What's new

Induction of CM-400 AKG Confirmed

Due to its compact size and width can be carried on centerline as well ?? Compared to c-803 which has bigger size and width ie fins
 
un realistic load...the jet will be fuel stressed in this profile
especially since cm 400 is 30-40% heavier than c802 and it is carying 4BVRs instead of two

hence why engine and fuel needs addressing

may be the dorsal spine can be made in block 3 which can free up fuel space otherwise

Gripen NG evolved to carry 40% more fuel..the LCA was deemed useless for being too short on fuel and MK1A is increasing its fuel by 20%
 
un realistic load...the jet will be fuel stressed in this profile
especially since cm 400 is 30-40% heavier than c802 and it is carying 4BVRs instead of two

hence why engine and fuel needs addressing

may be the dorsal spine can be made in block 3 which can free up fuel space otherwise

Gripen NG evolved to carry 40% more fuel..the LCA was deemed useless for being too short on fuel and MK1A is increasing its fuel by 20%
That's a heavy load even on a plane like J-10, and F-16. Best loadout would be one that fulfills one mission. For example, JF-17 A2A should carry 4 SD-10s and 2 PL-5s, cruise missile carrier should be 2 CM-400AKGs, and 2 PL-5s to achieve maximum range.
 
un realistic load...the jet will be fuel stressed in this profile
especially since cm 400 is 30-40% heavier than c802 and it is carying 4BVRs instead of two

hence why engine and fuel needs addressing

may be the dorsal spine can be made in block 3 which can free up fuel space otherwise

Gripen NG evolved to carry 40% more fuel..the LCA was deemed useless for being too short on fuel and MK1A is increasing its fuel by 20%

Which program at Lockheed we’re you involved with ? Or was it at Boeing ?

Oem displaying not my call
 
IMG_4175.JPG
 
That is the big question.

A MRAP could not be deployed to protect our boys on patrols but Honda Civics were purchased as staff cars.

Everything that is wrong with the Pakistan military highlighted.

Those 4x4 Mitsubishi and Hiluxes were the reason why so many of our brave men had to die in ambushes, and they were sent in the combat zone again and again, nobody took responsibility for this criminal negligence, it's as such that we deliberately let them die.
 
Those 4x4 Mitsubishi and Hiluxes were the reason why so many of our brave men had to die in ambushes, and they were sent in the combat zone again and again, nobody took responsibility for this criminal negligence, it's as such that we deliberately let them die.


One factor during the ops would have been cost of operating and cost of procurement . .

Keeping costs down is one of reasons that we won that war while USSR and USA did not under same circumstances..they simply spent too much. We didn't

But now with widespread military ops are over I agree.that MRAPs shud be deployed in considerable numbers
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom