Indian Muslims also voted for creation of Pakistan: Pakistan PM Imran Khan during show of strength rally

[Akshay89]

ah!!! Believe me some of them even left their parents. They had to, their parents lived all their life in India and they were not willing to move to a new country. My mother-in-law maternal grandfather refused to move to Pakistan, all his children moved to Pakistan except one of his daughter, it is said that he used to call his children by name whenever he was lonely.

It's sad.

But let's be real Pakistan would have never accepted all Indian Muslims if they chose to move.

Besides Muslim stayed back to spread Islam in India.

 

[cocomo]

And rightly so, they knew their survival depends on a strong Pakistan, a weak Pakistan has lead to them being treated worst than Dalits.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

But let's be real Pakistan would have never accepted all Indian Muslims if they chose to move.

Pakistan would have never happened if Nehru agreed to Jinnah's demands.

And rightly so, they knew their survival depends on a strong Pakistan, a weak Pakistan has lead to them being treated worst than Dalits.

LOL

How?

Will Pakistan wage a war on India to save Indian Muslims?

 

[Akshay89]

1. As a UNO member Pakistan has thus the right and the obligation to raise voice not only for Indian Muslims ( which Pakistan does because it is the easiest ) but to raise voice for all oppressed people wherever they might be, whichever religious / political belief they might hold. Isn't being part of the UNO used by the misguided / criminal NATO governments who have a perceived right and obligation to take upon themselves to intervene in other countries ? Isn't being part of UNO and a member of humanity in general that made Putin to demand "Who gave right to NATO to eliminate Gaddafi ?" and to support Syria ?

2. Pakistan is part of the OIC and thus should at least now support the Syrian forces and their foreign allies and should have the Libyan Jamahiriya in fighting against the NATO-created AQ and "M"B criminals but instead in 2011 the chief minister of Pakistan Punjab declared his intention to rename the Gaddafi stadium in Lahore because he had eaten the NATO propaganda that Gaddafi's forces "were killing civilians, including women and children".

3. The Ottoman empire was a monarchy and not a true democratic entity and thus had to be rejected like any sensible person should now reject NATO.

Pakistan would have never happened if Nehru agreed to Jinnah's demands.

Pakistan was always meant to happen.


Muslims would never rule under the tyranny of Hindu majority

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

Pakistan was always meant to happen.


Muslims would never rule under the tyranny of Hindu majority

Majority in both India and Pakistan won but minorities in both countries lost due to partition.

 

[Goenitz]

1. As a UNO member Pakistan has thus the right and the obligation to raise voice not only for Indian Muslims ( which Pakistan does because it is the easiest ) but to raise voice for all oppressed people wherever they might be, whichever religious / political belief they might hold. Isn't being part of the UNO used by the misguided / criminal NATO governments who have a perceived right and obligation to take upon themselves to intervene in other countries ? Isn't being part of UNO and a member of humanity in general that made Putin to demand "Who gave right to NATO to eliminate Gaddafi ?" and to support Syria ?

2. Pakistan is part of the OIC and thus should at least now support the Syrian forces and their foreign allies and should have the Libyan Jamahiriya in fighting against the NATO-created AQ and "M"B criminals but instead in 2011 the chief minister of Pakistan Punjab declared his intention to rename the Gaddafi stadium in Lahore because he had eaten the NATO propaganda that Gaddafi's forces "were killing civilians, including women and children".

3. The Ottoman empire was a monarchy and not a true democratic entity and thus had to be rejected like any sensible person should now reject NATO.

I said they did or didn't.. Ottomans supported Nizam but not Tipu. Like Turkey supporting Algeria but not Assad or supporting Yemni president. etc.

 

[jamahir]

It is an interesting premise. Maybe I can start saying that I am that 'Parsi sanghi troll' in a new avatar. Like in old movies some imposter would appear on the scene, claiming to be the guy whom everyone presumed dead but had never seen, so they believed the imposter anyway.

He is @padamchen and not padman something as said by @Akshay89. And his previous account was @vsdoc. Read his posts before becoming him in your next account.

"Bombai Ka Babu" 1960 Bollywood movie

Why are you banned ?

I said they did or didn't.. Ottomans supported Nizam but not Tipu. Like Turkey supporting Algeria but not Assad or supporting Yemni president. etc.

OK, got your point. But I didn't know Turkey under Erdogan supported Algeria because Algeria is in the Russian camp, yes ? And also some of Gaddafi's family lived for a bit in Algeria after the 2011 invasion and Erdogan is deeply involved supporting AQ and "M"B in Libya so I am confused.

 

[Paitoo]

He is @padamchen and not padman something as said by @Akshay89. And his previous account was @vsdoc. Read his posts before becoming him in your next account.

No no sir. I am Padamchen. I just finished my early dinner of lagan nu bhonu and patra ni machi with Raspberry soda in my residence in Dadar Parsi colony. See, I am giving so many details about myself. What more do you want?

Mara par viswaas karo ni deekra

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

I know a lot of interesting Parsis as I used to live in South Bombay, their main base in India. They were with me in school and college. After finishing class 12 we had a long vacation before we joined professional courses. A Parsi friend of mine was moving to Australia for higher studies and arrived at my door one fine afternoon, unannounced (there were no mobile phones that time and simply turning up without a warning was the norm). He was carrying a large heavy sack of something he wanted me to dispose or keep. Obviously we was talking in a very secretive manner and my mother who was in the living room was getting suspicious. So I took him to the lift lobby where he showed me the contents. It was a sack full of p0rn magazines. Unless he had inherited it, he must have spent all his lifetime pocket money on the collection. My shock was not at the size of the collection, but the fact that it was the shy, awkward classmate, considered a seedha sadha bacha by everyone who owned it. We carried the sack to a nearby rocky beach and dumped it between the rocks. The numerous couples who hid in those rocks in the evening must have been thrilled at the bounty.

Are you from Mumbai?

 

[Paitoo]

Are you from Mumbai?

Nope. Used to live there quite a while back. But among all the cities I have lived, Mumbai was the longest. So in that sense more Mumbaikar than anything else

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Nope. Used to live there quite a while back. But among all the cities I have lived, Mumbai was the longest. So in that sense more Mumbaikar than anything else

Me also Mumbaikar.

 

[Paitoo]

Me also Mumbaikar.

Once a Mumbaikar always a Mumbaikar

Isn't it Bombaiya ?

I have moved with the times

 

[jamahir]

Me also Mumbaikar.

Once a Mumbaikar always a Mumbaikar

Isn't it Bombaiya ?

Besides Muslim stayed back to spread Islam in India.

LOL, do you think any non-Muslim will look at your heroine - Angry Burqa Girl Muskan - and look favorably at Islam ?

 

[El Sidd]

Majority in both India and Pakistan won but minorities in both countries lost due to partition.

The Nehru-Liaquat treaty provides a working solution in safeguarding minorities from majoritarian tyranny.

Pakistan regularly voices concerns for Indian minorities and have enabled access to religious sites.

There exist no resentment among the masses for their political affiliations prior to formation of the country unlike in India which is stuck in perpetual timeline of 40s.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

The Nehru-Liaquat treaty provides a working solution in safeguarding minorities from majoritarian tyranny.

Pakistan regularly voices concerns for Indian minorities and have enabled access to religious sites.

There exist no resentment among the masses for their political affiliations prior to formation of the country unlike in India which is stuck in perpetual timeline of 40s.

India is stuck in 712 AD

Muhammad Bin Qasim: Predator or preacher?​

Muhammad Bin Qasim: Predator or preacher?

We all know Bin Qasim conquered Sindh in 712AD. However, what fate followed for the conqueror is known to few among us.

www.dawn.com