Indian village will boycott love marriages from now on

[Andhadhun]

Since when did khap panchayats become justice-providing socialist movements ??

As for "protect", why preserve rules that are the opposite of justice ??

Khap panchayats always existed to organize society to function better and preserve its values. Don't care much for the"socialist" part of your question.

They preserve rules they think best serve society. In their collective wisdom.

Agreed. Marriage is a social act and a social contract that seeks to provide a legal clause around a relationship so that especially the woman is not at the receiving end of a casually ending of the relationship by the man.

That in a nutshell is what their Islamic marriage is all about.

We are not discussing islamic marriage.

 

[jamahir]

Khap panchayats always existed to organize society to function better

Name one khap-ruled village that has become capable of sending people into space.

They preserve rules they think best serve society. In their collective wisdom.

So now khap elders have become philosophers ??

We are not discussing islamic marriage.

But in your own words, we are discussing all marriages.

 

[Andhadhun]

Name one khap-ruled village that has become capable of sending people into space.

Khap rules are not supposed to make people capable of going to space. For that you need to go to school, get great grades, migrate to the US, work hard to build a suitable reputation and have some luck on your side.

So now khap elders have become philosophers ??

They are the village friend, philosophers and guide.

But in your own words, we are discussing all marriages.

Yes, I fail to see the connection.

 

[terry5]

Arranged marriages by parents might not end in divorce, but it does not guarantee a happy marriage either.

OTOH your PM imran khan married 3 times to find happiness.

Its funny when he advocates for dialog with India to resolve issues when he himself could not resolve issues with his ex-wives. See the irony here ?

Love marriage don’t guarantee happiness

Imran most likely still be married if he married due to he’s families wishes

So by your logic modi fire blanks in the bedroom and blanks he fired at Pak

Gay ?
Didn’t touch he’s wife let her rot until cobwebs started to form
Haunted vagina he gifted her .

That’s is not a man where’s as imran virile like international cricketer slept through half of Bollywood dump them and picked up young billionaire Jewish girl

No contest in

(Reply your mush mash diversion post)

That is because, in traditional desi arranged marriages, the woman is expected to put up with abusive marriage and not complain.

Remember that in Islam, a marriage is a legal contract that can be terminated via divorce. So in Islam divorce is not a bad thing.



How is this humanism when it deprives, takes away or suppresses the mutual decision taken by a love couple ??



No elitist arrogance.

Just that I am not being romantic about rural life.



I roughly know that a Gotra has something to do with family line but I didn't know that the Sikhs follow it too.



A marriage should not exist to make the society happy but something to make the couple happy.



Your reasoning is illogical.

What did you say in Islam divorce is not a bad thing ?

Look at children of love marriage and look at children of arrange marriage

I have been married 3 times all love I have four children youngest 14 oldest 24
My eldest daughter I had when I was 18
Three different mothers

 

[jamahir]

They are the village friend, philosophers and guide.

You should watch the singing talent shows on Hindi TV and pay attention to those contestants who come from rural background. Their life is difficult and they will tell you that you are romanticising and over-simplifying rural life.

Yes, I fail to see the connection.

Again I repeat your own words : We are discussing all marriages. Therefore I was merely stating that Islamic marriage laws are scientific among all religions.

My eldest daughter I had when I was 18
Three different mothers

You probably are against divorce because I think you got married when you were not ready for marriage.

Of course divorce is difficult, but think of the alternative : living in loveless marriage.

 

[Andhadhun]

Love marriage don’t guarantee happiness

Imran most likely still be married if he married due to he’s families wishes

So by your logic modi fire blanks in the bedroom and blanks he fired at Pak

Gay ?
Didn’t touch he’s wife let her rot until cobwebs started to form
Haunted vagina he gifted her .

That’s is not a man where’s as imran virile like international cricketer slept through half of Bollywood dump them and picked up young billionaire Jewish girl

No contest in

(Reply your mush mash diversion post)

I think the term you are looking for is "Male Slut".

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Male Slut

A promiscuous man who sleeps with people of his choosing and who lives a sexually liberated lifestyle.

Possibly having sexual relationships with more than one person at one time.

Possibly partaking in sexual relations without emotional involvement with a person.

e.g.
Amanda: "So if you think I'm a slut, what does that make you?"
Joe: "A male slut."


The term that describes Modi is "Brahmachari"

Brahmacharya is different from English term "celibacy," which merely means non-indulgence in sexual activity. Brahmacharya is when a person controls his citta, which does not necessarily mean abstaining through word, thought, and deed from physical or sensual pleasures to achieve Brahmagyan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmacharya


Its quite an embarrassing comparison to be honest. But I guess, you asked for it.

 

[313ghazi]

Great gym track from back in the day!

not surprised...rape marriages are the norm in india anyway...

Also no ban on marrying cows, dogs, trees, monkeys or your brothers wife - which is common amongst these people.

http://www.orissapost.com/modern-ma...ry-single-woman-take-turns-to-sleep-with-her/

 

[Andhadhun]

You should watch the singing talent shows on Hindi TV and pay attention to those contestants who come from rural background. Their life is difficult and they will tell you that you are romanticising and over-simplifying rural life.

I am merely replying to the question framed by you. Your questions were leading and was not designed to understand reality nor discover the truth.

Again I repeat your own words : We are discussing all marriages. Therefore I was merely stating that Islamic marriage laws are scientific among all religions.

There is nothing "scientific" about marriage.

One can only call an "contract marriage" as unemotional and cold.

Also no ban on marrying cows, dogs, trees, monkeys or your brothers wife - which is common amongst these people.

http://www.orissapost.com/modern-ma...ry-single-woman-take-turns-to-sleep-with-her/

LOL.... your religion sanctions polygamy and you have the audacity to speak up against polyandry ? Could you be any more sexist.

 

[terry5]

You should watch the singing talent shows on Hindi TV and pay attention to those contestants who come from rural background. Their life is difficult and they will tell you that you are romanticising and over-simplifying rural life.



Again I repeat your own words : We are discussing all marriages. Therefore I was merely stating that Islamic marriage laws are scientific among all religions.



You probably are against divorce because I think you got married when you were not ready for marriage.

Of course divorce is difficult, but think of the alternative : living in loveless marriage.a

I’m not against divorce and my first two women I wasn’t technically married I was young overseas sowing my oats flashy making money

I think the term you are looking for is "Male Slut".

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Male Slut

A promiscuous man who sleeps with people of his choosing and who lives a sexually liberated lifestyle.

Possibly having sexual relationships with more than one person at one time.

Possibly partaking in sexual relations without emotional involvement with a person.

e.g.
Amanda: "So if you think I'm a slut, what does that make you?"
Joe: "A male slut."


The term that describes Modi is "Brahmachari"

Brahmacharya is different from English term "celibacy," which merely means non-indulgence in sexual activity. Brahmacharya is when a person controls his citta, which does not necessarily mean abstaining through word, thought, and deed from physical or sensual pleasures to achieve Brahmagyan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmacharya


Its quite an embarrassing comparison to be honest. But I guess, you asked for it.

Nothing wrong with that I do it myself but Brahmacharya is a disease in Pakistan You’ll get laughed out of town if you keep up that shit .

 

[jamahir]

I’m not against divorce and my first two women I wasn’t technically married I was young overseas sowing my oats flashy making money

So what is your point ??

 

[hasnainfirst]

 

[Andhadhun]

Nothing wrong with that I do it myself but Brahmacharya is a disease in Pakistan You’ll get laughed out of town if you keep up that shit .

I am not interested in pakistani diseases or its victims. Nor am I interested in your sex life.

I think you should go find someone else who is interested in you and then discuss these things.

 

[terry5]

Nothing wrong wi

So what is your point ??

That arrange marriage through family is better isn’t this what the thread is about

And stop tell lies on Islam that divorce isn’t a bad thing . It’s the most hateful permissible act (google it)

I am not interested in pakistani diseases or its victims. Nor am I interested in your sex life.

I think you should go find someone else who is interested in you and then discuss these things.

You fantasising about imran khans private life remember ?

Irony no ? As you said .

Lol at this impotent little Indian talking mush mash

 

[Andhadhun]

You fantasising about imran khans private life remember ?

Irony no ? As you said .

Lol at this impotent little Indian talking mush mash

No I was commenting on IK utter failure in conflict resolution and his inability to resolve differences with dialog and action based on his two failed marriages.

For such a man to claim that dialog with India will resolve issues is the very definition of irony.

What part of this is hard to understand ?

 

[terry5]

No I was commenting on IK utter failure in conflict resolution and his inability to resolve differences with dialog and action based on his two failed marriages.

For such a man to claim that dialog with India will resolve issues is the very definition of irony.

What part of this is hard to understand ?

Compared to impotent modi

How can he look after nation if he couldn’t look after he’s mother or he’s wife

How can he look after the poor and middle class when he was unable to run a family

Why he spoil he’s wife’s life he has he give her any compensation, is he divorced ?

Potent man will keep wife with him after marriage give her what she wants give her enjoyment in life

Hence impotent

I hope you understand now your irony