India's NRC is creating a refugee crisis for Bangladesh

[Ritual]

Essentially, India kept Kashmir and gave Sindh areas like Umerkot which was hindu majority but Pakistan did not want the indus river to be cut off by India via Sindh. It was a fair trade. Keeping additional muslims was extra burden on India. It would have been better if India gave away Kashmir and took back part of Sindh and done a full population exchange. Kashmir is too small a land to justify keeping such large muslim

I have read in numerous places that the areas of Sindh were in exchange for the Muslim majority areas of Punjab (Kapurthala, Ferozepur, Gurdaspur etc) that Radcliffe decided to give to India.

Bear in mind - Pakistan did not receive even one district that had a non Muslim majority in West Pakistan, but lost at least 4 to India.

See this map -

So nothing was given to Pakistan in exchange for Kashmir. By all logic Kashmir was a Muslim majority area bordering Pakistan and was bound to go to Pakistan.

Of course the idea it was acceded by the Dogra King, was completely negated by the accession of Junagadh to Pakistan which later snatched back by India.

But as others have so partition was never meant to include partition transfer. Even duplicitous Nehru, was reported to be saddened when he heard some Muslims were pushed out of Rajasthan. The situation would have been much different.

 

[Kabira]

I have read in numerous places that the areas of Sindh were in exchange for the Muslim majority areas of Punjab (Kapurthala, Ferozepur, Gurdaspur etc) that Radcliffe decided to give to India.

Bear in mind - Pakistan did not receive even one district that had a non Muslim majority in West Pakistan, but lost at least 4 to India.

See this map - View attachment 590648



So nothing was given to Pakistan in exchange for Kashmir. By all logic Kashmir was a Muslim majority area bordering Pakistan and was bound to go to Pakistan.

Of course the idea it was acceded by the Dogra King, was completely negated by the accession of Junagadh to Pakistan which later snatched back by India.

But as others have so partition was never meant to include partition transfer. Even duplicitous Nehru, was reported to be saddened when he heard some Muslims were pushed out of Rajasthan. The situation would have been much different.

Don't pay attention to these hindutvas. Sindh was made province in 1936, it was not divided on basis of hindu-muslim districts. Punjab was divided not because of "hindus". But sikhs that served British army in large numbers didn't want to join Pakistan. Otherwise even so called Haryana would have been part of Pakistan despite being hindu majority.

 

[Ritual]

Don't pay attention to these hindutvas. Sindh was made province in 1936, it was not divided on basis of hindu-muslim districts. Punjab was divided not because of "hindus". But sikhs that served British army in large numbers didn't want to join Pakistan. Otherwise even so called Haryana would have been part of Pakistan despite being hindu majority.

Yep, they shot themselves in the foot. But in regards to partition they seem to think they were hard done by. If you look at the partition map of Punjab, so many Muslim majority areas were kept by Radcliffe in India. They bent over backwards to appease Congress and Nehru hoodwinked them all that India was a flowery secular paradise.

 

[Kabira]

Yep, they shot themselves in the foot. But in regards to partition they seem to think they were hard done by. If you look at the partition map of Punjab, so many Muslim majority areas were kept by Radcliffe in India. They bent over backwards to appease Congress and Nehru hoodwinked them all that India was a flowery secular paradise.

These randis need to thank Sikhs for IoK, Himachal, east punjab and Haryana, but instead these haramkhor pay them back with 1984 genocide. Patel hated large numbers of sikhs in army and wanted to reduce their numbers as soon as possible after 1947. Sikhs made blunder by joining India without any condition.

 

[Kabira]

Sheikh Abdullah handed over IoK to India despite Jinnah offer. And now these hindutvas curse Abdullah and instead reward Patel who wanted to give up IoK.

 

[PakFactor]

Sheikh Abdullah handed over IoK to India despite Jinnah offer. And now these hindutvas curse Abdullah and instead reward Patel who wanted to give up IoK.

IoK Kashmiri's are suffering due to their own stupidity - even during war the IoK side was pointing out Pak Army positions to Indian Army - and Sheikh Abdullah they have to thank for all this crap.

One poor decision of a leader makes the whole nation suffer.

 

[M.Bison]

IoK Kashmiri's are suffering due to their own stupidity - even during war the IoK side was pointing our Pak Army positions to Indian Army - and Sheikh Abdullah they have to thank for all this crap.

One poor decision of a leader makes the whole nation suffer.

Can't blame the sons for the father's mistake.

 

[sohail.ishaque]

Pakistan should simply give Bangladesh nukes, in an ideal world. Hasina is the problem.

good idea. We give them nukes and then they lick indian balls and start threatening Pakistan with nukes.
Btw Banladeshi prefers color and culture more then anything else. If a person have looks like them and their culture seems same then they love him and religion has no part in it.

so hindu or not if he has same looks, he has the support of Bangla...

Their ideology is totally different now. Their whole mission of existent is to make India happy..

 

[PakFactor]

Can't blame the sons for the father's mistake.

Well these same sons supported Abdullah’s son in IoK. So.... you get the rest where I will go with this.

 

[M.Bison]

Well these same sons supported Abdullah’s son in IoK. So.... you get the rest where I will go with this.

lol.. yeah you are right. Lets throw acid on them.

 

[Tom M]

We dream with wide open eyes than make it possible bruh!

Almost 2 billions of Muslims, 50+ Muslim countries didn’t just dropped from the heaven. We made it possible.

BTW, Your ancestors also laughed like you but, india was ruled by Muslims for hundreds of years...

Indeed. Well we Christians have more countries and much more success globally. So what's your point ???

And almost all of the 50+ Muslim nations you mentioned were under Western colonial rule for centuries at some point of time. Even the biggest caliphate was dismantlement by the west to create majority of this so called 50 Plus Muslim nations, please don't forget that. So again, what is your point ??? LOL

Dreams are an important part of life. How do you accomplish your goals if you dream with eyes closed? You need to live your dreams so that one day they can become a reality.. A sewer rat like you wouldn't understand that.

Calling names, huh ??? LOL, your desperation is well evident.

 

[M.Bison]

Indeed. Well we Christians have more countries and much more success globally. So what's your point ???

And almost all of the 50+ Muslim nations you mentioned were under Western colonial rule for centuries at some point of time. Even the biggest caliphate was dismantlement by the west to create majority of this so called 50 Plus Muslim nations, please don't forget that. So again, what is your point ??? LOL



Calling names, huh ??? LOL, your desperation is well evident.

Desperation or not I was just stating a fact.

 

[Tom M]

Desperation or not I was just stating a fact.

And now wake up and smell the coffee. Who gained or lost more territories over the years in the process of dreaming with wide open eyes ??? India, huh ??

But yes, you are entitled to live your dream like anyone else. As I said it neither need any resources nor have any associated cost. So enjoy.

 

[Abu Shaleh Rumi]

Indeed. Well we Christians have more countries and much more success globally. So what's your point ???

I thought you are a hindu! LOL

Anyways, Christians had hundreds of years of head start and could committed most brutal genocides to advance their cause. We will take some time to catch you folks! As we need to obey religious rules and show humanity, which you Christians dont have...

And almost all of the 50+ Muslim nations you mentioned were under Western colonial rule for centuries at some point of time. Even the biggest caliphate was dismantlement by the west to create majority of this so called 50 Plus Muslim nations, please don't forget that. So again, what is your point ??? LOL

Never knew colonialists were motivated by religion!

We have our ups and downs. Mongols wreaked us, we recovered and became stronger than before. Europeans wreaked us, we are recovering and we will be back. Again...

My point is, we dream impossible then with time we make it possible.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

I have read in numerous places that the areas of Sindh were in exchange for the Muslim majority areas of Punjab (Kapurthala, Ferozepur, Gurdaspur etc) that Radcliffe decided to give to India.

Bear in mind - Pakistan did not receive even one district that had a non Muslim majority in West Pakistan, but lost at least 4 to India.

See this map - View attachment 590648



So nothing was given to Pakistan in exchange for Kashmir. By all logic Kashmir was a Muslim majority area bordering Pakistan and was bound to go to Pakistan.

Of course the idea it was acceded by the Dogra King, was completely negated by the accession of Junagadh to Pakistan which later snatched back by India.

But as others have so partition was never meant to include partition transfer. Even duplicitous Nehru, was reported to be saddened when he heard some Muslims were pushed out of Rajasthan. The situation would have been much different.

You are mistaking. Punjab had 50-50 Muslim & Hindu (include Sikhs). So, it should have been divided in 50-50. Why India got lesser share of punjab? Don't go by district data as just because Hindus had 40% in 5 district while 90% in 2 district does not mean hindus only get 2 districts while muslims get 5.

Similarly, there were significant Hindu population in Sindh and that was not given any recognition. So, it can be considered as an exchange for Kashmir. Moreover, only Kashmir and not Ladakh or Jammu had muslim majority. If at all given, it should only have been Kashmir. So, it is only 16000 sq km of kashmir which is currently with India. This is just the size of one city of Karachi and not something which can be considered as major area. The areas lost by India in Sindh is good compensation.

It is meaningless to say partition does not involve partition transfer. Why would there be any partition if there is no transfer? Pakistan got enough land in comparison to muslim population. It made no sense not to transfer population.