What's new

Indian doctor charged with Deliberate Manslaughter , Receives a Life sentense.

Kompromat

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
40,366
Reaction score
416
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Jayant Patel facing life in jail over patients' deaths

911697-jayant-patel.jpg


JAYANT Patel was behind bars last night after a jury convicted him of the manslaughter of three patients and causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth.

The verdict brought to a climax the patient abuse scandal that rocked the Queensland health system.

The Indian-trained doctor showed no emotion when the six-man, six-woman jury panel delivered its bombshell verdict at 6.15pm (AEST) last night, after 14 weeks of evidence, more than 75 witnesses and nearly 50 hours of deliberations over six days.

Patel's wife, Kishoree, wept silently as her husband was led into the cells, before the packed courtroom.

Trial judge John Byrne denied bail to the 60-year-old former director of surgery at Bundaberg Base Hospital.

Patel had pleaded not guilty to the manslaughter of Mervyn Morris, 75, Gerry Kemps, 77, and James Phillips, 46. He also pleaded not guilty to causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth patient, Ian Vowles, 63.

Asked by Justice Byrne's associate whether he had anything to say after the verdict was delivered, Patel answered: "No, your honour."

Last night's unanimous guilty verdicts sparked an outpouring of emotion in both Brisbane and Bundaberg, where the surgeon's patients and the families of his victims had gathered.

Judy Kemps - wife of Gerry Kemps - was tearful and relieved.

"My only concern has been that he will go somewhere else and do the same thing, and I didn't want anyone else going through what we went through," Ms Kemps said outside the Queensland Supreme Court in Brisbane.

"I feel so relieved it's all over. I'm ready to start my life again."

Mr Vowles, who was the only former patient to give evidence in the trial, was overjoyed at the guilty verdict.

Dr Patel removed his bowel, declaring it "didn't like" his body and he needed to "whip it out", despite tests showing it was non-cancerous.

In Bundaberg last night, Mr Vowles said he was keen to get on with his life after years of stress.

"People mightn't think it has been (affecting me) but it's kind of on your mind all the time, dragging you down," he said.

Dr Patel's sentencing has been adjourned until tomorrow. Manslaughter carries a maximum jail sentence of life, and grievous bodily harm up to 14 years' jail.

During the trial, the surgeon was accused of possessing a "toxic ego", misdiagnosing patients and rushing into unnecessary, complex surgery on patients too frail to handle the operations.

All four of the patients consented to the operations.

Phillips died on May 21, 2003, two days after Dr Patel performed an oesophagectomy on him.

Phillips was a frail, sick man suffering from oesophageal cancer and was also an end-stage renal patient. The Crown argued Patel should never have performed such a complex and dangerous operation on Phillips.

Patel removed part of the colon of Morris on May 23, 2003, to treat rectal bleeding. The prosecution argued that Patel misdiagnosed Morris, and the operation did not treat the rectal bleeding. Morris died on June 14, 2003, from respiratory failure, after continued bleeding and poor nutrition.

Patel removed Mr Vowles's large bowel on October 4, 2004, despite biopsies on removed polyps showing he was cancer-free. He was left impotent and needing a permanent ileostomy bag. The prosecution said the operation was unnecessary because Mr Vowles did not have cancer.

Kemps died on December 21, 2004, after Patel performed an oesophagectomy on him the day before. After the oesophagectomy, Kemps continued to bleed, but Patel did not re-operate until hours later. He could not find the source of the bleeding and Kemps bled to death. The prosecution argued Patel should not have performed the operation in the first place, and that he should have re-opened Kemps immediately.

Patel's legal battle will not end with last night's guilty verdicts, and the appeal his lawyers flagged. The former surgeon faces another Supreme Court trial on charges of grievous bodily harm and fraud, but a date has not yet been set.

Patel has been committed to stand trial on eight fraud charges.

He is accused of dishonestly gaining employment and a salary at the Bundaberg Base Hospital and dishonestly gaining registration as a doctor in Queensland.

Patel is also facing a grievous bodily harm charge, relating to his treatment of Darcy Russell Blight.

Additional reporting: Rosanne Barrett, Naomi Lim
 
.
Source?????????????????????? Or were you waiting for someone to ask you for source. Anyway if he's guilty, Then he must be punished severely.
 
. .
I don't know man this looks fishy ... sorry but looks fishy

All the ppl most of them who died were like 75? like come on 75 years old
 
.
I don't know man this looks fishy ... sorry but looks fishy

All the ppl most of them who died were like 75? like come on 75 years old

Dying and Killing are two different concepts - a life is a life no matter how old.
 
.
Jayant Patel facing life in jail over patients' deaths

911697-jayant-patel.jpg


JAYANT Patel was behind bars last night after a jury convicted him of the manslaughter of three patients and causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth.

The verdict brought to a climax the patient abuse scandal that rocked the Queensland health system.

The Indian-trained doctor showed no emotion when the six-man, six-woman jury panel delivered its bombshell verdict at 6.15pm (AEST) last night, after 14 weeks of evidence, more than 75 witnesses and nearly 50 hours of deliberations over six days.

Patel's wife, Kishoree, wept silently as her husband was led into the cells, before the packed courtroom.

Trial judge John Byrne denied bail to the 60-year-old former director of surgery at Bundaberg Base Hospital.

Patel had pleaded not guilty to the manslaughter of Mervyn Morris, 75, Gerry Kemps, 77, and James Phillips, 46. He also pleaded not guilty to causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth patient, Ian Vowles, 63.

Asked by Justice Byrne's associate whether he had anything to say after the verdict was delivered, Patel answered: "No, your honour."

Last night's unanimous guilty verdicts sparked an outpouring of emotion in both Brisbane and Bundaberg, where the surgeon's patients and the families of his victims had gathered.

Judy Kemps - wife of Gerry Kemps - was tearful and relieved.

"My only concern has been that he will go somewhere else and do the same thing, and I didn't want anyone else going through what we went through," Ms Kemps said outside the Queensland Supreme Court in Brisbane.

"I feel so relieved it's all over. I'm ready to start my life again."

Mr Vowles, who was the only former patient to give evidence in the trial, was overjoyed at the guilty verdict.

Dr Patel removed his bowel, declaring it "didn't like" his body and he needed to "whip it out", despite tests showing it was non-cancerous.

In Bundaberg last night, Mr Vowles said he was keen to get on with his life after years of stress.

"People mightn't think it has been (affecting me) but it's kind of on your mind all the time, dragging you down," he said.

Dr Patel's sentencing has been adjourned until tomorrow. Manslaughter carries a maximum jail sentence of life, and grievous bodily harm up to 14 years' jail.

During the trial, the surgeon was accused of possessing a "toxic ego", misdiagnosing patients and rushing into unnecessary, complex surgery on patients too frail to handle the operations.

All four of the patients consented to the operations.

Phillips died on May 21, 2003, two days after Dr Patel performed an oesophagectomy on him.

Phillips was a frail, sick man suffering from oesophageal cancer and was also an end-stage renal patient. The Crown argued Patel should never have performed such a complex and dangerous operation on Phillips.

Patel removed part of the colon of Morris on May 23, 2003, to treat rectal bleeding. The prosecution argued that Patel misdiagnosed Morris, and the operation did not treat the rectal bleeding. Morris died on June 14, 2003, from respiratory failure, after continued bleeding and poor nutrition.

Patel removed Mr Vowles's large bowel on October 4, 2004, despite biopsies on removed polyps showing he was cancer-free. He was left impotent and needing a permanent ileostomy bag. The prosecution said the operation was unnecessary because Mr Vowles did not have cancer.

Kemps died on December 21, 2004, after Patel performed an oesophagectomy on him the day before. After the oesophagectomy, Kemps continued to bleed, but Patel did not re-operate until hours later. He could not find the source of the bleeding and Kemps bled to death. The prosecution argued Patel should not have performed the operation in the first place, and that he should have re-opened Kemps immediately.

Patel's legal battle will not end with last night's guilty verdicts, and the appeal his lawyers flagged. The former surgeon faces another Supreme Court trial on charges of grievous bodily harm and fraud, but a date has not yet been set.

Patel has been committed to stand trial on eight fraud charges.

He is accused of dishonestly gaining employment and a salary at the Bundaberg Base Hospital and dishonestly gaining registration as a doctor in Queensland.

Patel is also facing a grievous bodily harm charge, relating to his treatment of Darcy Russell Blight.

Additional reporting: Rosanne Barrett, Naomi Lim

IMHO it is an isolated event. Not merely enough to generalize Indian Doctors in Australia.
 
. .
He looks innocent doctors don't try to save a cancer patient and kill them you know the story says there was some cancer patient almost dieing it was a last ditch effort ...

Anyhow he looks innocent
 
.
True but the skills and qualification of Indian doctors are under discussion.

He is not indian doctor. he is Indian-Origin American doctor working in Australia.

btw, you were too quick to generalize.
 
.
This issue has been going in Australia for awhile about Dr. Patel, has been all over the news!!

Dr Patel undertook initial surgical studies at the M.P. Shah Medical College in Saurashtra University, and obtained a master's degree in surgery, After graduation he moved to the United States where he received further surgical training at the University of Rochester School of Medicine as a surgical intern and resident of surgery. Whilst Patel was working at a hospital in the city of Buffalo in 1984, New York health officials cited Patel for failing to examine patients before surgery. Patel was fined US$5,000 and was placed on three years' clinical probation. In 1989, Patel moved to Oregon and began working for Kaiser Permanente Hospital in Portland, Oregon. Medical staff alleged that he would often turn up, even on his days off, and perform surgery on patients that were not even his responsibility. In some cases, surgery was not even required, and caused serious injuries or death to the patient.
After a review, Kaiser restricted Patel's practice in 1998, banning him from doing liver and pancreatic surgeries and requiring him to seek second opinions before performing other surgeries. Further, after reviewing four cases in which three patients died, the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners made Patel's restriction statewide in September 2000, and New York State health officials required him to surrender his license in April 2001.

Dr. Patel than moved to Australia and started practising here! Public of Australia has demanded answers as to why he was given license to practice in Queensland hospital despite the shaky past?

The administration and health department is under lot of scrutiny now because proper investigation and background check was not performed before employing Dr. Patel.
 
.
He is not indian doctor. he is Indian-Origin American doctor working in Australia.

Yes he is an Indian & Indian trained which makes him an Indian doctor , he worked in US and got citizenship - he was banned from performing surgery in two states because of his record and this is why he came to Australia.

The Indian-trained doctor showed no emotion when the six-man, six-woman jury panel delivered its bombshell verdict at 6.15pm (AEST) last night, after 14 weeks of evidence, more than 75 witnesses and nearly 50 hours of deliberations over six days.

btw, you were too quick to generalize.

You have the answer now and it would be good to condemn this murder rather then defending him-you should be ashamed of it.

Jayant Patel facing life in jail over patients' deaths | The Australian
 
.
Yes he is an Indian & Indian trained which makes him an Indian doctor , he worked in US and got citizenship - he was banned from performing surgery in two states because of his record and this is why he came to Australia.

Yes he is of Indian origin so what?? He got trained in US as well read the para below again

Dr Patel undertook initial surgical studies at the M.P. Shah Medical College in Saurashtra University, and obtained a master's degree in surgery, After graduation he moved to the United States where he received further surgical training at the University of Rochester School of Medicine as a surgical intern and resident of surgery.

There are thousands of Indian trained doctors in US, Australia,Canada and European countries and we have not heard anything bad about them. One off case and you as a Pakistani got a chance to shoot it out on all Indians docs ignoring the fact that he got trained in US as well and is in fact US citizen.

And why the hell idiots in Australian made him Director without any due diligence? who's fault is this? their lazy docs/health care officials didn't care to verify the records and offered him lucrative post. How silly isn't it? Looks like any Tom Dick Harry can become Directors or so in Oz...
 
. .
It is true many Indian-origin doctors are a disgrace in Queensland. But they can also be useful. My elderly father was a refugee and was suffering from trauma and but he could not reside there indefinitely. There was no way he could go home without being killed. There was this stuck up Malaysian-born Indian psychiatrist who was not helping.

However, as luck would have it, we came to know that insanity ran in her family. A Pakistani counterpart in Malaysia helped out and sent out a subtle feeler.

After that, everything was resolved. I don't know how but my father got to stay on. In this case, thank Allah for dubious Indian doctors.
 
.
You have the answer now and it would be good to condemn this murder rather then defending him-you should be ashamed of it.

Jayant Patel facing life in jail over patients' deaths | The Australian

Are you ashamed of every Pakistani that blowsup, or kills somebody, or goes around the world threatening to kill people. Do you want people asking you if are ashamed of being a Pakistani when something bad happens in Pakistan or by a Pakistani.

He is a criminal for all it's worth, like there are in every country in the world, but nobody needs to be ashamed of it because you have a problem of generalization.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom