What's new

Iran nuclear weapon over a year away, says Obama

BDforever

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
14,387
Reaction score
8
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
US President Barack Obama has told an Israeli television channel it would take Iran "over a year or so" to develop a nuclear weapon.

In an interview with Channel 2 he said he did not want to "cut it too close" and declined to rule out the possibility of military action.

Iran's nuclear programme is expected to be high on the agenda when Mr Obama visits Israel later this month.

Tehran insists it is refining uranium only for peaceful energy purposes.

But Israel has repeatedly threatened a military strike if Iran appears to be on the verge of obtaining a bomb.

Washington is pushing for more time to allow diplomacy and economic sanctions to run their course.

"We think that it would take over a year or so for Iran to actually develop a nuclear weapon but obviously we don't want to cut it too close," Mr Obama said.

"My message (to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu) will be the same as before: if we can resolve it diplomatically, that's a more lasting solution. But if not, I continue to keep all options on the table."

Asked if an attack on Iran's nuclear sites was a realistic option he said: "When I say that all options are on the table, all options are on the table and the United States obviously has significant capabilities.

"But our goal here is to make sure that Iran does not possess a nuclear weapon that could threaten Israel or could trigger an arms race in the region. That would be extraordinarily dangerous at a time when obviously there are already a lot of things going on."
Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in March 2012 Mr Obama is known to have had a fractious relationship with Mr Netanyahu.

On 20 March Mr Obama is due to begin his first trip to Israel, the Palestinian territories and Jordan since being elected president in 2008.

He and Mr Netanyahu are also expected to discuss the war in neighbouring Syria and efforts to revive peace talks with the Palestinians.

The UN Security Council has ordered Iran to stop uranium enrichment and imposed four sets of sanctions.

Earlier this month the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog called for access to Iran's Parchin military site "without further delay" and without waiting for negotiations to make progress.

The IAEA has long suspected nuclear weapons research is taking place at the site, just outside Tehran.

It has not had access to the military complex since 2005.

In the same interview with Channel 2, Mr Obama said he had no plans to "immediately" release convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard.

Pollard, 57, was jailed for life in 1987 for leaking secret US documents to Israel. Mr Obama said he was guilty of "a very serious crime".

In another development on Thursday, the Pentagon said a US fighter jet over the Gulf had fired a warning flare to stop an Iranian jet approaching an unmanned US drone.

A statement said the Iranian fighter broke off pursuit after the incident on 12 March. It said the drone had been flying over international waters.
source: BBC News - Iran nuclear weapon over a year away, says Obama
 
.
The US should in my view supply the weaponry and military and diplomatic backup to Israel to destroy those centrifuges soon, as well as anti-ICBM capability, to Israel.
 
.
So the war is inching towards Persia sooner than later.....
 
. . .
They could attempt to strike Targets in Iran, But a war... Haven't they learned from Afghanistan and Iraq. Then theres the big boss up north which would never allow an invasion of Iran.

Many people think that a war against Iran is a walk in park. Irans population is as big as Iraq and Afghanistan combined, and unlike the latter, they have an army that's willing to fight. With Irans' geography and the nature of its people. This war will be VietnamX10.

Besides who the hell is going to fund the war, China? :lol:
 
. .
They could attempt to strike Targets in Iran, But a war... Haven't they learned from Afghanistan and Iraq. Then theres the big boss up north which would never allow an invasion of Iran.

Many people think that a war against Iran is a walk in park. Irans population is as big as Iraq and Afghanistan combined, and unlike the latter, they have an army that's willing to fight. With Irans' geography and the nature of its people. This war will be VietnamX10.
Besides who the hell is going to fund the war, China? :lol:

What would be Iran's response against US shock n awe with all those Tomahawks raining down on Iran.....

It started a while back, cyber warfare.

Cyber war cant pin down Iran 1-2-3.
It has to be a surgical strike to decimate EU units without killing people.
 
.
They could attempt to strike Targets in Iran, But a war... Haven't they learned from Afghanistan and Iraq. Then theres the big boss up north which would never allow an invasion of Iran.

Many people think that a war against Iran is a walk in park. Irans population is as big as Iraq and Afghanistan combined, and unlike the latter, they have an army that's willing to fight. With Irans' geography and the nature of its people. This war will be VietnamX10.

Besides who the hell is going to fund the war, China? :lol:

In this era of technology, population doesn't play any major role and even with/out the population factor Iran is going to lose, it will not be able to confront. It doesn't have any technological capabilities to launch a retaliatory attack on US/ISrael, Nor it has the capabilities to resist any attack coming from those countries.

Iran is totally surrounded from Iraq, Afghanistan, pakistan, Azerbaijan, Qatar and UAE. The US are camping everywhere in the region near by. what would the mullas strategy be here if the attacks rains on each part of the country at once? what will happen when the useless missiles iran have are not able to leave their place taking the presence of the US missile shield into calculation wether on the Arabian gulf, iraqi, Afghanistan..etc Hence the Patriot Turkey deployed lately.

Simply Iran cant face the US/Israel air force and the navy. both are nuclear strike capability. The mullas will be swallowed easily like chicken bits;Waving the white flag is the only option.
 
.
In this era of technology, population doesn't play any major role and even with/out the population factor Iran is going to lose, it will not be able to confront. It doesn't have any technological capabilities to launch a retaliatory attack on US/ISrael, Nor it has the capabilities to resist any attack coming from those countries.

Iran is totally surrounded from Iraq, Afghanistan, pakistan, Azerbaijan, Qatar and UAE. The US are camping everywhere in the region near by. what would the mullas strategy be here if the attacks rains on each part of the country at once? what will happen when the useless missiles iran have are not able to leave their place taking the presence of the US missile shield into calculation wether on the Arabian gulf, iraqi, Afghanistan..etc Hence the Patriot Turkey deployed lately.

Simply Iran cant face the US/Israel air force and the navy. both are nuclear strike capability. The mullas will be swallowed easily like chicken bits;Waving the white flag is the only option.

Or maybe in another scenario,Iran and U.S end hostilities and suddenly Persian Gulf's Arab monarchies lose all their importance and role as puppets in a blink of an eye,and feel humiliated for billions of dollars they spent to be able to stand against Iran.

Arabs's are exactly playing the role against Iran that Iran was doing in 70s against Soviets.But your hate is too much to understand that.I hope it won't be too late when you get it.
 
.
US as of now is a balloon with tiny holes in it. There was a time when they were planning to atack iran all alone. Now they need israeilis to help them with their agenda. How low a super power can fall lets just wait and see.

In this era of technology, population doesn't play any major role and even with/out the population factor Iran is going to lose, it will not be able to confront. It doesn't have any technological capabilities to launch a retaliatory attack on US/ISrael, Nor it has the capabilities to resist any attack coming from those countries.

Iran is totally surrounded from Iraq, Afghanistan, pakistan, Azerbaijan, Qatar and UAE. The US are camping everywhere in the region near by. what would the mullas strategy be here if the attacks rains on each part of the country at once? what will happen when the useless missiles iran have are not able to leave their place taking the presence of the US missile shield into calculation wether on the Arabian gulf, iraqi, Afghanistan..etc Hence the Patriot Turkey deployed lately.

Simply Iran cant face the US/Israel air force and the navy. both are nuclear strike capability. The mullas will be swallowed easily like chicken bits;Waving the white flag is the only option.

In short every one except Iran sold out their souls to Americans for sake of a long shot win against Iran.
 
.
If Obama really knows the Iranian Nuke development and he is predicting the time of completion....he must have attacked on that location...through surgical strikes.....,...

They are just making mountains of news against Iran....to get reason from their allies to put more sanctions on Iran.....and Once more time....NATO and US Allies are ready to become fools
 
.
The US should in my view supply the weaponry and military and diplomatic backup to Israel to destroy those centrifuges soon, as well as anti-ICBM capability, to Israel.
What if they supply the weaponry and military and diplomatic backup to Iran to destroy the already nuclear Israel?, as well as an anti-ICBM...blah...blah..
 
.
What if they supply the weaponry and military and diplomatic backup to Iran to destroy the already nuclear Israel?, as well as an anti-ICBM...blah...blah..

Any which way, Iran will go down too, that also without a strugle.

If Israel, which is a one bomb country is wiped out.

They will make sure their underwater strategic assets are activated.

And with a Samson option, not only Iran, but whole region would be charcoal.

A nation with second strike capability is never a walk over.
 
.
Any which way, Iran will go down too, that also without a strugle.

If Israel, which is a one bomb country is wiped out.

They will make sure their underwater strategic assets are activated.

And with a Samson option, not only Iran, but whole region would be charcoal.

A nation with second strike capability is never a walk over.

Would you mind giving explanations for the BOLD parts?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom