I wonder why some Chinese on this forum are so uneducated.
Did anyone care to look at the graph and what it represents? It was bad-loan-rate. Not absolute number of loans or not absolute value of loans.
Let me make it simpler for you...
Read this article :
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/28/chi...ising-doubts-over-yellens-crisis-remarks.html
Total internal debt in China is about 3 times that of GDP. That will be about 33.6 trillion dollars. Still smaller whole europe combined, which stands at 97 trillion dollars.
Total internal debt in India is around 2.9 Trillion dollars.
Now about 10 percent of this is bad debt for India. That means 290 billion dollars.
For China, at 2% this will be around 670 billion dollars.
This shows the sheer difference in scales when you look at the whole picture.
Also, Unlike India where this debt is held by private corporates, most of Chinese debt is held by State Owned Enterprises. Which mean, if they go kaput, Chinese govt will have to foot the bill. This makes China's debt a systemic risk. Also, unlike India, accounts of a lot of Chinese banks are never disclosed properly and there is a huge shadow banking system. So, it is almost impossible for someone like bloomberg to even know the complete extant of debt and bad loans in China. We only know the surface.
In case of India, most of these records are open for investigation and the extant of this risk can be estimated. Also, most of this debt is held by private Indian companies and those company's assets will be liquidated and private individuals who are responsible for this will feel the heat. Heck this happened in the case of one of the most publicized Indian billionaire who was running from debt. Selling these assets, a lot of which are in form of commercial land will allow new businesses to replace the old dead ones.
True, banks in both the case will have turbulant times, but unlike China, in case of India it will not be a systemic risk where one company going kaput will topple whole of the financial system.