What's new

Indian troops attacked Chinese officers who went for negotiations: Diplomat

If u did bother to dig deeper. All Chinese soldiers are standard equip with kelvar bullet proof vest, kneel and elbow guard with oxygen supply tank. Plus war helmet. While Indian soldiers lack such luxury. It's not surprising when comes to one to one combat who will come out victories.
If the Chinese can actually fight in a melee combat while carrying which I assume be around 10-20kg of weight around then I am impressed.
 
.
If the Chinese can actually fight in a melee combat while carrying which I assume be around 10-20kg of weight around then I am impressed.

In their anxiety to impress those reading this thread, the Chinese members didn't realise how contradictory their staements were. It takes not days, not weeks, but years for the PLA to come out with truthful figures; casualty figures for 1962 were finally released only in the 90s.

There is no point arguing with Internet warriors about the numbers.

They neither know nor care, and their posts are not intended to do anything except to denigrate the 'enemy'. Part of the package. @Beast, @Flight of falcon, @S10, @baconlover, @CAPRICORN-88, @52051 and their other colleagues are only faithfully playing their assigned roles.

Spoken like a true communist.

It isn't about communism; these are people conditioned to repeat a pre-determined statement again and again until they completely dominate any discussion. Discussions are not required, only complete and faithful acceptance of their version of the events.
 
.
In their anxiety to impress those reading this thread, the Chinese members didn't realise how contradictory their staements were. It takes not days, not weeks, but years for the PLA to come out with truthful figures; casualty figures for 1962 were finally released only in the 90s.

There is no point arguing with Internet warriors about the numbers.@CAPRICORN-88, @52051 and their other colleagues are only faithfully playing their assigned roles.



It isn't about communism; these are people conditioned to repeat a pre-determined statement again and again until they completely dominate any discussion. Discussions are not required, only complete and faithful acceptance of their version of the events.

All these brave talks by IIndian politicians and News Media tantamount to nothing but hot air unless they can be substantiated by hard evidences.
Since you brought up the 1962 war, kindly explained to us why the Henderson-Brooke Report that was written way back in 1963 remained classified as a top secret up till today by India and you are pointing your finger at China.

Why don't India just released the report to show to us how gallant the India Army was back then?

We know how good the Indian Soldiers were back then in Dec 8, 1941 when 60,000 British Indian Army surrendered and ran away after confronting a 10,000 strong Japanese Imperial Army.
Only the Gurkha and Khalistani soldiers stay back and fought the Japanese invaders.
After the WW2 ended Singapore refused to accept India Army as the island defender.
:coffee:
 
.
All these brave talks by IIndian politicians and News Media tantamount to nothing but hot air unless they can be substantiated by hard evidences.
Since you brought up the 1962 war, kindly explained to us why the Henderson-Brooke Report that was written way back in 1963 remained classified as a top secret up till today by India and you are pointing your finger at China.

When did you join the forum? Long before you joined, my friend @chauism and I had written a bipartisan account of the 1962 conflict.

Why don't India just released the report to show to us how gallant the India Army was back then?

Because it reflects badly on some politicians, and it was considered, at that time, inappropriate to release details of their mistakes.

We know how good the Indian Soldiers were back then in Dec 8, 1941 when 60,000 British Indian Army surrendered and ran away after confronting a 10,000 strong Japanese Imperial Army.
Only the Gurkha and Khalistani soldiers stay back and fought the Japanese invaders.
After the WW2 ended Singapore refused to accept India Army as the island defender.
:coffee:

Good for you. Such a clever fellow.

Those days have passed. Those were also the days when one Chinese Army was busy trouncing another Chinese Army, with results that the whole world saw.

Those days have passed, but you will remain what you are today, a troll.
 
.
When did you join the forum? Long before you joined, my friend @chauism and I had written a bipartisan account of the 1962 conflict.



Because it reflects badly on some politicians, and it was considered, at that time, inappropriate to release details of their mistakes.



Good for you. Such a clever fellow.

Those days have passed. Those were also the days when one Chinese Army was busy trouncing another Chinese Army, with results that the whole world saw.

Those days have passed, but you will remain what you are today, a troll.

You wrote a bipartisan account and we have to take your word for it.
LOL. What a joke? Is it in the British archives?
So what role are you playing this round?
A historian, a nurse or just another propagandist!
:cheers:
It is obvious you are imprisoned in your country own gargargantuan of propaganda machine.
Behaving like a authorative critic in a multitude of self-serving opinions that impress no one except your pompous self.

In other word.
A TROLL who believe his own shit.

A tale told by idiot. Full of sound and fury. Signifying nothing.
:coffee:
 
. .
Indian troops attacked Chinese officers who went for negotiations: Diplomat
By News Desk
Published: June 20, 2020
TWEET EMAIL
2246745-lijianzhaochinaspokespersonx-1592651988-851-640x480.jpg

Indian troops crossed border for illegal activities and launched provocative attacks, says Chinese FM Spokesperson Lijian Zhao. PHOTO: FILE

2246745-lijianzhaochinaspokespersonx-1592651988-851-160x120.jpg
2246745-chinaindiax-1592649044-469-160x120.jpg

The Deputy Director of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs Information Department Lijian Zhao on Saturday gave a step-by-step account of the confrontation that took place at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) that killed 20 Indian army troops including an officer.

The Chinse diplomat said the Galwan Valley area is located on the Chinese side of the LAC in the western section of the Sino-Indian boundary.
“For many years, the Chinese border troops have been patrolling and on duty in this region.” Zhao said.

“Since April, the Indian border troops have unilaterally and continuously built roads, bridges and other facilities at the LAC in Galwan Valley.”

Zhao also further that China lodged representations and protests on multiple occasions but Indian troops crossed the LAC and were responsible for provocations.

“On May 6, Indian border troops crossed LAC, trespassed into China’s territory, built fortification and barricades, which impeded the patrol of Chinese border troops,” Zhao said.

“They deliberately made provocations in an attempt to unilaterally change the status quo of control and management.”

The Chinese border troops were compelled to take necessary measures to respond to the situation on the ground and strengthen management and control in the border areas, the Chinese diplomat added.

“To ease the situation, China and India stayed in close communication through military and diplomatic channels.”

He added that, in response to the strong demands by China, India agreed to withdraw the personnel who had crossed the LAC and demolish the facilities, which they did.

“On June 6, the border troops held a commander-level meeting and agreed to ease the situation,” Zhao elaborated. “India promised it would not cross the estuary of Galwan River to patrol and build facilities.”

“Shockingly, on the evening of June 15, India’s front-line troops, in violation of the agreement reached the commander-level meeting, once again crossed the Line of Actual Control for deliberate provocation when the situation in the Galwan Valley was already easing,” Zhao said.

“India’s front-line troops even violently attacked the Chinese officers and soldiers who went there for negotiation, thus triggering fierce physical conflicts and causing casualties,” he added.




Lijian Zhao 赵立坚
@zlj517

·
23h

8. India’s front-line troops even violently attacked the Chinese officers and soldiers who went there for negotiation, thus triggering fierce physical conflicts and causing casualties. This is the step-by-step account of the Galwan clash.

7. Shockingly, on the evening of June 15, India's front-line troops, in violation of the agreement reached at the commander-level meeting, once again crossed the Line of Actual Control for deliberate provocation when the situation in the Galwan Valley was already easing.
6. On June 6, the border troops held a commander-level meeting & agreed to ease the situation. India promised it would not cross the estuary of Galwan river to patrol & build facilities. The two sides would discuss & decide phased withdrawal of troops by officials on the ground.

5. In response to the strong demand of the Chinese side, India agreed to withdraw the personnel who crossed the LAC and demolish the facilities, and so they did.
4. The Chinese border troops were compelled to take necessary measures to respond to the situation on the ground and strengthen management & control in the border areas. To ease the situation, China and India stayed in close communication through military and diplomatic channels.
3. On May 6, Indian border troops crossed LAC, trespassed into China's territory, built fortification & barricades, which impeded the patrol of Chinese border troops. They deliberately made provocations in an attempt to unilaterally change the status quo of control & management.

2. Since April, the Indian border troops have unilaterally and continuously built roads, bridges and other facilities at the LAC in Galwan Valley. China lodged representations and protests on multiple occasions but India went even further to cross the LAC and made provocations.

A step-by-step account of the Galwan clash 1. The Galwan Valley is located on the Chinese side of the Line of Actual Control in the west section of the China-India boundary. For many years, the Chinese border troops have been patrolling and on duty in this region.

Read more: China , clash , Galwan valley

Exactly like I said in my thread before

Those indian is so ignorant
 
. .
In their anxiety to impress those reading this thread, the Chinese members didn't realise how contradictory their staements were. It takes not days, not weeks, but years for the PLA to come out with truthful figures; casualty figures for 1962 were finally released only in the 90s.

There is no point arguing with Internet warriors about the numbers.

They neither know nor care, and their posts are not intended to do anything except to denigrate the 'enemy'. Part of the package. @Beast, @Flight of falcon, @S10, @baconlover, @CAPRICORN-88, @52051 and their other colleagues are only faithfully playing their assigned roles.



It isn't about communism; these are people conditioned to repeat a pre-determined statement again and again until they completely dominate any discussion. Discussions are not required, only complete and faithful acceptance of their version of the events.


For what it's worth, Chinese got nothing on Indians when it comes to regurgitating propaganda.
 
. .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom