What's new

India's role in making of Mukti Bahini, the forgotten terrorists

You are viewing RSS with the same lens as political Islam lens which is wrong. RSS is pan Indian cultural org open to all religions. It is anti Pak not anti Muslim. It is a great and gentle org which is being slandered by those scared of it


Pak army created the problem in BD
This is detritus.

RSS routinely targets Indian Muslims. Why even lie about that?
 
This is detritus.

RSS routinely targets Indian Muslims. Why even lie about that?
No, they don't. RSS has muslims in its organization's and quite a sizeable number. RSS just says that the soul of India is hindu which is a point of view no different from two nation theory of Pakistan. They have never killed people or sent terror across the borders. Some Indian politicians are scared because if Rss manages to unite the country then their business will be closed.
 
No, they don't. RSS has muslims in its organization's and quite a sizeable number. RSS just says that the soul of India is hindu which is a point of view no different from two nation theory of Pakistan. They have never killed people or sent terror across the borders. Some Indian politicians are scared because if Rss manages to unite the country then their business will be closed.
You damn idiot. Some Jews helped Hitler. That doesn't make the Nazis any less antisemitic.

You are correct though that RSS or its political arm - the BJP - never killed people or sent terror across the border, at least insofar as what we have documented evidence of. A crow doesn't count as people. Abhinandan is hardly terrifying.
 
This liar says RSS is open to all religion, this must be why their agents are lynching muslims for alleged cow theft.
The same tactic was used by the Nazis and by current White supremecists: repeat the lie, till everyone believes.

Reality is that, if measured by usual standards, RSS is a terror organization which has been banned several times in the past.
 
You damn idiot. Some Jews helped Hitler. That doesn't make the Nazis any less antisemitic.

You are correct though that RSS or its political arm - the BJP - never killed people or sent terror across the border, at least insofar as what we have documented evidence of. A crow doesn't count as people. Abhinandan is hardly terrifying.
It's a really silly and stupid argument that IK started of equating RSS with nazism because it has diluted every content of his intention in the international forum. Firstly nazism is about race. Aryans and semitic people. Here there is no race invloved. Second he wanted to eliminate Jews. Here RSS is merely asking muslims to assimilate to India culture not even asking them to convert. A propaganda about Ross was started by Indian left politicians which was false and IK fell into that trap of falsely accusing RSS which has nothing to do with Kashmir. Anyways continue.. no problems with me.
 
It's a really silly and stupid argument that IK started of equating RSS with nazism because it has diluted every content of his intention in the international forum. Firstly nazism is about race. Aryans and semitic people. Here there is no race invloved. Second he wanted to eliminate Jews. Here RSS is merely asking muslims to assimilate to India culture not even asking them to convert. A propaganda about Ross was started by Indian left politicians which was false and IK fell into that trap of falsely accusing RSS which has nothing to do with Kashmir. Anyways continue.. no problems with me.
I don't care what ik said or didn't say. I'm telling you what I think, not what ik thinks or says.

Regarding your obfuscation over "race", all that matters is that a specific group of people is targeted by RSS sanghees. Hence the analogy with Nazism is acceptable. The analogy relates to methods, underlying tactics and goals. Whether a race or religious group is targeted is irrelevant. In any case, many would argue that the use of "Hindu" doesn't relate to a monolithic "religious group" per se. Early Islamic chroniclers used the term "Hindu" for all non-monotheistic religious devotees of the "land of Hind" - that early descriptor has more or less held true ...as per RSS's own propaganda.
 
I don't care what ik said or didn't say. I'm telling you what I think, not what ik thinks or says.

Regarding your obfuscation over "race", all that matters is that a specific group of people is targeted by RSS sanghees. Hence the analogy with Nazism is acceptable. The analogy relates to methods, underlying tactics and goals. Whether a race or religious group is targeted is irrelevant. In any case, many would argue that the use of "Hindu" doesn't relate to a monolithic "religious group" per se. Early Islamic chroniclers used the term "Hindu" for all non-monotheistic religious devotees of the "land of Hind" - that early descriptor has more or less held true ...as per RSS's own propaganda.
Look, if you want to say what you think then do so. But stop ranting. Repeat of falsehoods doesn't make it factually correct.
 
Claim innocent all you want. Kargil fiasco, bleed by thousand cuts policy, terrorists arrested in US in connection with terror attacks in India. says a different story.


Nothing, RSS and BJP had only one wish to make the region into a full fledged state just like the rest of us. They got the mandate, they did exactly that. Either everything will go apeshit or things will get better. My money is on the later.

That capturing also happened in 71, saved 90000 men of you from the angry Bongs who wanted to court martial you for an alleged 3million genocide.
Thank Field Marshall Sam Manekshaw(RIP).
Another myth by indian i think you been reading alot of hindu terrorist books it was not 90000 40 some thousands including civilians and kids which india had to return cuz we have no habbit to hit even our enemy from back other wise we cud take whole Kashmir in 61 when chines was diggin indian hard with humiliation.
any ways if Hafiz saeed wins election dont cry cuz RSS is open terrorist and as narinder mody who admitted killing innocent muslims of gujrat. Now Kashmir i am not sure which state is going to suffer after.
india is running by butcher and terrorists.
 
Another myth by indian i think you been reading alot of hindu terrorist books it was not 90000 40 some thousands including civilians and kids which india had to return cuz we have no habbit to hit even our enemy from back other wise we cud take whole Kashmir in 61 when chines was diggin indian hard with humiliation.
any ways if Hafiz saeed wins election dont cry cuz RSS is open terrorist and as narinder mody who admitted killing innocent muslims of gujrat. Now Kashmir i am not sure which state is going to suffer after.
india is running by butcher and terrorists.
Pakistan put up a stamp (in 1971-2) saying there are 90000 POWs. Maybe there was more, given numbers and you don't go hand in hand. As for China, how long can you ride on someone else's victory. Fact is you didn't fight, when you fought IA you didn't win anything.
Hafiz Saeed is a global terrorist now and LeT and HM are in sanctions list. Neither RSS nor any Parivar group are in such an embarrassing list.
 
Pakistan put up a stamp (in 1971-2) saying there are 90000 POWs. Maybe there was more, given numbers and you don't go hand in hand. As for China, how long can you ride on someone else's victory. Fact is you didn't fight, when you fought IA you didn't win anything.
Hafiz Saeed is a global terrorist now and LeT and HM are in sanctions list. Neither RSS nor any Parivar group are in such an embarrassing list.
oh thats what you think tripple the size of the enemy and cudnt come inch in we are holding you other side despite the wish of yours akhand bharat you are staying where you are. we never celebrate china's victory but we admire what they did to you.
so did we make you get on your knees in 65 and kargil after 65 india have no way to attack Pakistan directly so they use bangali capture pow including women and kids who knows they even 100 thousands or more it actually good thing happen to Pakistan we know india tht if you guys become sweet you would not be less than poison even to each other. A nation who selected terrorist as PM imagin their values.
 
oh thats what you think tripple the size of the enemy and cudnt come inch in we are holding you other side despite the wish of yours akhand bharat you are staying where you are. we never celebrate china's victory but we admire what they did to you.
so did we make you get on your knees in 65 and kargil after 65 india have no way to attack Pakistan directly so they use bangali capture pow including women and kids who knows they even 100 thousands or more it actually good thing happen to Pakistan we know india tht if you guys become sweet you would not be less than poison even to each other. A nation who selected terrorist as PM imagin their values.
That's one way to put it. Or you divided India into India and Pakistan, we divided Pakistan into Bangladesh and Pakistan. Whichever way you want to see it. Put a ring on 'two' nation theory.
In 65 you came to take over Kashmir ended up defending Punjab from Indian invasion. Rest of India bashing in poor English do not command a reply, in all honesty it's incomprehensible.
 
we divided Pakistan into Bangladesh and Pakistan.

Bengalis did most of the work, Hindus just piggybacked on the efforts of other Muslims.

In 65 you came to take over Kashmir

The war started on the 6th of September when India crossed the IB, get it right and don't engage in historical revisionism by pushing the date back to events that occurred prior.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom