What's new

India's press freedom rank slips below Pakistan, Afghanistan to an abysmal 161


"In India, media takeovers by oligarchs close to Prime Minister Modi have jeopardised pluralism," the report said while referring to NDTV's takeover by the Adani group.

The report states that though India has a huge media presence of over 10,000 newspapers and almost 400 TV channels, the ownership is concentrated in the hands of a few media groups.

While referring to the legal framework, the report stated that the charges of defamation, sedition, contempt of court and endangering national security were increasingly used against media outlets and journalists critical of the government. The arrest of Malayali journalist Sidique Kaappan is a case in point.

These repeated violations undermine media self-regulatory bodies, such as the Press Council of India (PCI) and the Electronic Media Monitoring Centre (EMMC), the report stated.

The report also slams the mainstream media for lack of representation. “For example, fewer than 15 per cent of the participants in major evening talk shows are women,” it said.


In the World Press Freedom Index report, each country or territory’s score is evaluated using five contextual indicators that reflect the press freedom situation in all of its complexity: political context, legal framework, economic context, sociocultural context and safety. India falls in the red zone for three out of the five indicators.

Political

Political context evaluates the degree of support and respect for media autonomy vis-à-vis political pressure from the state. India falls in the 'very serious range' for this indicator with its rank dropping from 145 to 169 in this category.

Legal

Legal framework refers to the level of censorship, access to information, ability to protest sources and penalty for violence against journalists.

India's ranking has dropped from 149 to 155 in this category and the indicator falls in the red zone of 'very serious'.



Economic

Economic context includes the difficulty of creating or maintaining a media outlet and constraints linked to non-state actors and the ability to promote business interests. Falling in the 'difficult' range, India's ranking has dropped from 120 to 144 for this indicator.

Social

Sociocultural context includes attacks on press issues such as gender, class, ethnicity and religion; and pressure to not question certain interest groups or power groups.

With a drop from 127 to 143, the country's index has shifted from the 'problematic' range to 'difficult' for this indicator.

Safety


Safety is the ability to identify, gather and disseminate news and information in accordance with journalistic methods and ethics, without unnecessary risk of bodily harm, psychological or emotional distress, or professional harm.

Falling in the red zone of 'very serious', India ranks among the bottom 10 countries when it comes to the safety of journalists. The rank has dropped from 163 to 172 for the indicator.
 

"In India, media takeovers by oligarchs close to Prime Minister Modi have jeopardised pluralism," the report said while referring to NDTV's takeover by the Adani group.

The report states that though India has a huge media presence of over 10,000 newspapers and almost 400 TV channels, the ownership is concentrated in the hands of a few media groups.

While referring to the legal framework, the report stated that the charges of defamation, sedition, contempt of court and endangering national security were increasingly used against media outlets and journalists critical of the government. The arrest of Malayali journalist Sidique Kaappan is a case in point.

These repeated violations undermine media self-regulatory bodies, such as the Press Council of India (PCI) and the Electronic Media Monitoring Centre (EMMC), the report stated.

The report also slams the mainstream media for lack of representation. “For example, fewer than 15 per cent of the participants in major evening talk shows are women,” it said.


In the World Press Freedom Index report, each country or territory’s score is evaluated using five contextual indicators that reflect the press freedom situation in all of its complexity: political context, legal framework, economic context, sociocultural context and safety. India falls in the red zone for three out of the five indicators.

Political

Political context evaluates the degree of support and respect for media autonomy vis-à-vis political pressure from the state. India falls in the 'very serious range' for this indicator with its rank dropping from 145 to 169 in this category.

Legal

Legal framework refers to the level of censorship, access to information, ability to protest sources and penalty for violence against journalists.

India's ranking has dropped from 149 to 155 in this category and the indicator falls in the red zone of 'very serious'.



Economic

Economic context includes the difficulty of creating or maintaining a media outlet and constraints linked to non-state actors and the ability to promote business interests. Falling in the 'difficult' range, India's ranking has dropped from 120 to 144 for this indicator.

Social

Sociocultural context includes attacks on press issues such as gender, class, ethnicity and religion; and pressure to not question certain interest groups or power groups.

With a drop from 127 to 143, the country's index has shifted from the 'problematic' range to 'difficult' for this indicator.

Safety


Safety is the ability to identify, gather and disseminate news and information in accordance with journalistic methods and ethics, without unnecessary risk of bodily harm, psychological or emotional distress, or professional harm.

Falling in the red zone of 'very serious', India ranks among the bottom 10 countries when it comes to the safety of journalists. The rank has dropped from 163 to 172 for the indicator.
Yeah Afghanistan has better press freedom than India and oligarchs don't own media houses in the west :rofl:
 
Perfect. some new rankings are coming up to place India at 190 due to the left-liberal cabal. Indians laugh at these rankings.
Lol do you even live in India ? If you do you must be living under a rock. Only trustworthy news these days are from YouTube channels of journalists like Ravish kumar.
What's with your moniker, DP name, is it taken from Modi spelling of strength.

Harvard ki nahi hardwork ki jaroorat hai, another one liner jumla from him.

Master of jumlas.

On topic: Cross media channels with vested business interests are discouraged in west, US.??
yes, my display name is from that gaffe.
 
Why this report is allowed to be Published ?

strange !!

Something wrong somewhere. doesn't add up.
 

"In India, media takeovers by oligarchs close to Prime Minister Modi have jeopardised pluralism," the report said while referring to NDTV's takeover by the Adani group.

The report states that though India has a huge media presence of over 10,000 newspapers and almost 400 TV channels, the ownership is concentrated in the hands of a few media groups.

While referring to the legal framework, the report stated that the charges of defamation, sedition, contempt of court and endangering national security were increasingly used against media outlets and journalists critical of the government. The arrest of Malayali journalist Sidique Kaappan is a case in point.

These repeated violations undermine media self-regulatory bodies, such as the Press Council of India (PCI) and the Electronic Media Monitoring Centre (EMMC), the report stated.

The report also slams the mainstream media for lack of representation. “For example, fewer than 15 per cent of the participants in major evening talk shows are women,” it said.


In the World Press Freedom Index report, each country or territory’s score is evaluated using five contextual indicators that reflect the press freedom situation in all of its complexity: political context, legal framework, economic context, sociocultural context and safety. India falls in the red zone for three out of the five indicators.

Political

Political context evaluates the degree of support and respect for media autonomy vis-à-vis political pressure from the state. India falls in the 'very serious range' for this indicator with its rank dropping from 145 to 169 in this category.

Legal

Legal framework refers to the level of censorship, access to information, ability to protest sources and penalty for violence against journalists.

India's ranking has dropped from 149 to 155 in this category and the indicator falls in the red zone of 'very serious'.



Economic

Economic context includes the difficulty of creating or maintaining a media outlet and constraints linked to non-state actors and the ability to promote business interests. Falling in the 'difficult' range, India's ranking has dropped from 120 to 144 for this indicator.

Social

Sociocultural context includes attacks on press issues such as gender, class, ethnicity and religion; and pressure to not question certain interest groups or power groups.

With a drop from 127 to 143, the country's index has shifted from the 'problematic' range to 'difficult' for this indicator.

Safety


Safety is the ability to identify, gather and disseminate news and information in accordance with journalistic methods and ethics, without unnecessary risk of bodily harm, psychological or emotional distress, or professional harm.

Falling in the red zone of 'very serious', India ranks among the bottom 10 countries when it comes to the safety of journalists. The rank has dropped from 163 to 172 for the indicator.
Good.
All forms of news media should be controlled by the state.
 
Lol do you even live in India ? If you do you must be living under a rock. Only trustworthy news these days are from YouTube channels of journalists like Ravish kumar.

yes, my display name is from that gaffe.
LOL! ravish kumar went senile in the last few years. he is contradicting his statements of 2013 vs 2022 on the same topics, social media exposes are now available for this bigotry. His brother is a congress leader in the state of Bihar arrested for molesting/ raping a female. While Ravish shouts for every crime, he was silent on his brother's crime. Just another gold-plated journalist.

I am very much in India and have seen enough journalists who faked their neutrality in last 7-9Y.
 
But for some reason, they are deeply troubled when something gets published in the NYT or WaPo
They have to maintain a facade about it. But deep down their belief and that of their most hardcore supporters is that vast majority of the population is stupid and does not deserve or need freedom of speech. This is in line with what the Chinese think too, whom right wing folks secretly admire for their toughness. It was also the belief of conservative white elites who believed that less educated people should not have a right to vote.
 
Modi ji won’t care about the rankings but will send the taxmen to raid their offices and withdraw their license.

Rest Modi ji won’t care.
 
LOL! ravish kumar went senile in the last few years. he is contradicting his statements of 2013 vs 2022 on the same topics, social media exposes are now available for this bigotry. His brother is a congress leader in the state of Bihar arrested for molesting/ raping a female. While Ravish shouts for every crime, he was silent on his brother's crime. Just another gold-plated journalist.

I am very much in India and have seen enough journalists who faked their neutrality in last 7-9Y.
Congressis used to buy journos by giving them padma shri medals, you won't see pidis accepting that. For all the ills of BJP, congress and its ideology is much worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom