No its limited to discourse related to Kashmiri separatists alone. However your comments indicate you still don't understand the basis of such a neutral policy for civil discourse.
Of course that is only true until you see your own countrymen its army getting abused in a similar manner at that time our reported posts alerts start going off, but when you lot do the same, its thand mahol.
What I don't understand is what is the need for namecalling on PDF? If you have nothing better to contribute to a discussion other than calling the person a terrorist, then perhaps you shouldn't be contributing at all.
I thanked you because as always you have taken the effort to put your views across, and that is always appreciated rather than an autocratic authoritarian approach to moderation.
But PLEASE man, Yasin Bhatkal IS A TERRORIST.
What would you have us call him if not a terrorist?
He and his gang are cowards. They plant bombs and kill and maim innocents. Then they run and hide. And plot the next bombing. And the next.
Do they lift guns and fight it out like men? NO.
They are not militants.
Do they want a different land? NO.
They are not separatists.
They are very happy sponging off India, where they breed, and will finally die.
So tell me what we should call them. In order to foster respectful discourse, so that Pakistanis do not take offense and call us names (kutte, suar, etc.).
Just yesterday @
Umair Nawaz called Arun Shourie (a respected BJP leader and intellectual) a k.utta. What was Arun Shourie's crime?
So if you think this name calling will stop because our side reins in and calls terrorists as holy martyrs or some such, it is a futile hope on your part.
Thanks for listening. As always.