Indian Judge at ICJ biased towards Pakistan in KBJ case???

[sakha39]

Thank you. I'm actually ignoring your posts because most of them are nonsense. But that one was marginally civilised.

He is being sarcastic Didn't you read his signature. No need to say thanks.

 

[NakedLunch]

He is being sarcastic Didn't you read his signature. No need to say thanks.

Really? Well, I'll be damned......

 

[SarthakGanguly]

But that one was marginally civilised.

Now my life has some meaning.

 

[SrNair]

It is not about the decision. It is about the rules and law a judge that can show his personal likes and dislikes cannot and should not sit for such a bench in any court.

Besides yes his bias can alter the balance in the final decision.

Duty is duty .He will do that without any emotions but that is not going to shed his patriotism.

 

[sinait]

Here here as we were talking about there is a Permanent Indian Judge at ICJ who is part of 11-member ICJ bench that is hearing case of Kalbhushan . The excitement and his statement to Indian media about the ICJ interim verdict when the matter is sub-judice taints the entire process ICJ.
Pakistan should raise this issue before proceeding
Has India's judge at ICJ committed a mistake by expressing his 'delight' on order?

Title is ambiguous. At first read, I thought Indian judge is for Pakistan.
Indian Judge at ICJ biased against Pakistan in KBJ case
would be clearer.

 

[Spring Onion]

Duty is duty .He will do that without any emotions but that is not going to shed his patriotism.

duty as a judge and patriotism that taints or compromise neutrality of a judge do not go hand in hand.

 

[SrNair]

duty as a judge and patriotism that taints or compromise neutrality of a judge do not go hand in hand.

Dont think so.
He is an Indian you cant deny that and so he will have patriotism.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

One judge cannot unilaterally Change the decision. There are laws and judges refer the law, when it comes to court a democratic system in decision making is followed, if there is any disagreements between judges, they will cast a vote and follow the majority, in this case all the judges agree upon the decision.

If the judge panel was entirely Indian judges, then you can claim that the decision was biased.

During our study... we "study" a subject "Ethics & Medical Jurisprudence".

Seems the indian judged skipped that part.


Now, Pak can allege the indian judges biasness has tainted the indian case.

Yes, I am sure Pakistani Military Court judges were quite unbiased, which is why there was no public trial, no consular access was given and the whole proceedings were kept secret.

Military courts try military personal and hardcore terrorists everywhere.

One thing you can be sure about is that no sane politician will risk his *** for your monkey, nor will Paks "evil" military let it go.

 

[ranjeet]

Military courts try military personal and hardcore terrorists everywhere.

One thing you can be sure about is that no sane politician will risk his *** for your monkey, nor will Paks "evil" military let it go.

India knows Jadhav's fate already, this move is about discrediting PA and justice system run by them in an international arena.

 

[Chhatrapati]

During our study... we "study" a subject "Ethics & Medical Jurisprudence".

Seems the indian judged skipped that part.

May be you should teach the same to your Military court that ruled unilaterally against KJ. With no-information whatsoever about the proceedings, heck who knows even there was a trial.

This is not a provincial judge who's brother got arrested for stealing, hence the judge abstain from ruling.

In ICJ the nationality or the former activities of the judge will not be a matter in ruling. That's why nobody raised an issue about it in the court.

Now, Pak can allege the indian judges biasness has tainted the indian case.

May be you should try to make an argument like that and see what happens.

If you still don't understand then read the following.
https://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_prot...mmary_of_case_law_on_conflict_of_interest.pdf[/QUOTE]

 

[punit]

PAKISTANIS are saying .. Indian origin judge is biased towards them. makes sense !

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

May be you should teach the same to your Military court that ruled unilaterally against KJ. With no-information whatsoever about the proceedings, heck who knows even there was a trial.

This is not a provincial judge who's brother got arrested for stealing, hence the judge abstain from ruling.

In ICJ the nationality or the former activities of the judge will not be a matter in ruling. That's why nobody raised an issue about it in the court.


May be you should try to make an argument like that and see what happens.

If you still don't understand then read the following.
https://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_prot...mmary_of_case_law_on_conflict_of_interest.pdf

[/QUOTE]
Remind that to your military courts next time they try a suspect !

Bullshytin for the sake of it won't change reality.

Brother or not, a judge is bound to not give moronic statements during trial of a case. The Indian bugger got a little too excited and tarnished not just his but Indias credibility (whatever it had).

And what does the Kyoto protocol state? Does it give the judge the right to discuss an under trial case or show his "delight" at the so called perceived judgement? It does not!

India knows Jadhav's fate already, this move is about discrediting PA and justice system run by them in an international arena.

Than you have achieved absolutely nothing, but a point that Pak can raise to tarnish your judges image, further strengthening our case and weakening yours and ICJs!

You being a lawyer should know that!

I'm sure you studied ethics? Have you not!

 

[Chhatrapati]

Remind that to your military courts next time they try a suspect !

Don't you know IA don't run military courts. They just don't have any control over civilian issues, that's how it's run in here. No fan boys for any army generals. They serve the elected government.

Bullshytin for the sake of it won't change reality.

That's the only thing you can do and you were doing it in ICJ. Since the hearing started.

Brother or not, a judge is bound to not give moronic statements during trial of a case. The Indian bugger got a little too excited and tarnished not just his but Indias credibility (whatever it had).

ICJ is gonna sleep over that complain, like it did in case of Israel in the past.

And what does the Kyoto protocol state? Does it give the judge the right to discuss an under trial case or show his "delight" at the so called perceived judgement? It does not!

The Kyoto protocol may state anything that is irrelevant to the article. The point is even though the judge thought to be biased towards one particular state, the ICJ