The first leak is an email, sent by Hassan Saadi, which he sent after meeting a member of the Abbottabad commission, who he refers to as a friend(Lt.Gen. (Retd) Nadeem Ahmed). This is one of the most revealing and damning piece of evidence about how Save the Children tried to infiltrate Abbottabad Commission and influence the nature of the final report.
Muhammad Noor, Hassan Saadi Former DCD Emergencies, Pakistan Currently out of Pakistan.
Krift, Tom Vice President, Strategic Operations
Khan, Amanullah DCD Program Implementation, Pakistan Currently out of country.
Aleem Afnan Director Security, Pakistan Currently out of country.
Novel Mike Regional Director, South & Central Asia
From: Muhammad Noor, Hassan Saadi (Hassan.Noor@savethechildren.org)
Sent: Tue 11/20/12 4:30 PM
To: Novell, Mike (SCI) (mike.novell@savethechildren.org); Krift, Tom (tkrift@savechildren.org); Khan, Amanullah (Amanullah.Khan@savethechildren.org)
Cc: Aleem, Afnan (afnan.aleem@savethechildren.org)
Hi All,
Today I had a brief meeting with our friend and following are some of the key points discussed
- The report primarily was compiled by our friend in the end and was endorsed by the chairman after incorporating the feedback that chairman had. However, one of the member (former ambassador) was not in agreement with the two members and said that after reviewing he might write a note of dissent. Unfortunately, his brother passed away in late October and therefore he was away and unavailable and after couple of weeks he started writing the note.
- The two members were excepting a short note of dissent that excluded Save the Children. However, few days back they received a note of dissent that in itself is a full report as it is a 73 pager note.
- Legally speaking, if commission wanted to issue the report they were bound to include the note. However, the note of dissent is a very strong one and is a full report almost. Very importantly, the note of dissent criticizes the two panel members were being soft on certain institutions (including Save the Children)
- The commission simply could not issue the report with that note and therefore now they are working on developing counter arguments on the note; however, it is taking them a lot of time and so far they have reached to just 16 pages.
- The commission needs to have a lot of comments removed from the note before it is in a shape that the report could be shared otherwise it can jeopardize the integrity of the members of commission. The third member is being very staunch in his ideas and not willing to change his stance and therefore the other two members have to work extra hard to factually prove wrong a lot of things that this third member is saying.
- With regards to Save the Children, the note says that CIA was working through Save the Children and had its operatives embedded in the organization. The Haripur house was taken to collect the DNA residue to continue looking for the trail of the deceased. Once that job was done, the house was vacated. Afridis statement, though might be inconsistent, also indicates the same thing that Save the Children is working on behalf of CIA
- The fourth member of the commission (Abbas Ali Khan) also is not content with the report, but rather coming with a note, has decided to stay in US, that he went to on pretext of medical grounds. He is not willing to sign the report in the current shape but also does not want to put in a note of dissent and therefore continues to prolong his stay in US.
- With these two members out, commission is no position to submit the report to the government.
- As a way forward, the two members will work with the third member and try to come to a point where the note is significantly reduced and number of comments are taken out from the report. This very well take some time and if all goes well then commission might be able to submit the report by next month. However, with current contents, it might never be published because the note of dissent talks about number of very sensitive issues very openly that cannot be shared
- To my question on so what Save the Children should do in this case? His reply was, that we need to work with MOI and EAD to build relationships and confidence. It would take few months for Save the Children to be back to complete normalcy. His opinion was that it might take 5 to 8 months for that to happen.
Best
Muhammad Hassan Noor Saadi | Deputy Country Director, Emergencies | Save the Children | House 3, Street 25, F-7/2, Islamabad | hassan.noor@savethechildren.org | Office: +92 51 2609601-9| Mobile: +92 300 8509351 | Skype: hassansaadi76
Muhammad Noor, Hassan Saadi Former DCD Emergencies, Pakistan Currently out of Pakistan.
Krift, Tom Vice President, Strategic Operations
Khan, Amanullah DCD Program Implementation, Pakistan Currently out of country.
Aleem Afnan Director Security, Pakistan Currently out of country.
Novel Mike Regional Director, South & Central Asia
From: Muhammad Noor, Hassan Saadi (Hassan.Noor@savethechildren.org)
Sent: Tue 11/20/12 4:30 PM
To: Novell, Mike (SCI) (mike.novell@savethechildren.org); Krift, Tom (tkrift@savechildren.org); Khan, Amanullah (Amanullah.Khan@savethechildren.org)
Cc: Aleem, Afnan (afnan.aleem@savethechildren.org)
Hi All,
Today I had a brief meeting with our friend and following are some of the key points discussed
- The report primarily was compiled by our friend in the end and was endorsed by the chairman after incorporating the feedback that chairman had. However, one of the member (former ambassador) was not in agreement with the two members and said that after reviewing he might write a note of dissent. Unfortunately, his brother passed away in late October and therefore he was away and unavailable and after couple of weeks he started writing the note.
- The two members were excepting a short note of dissent that excluded Save the Children. However, few days back they received a note of dissent that in itself is a full report as it is a 73 pager note.
- Legally speaking, if commission wanted to issue the report they were bound to include the note. However, the note of dissent is a very strong one and is a full report almost. Very importantly, the note of dissent criticizes the two panel members were being soft on certain institutions (including Save the Children)
- The commission simply could not issue the report with that note and therefore now they are working on developing counter arguments on the note; however, it is taking them a lot of time and so far they have reached to just 16 pages.
- The commission needs to have a lot of comments removed from the note before it is in a shape that the report could be shared otherwise it can jeopardize the integrity of the members of commission. The third member is being very staunch in his ideas and not willing to change his stance and therefore the other two members have to work extra hard to factually prove wrong a lot of things that this third member is saying.
- With regards to Save the Children, the note says that CIA was working through Save the Children and had its operatives embedded in the organization. The Haripur house was taken to collect the DNA residue to continue looking for the trail of the deceased. Once that job was done, the house was vacated. Afridis statement, though might be inconsistent, also indicates the same thing that Save the Children is working on behalf of CIA
- The fourth member of the commission (Abbas Ali Khan) also is not content with the report, but rather coming with a note, has decided to stay in US, that he went to on pretext of medical grounds. He is not willing to sign the report in the current shape but also does not want to put in a note of dissent and therefore continues to prolong his stay in US.
- With these two members out, commission is no position to submit the report to the government.
- As a way forward, the two members will work with the third member and try to come to a point where the note is significantly reduced and number of comments are taken out from the report. This very well take some time and if all goes well then commission might be able to submit the report by next month. However, with current contents, it might never be published because the note of dissent talks about number of very sensitive issues very openly that cannot be shared
- To my question on so what Save the Children should do in this case? His reply was, that we need to work with MOI and EAD to build relationships and confidence. It would take few months for Save the Children to be back to complete normalcy. His opinion was that it might take 5 to 8 months for that to happen.
Best
Muhammad Hassan Noor Saadi | Deputy Country Director, Emergencies | Save the Children | House 3, Street 25, F-7/2, Islamabad | hassan.noor@savethechildren.org | Office: +92 51 2609601-9| Mobile: +92 300 8509351 | Skype: hassansaadi76