogue states like Pakistan, Iran and North Korea from getting any close to developing nuclear weapons.

On the other hand, you want all these maniac countries and many other failed states to have nukes in order to undermine global stability and inflict WW3 on the human race. IAEA serves your agenda in its incompetence to prevent nuclear proliferation.

 

[T-Rex]

I would like an IAEA which can prevent rogue states like Pakistan, Iran and North Korea from getting any close to developing nuclear weapons.

On the other hand, you want all these maniac countries and many other failed states to have nukes in order to undermine global stability and inflict WW3 on the human race. IAEA serves your agenda in its incompetence to prevent nuclear proliferation.

So, you want this pocket organization of the west to continue. Now, that tells whose agenda it serves. Israel is the perfect example of a rogue state. It 's funny how the zionists play around with lies.

 

[Solomon2]

Very interesting. I wonder what Qaddafi planned to do with it. He wrapped up his own nuclear program years ago, yet neither gave up the yellowcake to the IAEA, nor sold it off.

 

[Hafizzz]

IAEA won't discuss Israel's 'nuclear capabilities' after Arab proposal dropped
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diploma...bilities-after-arab-proposal-dropped-1.386334

Israel secured a diplomatic achievement at the annual meeting of the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA) Friday in Vienna when the Arab states withdrew their proposal to discuss Israel’s “nuclear capabilities.”

With the support of the United States and other Western nations, Israel was active behind the scenes to torpedo the Arab initiative, and were ultimately successful. It would seem that one of the reasons that the Arab bloc withdrew their proposal was last year’s failure, when the conference denied their request to discuss the issue.
Dimona, nuclear - Reuters

The nuclear reactor at Dimona.
Photo by: Reutuers

Despite this, the conference adopted a decision entitled, “The Implementation of IAEA Supervision in the Middle East.” Israel abstained from voting on this proposal as it did last year, as did the United Nations, Canada and a number of other nations.

Israel also voted against a clause in the proposal that calls on all states in the Middle East to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel is not a signatory to the treaty, and it has no intentions to become one. Most of the world believes that Israel has nuclear weapons.

Anyone know powerful is Israel's nuclear capability ?

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

"There continue to be serious concerns that India's 2010 nuclear liability law is not consistent with the CSC," the state department said in response to a question on why the US wants India to seek a clarification from the IAEA.

I smell U.S's pepper in India's curry

 

[secularbuster]

Look back in this thread and you will find out that the outcome of this discussion was that there the answer is negative - IAEA and the international community should deal with much more urgent nuclear problems: Iran, Pakistan, North Korea.

There's nothing more urgent than the threat emanating from the israeli nukes.

---------- Post added at 02:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:56 PM ----------

Look back in this thread and you will find out that the outcome of this discussion was that there the answer is negative - IAEA and the international community should deal with much more urgent nuclear problems: Iran, Pakistan, North Korea.

There's nothing more urgent than the threat emanating from the israeli nukes.

 

[nirreich]

No, there isn't a greater threat than the israeli nukes and I represent the view of at least 175 countries while you represent the view of barely 15 countries in total. One of your friends tell me to use bold letters for you, you don't mind, do you?

It is not a question of majority and minority, almost all the countries in Iran's region, the ME, think that its nuclear programme is the biggest danger for them and for regional stability because Iran is a terror state. Who cares what most of the other countries think which are not part of the region and are not involved in world affairs (like the major powers)? Is Botswana's opinion important or Fiji's opinion on Iran's nuclear programme or other 175 countries like them?

Almost everybody who is affected from the developments in the ME strongly think that a nuclear Iran is a danger for the ME and for global stability. That includes most of the Arab countries (maybe except Syria), the EU countries, the global powers (the US, China and Russia), other important countries (like Japan, India, Australia, Canada), and of course Israel which is threatened by Iran to be exterminate.

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

Time for IAEA to Deal with Israeli Nukes ?
My answer is yes and also i add Iran will love to have Nuclear weapons, Because of their daily hate speeches against enemies, what is the guarantee that Iran will not make nuclear warheads??
I think There are certain reasons why Israel does not declare himself a nuclear state.
1. US will stop aid to Israel.
2. US will stop cooperate in Israeli defense such as F16s, more probably F22 in future.
3. Sanctions from UN.
I am not in favor of expansion of Nuclear warheads/programs both from Israel and Iran, And, "Iran", his past and current behavior shows much aggressive in nature i.e Death to Israel, Iran/iraq war.And about territory issue is just like India/pak separated in 1947, Now Question is that India have all right to demand his Land back because once this was India's land, If Israeli member is posting here with arguments, why not you prove him false with arguments. I love to see prove them false about their so called peaceful nuclear program.And i don't see their 1st use policy of nuclear weapons since 1960s. Similarly i don't see Israel need nukes because They have best missiles/air shield system in the world.

 

[Arian]

First comment before i answer: you are posting an opinion not an article. The book is old. Already discussed.

An opinion can't be an article? correction, I guess you mean it's not a news. well, tell that to Washington Post. and it's not from the book. you surely ain't bothered yourself to read the article completely before posting.

Then i answer you

First read it completely before answering.

it is written :

it means a military action against Iran.
That's why i answer you: NOW USA say they don't want military action.
You understand ?

the point of the article isn't whether the USA is attacking Iran or not, I don't understand why you thought it was that. read the title. the title is that this fella Khalili claims that Iran is already in possession of nuclear weapons while he's article is full of misinformation. like he says that the IAEA has already confirmed that Iran can build 6 nuclear weapons, while such a thing has never been reported by the IAEA ever.

 

[Hussein]

An opinion can't be an article? correction, I guess you mean it's not a news. well, tell that to Washington Post. and it's not from the book. you surely ain't bothered yourself to read the article completely before posting.

lol yes article of news to be complete.
anyone can write a blog . if it makes you think it is a valid source.
if you consider Khalili opinion as important to know ... wow what to say... you have nothing else to read?

And yes He already said all this bullshit in his book and already made noise .
And yes i read the article.... a lot of blabla .. he can say anything he wants. everyone can write pages of story
without proof

i don't see the importance to care about it.
you say yourself "the clown" so why care about him?

the point of the article isn't whether the USA is attacking Iran or not, I don't understand why you thought it was that. read the title. the title is that this fella Khalili claims that Iran is already in possession of nuclear weapons while he's article is full of misinformation. like he says that the IAEA has already confirmed that Iran can build 6 nuclear weapons, while such a thing has never been reported by the IAEA ever.

Are you ok?
did i say all the article is about attacking Iran?
No i am saying that this guy already asked USA to strongly act against Iran, by military purpose.
And even in this article as i just quote it before again he says:

We must act before it’s too late.

this guy wants scare people of USA

anyway i don't understand why you are so upset against what i write . i think like you this is a big lie.
as you say AIEA never reported what he said.