Indonesian foreign minister visits Bangladesh to discuss Rohingya issue.

[bluesky]

Don't listen to a secular kafir follower like > @madokafc . she don't care about Muslim at all
mostly indonesian Muslims supports Rohingya ignore her

I think, people should be sympathetic to other people who happen to suffer on the ground of ethnicity, language or religion.

 

[Nike]

kafir is a strong word, only god is able to judge other people as kafir or not. Not some random clown dude on internet like you @koteka

or you want to play the role of Allah SWT

more Muslim in Indonesia is caring about Ahok case than the plight of Rohingya. Is the FACT

 

[Boss Dragun]

@madokafc knows very well how international community helped East Timuri for their plight in Indonesia. Indonesia could not hide behind sovereignty. Could they?

i would not comment on topic that i don't know jack shit about if i were you.

precisely because we wanted to cede east timor anyway since they're a lost cause anyway. the only way they can be freed is by our own willingness. international plight can't even save them if we decided to keep them around. they have no use other than their own small oil reserve, and that is what the australian wants from them in the first place. but of course since BD is an international community, you surely can help their problem with australia, no?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-30/east-timor-demands-timor-sea-treaty-torn-up/7797118

kafir is a strong word, only god is able to judge other people as kafir or not. Not some random clown dude on internet like you @koteka

or you want to play the role of Allah SWT

more Muslim in Indonesia is caring about Ahok case than the plight of Rohingya. Is the FACT

should've reported the troll account. but then even the mods doesn't know when to use permanent ban to obvious trolls, so there you go.

 

[Kaniska]

China is in the same boat as us... Thats what they say.

What has China done to pressurize Myanmar in this issue.

 

[TopCat]

What has China done to pressurize Myanmar in this issue.

China itself is dealing with mm refugee in its border.

 

[Zabaniyah]

Well, they are looking very eager to have a permanent solution to this mess this time... Perhaps, a solution that includes contributions from both Myanmar and Bangladesh...

The refugee crisis of 2015 has actually dented the image of entire ASEAN...

ASEAN is a good economic platform. But they perform poorly in security.

I dont know where you guys shooting at? Sovereignty is a vague word.
You cant just deny a ethnic group with the minimum human rights and chasing them away, even suggesting to deport them to 3rd country en-mass. Only the rogue state will resort to the term sovereignty when confronted.

International community have every right in 21st century to intervene diplomatically, economically and even militarily if such rights are violated. We dont live in medieval monarchic Europe anymore where this Non Intervention term was invented by the monarchs themselves to cover each other's a$$.

@madokafc knows very well how international community helped East Timuri for their plight in Indonesia. Indonesia could not hide behind sovereignty. Could they?

Sovereignty is important in the sense that any country need a form of space to build itself and run its own affairs. The international community can at best suggest. But they can speak in other words. Nobody in the international community wants military rule, especially the Americans (and for good reason). I'm saying so because the American dollar is the dominant currency and most stable. But, economic sanctions had little effect on Burma's ethnic problems. As far as I see, it only increased their problems. Massive unemployment, a military government, ethnic tensions, a thriving drug trade and illegal trade of precious stones.

I don't know about East Timor. I guess the Indonesians didn't want anything to do with it for any longer. If memory serves, there was a UN mandated referendum. It was not like the Indonesians were forced to allow it to happen. Something that the Indians would never do in Kashmir.

And I'd suppose the international community as in the UN? Well, they have spoken on the issue. Even Obama went there and spoke on the matter. But not even he can solve it. Only suggest. And even that may be offensive/rude depending on how 'nationalistic' one can be. Personally, I think of far-right nationalism as a severe form of mental disorder.

Ask yourself, why do you think the League of Nations and then the UN were created in first place? Do you recall Archduke Franz Ferdinand? Once upon a time, he was visiting the wounded victims of a grenade attack where he was the intended target. And just because the driver of his car made the wrong turn and his vehicle's engine stalled, he and his wife were assassinated by Serbian revolutionary Gavrilo Princip. This lead to Austria-Hungary declaring war on Gavrilo's home country, Germany declaring war on Russia followed by France and Belgium. In turn, the UK declared war on Germany - WWI. A chain of events generated just because some dude's car stalled in the middle of a road in some bad part of town.

The UN were created so that world wars are prevented out of such small events. It was created to keep that peace, not necessarily solve a country's ethnic problems. Look at South Sudan for example. Messed up right? But no one is militarily intervening. The UN peacekeepers are there just to help negotiate the peace between the parties. Keeping the peace is the UN's job.

Now, you might recall the Balkan wars, but they had intervene to prevent a world war from ever happening. After all, it was the actions of a Serb that brought us WWI, WWII, tensions in the middle east and.....here. Iraq and Syria were catastrophic failures. Those alone may lead to more events. Very unpredictable ones.

Now there's a killer on the loose which no one can hope to catch. Even more elusive than OBL. This killer can inspire anyone to do acts like what Gavrilo Princip did anywhere around the globe. We need to catch this killer - and that should be top priority. Or at least, guard ourselves.

See, much of the history of the 20th century had been dominated by the West. Asia never really had much of a chance. Which is why we need to be very, very careful.

What surprised me was that there had been no action, no protest, not even a single word from the Burmese with regards to what happened to that police station. Given that the Rohingyas are illegals from Bangladesh (in their perception), that is a very serious matter. Our government had (thankfully) offered assistance to them. But all I hear is silence. We know for a fact that if anything like that had gone on in India, there would have been some sort of retaliation against Pakistan. Even words worked! But not with Burma. Strange don't you think? That country won't allow any UN observers in the regions close to the Chinese border where heavy fighting had been reported.

Like I said, in this day and age and an upcoming POTUS with a temper issue and technically unsound, we need to thread very carefully. We need to show our credibility by providing results in this war. And not just stay quiet.. We cannot count on anyone or anything as far as our security goes. It is only us.

Even though I disagree with much of our government, I think our Madam Prime Minister had handled the matter well for now. But we need to do more.

more Muslim in Indonesia is caring about Ahok case than the plight of Rohingya. Is the FACT

Some mayor who had allegedly engaged is blasphemy? So you admit that there are indeed quite a few deluded Islamic bigots in your country? The human mind is a dangerous thing.

 

[Mo12]

Do you think Indonesia will take some of the Rohingya muslims to their country?

 

[TopCat]

Do you think Indonesia will take some of the Rohingya muslims to their country?

NO. Why should any country facilitate ethnic cleansing.
Look at the Israel now. If everybody else encouraged Palestinian to leave then Palestine would had become a history and Muslim would had lost control of Al-Aqsa mosque the third holiest place for Muslim.

 

[Mo12]

NO. Why should any country facilitate ethnic cleansing.
Look at the Israel now. If everybody else encouraged Palestinian to leave then Palestine would had become a history and Muslim would had lost control of Al-Aqsa mosque the third holiest place for Muslim.

well india cany cope with more immigrants, we are already the most populated country in the world and get plnty of bangladeshis coming to india

 

[TopCat]

well india cany cope with more immigrants, we are already the most populated country in the world and get plnty of bangladeshis coming to india

You should put them in the refugee camp so that we can see.

 

[Mo12]

You should put them in the refugee camp so that we can see.

india politicians are to busy in making money via corruption, so that cant be done sadly

 

[TopCat]

india politicians are to busy in making money via corruption, so that cant be done sadly

Then live with it.