What's new

Iran, free trade pact top EU-India summit agenda

illusion8

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
12,232
Reaction score
-20
Country
India
Location
India
NEW DELHI: The European Union looks set to push India at a summit Friday to use its commercial and diplomatic influence to try to bring Iran back to the negotiating table over its disputed nuclear programme.

India has a good relationship with Iran, which is the South Asian nation's second-largest oil supplier after Saudi Arabia, providing 12 percent of India's crude needs at an annual cost of around $12.7 billion.

The energy-hungry country has continued to buy oil from Iran despite an intensifying US- and EU-led sanction campaign to smother Tehran's vital oil exports until it abandons its suspected drive to build nuclear weapons.

In an interview with the Times of India ahead of the one-day EU-India summit in New Delhi, European Council president Herman Van Rompuy suggested India's refusal to join the sanctions programme could be exploited constructively.

"I plan to ask Indian leaders to apply their considerable leverage to Iran and help in convincing the Iranian leadership to give up their sensitive nuclear programme and return to the negotiating table," Van Rompuy said.

Indian foreign policy experts have previously suggested New Delhi could act as an interlocutor with Iran to help the world community engage with the Islamic republic over its nuclear goals, which Tehran maintains are peaceful.

Defending its decision to continue oil purchases from Tehran, India argues it is bound only by UN sanctions on Iran, not embargoes imposed by other countries.

"We can't determine what Indian companies do," acknowledged EU ambassador to India Joao Cravinho.

During the summit -- attended by Van Rompuy, EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh -- the two sides will also focus on bridging differences holding up a long-delayed free trade pact.

"We hope to bring a package together that will get the political blessing from the EU president and Prime Minister Singh," Cravinho told AFP.

Such a package would allow negotiators to move into the final lap of talks for an accord that could be wrapped up in the second half of 2012, embracing 1.8 billion people or nearly a quarter of the global population, Cravinho said.

Intense negotiations have been under way for weeks with both sides "working on the nature of trade-offs needed to reach a political agreement", he added.

Indian Commerce Minister Anand Sharma said talks were in the "final stage" but a "few gaps" remained to be closed, while a senior Indian government official, who could not be named, said New Delhi hoped for a "significant announcement."

Deadlines for concluding the deal, under discussion since 2007, have been repeatedly missed with the EU pressing India to cut duties on cars, wines and spirits.

In turn India is seeking greater EU market access for its farm products, textiles and IT services.

The EU is also keen on making new inroads into India's banking and retail sectors, while India wants the EU to allow freer movement of its professionals in the 27-nation bloc.

"The EU-India free trade agreement is one of the biggest and most ambitious free trade agreements ever negotiated," said Cravinho.

India has already struck free trade deals with Japan, Malaysia and South Korea, while the EU is in trade liberalisation talks with Canada and Japan, among other countries.

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific/view/1182098/1/.html
 
.
Here's wishing all the luck to the successful talks to help ease the tensions surrounding Iran and Israel.

LOL Someone was saying yesterday here that India will not be asked to mediate :D
 
.
Here's wishing all the luck to the successful talks to help ease the tensions surrounding Iran and Israel.

LOL Someone was saying yesterday here that India will not be asked to mediate :D

mediate for what? :coffee:
 
.
Here's wishing all the luck to the successful talks to help ease the tensions surrounding Iran and Israel.

LOL Someone was saying yesterday here that India will not be asked to mediate :D

India is not asked to mediate, but is asked to put some pressure on Iran.
I am not sure India will oblige, and if she does, not sure whether Iran will listen.
 
.
mediate for what? :coffee:

Iran says they are pursuing Nuclear enrichment for peaceful purposes - India partly believes that.

Israel says Iran is into weapons development - The west believes so. It would be better if the differences are sorted out across the table rather than a war.
 
.
India is not asked to mediate, but is asked to put some pressure on Iran.
I am not sure India will oblige, and if she does, not sure whether Iran will listen.

pressure on Iran ??? ... for what ??? :coffee:

---------- Post added at 10:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:24 PM ----------

Iran says they are pursuing Nuclear enrichment for peaceful purposes - India partly believes that.

Israel says Iran is into weapons development - The west believes so. It would be better if the differences are sorted out across the table rather than a war.

we don't want any war ... but they want ... & we will kick them in A**
 
.
Iran says they are pursuing Nuclear enrichment for peaceful purposes - India partly believes that.

Israel says Iran is into weapons development - The west believes so. It would be better if the differences are sorted out across the table rather than a war.

Put pressure to bring them to the negotiating table.
 
.
pressure on Iran ??? ... for what ??? :coffee:

---------- Post added at 10:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:24 PM ----------



we don't want any war ... but they want ... & we will kick them in A**

Yeah sure..whatever, but it would be better if matters can be solved by talks.
 
.
India is not a puppet and no one can pressurize us against anybody.

These thick head Americans and Europeans leaders are not understanding this simple thing even after being rejected in MMRCA,
:devil:

And on top of it Iran is our very good friend.
:tup:

We can't back stab our friend we are not china.
 
. .
pressure on Iran ??? ... for what ??? :coffee:


Giving up of ur nuke plans.

---------- Post added at 10:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:24 PM ----------
we don't want any war ... but they want ... & we will kick them in A**

Iranian are very smart people there is no doubt about it and don't fall to the trap by saying we can kick or kill. Iran should negotiate saying that suppose if we (Iran) gave up its nuke plans what you (USA+EU) have for us on offer???

What will Iran gain if it give up nuke plan. Bargain hard and get benefit and silently build ur economy and defence and after some time build your nukes too ;);)
 
.
Nothing Iran says will change US and its alies minds, nothing. Nuclear dispute is just a cover for the real goal - changing Iran's government to subordinate regime like it was in Shah times.



^^^ I believe talks have to be given a chance, civilized countries talk and sort out their differences, why should be any different for Israel, the US and Iran?
 
.
India is not a puppet and no one can pressurize us against anybody.

And on top of it Iran is our very good friend. :tup:

We can't back stab our friend we are not china.

My feeling is that whatever India's foreign policy needs more pragmatism.
India has to decide about wheather India can go along with Iran in the long run?
Is oil is the only source for which India is supporting Iran in this case?
What is the cost benefit analysis for being in side with Iran? Because this is a fact that in case of global level Iran will never support India in any of the global forum where India needs it with respect to Pakistan because of religion factor.

Can Iran assist us in providing assured transit to Afghanistan to promote India's business interest in AF and Central Asia?

If India is not getting strategic beinifits then what is the point in lining up with Iran? (it is not like i don't like to be side with Iran.But my problem is that I know for sure Iran will not side with India whenever the need arises vis a vis Pakistan. Then what we are getting in return?
 
.
^^^ I believe talks have to be given a chance, civilized countries talk and sort out their differences, why should be any different for Israel, the US and Iran?
You have idealistic perception, West doesnt talk with Iran as an equal partner, they say "do our way, or get sanctions or even war". Problem is difference in power and influence, therefore jungle rules apply "the strong is always right, and weak is eaten".
 
.
My feeling is that whatever India's foreign policy needs more pragmatism.
India has to decide about wheather India can go along with Iran in the long run?
Is oil is the only source for which India is supporting Iran in this case?
What is the cost benefit analysis for being in side with Iran? Because this is a fact that in case of global level Iran will never support India in any of the global forum where India needs it with respect to Pakistan because of religion factor.

Can Iran assist us in providing assured transit to Afghanistan to promote India's business interest in AF and Central Asia?

If India is not getting strategic beinifits then what is the point in lining up with Iran? (it is not like i don't like to be side with Iran.But my problem is that I know for sure Iran will not side with India whenever the need arises vis a vis Pakistan. Then what we are getting in return?



^^^ the biggest cost benefit for us would be the avoidance of a potential war between two of our friends. That is enough for us to give it a try.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom