What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

I have read that the douchebag Mukherjee was saddened by demolition of Babri Majid but thought the action at Golden Temple was a necessity!

Quite a way to appreciate the contribution of Sikhs to the nation building.

He is a congressi after all.
 
That is actually a quote from movie, Gandhi never said that.
Ok stand corrected.......however google ascribes the quote to a biographer of Gandhi, Louis Fischer, who used the expression as an explanation of Gandhi's philosophy and not directly attributable to Gandhi himself.
 
But he said that when he's the "President of India" and nobody saw the blatant discrepancy in his views about what he regards as India's shameful past.

Prez or not , his views wiĺl always be in context of his Political affiliation.

Binderwale was a sanjay Gandhi backed preacher till he got out of controll in punjab.

Çomenting on Blue star is like indirectly commenting on Sanjay Gandhi's failure which any bootlicking congreessi wont even dare to do.:woot:
 
They knew they were gonna lose, so they tried burning all the bridges and mined as much they could.

How to Handle UPA's Financial Landmines?

By S Gurumurthy

Published: 06th July 2014

Some chartered accountants who attest corporate accounts bear uncomplimentary reputation for fudging accounts as the last resort to balance the books.* The last resort of such chartered accountants seem to have become the first option of finance ministers. Look at the way the numbers have been fudged and other financial landmines have been concealed in Budget 2013-14 and the Interim Budget for 2014-15. Take the fiscal deficit figures for 2013-14. Former finance minister P Chidambaram has taken credit for containing the deficit at 4.6 per cent of the GDP. It is crude fudging. Chartered accountants are definitely more subtle. Chidambaram has fudged the deficit for 2013-14 on three counts. One, he got the banks to deposit the tax deducted at source payable after 31.3.2014 in advance, to include it as his collection in 2013-14, thus stealing a revenue of Rs 20,000 crore which his successor Arun Jaitley would have collected. Two, short fall of Rs 15,000 crore in the revenues in the Revised Estimate given by Chidambaram for 2013-14 has been kept in wraps. Third, the petroleum subsidy has been short provided by Rs 10,000 crore in 2014-15–Jaitley has to fund this in his Budget. These three items will push the fiscal deficit for 2013-14 from 4.6 per cent to 5 per cent. This is the beginning, not the end, of the story.

Stopping development to cut deficit

The Fiscal Policy Strategy Statement attached to the 2014-15 Budget says the actual fiscal deficit had reached 94 per cent of the budgeted deficit in November 2013 itself, but it was maintained at the same level till March 2014–meaning that, in the last four months to March 2014, the deficit was very little. How did Chidambaram achieve this miracle? By “austerity measures”, non-plan spend was cut by 10 per cent and plan expenditure was “rationalised” –says the Strategy Statement. True? The story of a cut in non-plan spending is a half-truth–it finally vaulted over the budgeted figure by Rs 6,000 cr. It is the plan spending–read development spending–that has been cut by Rs 80,000 crore. Had the development spend been as budgeted, the deficit would have vaulted by further 0.7 per cent to 5.7 per cent. See the irony. Chidambaram proudly raised his voice to announce a 34 per cent [Rs 1.41 lakh crore] rise in development spend in his Budget speech in February 2013 and got encomiums. In February 2014, he announced a cut back of the very same spend by 58 per cent and got credit for reducing the fiscal deficit! There is not even a remote sense of remorse for cutting two-fifths of the development spend.

Fudging 2014-15 accounts

Now come to the Interim Budget for 2014-15. By stealing revenues of Rs 20,000 and short providing petroleum subsidy of Rs 10,000 crore, Chidambaram has already caused a Rs 30,000-crore hole in the final Budget that Jaitley will present. See further. Chidambaram has claimed to have fixed the fiscal deficit for 2014-15 at 4.1 per cent–a parting lie that again won for him the credit for lowering the deficit! Besides, he has concealed many financial landmines which can booby-trap Jaitley’s Budget. And also the nation’s economy, unless detected and addressed in time. Chidambaram has projected the nominal GDP growth at 13.4 per cent but a higher revenue rise at 19.2 per cent for 2014-15. How could revenues rise more than growth? Economists call the extra revenue over growth the buoyancy ratio. The buoyancy ratio assumed by Chidambaram for 2014-15 is 43 per cent over the GDP growth. For 2013-14, he had projected a nominal GDP growth rate of 13.4 per cent and got a lower revenue rise of 13 per cent rise– that is negative buoyancy ratio. That the projected buoyancy of 43 per cent for 2013-14 is just a mirage is corroborated by the budgeted rise of customs revenue by 15 per cent in 2014-15 against just 6 per cent in 2013-14–one and half times the rise in 2013-14. Similarly, Chidambaram projects excise to rise by 11.7 per cent in 2014-15 against 1.6 per cent in 2013-14–by more than seven times the previous year’s rise. If the revenues rise in 2014-15 is like 2013-14 only, the deficit will be higher by Rs 48,000 cr. More. Chidambaram had projected disinvestment receipts of Rs 54,000 crore in 2013-14, but ended up with `19,000 crore. Still he has projected a disinvestment income of Rs 52,000 cr for 2014-15. Here too if the 2013-14 numbers are repeated, the deficit will go up by Rs 33,000 crore. Again, Chidambaram has estimated non-plan spending to rise by some 8 per cent in 2014-15 but it had risen by some 17 per cent in 2013-14. Increase in interest outgo and normal rise in salaries alone would exhaust the rise in non-plan expenditure projected. If the non-plan spend rises in 2014-15, like in the previous year, the deficit would be up by Rs 1 lakh crore. Also, Chidambaram’s Budget does not recognise the Pay Commission arrears of Rs 40,000 crore for which a bill is waiting to be presented to Parliament. This will add Rs 40,000 crore to non-plan expenditure each year in 2017-18 and 2018-19. These add up to Rs 1,81 lakh crore to the deficit over Chidambaram’s number. Jaitley has to handle this in 2015-15 and later. This is besides the transfer of the deficit of `30,000 crore from Chidambaram’s 2013-14 account to Jaitley’s 2014-15 account.

More boobytraps

Information hidden in different places in the government discloses further financial landmine. As the plan spend till now is very poor, the plan spend for 2015-16 and 2016-17 is projected to rise by 20 per cent. But even with such increased allocation, Gross Budgetary Support for the 12th Plan will be only Rs 29.10 lakh crore. It will be short by Rs 6.58 lakh crore against Rs 35.68 lakh crore reckoned in the 12th Plan. It is clearly bound to affect growth. On the revenue side, even assuming that the General Sales Tax and Direct Tax Code become operative in 2015-2016 and up the GDP by 1 per cent and consequent rise in revenue, still the final resource gap will remain negative until 2016-17. To manage this gap, Tax-GDP ratio has been revised to 11.25 per cent from the projected 10.72 per cent in 2015-16, to 12 per cent from 11.20 per cent in 2016-17, to 13 per cent from 11.79 per cent in 2017-18 and to 14 per cent from 12.52 per cent in 2018-19. The revisions are just statistical hope. Yet, these hidden landmines can blast the economy out of control. And more. By transferring centrally-sponsored schemes to states in 2014-15 – resulting in a further transfer of Rs 1.19 lakh crore to states–Chidambaram has made Jaitley’s job more difficult as that much amount could have been churned by the central government for its new schemes. Here is some more hidden information. The public debt situation is grave. The dreaded debt-trap–where the government will be borrowing to pay only interest–is in sight by 2015-16. Proceeding from where Chidambaram has left the economy, the net government borrowing after repayment of debts will be Rs 4.20 lakh crore in 2016-17, but the interest burden of Rs 5.12 lakh crore for that year will exceed the borrowing by Rs 92,000 crore. This figure is likely to rise further and not go down till 2019-20. If he looks at these numbers, Jaitley will lose sleep. Unless, like diesel price rise, some harsh steps are taken this year and next, the nation may risk downgrade of its credit rating.

What should be done?

The UPA regime had only spent and never attempted to raise revenue for a decade. The result is the present financial mess. If this government has to start undoing the damage, it has to go for innovative, bold and fresh resource mobilisation. First, the annual tax giveaways of Rs 5.50 lakh crore have to be withdrawn, as suggested in the Economic Survey 2013-13. If it is withdrawn by one-fifth this year, it will yield a revenue of Rs 1.10 crore to government. Next there is need to tax the non-delivered forex, financial and equity derivatives. A tax of 10 paise per Rs 100 [at 0.1 per cent] will yield revenues of over `60,000 crore. Economist John Maynard Keynes had suggested this tax to contain speculation. In a paper [July 26, 2000], the Center for Economic and Policy Research noted that in most of the West such tax is levied on equity derivatives and the rate varies between 0.5 per cent and 1.6 per cent. Only in the US, the tax rate is low at 0.004 per cent. Most derivative transactions are speculative. The suggested tax is desirable even to contain volatility in markets. Also, new sources of revenue will emerge. These two measures will yield an additional revenue of Rs 1.70 lakh crore which can handle the financial landmines hidden in the files of government. Unless such bold steps are taken to raise revenues the status quo will continue. And it does not need a seer to say what the financial land mines left by UPA will do to the country.

http://www.newindianexpress.com/bus...ncial-Landmines/2014/07/06/article2316164.ece
 
They knew they were gonna lose, so they tried burning all the bridges and mined as much they could.

How to Handle UPA's Financial Landmines?

By S Gurumurthy

Published: 06th July 2014

Some chartered accountants who attest corporate accounts bear uncomplimentary reputation for fudging accounts as the last resort to balance the books.* The last resort of such chartered accountants seem to have become the first option of finance ministers. Look at the way the numbers have been fudged and other financial landmines have been concealed in Budget 2013-14 and the Interim Budget for 2014-15. Take the fiscal deficit figures for 2013-14. Former finance minister P Chidambaram has taken credit for containing the deficit at 4.6 per cent of the GDP. It is crude fudging. Chartered accountants are definitely more subtle. Chidambaram has fudged the deficit for 2013-14 on three counts. One, he got the banks to deposit the tax deducted at source payable after 31.3.2014 in advance, to include it as his collection in 2013-14, thus stealing a revenue of Rs 20,000 crore which his successor Arun Jaitley would have collected. Two, short fall of Rs 15,000 crore in the revenues in the Revised Estimate given by Chidambaram for 2013-14 has been kept in wraps. Third, the petroleum subsidy has been short provided by Rs 10,000 crore in 2014-15–Jaitley has to fund this in his Budget. These three items will push the fiscal deficit for 2013-14 from 4.6 per cent to 5 per cent. This is the beginning, not the end, of the story.

Stopping development to cut deficit

The Fiscal Policy Strategy Statement attached to the 2014-15 Budget says the actual fiscal deficit had reached 94 per cent of the budgeted deficit in November 2013 itself, but it was maintained at the same level till March 2014–meaning that, in the last four months to March 2014, the deficit was very little. How did Chidambaram achieve this miracle? By “austerity measures”, non-plan spend was cut by 10 per cent and plan expenditure was “rationalised” –says the Strategy Statement. True? The story of a cut in non-plan spending is a half-truth–it finally vaulted over the budgeted figure by Rs 6,000 cr. It is the plan spending–read development spending–that has been cut by Rs 80,000 crore. Had the development spend been as budgeted, the deficit would have vaulted by further 0.7 per cent to 5.7 per cent. See the irony. Chidambaram proudly raised his voice to announce a 34 per cent [Rs 1.41 lakh crore] rise in development spend in his Budget speech in February 2013 and got encomiums. In February 2014, he announced a cut back of the very same spend by 58 per cent and got credit for reducing the fiscal deficit! There is not even a remote sense of remorse for cutting two-fifths of the development spend.

Fudging 2014-15 accounts

Now come to the Interim Budget for 2014-15. By stealing revenues of Rs 20,000 and short providing petroleum subsidy of Rs 10,000 crore, Chidambaram has already caused a Rs 30,000-crore hole in the final Budget that Jaitley will present. See further. Chidambaram has claimed to have fixed the fiscal deficit for 2014-15 at 4.1 per cent–a parting lie that again won for him the credit for lowering the deficit! Besides, he has concealed many financial landmines which can booby-trap Jaitley’s Budget. And also the nation’s economy, unless detected and addressed in time. Chidambaram has projected the nominal GDP growth at 13.4 per cent but a higher revenue rise at 19.2 per cent for 2014-15. How could revenues rise more than growth? Economists call the extra revenue over growth the buoyancy ratio. The buoyancy ratio assumed by Chidambaram for 2014-15 is 43 per cent over the GDP growth. For 2013-14, he had projected a nominal GDP growth rate of 13.4 per cent and got a lower revenue rise of 13 per cent rise– that is negative buoyancy ratio. That the projected buoyancy of 43 per cent for 2013-14 is just a mirage is corroborated by the budgeted rise of customs revenue by 15 per cent in 2014-15 against just 6 per cent in 2013-14–one and half times the rise in 2013-14. Similarly, Chidambaram projects excise to rise by 11.7 per cent in 2014-15 against 1.6 per cent in 2013-14–by more than seven times the previous year’s rise. If the revenues rise in 2014-15 is like 2013-14 only, the deficit will be higher by Rs 48,000 cr. More. Chidambaram had projected disinvestment receipts of Rs 54,000 crore in 2013-14, but ended up with `19,000 crore. Still he has projected a disinvestment income of Rs 52,000 cr for 2014-15. Here too if the 2013-14 numbers are repeated, the deficit will go up by Rs 33,000 crore. Again, Chidambaram has estimated non-plan spending to rise by some 8 per cent in 2014-15 but it had risen by some 17 per cent in 2013-14. Increase in interest outgo and normal rise in salaries alone would exhaust the rise in non-plan expenditure projected. If the non-plan spend rises in 2014-15, like in the previous year, the deficit would be up by Rs 1 lakh crore. Also, Chidambaram’s Budget does not recognise the Pay Commission arrears of Rs 40,000 crore for which a bill is waiting to be presented to Parliament. This will add Rs 40,000 crore to non-plan expenditure each year in 2017-18 and 2018-19. These add up to Rs 1,81 lakh crore to the deficit over Chidambaram’s number. Jaitley has to handle this in 2015-15 and later. This is besides the transfer of the deficit of `30,000 crore from Chidambaram’s 2013-14 account to Jaitley’s 2014-15 account.

More boobytraps

Information hidden in different places in the government discloses further financial landmine. As the plan spend till now is very poor, the plan spend for 2015-16 and 2016-17 is projected to rise by 20 per cent. But even with such increased allocation, Gross Budgetary Support for the 12th Plan will be only Rs 29.10 lakh crore. It will be short by Rs 6.58 lakh crore against Rs 35.68 lakh crore reckoned in the 12th Plan. It is clearly bound to affect growth. On the revenue side, even assuming that the General Sales Tax and Direct Tax Code become operative in 2015-2016 and up the GDP by 1 per cent and consequent rise in revenue, still the final resource gap will remain negative until 2016-17. To manage this gap, Tax-GDP ratio has been revised to 11.25 per cent from the projected 10.72 per cent in 2015-16, to 12 per cent from 11.20 per cent in 2016-17, to 13 per cent from 11.79 per cent in 2017-18 and to 14 per cent from 12.52 per cent in 2018-19. The revisions are just statistical hope. Yet, these hidden landmines can blast the economy out of control. And more. By transferring centrally-sponsored schemes to states in 2014-15 – resulting in a further transfer of Rs 1.19 lakh crore to states–Chidambaram has made Jaitley’s job more difficult as that much amount could have been churned by the central government for its new schemes. Here is some more hidden information. The public debt situation is grave. The dreaded debt-trap–where the government will be borrowing to pay only interest–is in sight by 2015-16. Proceeding from where Chidambaram has left the economy, the net government borrowing after repayment of debts will be Rs 4.20 lakh crore in 2016-17, but the interest burden of Rs 5.12 lakh crore for that year will exceed the borrowing by Rs 92,000 crore. This figure is likely to rise further and not go down till 2019-20. If he looks at these numbers, Jaitley will lose sleep. Unless, like diesel price rise, some harsh steps are taken this year and next, the nation may risk downgrade of its credit rating.

What should be done?

The UPA regime had only spent and never attempted to raise revenue for a decade. The result is the present financial mess. If this government has to start undoing the damage, it has to go for innovative, bold and fresh resource mobilisation. First, the annual tax giveaways of Rs 5.50 lakh crore have to be withdrawn, as suggested in the Economic Survey 2013-13. If it is withdrawn by one-fifth this year, it will yield a revenue of Rs 1.10 crore to government. Next there is need to tax the non-delivered forex, financial and equity derivatives. A tax of 10 paise per Rs 100 [at 0.1 per cent] will yield revenues of over `60,000 crore. Economist John Maynard Keynes had suggested this tax to contain speculation. In a paper [July 26, 2000], the Center for Economic and Policy Research noted that in most of the West such tax is levied on equity derivatives and the rate varies between 0.5 per cent and 1.6 per cent. Only in the US, the tax rate is low at 0.004 per cent. Most derivative transactions are speculative. The suggested tax is desirable even to contain volatility in markets. Also, new sources of revenue will emerge. These two measures will yield an additional revenue of Rs 1.70 lakh crore which can handle the financial landmines hidden in the files of government. Unless such bold steps are taken to raise revenues the status quo will continue. And it does not need a seer to say what the financial land mines left by UPA will do to the country.

http://www.newindianexpress.com/bus...ncial-Landmines/2014/07/06/article2316164.ece

Nothing surprising here congress doesn't give a shit about our country they will stoop to any cheap level to remain in power or getting re-elected again and WTF is this man
"The UPA regime had only spent and never attempted to raise revenue for a decade"
Proceeding from where Chidambaram has left the economy, the net government borrowing after repayment of debts will be Rs 4.20 lakh crore in 2016-17, but the interest burden of Rs 5.12 lakh crore for that year will exceed the borrowing by Rs 92,000 crore. This figure is likely to rise further and not go down till 2019-20

And people call this Old Fart a good economist . India will develop only when the congress is chased away like a street dog from our country
 
Nothing surprising here congress doesn't give a shit about our country they will stoop to any cheap level to remain in power or getting re-elected again and WTF is this man
"The UPA regime had only spent and never attempted to raise revenue for a decade"
Proceeding from where Chidambaram has left the economy, the net government borrowing after repayment of debts will be Rs 4.20 lakh crore in 2016-17, but the interest burden of Rs 5.12 lakh crore for that year will exceed the borrowing by Rs 92,000 crore. This figure is likely to rise further and not go down till 2019-20

And people call this Old Fart a good economist . India will develop only when the congress is chased away like a street dog from our country
I don't think the Congress party per se is the problem, there are a lot of very smart people in Congress. The problem is the first family and the precedent they set. In order for our untalented first family to stay in power they need the help of the faceless villains that control things from behind the curtains. In order to stay on power they select office bearers for loyalty only. Not for merit. It also makes dynasty the rule within the party and stubs out merit. The only way to get ahead is by sycophancy to one of the dynasties ...and with each generation the dynasties are getting stupider and further removed from the people.

If somehow every single Nehru -Gandhi was removed from the Congress party then in time the party could heal itself and allow it's more meritorious members to take the lead.

At the end of the day we need a good two party system and Congress minus the queen and her courtiers has actually got promise.
 
Last edited:
I don't think the Congress party per se is the problem, there are a lot of very smart people in Congress. The problem is the first family and the precedent they set. In order for our untalented first family to stay in power they need the help of the faceless villains that control things from behind the curtains. In order to stay on power they select office bearers for loyalty only. Not for merit. It also makes dynasty the rule within the party and stubs out merit. The only way to get ahead is by sycophancy to one of the dynasties ...and with each generation the dynasties are getting stupider and further removed from the people.

If somehow every single Nehru -Gandhi was removed from the Congress party then in time the party could heal itself and allow it's more meritorious members to take the lead.

At the end of the day we need a good two party system and Congress minus the queen and her courtiers has actually got promise.

Come-on man we are talking economics here we are taking about Fiscal Deficit ,Revenue generation and all other stuffs related to economy do you think that the Italian Mafia is going to come and dictate something like don't improve the revenue generation, Keep the fiscal deficit high and all that stuffs ? .This role perfectly lies with the Old Fart Chidambaram if these guys cared for the Economy instead of concentrating on how to Make the life miserable for next government then think how much growth India would have achieved. To give you an idea go back to Vajpayee Era when Yashwant Sinha was FM he left the economy in a very good condition at 4% or even a lesser fiscal Deficit for Chidambaram to take over and India had grown at 9% growth without any effort from the Congress but still Chidambaram left the Deficit in a bad state at the end of UPA-1 and again did the same on UPA-2 . so in the end its we who are loosing for the politics played by the Congress . Now when Modi cant fix the economy these guys would be re-elected again and they will repeat the same cycle all over again which is why I said congress should be chased away like a street dog from India
 
Come-on man we are talking economics here we are taking about Fiscal Deficit ,Revenue generation and all other stuffs related to economy do you think that the Italian Mafia is going to come and dictate something like don't improve the revenue generation, Keep the fiscal deficit high and all that stuffs ? .This role perfectly lies with the Old Fart Chidambaram if these guys cared for the Economy instead of concentrating on how to Make the life miserable for next government then think how much growth India would have achieved. To give you an idea go back to Vajpayee Era when Yashwant Sinha was FM he left the economy in a very good condition at 4% or even a lesser fiscal Deficit for Chidambaram to take over and India had grown at 9% growth without any effort from the Congress but still Chidambaram left the Deficit in a bad state at the end of UPA-1 and again did the same on UPA-2 . so in the end its we who are loosing for the politics played by the Congress . Now when Modi cant fix the economy these guys would be re-elected again and they will repeat the same cycle all over again which is why I said congress should be chased away like a street dog from India
But the Italian mafia did choose MMS to be the PM and precisely because he was too weak to stand up to the mafia...and the Italian mafias kitchen cabinet came up with one super expensive hair brained welfare scheme after the other in order to bribe voters to vote for the moron Crown Prince.

If it was not for the queen mother and her sycophants, MMS would never have been PM. if instead there had been a strong candidate one without a royal name, he would have known that he needs to deliver to get re elected, he would have acted accordingly.

The Congress is so corrupt because the family is corrupt and inept. But there are a lot if people in the party with great experience and talent, they are not able to rise because the congress system is rigged to family loyalty, why do you want to waste that?
 
But the Italian mafia did choose MMS to be the PM and precisely because he was too weak to stand up to the mafia...and the Italian mafias kitchen cabinet came up with one super expensive hair brained welfare scheme after the other in order to bribe voters to vote for the moron Crown Prince.

If it was not for the queen mother and her sycophants, MMS would never have been PM. if instead there had been a strong candidate one without a royal name, he would have known that he needs to deliver to get re elected, he would have acted accordingly.

The Congress is so corrupt because the family is corrupt and inept. But there are a lot if people in the party with great experience and talent, they are not able to rise because the congress system is rigged to family loyalty, why do you want to waste that?


Off course I don't want to waste that I or for that matter most of the sensible Indians would be happy if congress doesn't comeback to power again. I agree on the spending part like MNREGA,Food Security Bill is created by the NAC which is under the Italian Mafia but what stops this old Fart Chidambaram to make an effort to raise the revenue for the country? he failed to do it for almost a decade this is least expected from a Harvard educated chuthiya like him
 
12573027_965785256790286_5282314298130851921_n.jpg
 
I voted for the first time in my life today for the bjp-tdp alliance in the GHMC elections :)
[Attached file below]

25.83% Voting has been registered at 1 PM. Hyderabadis /Hyderabadu Janalu, please go out & vote!!!

Those who don't vote have little right to whine & complain when the GHMC does a bad job later!!




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GHMC Election Analysis -1
@Bombermanx1 what do you think? Who will win??

I am giving 50-60 to TRS,40 to MIM, About the rest I m not sure. TRS+MIM will come together.

& I am not taking into consideration all those who will join TRS after counting of votes end :P

Though I can say that NDA will definitely do better than Congress & if Congress gets less than BJP(which took 60 seats). Then it's on it's path to destruction in TG.

But then , a new question arises.. of whether any opposition will rise under TDP-BJP or will TG become another Orissa with a below average CM?
------------------------------------
Also you must have noticed, it is KTR leading the TRS campaign in Hyderabad this time. An attempt by Father-Son duo to raise his image in the party & the state.

& then this:- http://www.greatandhra.com/politics/gossip/ktr-to-get-promotion-in-ts-cabinet-reshuffle-72343.html

Then the total slighting & black out of KHR from GHMC..
http://www.greatandhra.com/politics/gossip/harish-facing-unofficial-ban-in-hyd-72368.html
Is He going to stand for this & remain with the party or will he make preparations to leave the TRS in a few years starting now?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom