Interracial marriage in US doubles

[Sasquatch]

Immigration policy depends on the resources and populations of a country. Most Asian countries just have too much population, as China enforces one child policy to reduce its own population, it totally doesn't make any sense to have a large number of immigration. This is very different from countries that have robbed lands like Canada, US and Australia and certainly has nothing to do with racism. In addition, this is just a recent phenomenon as historically Chinese dynasties always encourage immigration and that's the reason they are so many Arab/Persian/Jewish decedents in China.

And the initial article is talking about Asians as a whole, I am just amazed that you could always relate any topic to China bashing. Too much hatred is not good to your health.

This is true Arab/Persian Traders and Travelers came and married with Hans = Hui, I'm Hui. you have stated this well Fly.

 

[500]

Then there's no such thing as de facto racism, since anything can come down to personal preference.

Everyone will always have personal preferences. Question is were u apply these prefences. If you use personal preferences when you hire someone to job its discrimination and therefore can be racism. But when its comes to bed its no ones business.

 

[sur]

...>>> I ask the non-Americans here to consider your own societies. How much racial intermarriage is acceptable in your society? <<<...>>> Of all the national cultures you have personal knowledge of, where is inter-racial acceptance the most developed?

The Answer:-

PAKISTAN.... sounds like an intentional joke, right...?
=
=
Many places in world were invaded\migrated-to by various foreigners, including sub-continent,,, But at none of those places we see as much mix of races as in present day Pakistan ,,, Arabs, Persians (include-Children-Of-Israel=Children of Jacob), Turks, Arians, & other native races & even Chinese who came to reside here married & present day Pakistan is a mix of ALL those races living so harmoniously that ppl don't even remember or consider what races there forefathers were from ,,, What America is just going thru as a result of immigration, we have gone thru centuries back & have lived well ,,,

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

You already have but are too chickensh!t to admit it. The American society reflects that statistics and the only way to reverse that trends is for the US to be like racist China to limit:

- The amount of immigration,
- Interracial relationships of all types,
- US citizenship to only European immigrants.

And eventually the US will be a 'white' country, just like how China is a 'Chinese' country, or Japan is a 'Japanese' country.

So actually, YOU should be rooting for such a United States since you support China's racist policies. If what is good for the goose is good for the gander, then what racist policies are good for China should be good for the US as well, right?

Racists of the world...Unite...!!!

China does not limit immigration. If you're a foreigner overstaying your visa for even 1 day in the US, the feds will boot you out of the country so fast your head will spin. However China allows people who overstay their visas to pay a small fine and extend it.

China does not limit interracial marriage. Indeed a major worry is interracial marriage between minorities and between minorities and Han wiping out the minorities uniqueness. As migrant workers from minority filled Yunnan, Guizhou, Tibet, Xinjiang and Guangxi leave for the cities, they become very likely to marry Hans.

US did give US citizenship to only white Western Europeans until 1865 when they were forced to give it to native born blacks. Asians were still excluded until 1930's. China never limited citizenship; becoming a citizen is equally hard for anyone that was not previously a Chinese citizen.

 

[Sasquatch]

Immigration policy depends on the resources and populations of a country. Most Asian countries just have too much population, as China enforces one child policy to reduce its own population, it totally doesn't make any sense to have a large number of immigration. This is very different from countries that have robbed lands like Canada, US and Australia and certainly has nothing to do with racism. In addition, this is just a recent phenomenon as historically Chinese dynasties always encourage immigration and that's the reason they are so many Arab/Persian/Jewish decedents in China.

And the initial article is talking about Asians as a whole, I am just amazed that you could always relate any topic to China bashing. Too much hatred is not good to your health.

This is true Arab/Persian Traders and Travelers came and married with Hans = Hui, I'm Hui. you have stated this well Fly.
in my hometown ningxia we have more Han then Hui and we Marry and get along very well.

 

[gambit]

China does not limit immigration.

Did not comment on China's immigration policy. I used immigration, as in limiting, by the US in order to keep the US as racially pure as China insist on being. Do you think it is a good policy to keep China as racially pure as possible?

If you're a foreigner overstaying your visa for even 1 day in the US, the feds will boot you out of the country so fast your head will spin.

Why is that wrong? Immigration is a privilege, not a right. So if someone violate that privilege, why is it wrong to impose a punishment? Is it not good that there is an allowance for immigration in the first place?

However China allows people who overstay their visas to pay a small fine and extend it.

A fine is still a punishment. Keep in mind that one of your suck-ups' argument is that personal interracial relationship determine how racially tolerant is the US, never mind business or political. I am going by his style and use immigration for China.

China does not limit interracial marriage. Indeed a major worry is interracial marriage between minorities and between minorities and Han wiping out the minorities uniqueness. As migrant workers from minority filled Yunnan, Guizhou, Tibet, Xinjiang and Guangxi leave for the cities, they become very likely to marry Hans.

Not really the same thing. When race is discussed in for the US, it is white, black, Hispanics, and Asians as the main groups. Minority ethnic subgroups within the larger Asian category is stretching it. But since one of your suck-ups' uses such marriages to judge US, we should have no problems using the same to judge you.

US did give US citizenship to only white Western Europeans until 1865 when they were forced to give it to native born blacks. Asians were still excluded until 1930's.

Does not matter much what happened generations ago. What matter is today and for US, interracial marriages, the most intimate of all interracial relationships, is continuing its rise in the US. And yet one of your suck-ups' argument is that this still does not mean the US is a racially tolerant country.

China never limited citizenship; becoming a citizen is equally hard for anyone that was not previously a Chinese citizen.

Then China does have limits on citizenship. Why is it important for China to place racial qualities upon citizenship?

But thanks for debunking your suck-up's argument for me, anyway. Hope he learns how idiotic his argument really is.

 

[Birbal]

Everyone will always have personal preferences. Question is were u apply these prefences. If you use personal preferences when you hire someone to job its discrimination and therefore can be racism. But when its comes to bed its no ones business.

What if you're giving a job for a fashion show? What if you don't want any black friends because of "your personal preferences"? What about Indians who don't want to marry Dalits? This "no one's business" argument is bullshit.

 

[500]

What if you're giving a job for a fashion show?

Just as any job.

What if you don't want any black friends because of "your personal preferences"?

Friendship is intellectual attraction not sexual. Sexual attraction on the other hand depends on looks (for overwhelming majority of people), looks depend on race.

What about Indians who don't want to marry Dalits?

Dalits look different?

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

Sexual attraction depends on money as well.

It also depends on legislation. Banning people from having sex with each is likely to decrease sexual attraction between them.

Sorry I do not buy the whole "its personal preference" thing. Its not. These "personal preferences" are strongly influenced by hard social, political, economic and military factors as is everything that's not physical science.

 

[Safriz]

in pakistan if they introduce arabic and portuguese.....
pakistani people will travel more to arabic speaking countries and south america and our obsession to bag an english speaking cucasian woman will end.

 

[gambit]

If I am not attracted to black women I am a racist? Strange logic.

Yes. Strange logic, indeed. If a white man voted for an Asian for city councilman whose decisions affect every citizen regardless of color because the white man happens to agree with the Asian's views, if the white man's wife is not of color, the white man is as racist as a hardcore Klansman. There is no real logic to it. It is only 'logical' to the extent that the absurd argument serves to portray the US in a certain light.

 

[Birbal]

Yes. Strange logic, indeed. If a white man voted for an Asian for city councilman whose decisions affect every citizen regardless of color because the white man happens to agree with the Asian's views, if the white man's wife is not of color, the white man is as racist as a hardcore Klansman. There is no real logic to it. It is only 'logical' to the extent that the absurd argument serves to portray the US in a certain light.

Ungrammatical sentence and straw man again.

---------- Post added at 08:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:03 PM ----------

Just as any job.

So you agree that discrimination against blacks because they aren't considered sexually attractive is wrong in the fashion industry?

Friendship is intellectual attraction not sexual. Sexual attraction on the other hand depends on looks (for overwhelming majority of people), looks depend on race.

Yes, and what looks good is a cultural thing. In South Africa, fat women are considered good looking. In America, thin women are considered good looking. Similarly, in America, black women are not considered good looking.

Dalits look different?

On average, yes there are statistical differences between say Brahmins and Dalits.

 

[Rig Vedic]

What if you don't want any black friends because of "your personal preferences"? What about Indians who don't want to marry Dalits? This "no one's business" argument is bullshit.

You can't force any body to be friends with or marry somebody.

 

[Safriz]

i like curves....and good facial features...
i dont care if she is black..brown..yellow or white...

the testimonial of my non bias towards any particular race is that i perv on any woman who has junk in the trunk...and dont care what color of skin she is

 

[fly2012]

i like curves....and good facial features...
i dont care if she is black..brown..yellow or white...

the testimonial of my non bias towards any particular race is that i perv on any woman who has junk in the trunk...and dont care what color of skin she is

There you go.

Does discrimination only apply on skin colors, not the size of cups?