rubyjackass
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 3,610
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
O bhai, read his words, what he called fake. His witness has no bearing on what he called fake. Except the movie part, which, for the last time, is a very minor error.Yup , the main witness calls it fake and apparently he does not matter Am talking about how the documentary was used to generalize and stereotype Indians. Apparently a foreigner can talk shit about India while worse things happen in her own country and there are libtards who support it.
India is not yet in a place where false rape cases have overwhelmed the genuine cases. In fact many genuine cases are not even reported much less investigated. In the documentary we find evidence for this. The rapist who committed suicide had already raped hundred girls according to his brother.Yes and apparantly the new law is being seriously misused which you tend to convinantly ignore. Every society has problems not Only India. Foreigners should mind they own business rather than focusing on someone else's problems
There are also huge amount of false Rape cases and also large number of false dowry cases. But Libtards are usually silent in those issues and on those threads,
When did I backtrack? I said there is no evidence of her doing anything illegal so far. The ban was imposed without even any primary evidence. She supported her claims by showing relevant documents.How many times will you backtrack ? first you mouth of about the documentary then claims "nobody accepts it blindly", then you claim Leslee did not d anything illigal then when proven she did something illigal you make her into another Julian Assange
And I said I do not expect journalists to meticulously follow the law. Especially when it does some good. Like in Assange's case. Assange took far greater risk than Udwin obviously.
And you are the one who seems to be claiming that showing the documentary will spawn fans associations for the rapist.
Why are you talking like a moron? You are the one who is arguing that the film should be banned because a gora made it. You would have kept quite if a desi made it. Or would you howl treason even then?That's funny, the self rightious human rights activist using the word "Rape" so freely Apparently according to LIbtards foreigners can break laws and make films and it still should not be banned because a gora made it ,Screw Indian laws
The film is already out and it there even on youtube uploaded by secondary sources. You are the one who is walking naked and calling names to everyone who warns about it. And now you are laughing at them like a loon. Good humour.Relax, take a cold bath and calm down, you are the libtard who usually likes dragging INdia face into the mud at the slightest opportunity. If you break laws your film gets banned. Its quiet simple. Stop whining about it so much.