What's new

India's richest corner 73 percent of wealth: Oxfam

BDforever

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
14,387
Reaction score
8
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
New Delhi, India - Up to 670 million Indians, who comprise the poorest half of the population, saw just one percent increase in their wealth while the richest one percent cornered 73 percent of the national income generated in the country last year, according to anti-poverty charity Oxfam.

"The wealth of the elite 1 percent increased by 20913 billion rupees [$327bn], equivalent to the total budget of the Indian government last financial year," Oxfam said in its report published on Monday.

Indian billionaires' wealth increased by $76.5bn (₹4891bn) - from $247bn (₹15,778bn) to over $324bn (₹20,676bn) - making the country one of the most unequal in the world, the report said.

"It is one percent versus the rest. This is nothing short of loot. That's why you are seeing starvation deaths in India," Nikhil Dey, rights-activist and founder of a workers group, MKSS, told Al Jazeera.

"At best, those in power are saying one thing and doing another. At worst, their only deliberate concern is about the generation and pocketing of wealth for people in power.

"The rich are being subsidised in India in every which way ... . The poor are not being allowed to function. Land is being taken over, employment does not exist, schools are being privatised. You can't have 73 percent of wealth in the hands of one percent."

The report was released as Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, flew to Switzerland to woo global investors at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Modi, who is being accompanied by the finance and commerce ministers, was scheduled to host a dinner for global industry bosses from 18 countries on Monday night, according to the Indian Express newspaper.

Worsening inequality
Overall global inequality figures further worsened according to the Oxfam report, with the richest one percent cornering 82 percent of the wealth created last year.

Activists and development economists are worried at the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the rich in India. Last year, 58 percent of national income went to India's richest one percent.

"It is a direct result of these neo-liberal policies whose modus operandi is to pamper the rich in the name of achieving higher growth," Prabhat Patnaik, professor emeritus at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, told Al Jazeera.

COUNTING THE COST: The challenge of economic inequality (25:00)


"But the growth that occurs is accompanied by the absolute impoverishment of large numbers. Such inequalities undermine the foundations of modern India and its survival as a secular democratic republic."

Oxfam said the figures suggest that "approximately two-thirds of billionaire wealth is the product of inheritance, monopoly and cronyism".

The report, Reward Work Not Wealth, blames the race to the bottom between countries on tax and on wages as a top contributor to deepening inequality, along with the crushing of workers' rights.

"It would take around 17.5 days for the best-paid executive at a top Indian garment company to earn what a minimum wage worker in rural India will earn in their lifetime (presuming 50 years at work)," Oxfam said.

Falling short
Since taking office in 2014, the Modi government has announced schemes to increase spending on infrastructure, including ports and roads, to boost economic growth.

But it has fared poorly in combating poverty, say critics.

"The Indian government’s efforts at reducing inequality and combating poverty faster are woefully inadequate. It needs to stop the super-rich and the corporates from continuing to rob India of its wealth," Nisha Agrawal, CEO of Oxfam India, told Al Jazeera.

The government needs to "invest more in agriculture; and implementing fully the social protection schemes (such as rural job scheme and the Food Security Act) that already exist."

COUNTING THE COST: Higher retirement age vs lower pensions (06:37)


India's wealth inequality also contributes to lack of access to quality medical care for the poor.

Those living on $2 a day have a mortality rate three times the global average, according to the Oxfam report.

"Healthcare spending during accidents or emergencies for low-income households often means a reduction in the consumption of food or other basic needs that can push people below the extreme poverty line," the report warns.

India's health budget is at 1.15 percent of the country's GDP, one of the lowest proportions in the world.

Oxfam India on Monday urged Modi to tax the super-rich and ensure that the Indian economy "works for everyone and not just the fortunate few".

In an online survey conducted by Oxfam, 73 percent Indians said they wanted "the gap between the rich and poor to be addressed very urgently".

Global wealth databook
In the survey with a sample size of 11,000 Indians, a majority of respondents said CEOs should accept pay cuts up to 60 percent.

Oxfam said it used calculations to compare returns to shareholders and CEO compensation with returns to ordinary workers for its analysis.

It used data from Credit Suisse's annual Global Wealth Databook and the Forbes billionaires list.

India lifted 120 million people from extreme poverty between 1990 and 2013, according to the World Bank. However, one out of two Indians remain vulnerable to falling back into poverty, it says.

India's march to reducing poverty has been significantly slower compared to neighbouring China. Over the same 1990-2013 period, China reduced the number of people living in extreme poverty from 756 million to 25 million.

"The message in the Oxfam report is not new. The main question is: Is the government willing to acknowledge the message?" Reetika Khera, Development Economist at the Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, told Al Jazeera.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS
 
.
Dumb article.

India is a democracy and makes populist budgets every year.
 
.
New Delhi, India - Up to 670 million Indians, who comprise the poorest half of the population, saw just one percent increase in their wealth while the richest one percent cornered 73 percent of the national income generated in the country last year, according to anti-poverty charity Oxfam.

"The wealth of the elite 1 percent increased by 20913 billion rupees [$327bn], equivalent to the total budget of the Indian government last financial year," Oxfam said in its report published on Monday.

Indian billionaires' wealth increased by $76.5bn (₹4891bn) - from $247bn (₹15,778bn) to over $324bn (₹20,676bn) - making the country one of the most unequal in the world, the report said.

"It is one percent versus the rest. This is nothing short of loot. That's why you are seeing starvation deaths in India," Nikhil Dey, rights-activist and founder of a workers group, MKSS, told Al Jazeera.

"At best, those in power are saying one thing and doing another. At worst, their only deliberate concern is about the generation and pocketing of wealth for people in power.

"The rich are being subsidised in India in every which way ... . The poor are not being allowed to function. Land is being taken over, employment does not exist, schools are being privatised. You can't have 73 percent of wealth in the hands of one percent."



Activists and development economists are worried at the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the rich in India. Last year, 58 percent of national income went to India's richest one percent.





India's march to reducing poverty has been significantly slower compared to neighbouring China. Over the same 1990-2013 period, China reduced the number of people living in extreme poverty from 756 million to 25 million.


SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS


Unbelievable. I cant even imagine. This raises serious questions of development in india. Whats the use of good economy if more than half the wealth is going to just 1 percent elite of the country.

Dumb article.

India is a democracy and makes populist budgets every year.
So everything you dont like is dumb. Well done folks.
 
. . .
So everything you dont like is dumb. Well done folks.

What's there not to like? The fact is the rich will make money, the poor won't. Fact of life.

But the Indian govt exists to make the rich poor and the poor rich, and they do a damn crappy job at that. There's nothing to it.

Whether you are poor or rich, your vote counts as one. And if there are more poor than rich, then the govt is going to focus on getting the votes of the poor. That's why the govt makes populist policies, ie, policies that favour the poor at the expense of the rich. This is common sense.
 
.
What's there not to like? The fact is the rich will make money, the poor won't. Fact of life.

But the Indian govt exists to make the rich poor and the poor rich, and they do a damn crappy job at that. There's nothing to it.

Whether you are poor or rich, your vote counts as one. And if there are more poor than rich, then the govt is going to focus on getting the votes of the poor. That's why the govt makes populist policies, ie, policies that favour the poor at the expense of the rich. This is common sense.

I dont understand what your point is. I wouldnt expect you to a defend this inequality. Perhaps you are trying to explain the reason behind this gap. Having said that dont you think that it will be a problem for india in the future if everybody is not included in the progress , if the money remains in the hand of just 1 percent. You are smart enough I ll leave that for you to decide. However if you want to ignore this and are happy with affairs, good luck.

What's there not to like? The fact is the rich will make money, the poor won't. Fact of life.

.

This not a fact, its your opinion my friend.
 
. .
I dont understand what your point is. I wouldnt expect you to a defend this inequality. Perhaps you are trying to explain the reason behind this gap. Having said that dont you think that it will be a problem for india in the future if everybody is not included in the progress , if the money remains in the hand of just 1 percent. You are smart enough I ll leave that for you to decide. However if you want to ignore this and are happy with affairs, good luck.

India's inequality is barely anything compared to many other countries.

2014_Gini_Index_World_Map%2C_income_inequality_distribution_by_country_per_World_Bank.svg


This not a fact, its your opinion my friend.

Fact: Only the rich make money. If you are poor, then you are not not making money, that's why you are poor. Hence "rich will make money, the poor won't".

It's the way middle class is defined that's really an opinion.

No, it's called inequality.
Inequality does not exist in democracy?

The problem is not inequality, it's the opinions in the article. Stuff like the rich are being subsidized and other nonsense. They think the rich have to be taxed more for no reason and the govt is making anti-poor policies, both of which are wrong.

The govt has been making pro-poor policies for decades. The poverty rate has decreased from 80% of the population since independence to less than 13%.

The voices in the article are Marxist. A failed system.

The best system is where the middle class and the rich are taxed less and incentivised more to consume more or invest in the economy. That's why the govt is trying to abolish personal income tax in India.

You don't remove inequality by making rich people poor.
 
.
India's inequality is barely anything compared to many other countries.

2014_Gini_Index_World_Map%2C_income_inequality_distribution_by_country_per_World_Bank.svg




Fact: Only the rich make money. If you are poor, then you are not not making money, that's why you are poor. Hence "rich will make money, the poor won't".

It's the way middle class is defined that's really an opinion.



The problem is not inequality, it's the opinions in the article. Stuff like the rich are being subsidized and other nonsense. They think the rich have to be taxed more for no reason and the govt is making anti-poor policies, both of which are wrong.

The govt has been making pro-poor policies for decades. The poverty rate has decreased from 80% of the population since independence to less than 13%.

The voices in the article are Marxist. A failed system.

The best system is where the middle class and the rich are taxed less and incentivised more to consume more or invest in the economy. That's why the govt is trying to abolish personal income tax in India.

You don't remove inequality by making rich people poor.

There are 1.6 billion people living in multidimensional poverty across the world and nearly 440 million of them are in eight large Indian states, according to a new analysis using a unique index developed at the University of Oxford.

The eight Indian states that have similar number of poor as in 25 African countries are Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Odisha, Rajasthan and West Bengal. The poorest region in south Asia is Bihar, the analysis states.

In 2010, the Oxford analysis had concluded that there were more poor in India than in sub-Saharan Africa. Its 2014 analysis said the largest number of people classified as ‘destitute’ among developing countries was in India.

Sabina Alkire, director of the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, told Hindustan Times on Thursday that the least poor Indian states according to the global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) in 2015 remained the same as in the 2010 analysis.

They are: Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Mizoram, Goa and Delhi.

The 2015 analysis is based on the last available data from India, Alkire said, and added that as per poverty estimation of seven south Asian countries, Afghanistan is the poorest, followed by India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka.

“Our measure of destitution, which identifies a subset of poor people as destitute if they experience a number of extreme deprivations like severe malnutrition, losing two children, having all primary-aged school children out of school, and using open defecation,” she said.

The destitution results for South Asia “are significant”, Alkire said. Afghanistan has the highest rate of destitution of 38%, followed by India at a “troubling” 28.5% (over 340 million people).

“But interestingly Bangladesh has much lower rate of destitution than either Nepal or Pakistan, showing that the country has alleviated the worst forms of deprivations,” she added.

“As the UN prepares to adopt 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) this September, which will determine the development agenda for the next 15 years, our findings serve as a powerful reminder of the extent of poverty reduction challenge ahead and the need for an energetic and coordinated response,” Alkire said.

The MPI is unique in capturing the simultaneous disadvantages experienced by poor people, such as malnutrition, education and sanitation, to provide a high-resolution lens on their lives. If people are deprived in one-third or more of ten (weighted) indicators, they are identified as MPI-poor.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...-on-poverty/story-ys7Oths8HIzK21WWdB8AnL.html
 
.
There are 1.6 billion people living in multidimensional poverty across the world and nearly 440 million of them are in eight large Indian states, according to a new analysis using a unique index developed at the University of Oxford.

The eight Indian states that have similar number of poor as in 25 African countries are Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Odisha, Rajasthan and West Bengal. The poorest region in south Asia is Bihar, the analysis states.

In 2010, the Oxford analysis had concluded that there were more poor in India than in sub-Saharan Africa. Its 2014 analysis said the largest number of people classified as ‘destitute’ among developing countries was in India.

Sabina Alkire, director of the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, told Hindustan Times on Thursday that the least poor Indian states according to the global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) in 2015 remained the same as in the 2010 analysis.

They are: Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Mizoram, Goa and Delhi.

The 2015 analysis is based on the last available data from India, Alkire said, and added that as per poverty estimation of seven south Asian countries, Afghanistan is the poorest, followed by India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka.

“Our measure of destitution, which identifies a subset of poor people as destitute if they experience a number of extreme deprivations like severe malnutrition, losing two children, having all primary-aged school children out of school, and using open defecation,” she said.

The destitution results for South Asia “are significant”, Alkire said. Afghanistan has the highest rate of destitution of 38%, followed by India at a “troubling” 28.5% (over 340 million people).

“But interestingly Bangladesh has much lower rate of destitution than either Nepal or Pakistan, showing that the country has alleviated the worst forms of deprivations,” she added.

“As the UN prepares to adopt 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) this September, which will determine the development agenda for the next 15 years, our findings serve as a powerful reminder of the extent of poverty reduction challenge ahead and the need for an energetic and coordinated response,” Alkire said.

The MPI is unique in capturing the simultaneous disadvantages experienced by poor people, such as malnutrition, education and sanitation, to provide a high-resolution lens on their lives. If people are deprived in one-third or more of ten (weighted) indicators, they are identified as MPI-poor.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...-on-poverty/story-ys7Oths8HIzK21WWdB8AnL.html

The central states of India are the most populous and also the most poor. The worst news that you hear out of India also comes from this region.

It's because social governance was mostly handed over to states and some states made better policies than others.

“But interestingly Bangladesh has much lower rate of destitution than either Nepal or Pakistan, showing that the country has alleviated the worst forms of deprivations,” she added.

Obvious, isn't it? Bangladesh has focused on economic growth. The country is weaker than Pakistan by any margin, but the country is far more respected and is capable of even keeping great powers at bay due to sound policies.

Pakistan, otoh, has little to no international respect. A lot of money is spent on the military and internal security instead of economic growth. And governance is very poor.
 
.
The central states of India are the most populous and also the most poor. The worst news that you hear out of India also comes from this region.

It's because social governance was mostly handed over to states and some states made better policies than others.



Obvious, isn't it? Bangladesh has focused on economic growth. The country is weaker than Pakistan by any margin, but the country is far more respected and is capable of even keeping great powers at bay due to sound policies.

Pakistan, otoh, has little to no international respect. A lot of money is spent on the military and internal security instead of economic growth. And governance is very poor.

Seems like Africa nations have better public policy compared to India :)

SUPA POWER
 
.
This means if India's GNI in 2016 is approx $2.4 Trillion (assuming $150 billion earned abroad, not sure about actual) and 73% is bagged by 1% then the rest of 99% get $648 billion.

So, the average person in these 99% must be getting about $494/year or INR 31505/year and that figure seems quite alarming because it translate to much bigger percentage of population bellow poverty line. (Based on given figure, an average family should be getting around INR 13000/Month)

PS: Either Oxfam figure is wrong or situation is indeed very bad there. Can someone confirm what is minimum wages there?
 
Last edited:
.
The central states of India are the most populous and also the most poor. The worst news that you hear out of India also comes from this region.

It's because social governance was mostly handed over to states and some states made better policies than others.



Obvious, isn't it? Bangladesh has focused on economic growth. The country is weaker than Pakistan by any margin, but the country is far more respected and is capable of even keeping great powers at bay due to sound policies.

Pakistan, otoh, has little to no international respect. A lot of money is spent on the military and internal security instead of economic growth. And governance is very poor.
All bla bla bla . Bangladesh is bad Pakistan is worse, however india is super power. What non sense!!

There are 1.6 billion people living in multidimensional poverty across the world and nearly 440 million of them are in eight large Indian states, according to a new analysis using a unique index developed at the University of Oxford.

The eight Indian states that have similar number of poor as in 25 African countries are Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Odisha, Rajasthan and West Bengal. The poorest region in south Asia is Bihar, the analysis states.

In 2010, the Oxford analysis had concluded that there were more poor in India than in sub-Saharan Africa. Its 2014 analysis said the largest number of people classified as ‘destitute’ among developing countries was in India.

Sabina Alkire, director of the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, told Hindustan Times on Thursday that the least poor Indian states according to the global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) in 2015 remained the same as in the 2010 analysis.

They are: Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Mizoram, Goa and Delhi.

The 2015 analysis is based on the last available data from India, Alkire said, and added that as per poverty estimation of seven south Asian countries, Afghanistan is the poorest, followed by India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka.

“Our measure of destitution, which identifies a subset of poor people as destitute if they experience a number of extreme deprivations like severe malnutrition, losing two children, having all primary-aged school children out of school, and using open defecation,” she said.

The destitution results for South Asia “are significant”, Alkire said. Afghanistan has the highest rate of destitution of 38%, followed by India at a “troubling” 28.5% (over 340 million people).

“But interestingly Bangladesh has much lower rate of destitution than either Nepal or Pakistan, showing that the country has alleviated the worst forms of deprivations,” she added.

“As the UN prepares to adopt 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) this September, which will determine the development agenda for the next 15 years, our findings serve as a powerful reminder of the extent of poverty reduction challenge ahead and the need for an energetic and coordinated response,” Alkire said.

The MPI is unique in capturing the simultaneous disadvantages experienced by poor people, such as malnutrition, education and sanitation, to provide a high-resolution lens on their lives. If people are deprived in one-third or more of ten (weighted) indicators, they are identified as MPI-poor.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...-on-poverty/story-ys7Oths8HIzK21WWdB8AnL.html
Another slap on so called self claimed super power.
 
.
Seems like Africa nations have better public policy compared to India :)

SUPA POWER

I would recommend comparing Africa's economic conditions along with the combined military and scientific strength of Africa in comparison to India.

We used to be as poor and uneducated as Africa. We have 10 times less land. We have had multiple major wars. Look where we are headed now.

Superpower is right, but I would recommend getting the spelling right.

This means if India's GNI in 2016 is approx $2.4 Trillion (assuming $150 billion earned abroad, not sure about actual) and 73% is bagged by 1% then the rest of 99% get $648 billion.

So, the average person in these 99% must be getting about $494/year or INR 31505/year and that figure seems quite alarming because it translate to much bigger percentage of population bellow poverty line. (Based on given figure, an average family should be getting around INR 13000/Month)

PS: Either Oxfam figure is wrong or situation is indeed very bad there. Can someone confirm what is minimum wages there?

It's referring to 73% of the growth, not the entire GNI.

If GNI is $2.4T. We saw 7.1 growth, which means growth is about $165B. So 73% of the 165B, or 120B went to the 1%. The rest represented $45B.

Most of the growth was cornered by the rich, which is typical in any economy.

All bla bla bla . Bangladesh is bad Pakistan is worse, however india is super power. What non sense!!

Quite accurate. India was poorer than Pakistan in the 60s and 70s.

Bangladesh was also poorer than Pakistan. Now they are higher.

Another slap on so called self claimed super power.

We have 30 states. I would recommend googling Maharashtra's figures and comparing them with Pakistan's.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom