Iran Decides to AcComplete Takeover of Afghanistan

[Areesh]

The Iranian spokesperson did not mention Pakistan.

He did. Check the first post of this thread

I listened to the clip presented....NO mention of "Pakistan".

Her refers to reports of "Foreign" interference only to be investigated.

Why are you guys lying? The text of the tweet clearly mentions Pakistan

 

[SalarHaqq]

He did. Check the first post of this thread


Why are you guys lying? The text of the tweet clearly mentions Pakistan

We're translating his statement from the actual video of the press conference for you.

Here:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1434759697471623169

You can listen yourself. A reporter probably mentioned Pakistani intervention, but in his reply, the spokesperson in turn did not name Pakistan but only spoke of "foreign intervention" ("modakheleye khareji"), stating they will examine the veracity of these reports. Probable misquote by the Tehran Times Twitter account mixing the journalist's words with the official's.

 

[aryobarzan]

We're translating his statement from the actual video of the press conference for you.

Here:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1434759697471623169

You can listen yourself. A reporter probably mentioned Pakistani intervention, but in his reply, the spokesperson in turn did not name Pakistan but only spoke of "foreign intervention". Probable misquote by the Tehran Times Twitter account.

Tweet is manipulated..read my previous post. Translation is fake.

دخالت خارجی در بحث همکاری پاکستان با طالبان از سوی ما بررسی می‌شود....This is Fake Translation.

 

[Areesh]

We're translating his statement from the actual video of the press conference for you.

Here:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1434759697471623169

You can listen yourself. A reporter probably mentioned Pakistani intervention, but in his reply, the spokesperson in turn did not name Pakistan but only spoke of "foreign intervention". Probable misquote by the Tehran Times Twitter account.

There is no reporter who mentioned Pakistan

It is the text both in English and Persian that mentions Pakistan

Stop lying man. You can love Iran all you want to. But don't expect us to go blind with something this obvious

Tweet is manipulated..read my previous post. Translation is fake.

Translation is perfect. Pakistan is clearly mentioned in the text

We here in Pakistan can read and write urdu. We can see that Pakistan is written in the text both in English and Persian

 

[Gripen9]

Iran is no good but Arabs are equally evil i would say... we should work for Pakistan.

I missed the the news were Arab states were endorsing and spreading misinformation about Pakistan?

Pakistan needs to counter this propaganda more forcefully.

 

[SalarHaqq]

There is no reporter who mentioned Pakistan

It is the text both in English and Persian that mentions Pakistan

Stop lying man. You can love Iran all you want to. But don't expect us to go blind with something this obvious

Look, this was a press conference. And the spokesperson is responding to questions put to him. The way he says "and concerning foreign intervention, we will definitely investigate these reports" clearly illustrates this fact.

What text are you referring to, other than the Tweet in the OP? I'm talking about his actual words as heard in that video. Please point me to where he mentions Pakistan's name in that clip.

 

[Aesterix]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1434762525296533508

What is these guys problem?

First of all Pakistan never intervened in Panjsher and all are just social media fake news but Iran has decided to name Pakistan for the alleged intervention

Iran helped the original Shia resistance against Taliban, the northern alliance.
Now again they are out to create Shia militia in a sunni majority country, same as they have done in pretty much every sunni majority country.

 

[Maula Jatt]

The Iranian spokesperson did not mention Pakistan. Nor did he confirm the reports about outside intervention, he only said these claims are going to be investigated.

It would appear that Iran had preferred the Panjshir issue to be solved through negotiations rather than through force, similar to Herat for instance, where the Taliban and Ismail Khan reached an agreement and bloodshed was avoided. And so Tehran expressed its point of view through the spokesman's commentary.

I honestly don't see what the big deal is here... It's simply a differing stance on a specific case where Iran might feel the Taliban did not quite act the way they had told Iran they would. But I very much doubt that this will suffice to make Iran revise its overall policy towards Afghanistan.

If this model of confronting domestic political competitors (some of whom are close to Iran) is generalized however, or if the Taliban proceed to opting for an outright anti-Iranian line under the influence of the US and its regional clients, then things may change. Absent these sorts of developments however, Iran is unlikely to modify its basic approach on the Taliban.

Look up the op that's what people are angry about

A- Pak never did anything in Afghanistan, it's was Indian propoganda (the Panjshir guys might be lying to them- and dumb indians ran with it, put thier propoganda cell to work)
If Pak air force or drones were doing anything, anything
Give us a video from a mobile camera even
B- The angry tone of foreign ministry towards Pakistan over what it must do, as in lecturing em

The op is what people are angry about

 

[Gripen9]

absolutely! we dont want anymore of that wahabi shit! They can keep their money!

Who is we?
So you have alternative jobs to provide 10-15 million Pakistani a that are currently employed in tge SA/ Gulf?

 

[Crimson Blue]

Most probably this is presented by Pajeet Newj Factory

Its not fake news. Iranian members of PDF are also supporting this news article.
Just remember Iran would never miss any opportunity to malign Pakistan, with or without a cause.

in Iran it has been all over social media ( and i mean aaaaaaall over ) that Pakistan air forces have attacked Afghanistan in favor of Taliban so ppl here are shocked and angry as no one expected that to be true, they asking if army radars have picked up any Pakistan military movements, so government said they are investigating

 

[Maula Jatt]

Who is we?
So you have alternative jobs to provide 10-15 million Pakistani a that are currently employed in tge SA/ Gulf?

Lol your figures are way off

 

[Areesh]

Look, this was a press conference. And the spokesperson is responding to questions put to him. The way he says "and concerning foreign intervention, we will definitely investigate these reports" clearly illustrates this fact.

What text are you referring to, other than the Tweet in the OP? I'm talking about his actual words as heard in that video. Please point me to where he mentions Pakistan's name in that clip.

There are two tweets. One in English and another in Persian

The English one:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1434762525296533508

Clearly Pakistan is mentioned. No question by any reporter here

The Persian one:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1434759697471623169

Again pakistan is mentioned

Both times by your Spokesman. You think we are some sort of idiots or something??

 

[Maula Jatt]

There is no reporter who mentioned Pakistan

It is the text both in English and Persian that mentions Pakistan

Stop lying man. You can love Iran all you want to. But don't expect us to go blind with something this obvious


Translation is perfect. Pakistan is clearly mentioned in the text

We here in Pakistan can read and write urdu. We can see that Pakistan is written in the text both in English and Persian

I think he is saying tweet and text is false

Shat FM actually said was different

 

[aryobarzan]

You guys asked for translation..I did the translation.........and I am out of here.

 

[SalarHaqq]

Iran helped the original Shia resistance against Taliban, the northern alliance.
Now again they are out to create Shia militia in a sunni majority country, same as they have done in pretty much every sunni majority country.

The Northern Alliance was composed of Sunnis essentially. And on certain occasions, they even fought Shia Hazara groups. Iran backed both these parties despite their occasional infighting. Have you not seen how Ismail Khan, a Sunni, was peacefully escorted by to Iran by the Taliban?

I would advise against falling into this trap concocted by the zionists, the US and their clients, which consists in interpreting Iranian policy as well as the Afghan theater in sectarian terms (in fact, the ethnic factor has prevailed over confessional divisions in Afghanistan). Nobody would benefit from these sorts of tensions except the common enemies of Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, China and Russia.