What's new

Indian medicines set off safety worries in US

@wolfschanzze

That is pathetic attitude. In your post suggests no remorse for people's health. That's whole point of this thread. This is idiotic post of all.
Where is the pathetic attitude? that instead of answering a troll i chose to keep quiet is that pathetic?
Our drugs are good enough for our people and other countries buy our drugs because they are affordable and good and only after they passed their respective food and drug administation checks and tests in their countries are our drugs allowed to be sold there, no country wants to kills its citizens.
 
@wolfschanzze

The competition is not the issues, rather the health's concern is very legit, and that's something you are ignoring whilst using 'competitive' card at the same time. His concern on health and safety code is very legit, but you have undermined his point as to suggest 'the right to be competitive' whilst ignoring the genuine health concern, which is main point to be precisely. Read the article again.
 
We have heard many reports saying Indian drugs don't work and cause even more problems than the problems they are supposed to cure.
Indian quality standards are poor. This is not electronic goods, these are things humans put into their body, so they must be of the highest quality.
how many USFDA compliant plants you have in china ? must be in hundreds if not thousands ?
please let me know.. as you comments shows you are top of quality standards in pharma
also do research who have max usfda approved plats outside usa..

They consume because they will die if they don't. They rely on Indian drugs companies and India let these poor people down.
we treat poor ..we dont kill them..

@wolfschanzze

The competition is not the issues, rather the health's concern is very legit, and that's something you are ignoring whilst using 'competitive' card at the same time. His concern on health and safety code is very legit, but you have undermined his point as to suggest 'the right to be competitive' whilst ignoring the genuine health concern, which is main point to be precisely. Read the article again.
yes.. concern is imp and they have right to do so..
india is one of few county who have top infra (tech, manpower,legal, regulatory ) for pharma.
usfda is known for highest standards..
they punish ranbaxy for same..
but other than that they have to prove it
 
Last edited:
@wolfschanzze

The competition is not the issues, rather the health's concern is very legit, and that's something you are ignoring whilst using 'competitive' card at the same time. His concern on health and safety code is very legit, but you have undermined his point as to suggest 'the right to be competitive' whilst ignoring the genuine health concern, which is main point to be precisely. Read the article again.
read my previous posts i said if it passes FDA then it is good enough, it passed FDA in india therefore our companies get license to produce those drugs for consumption in India from our government .
Coming to other countries around the world they have their own respective FDA and rules only if those rules and tests are satisfied are they deemed safe and efficient otherwise why would they buy it?
Where did i ignore it using competitive card ?read my posts again.We have high standards and huge manpower which makes us more efficient in mass producing high standard ,efficient drugs at lower prices.If someone is cursing us for that then its their worry.

That op is a troll, even after sufficient explanation and proofs posted by other members he still chose to rant Bullcrap, no use talking to such trolls.

Pharmaceutical chief tries to stop India replicating its cancer treatment | Mail Online

We didn't make this medicine for Indians… we made it for western patients who can afford it': Pharmaceutical chief tries to stop India replicating its cancer treatment
  • Indian firm granted government licence to produce copy of a Bayer drug
  • Nexavar is used for the treatment of kidney, liver and thyroid cancers
  • A patient would pay £58,000 for a year's course of the Bayer version
  • However the cost of the Natco version would be around £1,700
  • Bayer CEO Marijn Dekkers made comments during a panel discussion
  • He has previously described India's patent laws as 'essentially theft'


Read more: Pharmaceutical chief tries to stop India replicating its cancer treatment | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Leading generic drug maker faked test results for FDA approval

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/generic-drug-maker-skipped-steps-required-for-fda-approval

CBS News) Eighty percent of the drugs prescribed to Americans are generic drugs. They have to be approved by the FDA, usually after years of testing. Many of those drugs are made in India, and it turns out a leading manufacturer, Ranbaxy, often skipped the required steps for approval of its generic drugs.

In 2004, Ranbaxy executive Dinesh Thakur was asked by his boss to investigate allegations of fraud at the company. Thakur quickly uncovered disturbing problems with the data required by the FDA to prove the effectiveness of Ranbaxy drugs.

"The data's important because the FDA or other agencies globally look at that information to give you marketing authorization to sell the drug," Thakur says. "We started getting the files, and, lo and behold, we find that none of that exists in the first place. ... It means that we've gotten approvals from the FDA to sell drugs that were based on no data, or data that was fraudulent."

Thakur found Ranbaxy's drugs for illnesses like AIDS, heart problems and infections had no proof that they were effective. His findings were presented to Ranbaxy executives in 2005. But he says nothing was done.

"I was dumbfounded," he says. "I've worked in this industry for 11 years at that point and never seen such callous behavior."

He points to an incident where his young son was prescribed a Ranbaxy antibiotic for a fever.

"He kept getting worse, so we got another company's formulation and the fever went away," he says, adding that incident made him realize "I had to do something."

In 2005, Thakur blew the whistle to the FDA. Their investigation found Ranbaxy had a "persistent ... pattern" of submitting "untrue statements." On at least 15 new generic drug applications, auditors found over 1,600 data errors. The FDA concluded that their drugs were "potentially unsafe and illegal to sell."

In 2008, the FDA prohibited Ranbaxy from shipping drugs to the U.S. from two Indian plants. But the company continued to sell drugs in the U.S. from its other Indian facilities.

Then, in 2011, while one arm of the FDA was investigating Ranbaxy for serious criminal violations, another arm of the FDA was approving the company for the exclusive rights to make the generic version of one of the most popular pharmaceuticals of all time: Lipitor -- a decision by the FDA that reportedly earned the company $600 million in the first six months.

FDA officials declined to be interviewed on camera but told CBS News at the time that Ranbaxy was approved to make generic Lipitor, the company met FDA's standards.

The federal investigation based on Dinesh Thakur's allegations led Ranbaxy to plead guilty to seven felonies. Ranbaxy was bought by a new owner in 2008 -- the Japanese firm Daiichi Sankyo.


The new owners declined an interview but in a statement said the company has "invested more than $300 million in infrastructure ... plant upgrades" and training and "will take all measures to keep facilities in full compliance to all regulations."

For his role in exposing the company, Thakur was awarded $49 million by a U.S. court.

Asked if, knowing what he knew at the time, he would have taken a Ranbaxy drug himself, Thakur says "No." He adds he still wouldn't take a Ranbaxy drug today.

Despite the actions against the company, the FDA says patients shouldn't stop taking Ranbaxy drugs. If patients are concerned about their prescriptions, they should talk to their doctors.

John Miller will have more on this CBS News investigation tomorrow on the "CBS Evening News" and on "CBS This Morning."

See the observations made by the FDA during September 2012 inspections of Ranbaxy's Mohali plant, below.

Leading generic drug maker faked test results for FDA approval - CBS News
 
here some more....
Dinesh Thakur: Meet the man who won Rs 244 cr for blowing the whistle against Ranbaxy - Economic Times

--------
Dinesh Thakur: Meet the man who won Rs 244 cr for blowing the whistle against Ranbaxy
Soma Das & DIVYA RAJAGOPAL, ET BureauMay 15, 2013, 07.00AM IST
pixel.gif

pixel.gif

Tags:

(Dinesh Thakur, pocketed…)


NEW DELHI: DineshThakur, the former Ranbaxy executive who pocketed Rs 244 crore ($48 million) for blowing the whistle on the dubious manufacturing practices of the country's largest drug maker, has made some of his peers and ex-colleagues turn green with envy.

"I worked for the company for almost two decades. In all these years, my cumulative paycheck was nowhere near what Dinesh has got from the settlement," remarked a former Ranbaxy executive, wryly.
pixel.gif

But then Thakur, a former director of project and information management at Ranbaxy, has pulled off what very few corporate executives dare to do. He gave evidence to the US authorities about the company falsifying drug data and violating good management practices, triggering a massive investigation that resulted in the drugmaker pleading guilty to felony charges related to the manufacture and distribution of certain adulterated drugs made at two of its plants in India. The company has agreed to pay $500 million to resolve false claim allegations.

This is the largest financial penalty paid by any generic drugmaker in the US for violating the provisions of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).

Thakur will receive his money from the US government's share of the settlement. He has been awarded this sum as part of the civil settlement lawsuit under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act, which allow private citizens to bring civil actions on behalf of the US and share in any recovery, a US Department of Justice statement said on Monday.

20056538.cms
In a statement issued by Thakur on Monday, the former Ranbaxy executive claimed he had notified the company's management about the problems, but when they failed to correct them, he had no choice but to alert the healthcare authorities. In an earlier testimony to the US district court of Maryland in June 2012, he had alleged that when his boss had complained about instances of wrongdoing to the Ranbaxy management, he was told to destroy the evidence of the fraud.

On Monday, Thakur said he had worked with US regulatory authorities for two years to expose the fraud. "In furtherance of this effort, I filed a lawsuit to hold Ranbaxy accountable. It took us eight years to help government authorities unravel a complicated trail of falsified records and dangerous manufacturing practices that threatened to compromise the quality and safety of Ranbaxy drugs," he said.

Thakur has worked with Infosys Technologies in the past, and was hired by Ranbaxy in November 2002 from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), where he was employed for 11 years and served as director of discovery informatics. He was recruited by the Indian drugmaker's then R&D head, Rashmi Barbhaiya, a former BMS executive himself.

From 2004-05, Thakur reported to Barbhaiya's successor, Rajinder Kumar, and it was during this period that he began probing the processes followed by the company. In his testimony to the Maryland court last year , he said he began checking whether some of the contract research organisations hired by Ranbaxy had falsified data for HIV and some non-HIV drugs to gain approvals for marketing them in the US and other markets.

Subsequently, he widened the scope of investigation to include all generic products being sold by Ranbaxy. That is when, he alleges, other regulatory issues - violation of good manufacturing practices at its select facilities and instances of adulterated and misbranded drugs - came to fore.

Thakur left the company in 2005. His website said he quit after reporting the fraud to the management. But two former executives said he was asked to go, ostensibly for disciplinary reasons. "Thakur was a soft spoken, gentle person. But he was upset about the circumstances of his departure and felt the company's leadership did not treat him well. Probably, this made him bitter, and he spilt the beans," said an ex-Ranbaxy executive. In 2005, Brian Tempest was the managing director of the company and Malvinder Singh was its president. Singh sold Ranbaxy to Japan's DaiichiSankyo in 2008. Subsequently, Thakur returned to the US, and in 2007, co-founded a life-sciences KPO, Sciformix Corporation. The company is a scientific processing outsourcing organisation that delivers services in the areas of drug safety, biometrics, medical and regulatory writing, and clinical operations. He remained CEO of the company till last year, says his website. Simultaneously, he worked with the US authorities for eight years on the Ranbaxy investigations, which have finally culminated in a $500-million fine for the company and a $46-million payout for him.
 
Cholesterol drug recalled over glass concerns

(CNN) -- A manufacturer of a popular cholesterol-reducing medication has recalled more than 40 batches of the product after warning that they may contain small particles of glass.

Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc. says it is calling back bottles of its 10-, 20- and 40-milligram tablets of atorvastatin calcium, the generic version of the widely prescribed anti-cholesterol drug Lipitor. A total of 41 lots of 90- and 500-count bottles are subject to the recall, the company said.

"The recall is being conducted at the retail level for such select batches that may contain a foreign substance (small glass particles approximately less than 1mm in size)," Ranbaxy's U.S. subsidiary said in a statement on its website. "Ranbaxy is proactively recalling the drug product lots out of an abundance of caution, and in keeping the safety of our customers in mind."

A full list of the recalled lots can be found at Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited | Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Business | Ranbaxy Pharmaceutical company | Pharma outsourcing | Pharmaceuticals brand | Pharmaceuticals intellectual property

Ranbaxy said its action was taken "with the full knowledge" of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which granted the company its approval to manufacture the drug at a plant in New Jersey in 2011.

India-based Ranbaxy came under fire from FDA officials over conditions at two Indian plants in 2006 and 2008. That led to a January 2012 agreement with the Justice Department that cited the company for submitting false data to the FDA and barred the company from manufacturing drugs for the American market at those facilities until they could meet U.S. standards.

Cholesterol drug recalled over glass concerns - CNN.com
 
How India's Drug Biz Can Compromise Your Pills‬‬‬‬

In the cutthroat business of generic drug manufacturing it’s the little things that can bolster a company’s bottom line—like fabricating data about quality instead of fully testing products. Some major drug plants in India that exported medications to the U.S., it seems, did just that.

Such shoddy practices can lead to medicine that does not perform as it should or, worse, causes harmful side effects. In recent years these kinds of incidents have prompted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to place bans on several prominent drug suppliers in India. To follow up, FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg is going to India this week to meet with its health minister and industry officials. India’s drug and food programs will be at the top of the agenda, according to the FDA. India is currently the second-biggest drug provider, after Canada, and the eighth-largest exporter of food products to the U.S.

The meeting comes shortly after the U.S. curbed imports at yet another plant belonging to Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd., India’s largest drug manufacturer and one of the largest U.S. suppliers. Last month the FDA banned a Ranbaxy plant from producing or distributing drug ingredients for the U.S. market; the firm was caught retesting materials to produce acceptable findings after they had failed the first time around. The company had neither investigated nor reported why the products failed initially, the FDA says. Since 2008 the FDA has issued four bans against Ranbaxy plants. At present, no Ranbaxy human drug products are being imported into the U.S. The company has already pleaded guilty to federal drug safety violations as part of a $500-million settlement with the FDA, after a whistleblower from inside Ranbaxy came forward. Separately, Ranbaxy has experienced other quality and control lapses, one of which allowed pieces of glass to get into its generic Lipitor tablets in 2012. Ranbaxy is not the only Indian company that has been cited for sending flawed products to the U.S. Wockhardt and RPG Life Sciences have also received FDA admonishments.

Some critics have blamed lackluster FDA inspection practices for the mishaps, noting that although the FDA inspects domestic plants every two years, it only inspects foreign plants about once every seven to 13 years. In fiscal 2009, for example, the FDA inspected 1,015 domestic establishments but only 424 in all foreign countries combined. FDA data indicates that in 2013 the agency performed 111 inspections at Indian drug facilities.

Simply ramping up the number of FDA inspections overseas would not solve the problem, however, says Roger Bate, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute who studies the drug market. More unannounced inspections in India, along with testing products these plants send to the U.S. would help, he says, but any watershed changes would need to be fueled by the Indian government. The power to inspect and shut down facilities rests with each state in India, and some states are more diligent than others, he says. He notes that empowering India’s Central Drugs Standard Control Organization—equivalent to the FDA—to take action would help address the issue.

Commissioner Hamburg’s eight-day trip will apply needed pressure to the Indian government to crack down on the problem, Bate says. Hamburg is slated to take up food and drug safety issues during meetings with the CEOs of major drug and food producers and with India’s ministers for Commerce and Industry, Health and Family Welfare, and the drug controller general as well as state-level regulators.

She will also be meeting with World Health Organization officials and speaking at the World Spice Congress. India supplies nearly one quarter of the spices, oil and food colorings used in the U.S., but an FDA evaluation last fall found that some of the Indian spices were contaminated. Just one of many findings: almost 9 percent of the 1,057 spice shipments from India were laced with salmonella.

How India's Drug Biz Can Compromise Your Pills‬‬‬‬ - Scientific American
 
Pharmaceutical firms 'driving' India's drug regulations leaving patients subjected to dangerous medications

An unholy nexus between pharmaceutical firms, drug regulatory bodies and a section of medical experts is resulting in Indians being subjected to unsafe and dangerous drugs, a parliamentary standing committee has found.

'There is sufficient evidence on record to conclude that there is collusive nexus between drug manufacturers, some functionaries of the central drug control organisation and some medical experts,' the House panel on health, which reviewed drug regulation in India, has concluded.

'When it comes to approving new drugs, too much is left to absolute discretion of drug authority officials. There are no well laid out guidelines for determining when expert consultation is required,' it added.


article-2142149-13022242000005DC-212_634x421.jpg


846 drug inspectors oversee six lakh retail outlets and 10,500 manufacturing units

As a result, Indian patients are being subjected to inadequately tested drugs, in many cases to drugs which are banned in other countries.

That interests of patients are being treated as secondary go well with the drug regulator's stated mission, the committee has pointed out.

The regulator's mission is to 'meet the aspirations… demands and requirements of the pharmaceutical industry,' it said.

Pharmaceutical firms 'driving' India's drug regulations leaving patients subjected to dangerous medications | Mail Online

More...
In contrast, the stated missions of the US Food and Drugs Administration, UK's Medicine and Healthcare Regulatory Authority and Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration are all oriented at public health and safety.

Thus, most of the ills besetting the system of drugs regulation in India are mainly because of the skewed priorities and perceptions of Central Drug Standards Control Organisation.

'For decades together it has been according primacy to the propagation and facilitation of the drugs industry... [and] unfortunately, the interest of the biggest stakeholder - the consumer -has never been ensured,' the panel's report says.

'The biggest revelation of the report is that our drug regulator is working for the industry rather than patients.

'Another major finding is that doctors who are supposed to assess the safety of drugs, act as pharma agents. Thus rules are being violated grossly,' Dr C.M. Gualti, editor, Monthly Index of Medical Specialties, said.


article-2142149-13022239000005DC-346_634x286.jpg


Analgin: A popular pain-killer sold without prescription but banned in many nations for its severe side effects. It has not been withdrawn despite better alternatives




article-2142149-130221FE000005DC-290_306x481.jpg

article-2142149-13022235000005DC-503_306x481.jpg


Violations: Isentress (Raltegravir), left, used against HIV was approved without clinical trials while Colistimethate, right, used to treat bacterial infections was approved without phrase three human trials




The committee has said that the mission statement of the regulator should be formulated to convey in very unambiguous terms that the organisation is solely meant for public health.

In approval of new drugs, there have been cases where phase three clinical trials have not been carried out.

The basic purpose of these trials is to determine if there are any ethnic differences that can alter the metabolism, efficacy and safety of the drug when administered to patients of different ethnicities living in India such as Indo- Aryans, Dravidians, Mongoloids and tribals.

According to information provided by the ministry, 31 new drugs were approved between January 2008 and October 2010 without clinical trials on Indian patients.

The organisation has not been able to give any convincing defence in not conducting clinical trials in these cases.


article-2142149-13022219000005DC-502_634x363.jpg


Nimulid Safeinject: Used to relieve pain and inflammatory conditions and isn't sold in any developed countries




article-2142149-1302221E000005DC-534_634x571.jpg

Buclizine: Is an anti-allergic agent used for appetite stimulation but was approved without any clinical trials or consultation with experts

Besides, the purpose of conducting these trials to test the drug in various ethnicities is also not being met.

It is obvious that the organisation 'clears sites of preapproval trials without application of mind to ensure that major ethnic groups are enrolled in trials to have any meaningful data,' the report says.

The committee has found gross irregularities in the practice of taking opinion of experts on deciding about new drugs.

So called expert opinion is actually guided and written by 'invisible hands of drug manufacturer,' it says.

For example, for drug clevudine produced by Phamasset Inc, three experts - all professors of medicine at Delhi's All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gulbarga's K.B.N. Medical College and Kolkata's R.G. Kar Medical College respectively - sent identical letters of recommendation.

All of them went out of the way and gave unsolicited advice, in identical language, to the drug controller to give permission to the firm to market the drug without conducting mandatory clinical trials in India.

The drug control office isn't taking into consideration latest developments because of which drugs banned or withdrawn in other countries continue to be sold in India, the report says.
 
I don't trust any drugs made in india. I rather pay more for the real thing
 
We have heard many reports saying Indian drugs don't work and cause even more problems than the problems they are supposed to cure.
Indian quality standards are poor. This is not electronic goods, these are things humans put into their body, so they must be of the highest quality.
Indian generics are far better than Chinese one... What is the export of China to USA for medcine?? Very low.. Reason, worst quality... Believe me, am a Pharma research person and project manager...

The medicines should be put to test, and if their allegations are proved to be right, then the drug companies should face penalty. But the judicial process should be held in international courts where both parties will be weighed equally.
Its not about quality, its about quality of system.. meanwhile this Ranbaxy episode is about 4-5 years old... Ranbaxy has been taken over by daiichi sankyo more than 3 years back.. Its not Indo Japanese company... Articles are written by Journalis, who doesn't know the $hit of Medicine...

People that can't afford expensive drugs buy cheap Indian drugs, but once they consume the cheap Indian drug, they realise it doesn't work.
Ohhh.. Indian medicines are really good one.. One or two incidents cant make a generalized case...

Meanwhile do you know, many of the raw material is imported from China (because it is cheaper than Indian one) in India found to be of low quality making the final dosage form of low quality.. hence there is strict guidelines about importing RM from China....

They consume because they will die if they don't. They rely on Indian drugs companies and India let these poor people down.
India has made the best contribution in the field of Generic medicine.. Do not spread your BS... India has been most US FDA approved manufacturing plants outside USA...
You are just spreading hatred...
 
Last edited:
Urine Spills Staining Image of Wockhardt’s Generic Drugs - Bloomberg
logo_post_b.gif

Print Back to story
Urine Spills Staining Image of Wockhardt’s Generic Drugs
By Ketaki Gokhale - Sep 27, 2013
The Indian factory that makes copies of a popular heart pill sold in the U.S. turns out to be a jumble of dilapidated buildings with blighted windows connected by flaking pipes and capped by a rusty roof.

When U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspectors visited the Wockhardt Ltd. (WPL) plant that produces generic copies of the heart tablet Toprol-XL in July, they found urine spilling over open drains, soiled uniforms and mold growing in a raw-material storage area. They summarized their findings in a filing obtained by Bloomberg via a Freedom of Information Act request.

The document, known as an FDA Form 483, listed 16 so-called observations about Wockhardt’s factory in Chikalthana, 200 miles east of Mumbai, including concerns about quality control. While the FDA isn’t commenting on the possibility of enforcement action, such forms can be a prelude to export restrictions. A typical one contains only four to eight entries, said John Avellanet, managing director of Cerulean Associates LLC, an FDA compliance consultancy in Williamsburg, Virginia.

“This is very serious,” Avellanet said in an e-mail after reviewing the document. “Think of it as a giant vote of ‘no confidence’ from the FDA.”

Shares Fall
Wockhardt fell 5 percent to 551.05 rupees at 10:00 a.m. in Mumbai, the most since Sept. 17. That compares with a 0.4 percent drop in India’s benchmark S&P BSE Sensex index.

“Wockhardt’s down because its biggest product comes from this facility,” said Prakash Agarwal, an analyst at CIMB Securities India Pvt. in Mumbai. “That will be a big overhang on the stock.”

As U.S. regulators step up inspections, they’re finding more examples like Wockardt’s. The FDA has filed reports on four Indian facilities in the past six months and curbed exports at two drugmakers, including Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. (RBXY), the country’s largest. The findings highlight the contrast between immaculate headquarters like Wockhardt’s in Mumbai and working conditions at remote locations in India, where a fifth of the world’s generics are made.

Wockhardt’s Chikalthana plant makes metoprolol, a generic version of the heart pill sold by London-based AstraZeneca Plc under the brand name Toprol-XL. The white copycat tablets with beveled edges were approved for sale in the U.S. in July 2010 and belong to a class of medicines called beta blockers, which make the heart beat slower and with less force.

Wockhardt currently controls about 26 percent of the U.S. market for that pill, according to Needham & Co. Metoprolol alone makes up about 14 percent of the company’s 56 billion rupees in annual revenue. About $1.1 billion of generic Toprol-XL tablets are sold in the U.S. by companies including Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Par Pharmaceutical Co., data compiled by Danbury, Connecticut-based IMS Health show.

FDA Mandate
The FDA’s mandate includes inspecting overseas drugmakers cleared to sell medicines in the U.S. to monitor safety. The agency didn’t report finding contaminated pills. The Chikalthana filing marks the second time this year the regulator has noted diversions from what it calls current good manufacturing practices at a Wockhardt factory. The facility was intended to serve as a production backup after the FDA issued a warning letter in July about the company’s plant in Waluj, near the industrial city of Aurangabad.

The FDA curbed the Waluj plant’s right to export to the U.S., saying Wockhardt’s response to a Form 483 lacked sufficient corrective action. The inspectors noted seven observations at Waluj, less than half the total for Chikalthana.

Warning Letter
Ranbaxy, India’s largest drugmaker, had a third plant banned from exporting drugs to the U.S. last week. Another drugmaker, Strides Arcolab Ltd. (STR) said last week a facility in Bangalore being bought by Mylan Inc. got a warning letter after an inspection in June.

Wockhardt has hired consultants, appointed a new quality supervisor and is working on a better compliance system to address the report on Chikalthana, it said in a response to questions e-mailed by the public-relations firm Ketchum Sampark.

The FDA carried out the Chikalthana inspection from July 22 to July 31 jointly with the Irish Medicines Board and U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, which said in an e-mailed response to questions that it, too, identified “a number of manufacturing issues.”

The FDA’s 10-page report on Chikalthana notes missing and undocumented drug samples and an instance in which a worker didn’t record observed values during testing, instead stating he could remember the figures “in his head.”

Urine Smell
A check of the linen room found worker uniforms crusted with dirt. Raw-material storage areas had “significant mold growth” and the men’s toilets and toilets for the manufacturing gowning areas had urinals with inadequate drainage piping, with urine found to fall directly on the floor where it was collected in open drains and causing an odor, according to the report.

Inspectors found tablets stored at the wrong temperature, raw materials and finished drugs kept in makeshift storage areas with no cleaning or temperature procedures, and condensate droplets falling from an overhead air handling unit onto shipping containers of pills, they wrote.

‘Every Small Thing’
They also expressed concern about quality control procedures, mentioning “multiple examples” in which “samples appeared to have been tested into compliance.”

“The challenge for Indian companies comes in the execution,” Dinkar Saran, a PricewaterhouseCoopers principal in Boston, said in a telephone interview. “How do you convey that every small thing you do can impact the quality of the medicine.”

Wockhardt has responded to the report and awaits an FDA decision, according to the statement sent by Ketchum Sampark.

“We are also leveraging technology and deploying enterprise-wide software that will streamline the entire quality and compliance system,” the company said. “This is backed by a comprehensive compliance training program for all personnel responsible for manufacturing and quality control.”

Erica Jefferson, a spokeswoman for the FDA in Silver Spring, Maryland, wouldn’t comment on the Form 483 or the chance of export restrictions because the regulator doesn’t discuss potential enforcement action.

Stock Impact
“It’s very difficult to speculate on what may happen,” Managing Director Murtaza Khorakiwala said on a teleconference with analysts on Aug. 14 to discuss first-quarter earnings, according to a transcript of the briefing. “We hope that we don’t go -- we don’t end up with a warning letter or an import alert.” Export restrictions at Chikalthana are less likely than they were at Waluj, Khorakiwala said on the call.

If the FDA limits the plant’s ability to export, it could trim $350 million from annual revenue, creating “a big problem for Wockhardt,” according to Bino Pathiparampil, a health-care analyst at IIFL Institutional Equities in Mumbai.

Such an event may also cost investors. When a factory from rival Ranbaxy got hit with FDA export curbs on Sept. 16, the company’s stock price plunged 30 percent to 318.5 rupees, the worst one-day slide since at least January 1991. The news dragged down other Indian pharmaceutical stocks, including Wockhardt, which lost 19 percent that day and the next.

Drug Quality
Products from two other Ranbaxy plants were prohibited from export to the U.S. in 2008 because of quality control issues that were part of fraud allegations, which the company agreed to settle in May for $500 million. Gaurav Chugh, a Ranbaxy spokesman, did not return telephone calls and an e-mail.

Ranbaxy and Wockhardt are part of an industry India’s Department of Commerce says exported $14.6 billion of medicines last year -- a number that may reach $25 billion by 2016. More than one in seven generic drugs bought in the U.S. are Indian-made, the country’s Commerce Department estimates.

Demand for copycat versions of branded drugs are at the root of India’s pharmaceutical success. As the population ages in the U.S. and Europe, causing health-care spending to swell, governments are counting on generics to keep costs down.

“We want American consumers to be confident that the drugs they are taking are of the highest quality,” Howard Sklamberg, who heads the office of compliance at the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a Sept. 16 statement.

U.S. regulators are stepping up efforts to monitor the safety of medicines flowing into the country. The number of drug inspections in India has more than doubled in the past five years. The agency ran 195 checks last year, up from 13 in 2000, according to data supplied by the regulator. By 2017, it will be required to inspect foreign firms as often as domestic ones.

To contact the reporter on this story: Ketaki Gokhale in Mumbai at kgokhale@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jason Gale at j.gale@bloomberg.net

®2014 BLOOMBERG L.P. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
 
all they need is markets with out competetion.generic drugs at cheap prices are taking away the sales of the so called "branded drugs".and they are ready to fight even if poor die in the process..by the way mortality rate in india is lower than u.s..so perhaps they must first check on theirs first before complaining on anyone else..all this drama was started after novartis..our supreme court struck down an ever greening attempt by an MNC which prevented lakhs of cancer patients across the globe to get affordable generic drug.

They consume because they will die if they don't. They rely on Indian drugs companies and India let these poor people down.
right thats the reason for the mortality rate to come down all the way from 60 to 7 now!!thanks for your words of wisdom.
 
wrong..India is not some autocracy which is trying to perish its people.it has independent drug testing agencies,which tests these drugs.and only after they clear this trial,it gets approval to sale.its not some "Hush Hush" conspiracy to get rid of its people.

This is in case for Domestic market.. For US market, drugs are tested in house by Drug company itself which has to follow GLP and subject to USFDA audits which are very strict...
 
Back
Top Bottom