What's new

Indirect admission by US generals on support to Rouge groups in syria

AZADPAKISTAN2009

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
37,669
Reaction score
68
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Pretext of the discussion:
US government Official is questioning the logic of anti Assad forces (Weapon's supply) , that also include group which Turkey may consider anti Turkey (Inadvertidly mentions "KURDS" at 2:15)

Knowing very well that once Russia/ Turkey / Syria / Iran will take a stance there is no strategy
Quite an interesting eye opener

I was shocked
An actual debate/questioning of logic behind supporting the initiative with no planning


Thoughts by Turkish members/ Russians or Iranains

Mr Graham a very logical articulate man in his thinking and makes sense what he say why incite a war when you have no planning to the big sh*it that will fall after, the worry and passion in tha Senator is quite real , and justifiable

I would certainly like to see view point from Pro Erodgan vs None Pro Erodgan members

Similarly would be nice to see some views from Iranians and Russian

  • I think if you take a step back and then view the whole Syrian conflict in last 2-3 years really makes one think , just to topple Assad one man's government

Similarly would be intersting to hear from feedback from arab members , their argument has always been , well Russia the bad wolf but looks like its is not the Russians arming the rouges
And even Iran does not appear to be the main issue here - Thoughts Is the conflict still viewed as a Sactarian issue ?

Should Syria demand $$$ for the damages to its country in International Court ?
 
Last edited:
.
The minute Russia walked into Syria, it became a no-go zone for the Americans.

Plus the rebels the US is supporting are fighting on multiple fronts, much more than Assad. So they are stuck fighting ISIL more than Assad. That's why Assad was able to focus on Aleppo.
 
.
SS3vcCz.jpg
 
.
The minute Russia walked into Syria, it became a no-go zone for the Americans.

Plus the rebels the US is supporting are fighting on multiple fronts, much more than Assad. So they are stuck fighting ISIL more than Assad. That's why Assad was able to focus on Aleppo.

I would have chosen to say "The minute US stood there and watched Russia waltz into Syria" it became a no go.

And RTE retorik against Assad (with spit and foam coming out of his mouth like a zealot) didn't help our standing in the ME much.

I am thinking that RTE was so sure that the west would go into Syria with arms, soldiers etc. that he jumped in front of the line to "lead" by example and look at where it brought us.

A Euraphrate Shield plan they're implementing without support only beneficial for the western world.

They could have just let ppl go through Turkey and we'd not have the same amount of problems. it'd be Europes problem.
 
.
no planning

o_O

no not unplanned.. its with full knowledge and full purpose..

hey its not a war on terrorism its a war on islam.. even the name terrorism is selected to denounce islam and to let the stupids not see it..

russia, US, EU everything is the same coin but different perspectives/sides..
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom