Indian opposition proposes a new foreign policy regarding South Asia including Sri lanka.

[surya kiran]

The SuryaKiran Doctrine

Neighbours
1. Give to Bhutan, Nepal, and Maldives. Do not expect anything in return.
2. Provide all facilities to Bangladesh and SL, while improving relations continuously. Solve the issue of enclaves with BD and provide for transit facilities to Nepal. Provide electricity and disaster relief during monsoon to BD. Provide humanitarian and trade incentives to SL. Ensure, the SLN and Indian CG engage in regular exercises for better co-ordination.
3. Engage positively with Afghanistan and Burma, provide humanitarian and trade assistance. Enable more Burmese to study in India.
4. Increase trade with China and solve border issues. Live and let live.
5. Increase trade with Pakistan, keep talks cordial. Forget bhaichara...not going to happen. Zero tolerance on Kashmir.

Provide the visa on arrival facility to SL. Provide the Chinese with a 3 day trade visa if landing and attending conference in metros.

 

[bronxbull]

I don't know what kind of future Modi has in Politics but he certainly could make it as a Comedian. You gotta be joking right ?

How is he going to enforce this laughable stance against US, China and Russia.

Baniya Power ain't going to cut the mustard Guju Bhai.

u just flashed ur ignorance,first go learn about ground realities of Pak before opening ur gob about India.

How can Indian impose it on the South Asian countries?

figure how?

 

[Pakistanisage]

u just flashed ur ignorance,first go learn about ground realities of Pak before opening ur gob about India.

Aunty, why are you getting your big Panties in a twist....

 

[bronxbull]

i am not ur aunty,talk to ur mom like that not to me.

perhaps,ur lineage lets u do so.

 

[HeinzG]

For Sri Lanka--Operation Poomalai,IPKF,Operation Pawan

Op. Poomalai was successful because there was no one to oppose it.

And Operation pawan. It was intended to last i think a week or something but took IA more than 6 weeks to complete with heavy causalities.

You see India may do things to other countries. But not to Sri Lanka.

 

[harpoon]

Op. Poomalai was successful because there was no one to oppose it.

And Operation pawan. It was intended to last i think a week or something but took IA more than 6 weeks to complete with heavy causalities.

You see India may do things to other countries. But not to Sri Lanka.

Fighting insurgencey is one thing......but fighting a full blown war is a whole another ball game.

 

[bronxbull]

India can do things to SL but it shouldn't..

It won't also,not necessary at all,leave the island green and peaceful.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Op. Poomalai was successful because there was no one to oppose it.

And Operation pawan. It was intended to last i think a week or something but took IA more than 6 weeks to complete with heavy causalities.

You see India may do things to other countries. But not to Sri Lanka.

In Poomalai,
No one was there to oppose it due to this jet

If I remember correctly,previous attempt to send supply using sea was opposed by SLN and they prevented it.

Operation Pawan did what Sri Lanka couldn't do for years,taking Jaffna peninsula.plus,how many thousands got killed in Jaffna Peninsual after IPKF withdrew???do I have to remind about battle of elephant pass???or other mass killings??in front of those,30+ dead of IPKF is near to nothing.if IPKF and Indian Assistance were not there,Siege of Jaffna would kill tens of thousands civilians.

 

[manlion]

You see India may do things to other countries. But not to Sri Lanka.

please, say that to Rajapaksa

Geneva: What went wrong; is damage control possible? | The Sundaytimes Sri Lanka

Rajapaksa referred to a newspaper account which had claimed that the Foreign Office statement amounted to justifying a bigger country interfering in a smaller one

This was particularly in the context of the Northern Province. A big power could use the Sri Lankan stance on the Ukranian crisis as an example, the report had said pointing out that it raises the spectre of big power intervention.

Such a scenario, it argued could become possible if BJP leader Narendra Modi formed a government in New Delhi with the support of his southern ally, Jeyaram Jeyalalithaa, leader of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhakam (AIDMK). She is also the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu.

 

[HeinzG]

Fighting insurgencey is one thing......but fighting a full blown war is a whole another ball game.

He he full blown wars indeed convert into insurgencies.

In Poomalai,
No one was there to oppose it due to this jet

There was no one to oppose them. That's it.

Operation Pawan did what Sri Lanka couldn't do for years,taking Jaffna peninsula.plus,how many thousands got killed in Jaffna Peninsual after IPKF withdrew???

It was because of the IPKF that SLA had loose Jaffna to LTTE. The most important thing is that IPKF lost the war because they didn't fulfill there goals. For three years.

do I have to remind about battle of elephant pass???or other mass killings??

What about Elephant pass. SLA defended it. LTTE couldn't run it over. Even after the political and strategic draw backs SLA suffered in the early 1990s.

in front of those,30+ dead of IPKF is near to nothing.if IPKF and Indian Assistance were not there,Siege of Jaffna would kill tens of thousands civilians.

Oh don't blabber here. See what happened in 1996. How SLA liberated Jaffna.

please, say that to Rajapaksa

Geneva: What went wrong; is damage control possible? | The Sundaytimes Sri Lanka

So what are you suggesting. Succumb SL to your wet dream?

Good luck with Modi and your Jayalalitha.

 

[GR!FF!N]

There was no one to oppose them. That's it.

thats because they were warned beforehand that any resistance will be met with force.if those jets weren't there,SL surely try to block it

It was because of the IPKF that SLA had loose Jaffna to LTTE. The most important thing is that IPKF lost the war because they didn't fulfill there goals. For three years.

is that so???what is your theory on this???

What about Elephant pass. SLA defended it. LTTE couldn't run it over. Even after the political and strategic draw backs SLA suffered in the early 1990s.

but it just showed that without supports from IPKF,SL probably couldn't capture Jaffna that time.even they lost battle of 2nd Elephant Pass,even though having 15 times more soldiers.

Oh don't blabber here. See what happened in 1996. How SLA liberated Jaffna.

IPKF broke the backbone of LTTE.they tried to revive their force level,but couldn't and eventually lost it.

 

[HeinzG]

thats because they were warned beforehand that any resistance will be met with force.if those jets weren't there,SL surely try to block it

First of all there were no air defense system in Sri Lanka and there were no fighters to intercept the mirages. Even then the ground forces were ordered to not to shoot from there AK-47 by then SL politicos.

is that so???what is your theory on this???

The theory is that IPKF has lost the war. Because they failed to fulfill there objectives.

but it just showed that without supports from IPKF,SL probably couldn't capture Jaffna that time.even they lost battle of 2nd Elephant Pass,even though having 15 times more soldiers.

Tell me why SLA needed IPKF help in capturing Jaffna and why?

The 2nd battle of Elephant pass was won by LTTE because SLA decided to abandon the camp with out any valid reason.

IPKF broke the backbone of LTTE.they tried to revive their force level,but couldn't and eventually lost it.

IPKF didn't broke the back bone of the LTTE it just pushed them to the Wanni jungles.

If IPKF broke the back bone of the LTTE then why any major LTTE leader was not killed by the IPKF?

 

[GR!FF!N]

The theory is that IPKF has lost the war. Because they failed to fulfill there objectives.

..peace keeping missions,not war.if we were at war,we'd won that.but then,you've to know difference between peace keeping mission and war to understand that.

Tell me why SLA needed IPKF help in capturing Jaffna and why?
The 2nd battle of Elephant pass was won by LTTE because SLA decided to abandon the camp with out any valid reason.

then you should study that battle again.they lost many more,some were more disastrous than this battle.I'm thinking to open a thread on this topic.I'll sure invite you to discuss.the fact is,LTTE was a formidable force back then,even after IPKF withdrew,atleast for SL.any other country would tackle it easily.SL only won after using some brute force.

IPKF didn't broke the back bone of the LTTE it just pushed them to the Wanni jungles.
If IPKF broke the back bone of the LTTE then why any major LTTE leader was not killed by the IPKF?

just for the reason why many of our ULFA leaders are still alive but they lost it.to keep the organisation intact so they can bring it to the table.death of senior leaders will create factions which are more tough to tackle.plus,IAF barely used their force to bomb their hideouts,as we were peace keeping mission.we tried to capture pravakaran,one of the main prize which can end the war,but he escaped narrowly,one of the reason was a double agent.

 

[HeinzG]

..peace keeping missions,not war.if we were at war,we'd won that.but then,you've to know difference between peace keeping mission and war to understand that.

One of the objectives of IPKF is to disarm LTTE with in 48 hours. But what had happened? Instead of disarming LTTE, IPKF has to defend itself from LTTE.

SL only won after using some brute force.

What? Is there any war won without using brute force?

Did IA conducted Op. blue star with out brute force?

we tried to capture pravakaran,one of the main prize which can end the war,but he escaped narrowly,one of the reason was a double agent.

Escaped narrowly? And what the hell IPKF was trying? To kill Piribhaharan? Who asked IPKF to do that?

IPKF came to ensure peace between the warring parties. Wasn't they?

 

[GR!FF!N]

One of the objectives of IPKF is to disarm LTTE with in 48 hours. But what had happened? Instead of disarming LTTE, IPKF has to defend itself from LTTE.

actually,they surrendered their arms as per Indo-Sri Lankan Accord.but clashes started few months after it.Tamil Ealam was not only LTTE's demans.you should study about TULF as well as JVP.major blunder was to be not take these groups into consideration in that accord.

What? Is there any war won without using brute force?
Did IA conducted Op. blue star with out brute force?

you misunderstand the term "Brute Force".Operation Blue Star was a Short but Sharp mission that went wrong,mainly due to the lack of the knowledge of existence of Machine gun and Anti Tank Missiles.but Sri Lanka lost so many conventional battle against LTTE,in such a massive scale,that its beyond belief.at the end,they always used "Brute Force",that means Siege and Starve or Carpet Shelling,that generally costs its civilians more than these Rebels.

Escaped narrowly? And what the hell IPKF was trying? To kill Piribhaharan? Who asked IPKF to do that?
IPKF came to ensure peace between the warring parties. Wasn't they?

nope..IPKF was there to implement Indo-Sri Lankan Peace Accord,and its Sri Lankan Govt which asked Indian Govt to take action.the reason was massive amount of displaced people who took refuge into India due to your "War".if you can't control your "$H!T",then someone has to take action.