masterchief_mirza
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2019
- Messages
- 9,706
- Reaction score
- 17
- Country
- Location
I remain firmly of the opinion that India downplayed community transmission for a month or so and instead highlighted "imported" or "foreign" cases only via its heavily influenced media and its own health ministry announcements.
Not only were such cases kept in the national spotlight in terms of publicity, but the testing infrastructure and protocols remained heavily geared towards targeting and identifying cases and clusters with some identifiable connection to foreign travel. For a time, no Covid19 update in India's major press outlets was complete without the customary qualifying statement regarding which case or contact of the new cluster had travelled abroad, along with details of the destination.
One can but speculate as to the motivation behind such a deliberate and uniform policy but generalised hindutva nationalist fervour would certainly have contributed to and guided the decision makers in the upper echelons of India's state apparatus in this regard.
Modi knows the mindset of most of India because that is the mindset of his electorate. He has ridden the crest of the wave of such nationalism to enable multiple controversial majoritarian Hindu nationalist policy decisions over the last year. Having irreversibly bonded his own political persona with this fierce brand of Hindu nationalist fervour amongst his electorate, India now faced the prospect of a viral epidemic of proportions never seen before in the modern era.
Damming new data from cases studied between 15th Feb and 19th Mar (a period when significant community transmission was denied by Delhi) apparently confirms 40% community transmission of positive cases.
The question Indian citizens who profess to being unblinded and unblinkered by naive patriotism must now ask is "why?".
Why did their government facilitate a convenient position of denial and misdirection of public trust into an apparently self-serving agenda of detachment from responsibility, mitigation of culpability and abrogation of any need for concerted, timely, nationwide action?
Ref:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-52242806
"Doctors now believe that the infection was spreading in the community long before the government admitted to it, and testing slowly ramped up. Until two weeks ago, Indian health authorities had been denying community transmission.
ImageThe hospital in Indore has more than 140 patients
Now a new study by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) using surveillance data from 41 labs in the country has hinted at community transmission: 52 districts in 20 states and union territories reported Covid-19 patients. Some 40% of the cases did not report any history of international travel or contact with a known case. (The survey was based on swabs collected from nearly 6,000 patients between 15 February and 19 March. Of them 104 tested positive for Covid-19)"
Not only were such cases kept in the national spotlight in terms of publicity, but the testing infrastructure and protocols remained heavily geared towards targeting and identifying cases and clusters with some identifiable connection to foreign travel. For a time, no Covid19 update in India's major press outlets was complete without the customary qualifying statement regarding which case or contact of the new cluster had travelled abroad, along with details of the destination.
One can but speculate as to the motivation behind such a deliberate and uniform policy but generalised hindutva nationalist fervour would certainly have contributed to and guided the decision makers in the upper echelons of India's state apparatus in this regard.
Modi knows the mindset of most of India because that is the mindset of his electorate. He has ridden the crest of the wave of such nationalism to enable multiple controversial majoritarian Hindu nationalist policy decisions over the last year. Having irreversibly bonded his own political persona with this fierce brand of Hindu nationalist fervour amongst his electorate, India now faced the prospect of a viral epidemic of proportions never seen before in the modern era.
Damming new data from cases studied between 15th Feb and 19th Mar (a period when significant community transmission was denied by Delhi) apparently confirms 40% community transmission of positive cases.
The question Indian citizens who profess to being unblinded and unblinkered by naive patriotism must now ask is "why?".
Why did their government facilitate a convenient position of denial and misdirection of public trust into an apparently self-serving agenda of detachment from responsibility, mitigation of culpability and abrogation of any need for concerted, timely, nationwide action?
Ref:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-52242806
"Doctors now believe that the infection was spreading in the community long before the government admitted to it, and testing slowly ramped up. Until two weeks ago, Indian health authorities had been denying community transmission.
ImageThe hospital in Indore has more than 140 patients
Now a new study by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) using surveillance data from 41 labs in the country has hinted at community transmission: 52 districts in 20 states and union territories reported Covid-19 patients. Some 40% of the cases did not report any history of international travel or contact with a known case. (The survey was based on swabs collected from nearly 6,000 patients between 15 February and 19 March. Of them 104 tested positive for Covid-19)"