Indian lie about Vikram Lander's viral Thermal image is busted

[xyx007]

https://www.bbc.com/urdu/regional-49665329
The reverse image search reveals that the image being shared by Vikram Lander's Thermal Image taken by the Indian Arbiter is actually a picture of the US space agency NASA's mission 'Apollo 16'.

On June 18, 2019, NASA posted a story on its official website that used this image.

According to this story, this is a picture of the landing site of Apollo 16.

NASA's Apollo 16 Lunar Landing Mission was launched on April 16, 1972, at 12 o'clock 54 minutes from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, USA.

Indian are master of farting -
What would happen if Narendra Modi farts loudly during parliament sessions and everybody hears it?

 

[Rakesh]

This was posted by some random guy.
ISRO has not released any such images through its official website, the official Facebook or Twitter account.

 

[Protest_again]

This was posted by some random guy.
ISRO has not released any such images through its official website, the official Facebook or Twitter account.

BBC Urdu should employ some competent people.

 

[undercover JIX]

This was posted by some random guy.
ISRO has not released any such images through its official website, the official Facebook or Twitter account.

was there any official Pic released by ISRO, which orbiter sent using world's most advanced camera?

 

[Imad.Khan]

This is from the ISRO website

Reverse google search and i found this ( check the dates )

 

[Smarana Mitra]

This is from the ISRO website

Reverse google search and i found this ( check the dates )


View attachment 579100

Even that is not a thermal image of the Vikram Lander.

 

[Fawadqasim1]

Big farts is the trade trademark of indians

 

[Smarana Mitra]

so please share the actual Image

ISRO hasn't released any pictures of the lander.

 

[undercover JIX]

ISRO hasn't released any pictures of the lander.

Why? ISO invented world's most advance camera for this mission and if there is any truth in their claims what the keep back.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

is it because the fotooshaap injuneers are still working on it (I mean to to enhance the qwaaltee and not to deceive the public)?

I don't see where is the problem in detecting a 5 sq metre metal item from 100km. Even ordinary radars of old fighter aircrafts can find such objects. You seem to have inferiority complex and hence qant yo belittle others to feel proud

 

[Ultima Thule]

I don't see where is the problem in detecting a 5 sq metre metal item from 100km. Even ordinary radars of old fighter aircrafts can find such objects. You seem to have inferiority complex and hence qant yo belittle others to feel proud

wow just wow spy satellites hundreds kms above can see a car on road and NASA/ESA/China lunar space probes can detect Apollo landing sites, and older lander of Soviet and USA origins and your previous lunar mission were able to take pics of various Apollo landing sites at same altitudes so why not this space probe can't able to see your vikram lander @Smarana Mitra

 

[Smarana Mitra]

wow just wow spy satellites hundreds kms above can see a car on road and NASA/ESA/China lunar space probes can detect Apollo landing sites, and older lander of Soviet and USA origins and your previous lunar mission were able to take pics of various Apollo landing sites at same altitudes so why not this space probe can't able to see your vikram lander @Smarana Mitra

The orbiter can see the lander but the lander can't see the orbiter. Unlike the orbiter, the lander has a fixed direction of the antennae and hence it can communicate only if it landed correctly in the right position. Unlike the orbiter, which has solar power in several kilowatts, the lander has only few watts of power and had limited lifespan and as a result, had less powerful antennae

 

[Ultima Thule]

The orbiter can see the lander but the lander can't see the orbiter. Unlike the orbiter, the lander has a fixed direction of the antennae and hence it can communicate only if it landed correctly in the right position. Unlike the orbiter, which has solar power in several kilowatts, the lander has only few watts of power and had limited lifespan and as a result, had less powerful antennae

wow what a logic you have, i am talking about orbiter not lander, and Vikram lander was crashed, your previous lunar orbiter take a pics of Apollo landing sites with a same altitude, so why your i called (Vikram) orbiter can't able to take pics of (Vikram) LANDER @Smarana Mitra

 

[Aryan0395]

But where did u get the thermal image of lander that ISRO talked about? ISRO never shared that image with public.

 

[Aryan0395]

from the tweets by mahendra singh, Amitesh Tiwari and Bala k. Sri (BJP general secratary) View attachment 579219

Yes, because they are the official spokespersons for ISRO?
If you wanna make fun of him then go ahead, but the title seems to suggest that ISRO lied. Both these persons you mentioned are not ISRO.