What's new

INS Vikramaditya poised to meet latest deadline

selvan33

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
1,267
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
INS Vikramaditya poised to meet latest deadline
The aircraft carrier will once again take to sea in July; flight tests are scheduled a month later.

468_MVV8782.JPG

Sevmash engineers will perform repairs and maintenance during the initial 12-month warranty period, and then provide their services for another 20 years once the warranty has expired.

The INS Vikramaditya has undergone a complex operation at Russia’s Sevmash shipyard ahead of the final stage of trials and delivery to the Indian Navy later this year.
With 10 weeks still left until July 3, 2013, when the final sea trials are due to begin, tug boats carefully manoeuvred the giant ship to a drainable pool. There the Vikramaditya will once again be put on a frame. Once the water has been drained, engineers will inspect the hull of the ship and all its outboard parts and components.

468_Gorshkov_dok.JPG

This is what the ship looked like after refitting in the dock, ahead of taking to the sea

According to the head of the commissioning team, Igor Leonov, all the procedures in the dry dock - which are compulsory for a ship after repairs - will take two months. So far, the project remains strictly on the latest schedule.The April 25 deadline for putting the ship in the dock has been met, Leonov said.
Ekaterina Pilikina, spokeswoman for the Sevmash shipyard, gave the media details of the elaborate operation. The main complication was that there were only a few centimetres to spare between the hull of the enormous ship and the sluice gate. To make matters worse, the team worked in strong winds and had only an hour at the peak of the high tide to complete their task.
The operation was observed by senior Sevmash executives; the head of the White Sea naval base, Vladimir Vorobyev; the captain of the Indian crew of the Vikramaditya, Suraj Berry and the head of the Indian observation team, Kudaravalli Srinivas. Both Indian representatives were impressed with what they saw.

468_MVV1171.JPG

108 days at sea spent in 2012 by the Vikramaditya crew and commissioning team during trials in the White Sea and the Barents Sea.

Srinivas said this was the second time he saw such an operation. The first was back in 2008, when the ship was being taken out of the drainable pool after repairs. “Now Sevmash specialists have once again demonstrated their professionalism,” the Indian representative said. “They have coped very well with their task.”
The chief executive of the shipyard, Mikhail Budnichenko, expressed confidence that all the remaining work in the dock “will be done well and on schedule.” Sergey Novoselov, head of defence export projects at Sevmash, explained the nature of that work: “In accordance with the contract, we must inspect the state of the hull, the propeller-rudder system, and the sea valves. We will also restore the paintwork below the waterline, if necessary.”
Novoselov added that most of the problems identified during the sea trials have already been fixed. The ongoing refurbishment of the main boilers involves specialists of the companies which designed and manufactured them. The refurbishment is scheduled for completion in May. All the interim results of the project are inspected by the Indian customer and by the Russian MoD.

Before the Vikramaditya can take to the sea once again, the Sevmash quality assurance specialists will be asked to present their findings on 435 separate items covering almost the entire ship, including tens of thousands of individual parts and components. In addition, much of the interior finish has yet to be completed.
“There are more than 2,500 compartments in the ship,” Novoselov says. “That includes combat stations, bays, cabins, engine and boiler rooms, power plant compartments, and a 120 metre-long hangar, which is about the same length as a football pitch. We must paint all these compartments, install the hardware, properly insulate all the piping and frame elements, and present the whole thing for the customer's inspection. In addition to the engineers setting up the main equipment, we also have painters, joiners, fitters, insulation technicians and other specialists working on the Vikramaditya.”

In the autumn of 2012, the Vikramaditya was forced to return to Sevmash, where it had previously been repaired and refitted, to replace the fire-resistant insulation of the boilers, which began to deteriorate during trials in the Barents Sea. This and several other problems with the hardware had forced Russia to postpone the delivery of the Vikramaditya to the Indian Navy, which was previously scheduled for 2012.
The new delivery deadline is November 2013. Eight boilers must be refurbished before the end of May if that deadline is to be met. The ship is scheduled to take to the sea once again on July 3, so there will be a month left to test all the boilers of the main power plant, including operation at the maximum load. The next stage of the trials, which involves the planes and helicopters based on the Vikramaditya, is scheduled for August 3.
In mid-October the ship will return to Sevmash, where specialists will spend another month preparing it for the voyage to India.

Trials schedule: Every day counts
“On July 2013 the aircraft carrier will begin sea trials in the White Sea; we will spend a month testing all the boilers of the main power plant under various loads. The next stage of the trials will commence on August 3 in the Barents Sea, and end on September 30. It will involve the planes and helicopters based on the carrier; the aim is to test the operation of the entire carrier-aircraft complex. One of the critical parts of the trials is aircraft landings on the deck of the Vikramaditya during night-time. These flights will begin in late August or early September, once the midnight sun period north of the Polar Circle is over.

468_MVV8748.JPG


Then the ship is scheduled to return to Sevmash in early October to begin preparations for the voyage to India. November 15 is the deadline for the aircraft to be delivered to the customer and (for the ship to) set sail for its new home in India. Incidentally, we are planning a shorter route for that journey, via the Suez Canal rather than around Africa. In accordance with the terms of the contract, Sevmash engineers will perform repairs and maintenance during the initial 12-month warranty period, and then provide their services for another 20 years once the warranty has expired."
INS Vikramaditya poised to meet latest deadline | Russia & India Report
 
it was better for india to leave this dead body

She looks too beautiful to be called a dead body, does she not?

Aircraft-Carrier-INS-Vikramaditya-Indian-Navy-04.jpg


Aircraft-Carrier-INS-Vikramaditya-Indian-Navy-03.jpg


viki16.jpg


And here she is, launching the future of our naval aviation into the sunset:

02vikram1225538f.jpg


Those birds that fly off from her carry enough missiles to sink entire navies. And they can give neighbouring air forces a run for their money:

F84sq.jpg


This "dead body" will rule the arabian sea and the Indian ocean for a decade, matchless in her majesty, peerless in her power. In our region of interest, she will be the monarch of all she surveys.
 
Its as dead as the OHP Frigate, muy amigo. But much more powerful.

On the other side, it's far more expensive and years behind planned induction times. We never should have gone for it and now we are stuck with it, because we already paid too much. Just consider how many SSKs we could have bought instead, which would be operationally more useful for IN to defend our country.
It might not be dead, but not a good procurement either!
 
On the other side, it's far more expensive and years behind planned induction times. We never should have gone for it and now we are stuck with it, because we already paid too much. Just consider how many SSKs we could have bought instead, which would be operationally more useful for IN to defend our country.
It might not be dead, but not a good procurement either!
Hindsight is everything @sancho! At the time the deal looked pretty good- cheap(ish) and it would be a good replacement to the ageing/aged VIRAAT and would serve the IN well for a few years until Indian built ACCs came into the fleet.

Now all the benefits of the Viky have evaporated as it is late and horrendously over-budget.




And the Russians are pi$$ed when India starts to look elsewhere for defence products........LMAO!!

She looks too beautiful to be called a dead body, does she not?

Aircraft-Carrier-INS-Vikramaditya-Indian-Navy-04.jpg


Aircraft-Carrier-INS-Vikramaditya-Indian-Navy-03.jpg


viki16.jpg


And here she is, launching the future of our naval aviation into the sunset:

02vikram1225538f.jpg


Those birds that fly off from her carry enough missiles to sink entire navies. And they can give neighbouring air forces a run for their money:

F84sq.jpg


This "dead body" will rule the arabian sea and the Indian ocean for a decade, matchless in her majesty, peerless in her power. In our region of interest, she will be the monarch of all she surveys.

Her "reign" will be short lived as by 2018/19 the IN will get their IAC-1 and then after that the IAC-2 etc etc
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On the other side, it's far more expensive and years behind planned induction times. We never should have gone for it and now we are stuck with it, because we already paid too much. Just consider how many SSKs we could have bought instead, which would be operationally more useful for IN to defend our country.
It might not be dead, but not a good procurement either!
@sancho now Pitching for American Carriers :P

POV is EVERYTHING Sancho, am I right??

IN has made its Operational DOCTRINE around atleast one CBG since 60s.

No matter what we buy "INSTEAD" of AC, how will one change the working Doctrine of an Armed force??

No doubt SSK or SSBNs or Frigates or Distroyers or OPVs or LPDs are needed but NONE are replacement for a FLAGSHIP like an AC.

It carries Diplomatic, Peace-time & War-time Value.

+ IN din't see all this coming when it signed the contract in 2004.

BTW, Don't you think it's an SPECTACLE to watch 1-2 acres (sorry i don't know the area) of Movable Indian Land, raising Indian Flag high in the High sees, Making Port Calls to Friendly countries & Giving Sleepless nights to enemies. A Ship that can carry ac that are more than (qualitatively & quantitatively) nearly 2/3rd of world's Air Forces ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On the other side, it's far more expensive and years behind planned induction times. We never should have gone for it and now we are stuck with it, because we already paid too much. Just consider how many SSKs we could have bought instead, which would be operationally more useful for IN to defend our country.
It might not be dead, but not a good procurement either!

don't worry if we give another two deals to US and france, then russia will learn everything.
 
She looks too beautiful to be called a dead body, does she not?

Aircraft-Carrier-INS-Vikramaditya-Indian-Navy-04.jpg


Aircraft-Carrier-INS-Vikramaditya-Indian-Navy-03.jpg


viki16.jpg


And here she is, launching the future of our naval aviation into the sunset:

02vikram1225538f.jpg


Those birds that fly off from her carry enough missiles to sink entire navies. And they can give neighbouring air forces a run for their money:

F84sq.jpg


This "dead body" will rule the arabian sea and the Indian ocean for a decade, matchless in her majesty, peerless in her power. In our region of interest, she will be the monarch of all she surveys.

Why do you answer this guy? He is either completely ignorant and just trolling or simply butt hurt.
 
it was better for india to leave this dead body

Why bother posting if you don't understand ???
And if you are trolling which is most likely possibility the ideal answer for your comment would be
" like Pakistan leave behind the dead bodies of your soilders to rot in Kargil ???"
 
On the other side, it's far more expensive and years behind planned induction times. We never should have gone for it and now we are stuck with it, because we already paid too much. Just consider how many SSKs we could have bought instead, which would be operationally more useful for IN to defend our country.
It might not be dead, but not a good procurement either!

It has to do with the internal friction in IN. If you remember few years ago there was nice article in "Hindu" about the doctrine planning of IN
Some of Naval seniors believed IN should focus on subs for force projection like Russia and others believe ACC should be e flagship for force projection and Subs should complement them.

If we overlook the delays the procurement of ACC for 2.3 billion dollars is fine by me.
And about Subs aren't Scorpions running late too ;)
 
it was better for india to leave this dead body

Chicha...Good to know your knowledge level.... As per you view if INS Vikramaditya is dead body, then what is PAKISTAN NAVY...????....A COFINED BODY.
 
On the other side, it's far more expensive and years behind planned induction times. We never should have gone for it and now we are stuck with it, because we already paid too much. Just consider how many SSKs we could have bought instead, which would be operationally more useful for IN to defend our country.
It might not be dead, but not a good procurement either!
Chill out man its not that bad. Better than the one we got. IAC 1 will take ages. It's more of a statement to china and sleepless nights to pakistan. :flame:
 
Hindsight is everything @sancho! At the time the deal looked pretty good- cheap(ish) and it would be a good replacement to the ageing/aged VIRAAT and would serve the IN well for a few years until Indian built ACCs came into the fleet.

Now all the benefits of the Viky have evaporated as it is late and horrendously over-budget.

And the Russians are pi$$ed when India starts to look elsewhere for defence products........LMAO!!



Her "reign" will be short lived as by 2018/19 the IN will get their IAC-1 and then after that the IAC-2 etc etc

@Abingdonboy and @sancho; when the Gorshkov deal came up nothing else was on offer. Apart from that, India's financial condition was vastly different. So considering a build locally option was ruled out. Later there was "talk" of the Kitty Hawk; which remained talk only; because of two reasons: cost of operating that ship as well as American strings. I'll tell you this; the cost of operating any ship over 20-30 yrs old increases exponentially, whether a Naval Ship or Merchant Ship. In case of Merchant Ships the owners resort to ad-hoc measures for the most part to run them in those circumstances. With a Warship that is dangerous. The other thing that went wrong in the case of the Gorshkov is the nature of the condition assessment of the ship itself. The IN ended up asking for more refurbishment than they anticipated while Sevmash had run out of people with the skills to handle the work; simply because of the time elapsed from when they had built the ship. @Abingdonboy; let me point you in the direction of the HMS Astute project in UK where the sub was built in Barrow-on-Furness after eons. Even the skilled welders required for the job were not to be found; because Ship-Building has wound down in Britain. Remember Astute was built in the region which was at one time the leading builder of ships in the world! Do you know that generally speaking; there is a shortage of Boiler Engineers and Turbine Specialists in many countries. Astute went off-budget and off-timeline. The Scorpene project in MDL faced skills related problems too when it was initiated; because many of the skilled workers had retired after the conclusion of the HDW 209 project. Another similar incident though from the world of aviation was the IAF's restoration of its vintage Gypsy Moth. The Riggers and Mechanics needed for the restoration could not be found in India. If you wish to restore a 1950s Hillman Minx Car; even if you take it to a Mercedes Benz dealership in UK, you'll be turned away. The mechanics will simply look askance at the 'side-valve' engine and carburettor. You'll have to go to a specialist enthusiast. But then will still remain the question of parts. @Joe Shearer can tell us a thing or two about restoring and maintaing old cars.

That is the context of the Gorshkov Saga. But it will still be easier and cheaper to run Gorshkov than the Kitty Hawk if that infructous deal had come through.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom