What's new

Indian Defence Library

TO MAKE OUR FUTURE BRIGHT, WE SHOULD NEVER FORGET OUR HISTORY, ONE OF THE BIGGEST BLUNDERS COMMITTED BY GOI, IMHO...........

a modest proposal from the Soviets...duly rejected by Indian Babudom

I came across an article, written by a Brazilian. The article called for getting Brazil's defence programs & industry up & going by hiring from among the number of highly trained American Scientists & Engineers.

Brazil will never find another opportunity like the one that is available today with NASA laying off thousands of highly qualified scientists and engineers who are specialized in the aerospace area and are ready to go to work immediately on these projects.

This kind of endeavor brings many benefits to the Brazilian economy such as high paying jobs, innovation, new technologies, and also shows that Brazil is serious about becoming one of the leading nations in the 21st century.

The fast development of a state-of-the-art defense and aerospace industry in Brazil has become a priority for Brazil to go up to the next level and become one of the leading nations in the 21st century.

With the recent closure of America's Space Shuttle program, a large number of them are expected to lose their employment. Thus, their experience & knowledge would be an invaluable addition to any Science & Technology program they choose to associate themselves with.

While the article called for Brazil to approach these American Technologists, it was the Russian Government which itself made a similar proposal in the immediate aftermath of the break-up of the U.S.S.R. Saddled with a collapsed economy that fuelled widespread unemployment, the Russians sought to place its vast pool of Scientists & Technologists, that the Soviets-era regime had nurtured & supported during the Cold War, in suitable & relevant positions of employment, least they turn rogue [speculating]. With this in mind, it approached the Government of India, then headed by Prime Minister Mr. PVN Rao.

This was revealed by Mr. Bharat Karnad, in his book, "Nuclear Weapons & Indian Security: The realist foundations of strategy".

20110804-Soviet-Scientist-India-Russ%25255B5%25255D.jpg


20110804-Soviet-Scientist-India-Russia-Defence-02_thumb.jpg

As seen above, from the snippets of a page from the book, the Soviets even agreed to the Scientists being paid part of their salary in Indian Rupees, while the rest, expectedly, the much-needed American Dollars in cash. However, Indian Babus, playing "seniority-seniority" scuttled this heaven-sent opportunity, citing rulebooks, pay-grades, Loch Ness monster & what not's.

In India's defence though, our own economy up until the early 90s was itself tottering & heading nowhere, at least not up North. So the financial viability of the proposal, from India's stand point, could itself have been suspect [speculating]. However, as seen above, it wasn't India's fiscal situation that was cited as the reason for rejecting the offer, but pay-grade of government employees. Which is why the news is all that more irksome. Salary structure of government employees & seniority & prestige indicated by salary drawn eventually took precedence over India's National interests - how unfortunate.

Not surprisingly, they found a very welcoming China who, it appears, greeted them with open arms & coffers. Russian Scientists form an integral part of many a critical Chinese weapons development programs. In its drive to posses required technologies, China has adopted a multi-pronged approach, including contracting expertise from overseas, if required. Take, for example, China's flat-top development program. Ukraine, which inherited significant portions of erstwhile Soviet Unions vast Naval development infrastructure, has deputed large number of its Naval Engineers to be part of the program.

While by no means publicly advocating that India too engage in industrial espionage & unauthorized cyber-intrusions to lay its hands on required technologies, but to decline a legitimate offer that would've given a much-needed fillip to our own projects, borders on incredulity. The benefits, their participation in India's programs would have brought about are too obvious to require any re-stating. This huge loss of opportunity has left India's programs bereft of the immense benefits their participation would've brought in and could've possibly helped side-step many a roadblocks, including time & cost over-runs, it has had to encounter as part of its R&D programs.

a modest proposal from the Soviets...duly rejected by Indian Babudom - AA Me, IN

@ Indian members can i expect your contribution to this thread especially @Abingdonboy @sancho @IND151 @Skull and Bones ???
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@ i simply cant believe that GOI turned down this offer.

I suspect GOI secretly signed a deal with Russia and DRDO quietly absorbed some Russian scientists.
 
Current order book of Indian Navy, Indian Coast Guard and recent deliveriesCurrent order book of Indian Navy, Indian Coast Guard and recent deliveries

Two aircraft carriers - INS Vikramaditya (Ex-• Gorshkov) on trials in White Sea with delivery by end 2012 and Air Defence Ship (INS Vikrant) progressing at Cochin Shipyard Ltd (CSL) with revised delayed delivery of 2017.

Three Krivacks from Yantar Yard in Kalinngrad, Russia, with BrahMos missiles and Shtil anti-aircraft guns with delivery from 2012 onwards (INS Teg delivered, INS Tarkash in late 2012 and INS Trikand early 2013).

Three Type-17 Shivaliks from Mazagon Docks Ltd (MDL), Mumbai, with Klub Missiles and BEL sonars - INS Shivalik, INS Satpura, INS Sahyadri; last delivered July 2011.

Seven Type-17A stealth frigates in the pipeline • under ‘Buy Design and Make Modular in India’; four at MDL and three at Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers Ltd (GRSE), Kolkatta.

Three Type-15A destroyers - improved Delhi design - from MDL. Fitted with M-Star radar, BrahMos missiles, long-range Baraks and two multi-role ASW helicopters on each platform. JV between Pipavav Offshore and Engineering Services Ltd and MDL being progressed.

Six Scorpene submarines by DCNS Navantia combine from MDL from 2013 with Exocet MM 39 missiles and new torpedoes. Last two to be fitted with air independent propulsion (AIP). Selection of and RFP for three in progress.

Two-plus-two nuclear submarines: SSN INS Chakra with Klub missiles and CET torpedoes joined the fleet at Vishakapatnam and INS Arihant, built at Ship Building Centre (SBC) likely to proceed for sea trials end-2012 and to be fitted with K-15 nuclear-capable 700 km underwater launched missiles. Two more, larger, Arihants - S-4 and S-5 - reported under construction at SBC.

Six submarines of Project-75 (I) Second Line to be ordered; RFPs to be issued in 2012. Defence Acquistion Council (DAC) approved two to be imported, three to be constructed at MDL and one at Hindustan Shipyard Ltd (HSL). JV on Submarines between MDL and Larsen and Toubro Ltd (L&T) being progressed.

Four Indian Navy-designed OPVs from Goa • Shipyard Ltd (GSL) from 2013.

Four Type-28 ASW Kamorta-class corvettes of Indian Navy design from 2013 onwards from GRSE.

Two Indian-designed merchant ship configuration training ships ordered from ABG Shipyard. Delivery in 2013-14.

Two tankers from Italy’s Fincantieri - INS Deepak and INS Shakti - delivered.

Six Catamaran Australian-designed survey ships from Alock Ashdown Shipyard Ltd, Bhavnagar. INS Makkar undergoing sea trials off Mumbai.

Four Mistral-class LPDs approved by DAC; two to be built at HSL and two by the private sector.

Eight MCMVs from Kangnan, South Korea; two to be built in Korea and six at GSL.

Two submarine support ships: Order yet to be placed.

Two DSRVs: Order yet to be placed.

Boeing P8I reconnaissance aircraft from 2013 onwards. More likely later.

16 multi-role helicopters - European NH-90 or Sirkosky MH-60R - to be ordered.

56 utility helicopters: RFP issued.

Three Coast Guard oil pollution control vessels of 3,000 tonnes Rolls Royce-designs from ABG Shipyard. Two delivered: CGS Samudra Prahari and CGS Sagar Samudra Paheredar Prahari.

Seven OPVs to be ordered by Coast Guard. Replies to RFPs received.

145 interceptor boats for Coast Guard from L&T, GSL HSL and other yards.

80 FIVs ordered from Solas Marine, SriLanka.

..:: India Strategic ::. Navy: Current order book of Indian Navy, Indian Coast Guard and recent deliveries

@Skull and Bones, buddy pls avoid discussion here, post only technical stuffs so that this can act as a reference thread :)

I had already opened a thread on that issue earlier, here is the link:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...sal-soviets-duly-rejected-indian-babudom.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EVERYTHING ABOUT INDIAN BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENCE (BMD) SYSTEM


interceptor.jpg


Introduction

DRDO is developing a layered missile defense system that will be ready fro deployment by 2015.

Phased Development and Deployment

DRDO Chief V.K. Saraswat told the press on March 21, 2010, that the Ballistic Missile System is being developed in two phases under a capability based deployment plan.

In the first phase, which is currently underway, DRDO will develop and deploy a system for defense against missiles with less than 2,000 km range like Pakistan's Ghauri and Shaheen missiles and China's solid-fuel Dongfeng-21 (NATO designation: CSS-5).

In the second phase, system capability will be upgraded to defend against missiles with ranges greater than 2,000 km that can additionally deploy decoys or maneuver.

The Phase 2 system will require longer range radars (Detection range of 1,500km as opposed to 600 km for Phase 1 radars), and new hypersonic interceptor missiles flying at Mach 6-7 (As opposed to Mach 4-5 for Phase 1 missiles) with agility and the capability to discriminate against ballistic missile defence counter measures.

“Our effort is to have interception at very high altitudes, and the entire system will be able to handle multiple, simultaneous attacks,” Saraswat said.

Deployment Timeline


Following the eighth test of the BMD on November 23, 2012, validating its ability to engage multiple targets, Scientific Advisor to Defense Minister V.K. Saraswat told The Hindu from Wheeler Island, "We are now in a position to deploy the system."

He added that the First Phase of the BMD, which would be able to engage missiles of upto 2,000 kim range, would be deployed by 2013-14.

On June 24, 2012, PTI reported that the DRDO is preparing a proposal for clearance from the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) to develop BMD systems that can be deployed at short notice to protect Delhi and Mumbai.

Under the proposal, DRDO will identify secure sites in and around the two cities where missile interceptors and their associated tracking radars would be deployed if the country faced the threat of a nuclear war.

The BMD system will be completely automated and require minimum human intervention, DRDO sources told PTI.

In April 2012, DRDO Chief VK Saraswat told India Today:

"Phase-1 of the BMD programme will be completed by 2013. In this, we will intercept Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles with a range of 2,000 km. The second phase will be completed by 2016. In this, we will be able to intercept intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) with ranges over 5,000 km."

In August, 2011, Dr Avinash Chander, DRDO’s Chief Controller for Missiles and Strategic Systems, told the Business Standard, “We can deploy an effective ABM system for a single city within 3 years from now. We can definitely ensure the safety of one city in that time frame. After that, the [ABM shield for] other cities will follow.”

DRDO Chief V.K. Saraswat had told the press on March 21, 2010 that Phase 1 could be deployed in two years and Phase 2 by 2016.

Phase 1 System Overview

The system will be based on radar technology for tracking and fire control which the DRDO developed jointly with Israel and France respectively.

It will be implemented as a two tiered terminal phase interceptor system comprising of

Prithvi Air Defense (PAD) exo-atmospheric interceptor missile for intercepting targets outside the atmosphere.

Advanced Air Defense (AAD) endo-atmospheric interceptor missile for intercepting targets up to an attitude of 30 km .

'Swordfish' Long Range Tracking Radar (LRTR). The Swordfish LRTR has been developed jointly by LRDE, Bengaluru and ELTA of Israel. It is based on the Israeli Green Pine early warning and fire control radar imported by India from Israel in 2001-2002.

Multi Functional Guidance radar that tracks the incoming missile in its terminal phase and guides the interceptor missile onto the target. The DRDO developed the guidance radar in collaboration with French company, Thales.

The integrated exo and endo-atmospheric systems offer a hit-to-kill probability of 99.8 per cent.
Prithvi Air Defense

A two stage missile with a maximum interception altitude of 80 km (50 mi), the PAD has a solid fueled first stage and a liquid fueled second stage.

The missile uses inertial navigation with mid-course correction from LRTR. In its terminal phase, it switches to active radar homing.

The missile uses a maneuvering gimbaled directional warhead which can rotate 360 degrees to explode towards the incoming missile in order to destroy. DRDO claims to have tested the technology which so far only the US and Russia have demonstrated.

Because it is directional, the 30 kg warhead is able to generate an impact equivalent to a 150 kg omni-directional warhead.

PDV Interceptor Missile

The PAD-1 missile will be replaced with the PDV missile, which has two solid fuel stages.

The PDV will be capable of intercepting enemy missiles at altitudes upto 150 km. Like the PAD, it will feature a directional warhead.

It will be equipped with a innovative system to allow the missile to maneuver at altitudes up to 150 km, well outside the earth's atmosphere.

"The PDV will be the mainstay of the defence shield," Dr Saraswat told India Today in June 2010.

The first trial of the missile was initially scheduled for late June or early July 2010. On February 14, 2012, DRDO Chief VK Saraswat told Express News Service that the missile would be tested by the end of 2012.

“If every thing goes as per the plan, the new missile that can also carry the directional warhead would be test-fired by the year-end,” Saraswat said.
Advanced Air Defense (AAD)

The endo-atmospheric interceptor AAD is a 7.5m long, single stage solid fueled missile, equipped with a ring laser gyro based inertial navigation system, a hi-tech computer and an electro- mechanical actuators totally under command by the data up-linked from the sophisticated ground based radars to the interceptor.

In an interview with the Indian Express in April 2012, DRDO Chief VK Saraswat compared the ADD to Patriot 3.

"Israelis have used Patriot 2, and this (AAD) is equivalent to Patriot 3. There is a difference between Patriot 2 and 3. Patriot 2 was a semi-active guidance whereas Patriot 3 is active guidance.

"The philosophy in this case is first you launch the missile based upon the data collected by a ground radar about the target. Once the missile goes close to the target, the homing seeker homes onto the target and starts tracking autonomously."

P-Charge Interceptor Warhead

The AAD interceptor is equipped with a P-charge [projectile charge] warhead that can penetrate thick steel and cause damage with a high hit [repeat hit] density.

"That means the number of holes you create per unit area is very high," a DROD official told the press in October, 2009.

Target Missile

The DRDO uses a modified Prithvi missile as the target for testing the BMD system.

DRDO Chief VK Saraswat told the Indian Express in April 2012, "Prithvi missile in a normal course travels only up to an altitude of 40 km and covers a range of 350 km. Whereas I made it go up to a height of 100 km and come down like a ballistic missile, simulating the terminal velocities of a target of, say, 2,000-km class and then engaging that target with this AAD missile."
Phase 2 System

Phase 2 Interceptor Missiles


The Phase 2 missile defense system will be based on the AD-1 and AD-2 interceptor missile that are currently under development.

"Ground testing of the AD-1 will begin next year and the AD-1 missile will be test-fired in 2012," Saraswat told India Today in June 2010.

These interceptors would be capable of shooting down missiles that have ranges greater than 5,000 km, which follow a distinctly different trajectory than a missile with a range of 2,000 km or less. During their final phase, ICBMs hurtle towards their targets at speeds twice those of intermediate range missiles.

The Phase 2 system will match the capability of the THAAD or Terminal High Altitude Area Defence missiles deployed by the United States as part of its missile shield beginning this year. THAAD missiles can intercept ballistic missiles over 200 km away and track targets at ranges in excess of 1,000 km.

Phase 2 Radar

Unlike the Phase 1 Swordfish radar developed by India in partnership with Israel, the radar to support Phase 2 interception will have 80% indigenous component, DRDO chief VK Saraswat told the press on May 15, 2011.

"Only some of the equipments and consultancy would be provided by Israel," Saraswat said.
Floating Test Range for Phase 2 system

A floating test range is being developed for developing the Phase 2 system.

During the testing of the Phase 2 system, target missiles will be launched from specially constructed ships. [via PTI]

Scientists have started designing the ship and associated systems such as radar, mission control centre, launch control centre, communication network and many other equipment needed for phase-II trials, Sarsawat told the press.

BMD Tests


A total of five successful test of the BMD system have been carried out: Two using the PAD exo-atmospheric interceptor and three using the AAD endo-atmospheric interceptor.

First Test

On March 6, 2006 a PAD missile successfully intercepted a modified Dhanush surface-to-surface missile fired from INS Rajput anchored inside the Bay of Bengal, towards Wheeler Island, simulating a target “enemy” missile with a range of 1,500 km.

Second Test

On November 27, 2006 a PAD missile intercepted a Prithvi ballistic missile at 48 km altitude.

Third Test

In December 2007 an AAD missile intercepted a target missile at an altitude of 15kms.

The interceptor used a 'gimbaled directional warhead' or a warhead only one side of which explodes close to an incoming ballistic missile, shattering it.

The Advanced Air Defense (AAD) interceptor has so far been successfully tested up to an altitude of 15 kms.

The interceptor will next engage an incoming target missile at 30 km to validate the efficacy of the missile in its entire endo-atmospheric envelope.

Fourth Test Aborted

A test of the AAD missile on March 15, 2010 at 1010 was aborted after the modified Prithvi (Dhanush) missile launched to simulate the target deviated from its flight path.

In the test, a Dhanush missile launched from a naval ship was be guided along a trajectory similar to that of an 1,500 km range Ghauri missile in its terminal phase zeroing in on the Wheeler Island, off Damra village on the Orissa coast. A PAD interceptor launched from Wheeler Island was to intercep the "enemy" missile with a hit to kill at 70-80 km.

In an explanatory statement, DRDO said:

"The target missile took off in normal way; at T+20 sec (approx) the target deviated due to some onboard system malfunction and could not maintain the intended trajectory, failing to attain the desired altitude profile. The Mission Control Centre computer found that the interception is not warranted as the deviated target did not present the incoming missile threat scenario and accordingly the system intelligently did not allow take-off of the interceptor missile for engaging the target. The cause of the target malfunction is being investigated by analysis of tele-metered data."

On March 18, after analyzing the telemetry and other data, DRDO scientists conclude they had figured out the reason for the failure.

The target missile reached an altitude of nearly 65 km and then spiralled down into the Bay of Bengal having travelled 27 km.

Fuel leak caused test failure

On April 11, 2010, DRDO Chief VK Sarsawat said:

“Analysis of the earlier trial revealed there was a leakage in the target missile leading to system failure. We are rectifying it to ensure the next flight test in June will hit the target and demonstrate our advance capability in developing the missile defence shield against any adversary missile attack.”

He was speaking at the sidelines of a national convention on 'The Frontiers of Aeronautical Technologies', organised by the Aeronautical Society of India in Bangalore..

Fifth Test

A test of the AAD interceptor missile was conducted on Monday, July 26, 2010. The test was partially successful as the missile failed to score a direct hit.

A modified surface-to-surface Prithvi was launched from a mobile launcher at 10:05 am from launch complex-3 of ITR at Chandipur-on-sea.

The interceptor AAD missile, positioned at Wheeler Island, about 70 km across sea from Chandipur, engaged the target missile at an altitude of 15 km.

The warhead exploded within a few metres of the target missile releasing multiple bullet-like particles which hit and destroyed the target missile 26 seconds after its launch. The debris which fell into the sea was tracked by radars located along the coast.

The AAD missile for the first time used P-charge directional warhead.

A DRDO press release cryptically stated

Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), today successfully conducted fourth consecutive Interceptor Missile test in Endo atmospheric regime at 15 Km altitude off ITR, Chandipur, Orissa. The single stage Interceptor Missile fitted with Directional Warhead and other advanced systems neutralized the target.

The target ballistic ‘enemy’ missile was launched from Launch Complex – III, ITR Chandipur. The Interceptor Missile fitted with directional warhead was launched from Wheeler Island and destroyed the Target Missile breaking it into fragments. This was tracked by various Radars and sensors. All weapon system elements including Command and Control, Communication and Radar performed satisfactorily.

Sixth Test

An AAD interceptor missile armed with a P-charge directional warhead was successfully tested on Sunday, March 6, 2011.

A Target Missile mimicking an enemy Ballistic Missile with a 600-km range was launched from Launch Complex –III, ITR, Chandipur at 9.32 AM. The target missile climbed to an altitude of 120 km and began its downward trajectory.

The missile tracking network consisting of long range and multi function Radars and other Range sensors positioned at different locations detected and identified the incoming Missile threat.

The radars tracking the Ballistic Missile constructed the trajectory of the missile and continuous complex computations were done in real time by ground guidance computer to launch the interceptor at an exact time.

The fully automatic launch computer launched the interceptor at 9.37 AM and the onboard INS (Inertial Navigation System) and ground based Radars guided the interceptor to the target (incoming Ballistic Missile).

The Interceptor intercepted the Ballistic Missile at an altitude of 16 km and blasted the missile into pieces. It was a text book launch and all the events and mission sequence took place as expected.

The falling debris was tracked by various radars and sensors.

The test was witnessed by Scientific Advisor to Defense Minister V.K. Saraswat and other top DRDO officials.

Following the successful launch, Sarsawat told the press that after launch the interceptor maneuvered in the direction of the target; the maneuvered is referred to as the “least energy maneuver. In the terminal phase of the attacker's flight, as it was hurtling towards the earth, the interceptor's radio frequency seeker “acquired the target, rolled the interceptor in the right direction and, when it was a few meters from the target, gave the command to the directional warhead to explode,” Dr. Saraswat explained.

The warhead detonated, blasting the attacker to pieces. The ground-based radars and the sensors on board the targeted missile tracked the debris, which rained down over the Bay of Bengal, “confirming a very good kill,” the DRDO Director-General said. “Based on the data from the target, a 100 per cent kill was achieved.” The radars were located at Konark and Kendrapara, near Paradip, in Orissa.

It was earlier reported that the test would involve a maneuvering target missile. The report had quoted DRDO sources as saying it will be “a tricky mission” because the attacker would have a manoeuvrable trajectory and try to dodge the interceptor from homing in on it.

The test was earlier scheduled for for February 10, 2011.

Seventh Test

The endo-atmospheric (AAD) missile interceptor was successfully tested on February 10, 2012.

During the test, the AAD-05 missile destroyed a modified Prithvi missile simulating an enemy ballistic missile at a height of 15 kms.

The Prithvi ballistic missile was launched at 1010hrs from ITR Chandipur. It was initially picked up and tracked by the LRTR near Puri and thereafter by the Multi Functional Radar located near the seaport town of Paradip.

Based on the tracking information from the radars, a guidance computers continuously computed the trajectory of ballistic missile and launched AAD-05 interceptor missile from Wheeler island at a precisely calculated time.

The guidance computer command guided the AAD-05 till the terminal phase of the interception, when an RF seeker on the interceptor obtained a lock on the target enabling the interceptor to hit the target missile directly and destroy it. The warhead on the interceptor also exploded and destroyed the target missile into pieces.

The Prithvi target missile, mimicking the trajectory of an enemy missiles with a range of 2,000-3,000 km, climbed to a height of 100 km before descending towards its assigned target.

Radar and electro optic tracking systems (EOTS) tracked the missile and also recorded
the fragments of target missile falling into the Bay of Bengal.

The test was the first in which the interceptor hit the incoming ballistic missile directly and destroyed it. The mission was carried out in the final deliverable user configuration mode.

The test was the fifth test of the AAD interceptor.

Eighth Test

DRDO successfully demonstrated the ability of the BMD system to engage multiple target on November 23, 2012.

During the test, the BMD successfully intercepted a simulated electronic ballistic missile with a range of 1,500 km to 2,000 km at an altitude of 120 km using a simulated interceptor missile. It also scored an endo-atmospheric hit to kill against a shorter range ballistic missile (a modified Prithvi launched from Chandipur) at an altitude of 15 km over the Bay of Bengal.

The attacker Prihvi missile flew the trajectory of a missile with a range of 600 km to 1,000 km.

An Advanced Air Defence (AAD) missile launched from Wheeler Island successfully intercepted the 'hostile' Prithvi and destroyed it at an altitude of 15 km at 12.52 p.m.

The test was witnessed by the Scientific Advisor to Defense Minister V.K. Saraswat, Chief Controller, (Missiles and Strategic Systems), Avinash Chander, Associate Director, Research Centre Imarat, Sateesh Reddy and Program Director, (AD Mission) Adalat Ali.

The test on November 23 was the eighth of the BMD. So far seven missions have been successful and one of them, the first one was conducted in exo-atmosphere at an altitude of 48 km in November 2006.

Two radars processed the simulated and real missiles and assigned launchers to engage them.

No interceptor was launched against the electronic missile, but the interception sequence was simulated to T minus zero second.

The Need for Multiple Target Engagement and Simulation of Long Range Target Missile

A day earlier, Avinash Chander, Chief Controller (Missiles and Strategic Systems), DRDO told the press, "The Mission Control Center will process the two missiles and identify in real time which launcher is best suited to fire its missile against which target. Since one of the two attackers is an imaginary missile, we will not be firing a missile against that. But we will be going to the point of firing up to T-0."

Explaining the need for the test, Chander said, "The missile trial on November 23 (is) aimed at 'a deployable configuration' to intercept multiple adversarial missiles raining down on India.

"We are not able to launch live targets simultaneously because of the limitations of range and geometry. That is, since distances are not available, we are not able to fire two target missiles simultaneously."

Mr. Chander added: "In a real scenario, multiple ballistic missiles may be coming towards India which need to be handled. Our radars can track more than 200 missiles simultaneously. When multiple launchers are deployed, they can handle multiple missiles fired at us. We should be able to track them, process the signals, identify which is a threat and assign the specific launcher-missile that is best suited to intercept them. So far all our interceptor flight-trials have been one missile against one target … So the forthcoming interceptor mission would give the DRDO team a lot of confidence to simultaneously handle multiple targets."
DRDO Press Release

The DRDO press release following the test said, "The Ring Laser Gyro based Navigation System in Target, Fibre Optic Gyro based INS in Interceptor, Onboard computers, Guidance systems, Actuation Systems and the critical RF Seekers used for the terminal phase have performed excellently. The AAD Missile system initially guided by Inertial Navigation system was continuously getting update of the target position by the Radar through a data link. The Radio Frequency (RF) seeker tracked the Missile & Onboard computer guided the Missile towards the Target Missile and hit the target.

"The Radio Proximity Fuse (RPF) exploded the warhead thereby destroying the target missile completely."

It added, "All the four missiles were tracked by the Radars and all the guidance and launch computers operated in full operational mode for handling multiple targets with multiple interceptor. All the four missiles were in the sky simultaneously and both the interceptions took place near simultaneously. This has proved the capability of DRDO to handle multiple targets with multiple interceptors simultaneously. The complete Radar Systems, Communication Networks, Launch Computers, Target update Systems and state of the art Avionics have been completely proven in this Mission."

Outstanding Features of the Test

A DRDO scientist told the press that teams from five centers - Launch Complex-III at Chandipur, LCC at Wheeler Island, Mission Control Centre, Hyderabad; Long Range Tracking Radar, Konarak; and Multi-Functional Tracking Radar, Paradip - participated in the successful November 23 mission.

SA to the Defense Minister, VK Saraswat told the Hindu that that test had demonstrated the maturity of all the BMD technologies, including the directional warhead, radio-frequency seeker as also various networks.

Avinash Chander, Chief Controller (Missiles and Strategic Systems), DRDO, added that two major technologies were used for the first time: an indigenously-built fibre optic gyro-based INS system and a new class of warhead to provide a much higher velocity and better penetration and damage.



Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) System - IDP Sentinel

FOR FURTHER READING:

http://www.claws.in/administrator/uploaded_files/1262760881MP_15___111209.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since there was a lot of Talks on UNMOGIP (United Nations Military Observer Group in India & Pakistan), Some Facts & figures:

Current Strength (31 December 2012)

39 military observers
25 international civilian personnel*
48 local civilian staff*
*Note: Statistics for international and local civilians are as of 31 October 2012

Country contributors

Military personnel

Chile, Croatia, Finland, Italy, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Sweden, Thailand and Uruguay.

Fatalities

5 troops
1 military observer
2 international civilians
3 local civilians
_____
11 total

Financial aspects

Method of financing: United Nations regular budget

UNMOGIP Facts and Figures - United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan

UNMOGIP Background

In August 1947, India and Pakistan became independent. Under the scheme of partition provided by the Indian Independence Act of 1947, Kashmir was free to accede to India or Pakistan. Its accession to India became a matter of dispute between the two countries and fighting broke out later that year.

In January 1948, the Security Council adopted resolution 39 (1948) , establishing the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) to investigate and mediate the dispute. In April 1948, by its resolution 47 (1948) , the Council decided to enlarge the membership of UNCIP and to recommend various measures including the use of observers to stop the fighting. At the recommendation of UNCIP, the Secretary-General appointed the Military Adviser to support the Commission on military aspects and provided for a group of military observers to assist him. The first team of unarmed military observers, which eventually formed the nucleus of the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP), arrived in the mission area in January 1949 to supervise, in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, the ceasefire between India and Pakistan and to assist the Military Adviser to UNCIP.

The tasks of the observers, as defined by the Military Adviser, were to accompany the local authorities in their investigations, gather as much information as possible, and report as completely, accurately and impartially as possible. Any direct intervention by the observers between the opposing parties or any interference in the armies’ orders was to be avoided. These arrangements remained in effect until the conclusion of the Karachi Agreement on 27 July 1949 establishing a ceasefire line to be supervised by UN military observers.

The Karachi Agreement specified that UNCIP would station observers where it deemed necessary, and that the ceasefire line would be verified mutually on the ground by local commanders on each side with the assistance of UN military observers. Disagreements were to be referred to the UNCIP Military Adviser, whose decision would be final.

On 30 March 1951, following the termination of UNCIP, the Security Council, by its resolution 91 (1951) decided that UNMOGIP should continue to supervise the ceasefire in Jammu and Kashmir. UNMOGIP's functions were to observe and report, investigate complaints of ceasefire violations and submit its finding to each party and to the Secretary-General.

At the end of 1971, hostilities broke out again between India and Pakistan. They started along the borders of East Pakistan and were related to the movement for independence which had developed in that region and which ultimately led to the creation of Bangladesh.

When a ceasefire came into effect on 17 December 1971, a number of positions on both sides of the 1949 ceasefire line had changed hands. The Security Council met on 12 December, and on 21 December adopted resolution 307 (1971) , by which it demanded that a durable ceasefire in all areas of conflict remain in effect until all armed forces had withdrawn to their respective territories and to positions which fully respected the ceasefire line in Jammu and Kashmir supervised by UNMOGIP.

In July 1972, India and Pakistan signed an agreement defining a Line of Control in Kashmir which, with minor deviations, followed the same course as the ceasefire line established by the Karachi Agreement in 1949. India took the position that the mandate of UNMOGIP had lapsed, since it related specifically to the ceasefire line under the Karachi Agreement. Pakistan, however, did not accept this position.

Given the disagreement between the two parties over UNMOGIP's mandate and functions, the Secretary-General's position has been that UNMOGIP could be terminated only by a decision of the Security Council. In the absence of such an agreement, UNMOGIP has been maintained with the same arrangements as established following December 1971 ceasefire. The tasks of UNMOGIP have been to observe, to the extent possible, developments pertaining to the strict observance of the ceasefire of 17 December 1971 and to report thereon to the Secretary-General.

The military authorities of Pakistan have continued to lodge complaints with UNMOGIP about ceasefire violations. The military authorities of India have lodged no complaints since January 1972 and have restricted the activities of the UN observers on the Indian side of the Line of Control. They have, however, continued to provide accommodation, transport and other facilities to UNMOGIP.

UNMOGIP Background - United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan
 
CHANDRAYAAN - 2 EXPLAINED

chandrayaan2.jpg

Introduction

The Chandrayaan-2 is an ISRO mission that aims to place an orbiter around the moon and send a lander with a rover to its surface in 2015.

The mission is being undertaken in collaboration with Roskosmos of Russia.

Under an agreement signed on November 12, 2007 between the space agencies of India and Russia, ISRO and Roskosmos, each agency was to contribute Rs 425 crore towards the cost of the mission.

The spacecraft was to be launched in 2014, with an orbiter made by ISRO and a lander made by Russian Space Agency Roscosmos. The lander was to carry a small Indian built rover to collect and examine lunar soil samples, Russians refer to the project as Luna-Resource.
Roskosmos Dropout?

On January 21, 2013, Dr. S.V.S. Murty of the Planetary Exploration Group of the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), an institution in Ahmedabad under ISRO, announced that India would undertake the Chandrayaan mission all by itself, dropping earlier plans of collaborating with Russia. [via The Hindu]

Dr. Murty was speaking on India’s lunar and Mars missions at a workshop on exoplanets at the laboratory.

ISRO took the decision to go it alone after Russia's Roskosmos expressed its inability to provide the lander for the mission, following the failure of the Russian Phobos-Grunt mission to Mars in November 2011.

ISRO will now make the orbiter, lander and rover all in-house.

SAC has completed the design of the indigenous lander and preliminary configuration study, according to Murty. The mission profile has undergone minor alterations.

The Chandrayaan-2 will be launched using a GSLV powered by an indigenous cryogenic engine in 2015.

The Orbiter will have five primary payloads, two of which will be improvements on instruments that were onboard Chandrayaan-1.

The rover too will carry two additional instruments.

According to PRL director Jitendra Goswami, despite the Russian pull out from the Chandrayaan project, Indo-Russian collaboration in planetary exploration will continue.

Chandrayaan 2 was a component of Roskosmos' Luna-Glob moon exploration program. It is possible the Russian agency would collaborate with ISRO in one of its future lunar missions.

Roskosmos Dropout Denial

On January 22, 2013, Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) Director J N Goswami told the press that Chandrayaan 2 would continue to be a joint Indo-Russian project despite the delay.

"The Indo-Russian mission is going ahead. The project has got delayed. Currently, we are whole-heartedly working for the Mars project scheduled for November. The moon mission, for the time being, has got delayed," Goswami told PTI.

"The failure of Roskosmos Phobos-Grunt mission (in December 2011) has, for the time-being, delayed the moon mission," Goswami said, adding the construction of lander for the combined mission has been delayed.

According to PTI, it made repeated attempts to contact S V S Murty, who had announced the Roskosmo drop out a day earlier, but he was not available for comments on the issue.
At a Glance

Launch Date 2015
Launcher GSLV
Total Weight 2,660 kg
Orbiter Weight 1,400 kg
Lander Weight 1,260 kg (35 kg scientific instruments)
Rover 15kg

Launch Schedule

The launch of the spacecraft is scheduled for 2015, but is dependent on the GSLV launcher becoming operational again well in time.

ISRO Chariman K. Radhakrishnan reconfirmed to the press in July 2012 that the Chandrayaan-2 mission could be on its way in 2014. [via The Hindu]

Following the failure of the Russian Phobos-Grunt mission to Mars in November 2011, there were reports in the Russian press that the mission is likely to be rescheduled to 2016.

Academician Lev Zelyony, the director of the Institute for Space Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences told Interfax in February 2012 that "the technical solutions used in the Phobos-Grunt project need to be revised. Those solutions were used for the lunar projects too. It does not touch upon the equipment – it goes about spacecraft and control systems." [via Red Orbit]

However, ISRO's annual report for 2012, released in April 2012, still gives the launch year as 2014

To begin with, the spacecraft was planned to be launched in 2013 (First Quarter) using a GSLV Mk 3. However, following two consecutive failures of the GSLV launcher on April 15, 2010 and December 25, 2010, ISRO has pushed back the launch by nearly two years, and settled on GSLV Mk 1 as the launcher.

The Mk. 1 carries a lighter payload than the Mk 3. As a result, ISRO is limiting the experiments being carried on board.

Speaking to the press on September 9, 2011 ISRO Chairman K Radhakrishnan said, “We have to go through design review and then move ahead”. This mission is slated for 2013-14, he added.

As in early September 2011, ISRO was poised to start developing the engineering model its rover for testing with the lunar surface simulator.

Division of Responsibility

According to Government of India press release on August 4, 2010:

"The Chandrayaan-II project is envisaged to have an Indian Orbiter module with scientific instruments to go round the moon and a Russian Lander module carrying an Indian Rover and a few scientific instruments.

The Chandrayaan-II project will be launched using the Indian Geostationary Launch Vehicle - GSLV. The costs towards these components will be met by the Space Agencies of the respective countries."

ISRO will launch Chandrayaan 2 using a GSLV Mk-2 rocket and realize the orbiter and rover. Roscosmos will realize the lander that will carry the rover to the moon.

Many other countries (USA, France, Germany, Sweden) are expected to participate in the project by contributing instruments and equipment.

During 2009 ISRO and Russian officials talked of there being two rovers. A large main rover designed in Russia and fabricated in India; and a mini-rover designed and fabricated in India, with both rovers being controlled from India.

Following a cost analysis, the Russians gave up on their rover in May 2010.

“The tasks of the mission are to investigate rock samples at the maximum distance from the landing point and to confirm the presence of water,” Roscosmos Deputy Head Anatoly Shilov said at the Bengaluru Space Expo in August 31.

While the Indian rover will analyze lunar surface soil, the Russian lander is likely to drill into the lunar surface and analyse sub surface soil.

Payload Finalization

The payloads for Chandrayaan-2, as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Space Sciences (ADCOS), was announced by ISRO on Monday, August 30, 2010.

ADCOS is chaired by Prof U R Rao and comprises members are drawn from ISRO centres, academic institutions and R and D laboratories and Chaired by Prof U R Rao, Chairman,

"Inclusion of additional payloads, if possible within the mission constraints, will be considered at a later date following a detailed review", ISRO said in a statement
Project Director

The project is being helmed by Dr Mayilsamy Annadurai.

Mission Profile

According to a presentation made by Dr. Goswami and M. Annadurai, project director for Chandrayaan-2, at 2011 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference:

A GSLV Mk-2 launcher will will place the Chandrayaan-2's orbiter, lander and rover, in a transfer orbit around the Earth. From there, the orbiter's onboard rocket engine will propel both the spacecraft and the lander-rover combo into a trajectory that will take them to the Moon.

Once on the lunar transfer trajectory, the orbiter and lander-rover will separate. The two would then journey independently to the Moon,

Landing Sequence

During the landing, the lander's main engine will bring the spacecraft to hover at approximately 2 kms above the lunar surface and then shut down.

The lander will then free fall under the moon's weak gravity, with small thrusters periodically firing to control the rate of descent.

The lander will use a three beam Doppler radar to avoid large obstacles during its descent to the moon's surface.

The accuracy of the autonomous landing system allows the landing area to be predicted as an ellipse that is 30 km long and 15 km wide.

After the lander touches down on the moon, it will release the rover on the lunar surface.

The rover will be equipped with a robotic arm and two instruments to study the chemical composition and volatiles in the lunar surface material within a kilometre of the landing site.

Landing Site

The Chandrayaan-2 lander and rover are both powered with solar panels and hence cannot operate in an area completely devoid of sunlight.

Additionally, the spacecrafts need to be in direct communication with earth for control.

The main scientific goal of the mission is to confirm the presence of water ice on the moon.

It was earlier believed that ice on the moon is confined to areas permanently in darkness. More recent observations suggest ice is also present below the lunar surface in sunlit areas close to the South Pole.

Two candidate landing sites near the Lunar south pole have reportedly been identified by the Russians, based on data from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and Japanese Selena orbiter, which entered lunar orbit in 2007.

The Russian developed Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector, LEND, installed on LRO was used to identify sunlit areas, potentially with sub surface ice. Imagery from Selena and data from LOLA laser altimeter on NASA’s LRO orbiter was used to profile the terrain in these areas.

To begin with 14 sites in sunlight areas close to the South Pole that possibly have subsurface ice were identified..

Nine of these sites were rejected at the outset by the lander team because the terrain was too rough for the landing system of the spacecraft.

Selected Sites

Based on accuracy of the landing system, two sites have been short listed

Main site: 87.2 deg S, 68 deg E, Shoemaker, Faustini
Backup site: 88.5 deg S, 297 deg E, Gerlach

The sites finalized could change if the accuracy of the landing system is improved or based on other data.

Spacecraft Redesign

Once it became clear that Chandrayaan-2 would have to be launched by GSLV and not GSLV-III, the structure configuration of the spacecraft was changed from I2K to I3K to accommodate a revision in payload lift off capacity. The change will facilitate the use of larger propellant
tanks.

chandrayaan2_Evolution.jpg

The mission strategy was revised to inject the satellite in a lower initial orbit (170 X 16980 km) with a higher lift-off mass of 3200 kg and the Propulsion System Configuration changed to increase fuel carrying capability of the satellite.

Project History

ISRO announced on Wednesday, December 24, 2008, that the design for Chandrayaan II has been completed and it will be launched by 2012.

“The designs for Chandrayaan II have been completed and we hope to launch it by 2012,” ISRO chairperson G. Madhavan Nair told reporters on the sidelines of a function organized by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) to felicitate the Chandrayaan I team.

Annadurai told the press on January 18, 2009 that Chandrayaan 2 will be launched using a GSLV Mk III. The complete spacecraft will weigh 2,700 kg.

In a statement to the press on April 20, 2008, following the launch of RISAT 2, TK Alex, director of the ISRO Satellite Center, said that ISRO is finalizing the test equipment that would go with the two rovers that would soft land on the moon.

On August 16, 2009, ISRO chief G Madhavan Nair announced that a joint review of the design with the Russians had been completed.

"Right now, the design has been completed. We had a joint review with Russian scientists here," he said.

"Next...we will go towards prototype building, which will be taken up next year," Nair said.

On November 7, 2009, while inaugurating the sixth National Student Conference at University Visveswaraya College of Engineering, Annadurai stated that the projected will be completed by 2012-13.

“Chadrayaan-II will consist of the spacecraft and a landing platform with two moon rovers, one from India and one from Russia, which will land on the moon and move on wheels on the lunar surface, pick up samples of soil or rocks, do a chemical analysis a nd send the data to the spacecraft orbiting above,’’ Dr Annadurai said.

Design Change Following Discovery of Water on the Moon

Buoyed by the widespread presence of water on the moon, ISRO decided to tweak its Chandrayaan-2 rover payload to facilitate sub-surface soil analysis.

One of the two rovers onboard the Chandrayaan-2 lander will be equipped with a a drill capable of collecting samples from a few millimetres below the lunar surface.

"We have a good head start," said then ISRO chairman G Madhavan Nair.

"The data we have is really exciting and we will definitely have to re-visit the mission objectives.

"We may go for certain midcourse correction of the objectives."

On May 9 2010, Annadurai spoke to The Hindu after delivering the keynote address at the graduation ceremony of B. Tech and MBA students, organised by the Toc-H Institute of Science and Technology (TIST), Arakkunnam, near Cochine.

"The purpose of Chandrayaan-I was to understand what the entire moon contained. But now, the effort would be to understand it in situ. Originally, we wanted to have chemical-mineral analysis, but now that Chandrayaan-I has shown us traces of water on the moon's surface, the emphasis could also be on confirming the finding," he said.
Orbiter

The orbiter will weigh 1,400 kg.

The five payloads recommended for the orbiter by ADCOS are

Large Area Soft X-ray Spectrometer (CLASS) from ISRO Satellite Centre (ISAC), Bangalore and Solar X-ray monitor (XSM) from Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), Ahmedabad for mapping major elements present on the lunar surface.

L and S band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) from Space Applications Centre (SAC), Ahmedabad for probing the first few tens of metres of the lunar surface for the presence of different constituents, including water ice. SAR is expected to provide further evidence confirming the presence of water ice below the shadowed regions of the moon.

Imaging IR Spectrometer (IIRS) from SAC, Ahmedabad for mapping of lunar surface over a wide wavelength range for the study of minerals, water molecules and hydroxyl present.

Neutral Mass Spectrometer (ChACE-2) from Space Physics Laboratory (SPL), Thiruvananthapuram to carry out a detailed study of the lunar exosphere.

Terrain Mapping Camera-2 (TMC-2) from SAC, Ahmedabad for preparing a three-dimensaional map essential for studying the lunar mineralogy and geology.

The orbiter will circle the moon at an altitude of 200 km and is being designed for a life of 2 years.


The other activities completed are: finalization of all electrical and mechanical interfaces including the payload interfaces; Preliminary Design Reviews (PDRs) of Bus Systems (Power, Attitude Orbit
Control Electronics, Telemetry, Tracking and Command Baseband Systems, RF Systems, Data Handling System, Structure, Thermal Control System, Propulsion System); all systems accommodation studies and initial thermal analysis.

Nuclear Powered Orbiter Considered but Dropped

At one stage ISRO contemplated the use of nuclear power for the lunar orbiter in collaboration with Bhaba Atomic Research Center.

"We are thinking of powering some parts of Chandrayaan II with nuclear power and it will power the spacecraft when it revolves around the dark side of the moon," Madhavan Nair, Chairman, ISRO, told media in early August 2009.

Lander / Rovers

The Chandrayaan 2 will comprise a 1,260 kg Russian designed and developed moon lander carrying a single 15 kg rover developed by ISRO in collaboration with Russia.

Lander

The 1,2060 kg Russian lander will carry a scientific payload of 35 kg, not including the rover.

It will be powered by solar panels

It will focus on the geochemical analysis of the lunar soil and the detection of water, which was first confirmed from observations made using Chandrayaan - 1.

Russia is considering the use of a drill that could penetrate as much as a meter below the surface to possibly make contact with water.

Besides equipment to analyse the lunar soil and detect the presence of water, the lander will carry a seismometer and a laser reflector. Also being considered is a landing beacon that could facilitate future landings.

Russia plans to test the lander in 2011, Roscosmos Deputy Head Anatoly Shilov told AW&ST on August 31, 2010

Twin Rovers Considered at One Stage

Early plans envisaged that the moon lander will carry two rovers: A 50 kg Russian rover that will carry the major exploration instruments, and a 15 kg Indian rover, primarily designed to give Indian space scientists experience in robotics and precise remote control over planetary distances, which will separately undertake chemical analysis of the lunar soil.

The 15-kg. (33-lb.), 10-watt, solar-powered Indian rover will include a laser ablation tool for spectral analysis of rocks and soil, and video cameras for navigation. (AW&ST)

Single Rover Finalized

In May 2010, ISRO and Roskosmos dropped plans for a Russian rover, opting for a 15 kg Indian rover..

Rover Details

The rover has been designed in Russia but is being fabricated to Russians specs by Indian scientists.

Using the rover, ISRO scientists hope to hone their deep space communication technology - transmission of commands to the payloads and reception of data collected by them - for future planetary exploration.

Chemical analysis of the lunar soil is a secondary aim of the Indian rover.

Payload

The 15-kg (33-lb) rover will be powered by solar panels. It will carry up to two kilograms of scientific payload. It could be used to collect soil samples and analyse them.

There will be two payloads on the rover for analysis of lunar soil.

Laser induced Breakdown Spectroscope (LIBS) from Laboratory for Electro Optic Systems ( LEOS), Bangalore. (In English, a laser ablation tool for spectral analysis of rocks and soil.)
Alpha Particle Induced X-ray Spectroscope (APIXS) from PRL, Ahmedabad.

Both instruments are expected to carry out elemental analysis of the lunar surface near the landing site.

Rover Development

A significant part of the rover, including its communication package, is being fabricated in Kerala.

On September 10, 2011, ISRO announced that it is ready to start building an engineering test model of the rover for testing with the lunar surface simulator.

Mobility

IIT Kanpur is developing subsystems to provide mobility to the Indian rover to be placed on the moon by the Chandrayaan-2 lander.

The components being developed are: stereophonic camera based 3D vsion, kinematic traction control, and control and motor dynamics of the rover's six wheels.

The 3D vision component is being developed by Dr. K.S. Venkatesh, Associate Professor of Electrical engineering.

3D vision involves generating structured light based 3D map of lunar terrain, Dr Ashish Dutta, Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at IITK told HT:

“As there is no ready made map of the lunar surface, the focus is to use structured light to generate a map of the lunar terrain after landing. Based on the map the robot is expected to move from one point to another for experiments.

Kinematics and path planning involves using the generated map to move to a desired location, choosing the safest path to travel over the lunar terrain which has craters, rocks and dust.

The path chosen should not only be safe but also involve least energy consumption, Dutta said. The system has to factor in moon's lower (1/6th) gravity and the mandate for zero errors.

The stereo vision cameras will provide the ground team controlling the rovers a 3D view of the surrounding terrain.

The rover will have six wheels each driven by an independent electrical motor. Four of the wheels will also be capable of independent steering. A total of 10 electrical motors will be used for traction and steering.

Kinematic traction control will enable the rover to negotiate the rough lunar terrain using independent steering provided on four of its wheels.

IIT Kanpur reported completing the project in March 2012. [via HT]

The developed systems will now be handed over to ISRO for final testing and evaluation.
Rover and Lander Test Center

ISRO is setting up a center in Bangalore for testing of the Chandrayaan-2 rovers and lander, which will have a test area mimicking the lunar terrain and conditions. The Russian rover too will be tested there before being fitted to Chandrayaan-2.

Because of recent speculation that the dense packing of 11 payloads in the Chandrayaan lunar orbiter led to its overheating and subsequent loss, ISRO scientists are less keen to invite payloads from outside space agencies or universities.

Chandrayaan - 2 - Indian Space Projects
 
By Arun S Vishwakarma Issue Vol 24.1 Jan-Mar2009 | Date : 27 Jan , 2012 Shourya and Sagarika is a new common missile that can be launched from multiple
platforms, i.e. ground, submarine and mobile launcher. The naval version is called
Sagarika, while the land based version is called Shourya1. The Indian doctrine of
Minimum Credible Nuclear Deterrence envisages “No First Use” (NFU) policy and a triad of
nuclear counterstrike capability. The land based Agni-2 missile range is limited to about
3,300 km, and the longer range Agni-3 will enter service soon. The sea leg of the triad based on blue water naval assets dispersed across the world’s
oceans is most survivable and thus a critical part of the triad. The ability to reach all
corners of a potential challenger requires a range of 5,000 to 8,000 km. DRDO is developing sub-surface launched long range Agni-3SL with heavy MIRV payload and ABM countermeasures.Indian nuclear powered ATV due for sea trial in 2009 will
reportedly carry 12 launch tubes2 of 2.4m diameter. Launch tubes can be flexibly
configured to either carry a two meter diameter Agni-3SL or three wooden rounds3 of
0.74m diameter K15-Sagarika missile. Shourya and Sagarika fills the short to medium
range gap that is below Agni-3’s minimum range.At operational level these missiles
provide for range of warheads necessary for graduated nuclear escalation as enunciated by Indian staff and military warfare collages.4
This multifunction missile made in large quantities would fulfill India’s immediate
requirements. The missile optimally matches latest types of strategic weapons tested at
Pokhran-II in 1998. The missile will most likely takeover the strategic weapons role of
Prithvi and Agni-1 missiles, and make them unambiguously dedicated for conventional
roles thus stabilizing nuclear deterrence. Shourya and its counterpart Sagarika has been tested six times5 till date. The missile is expected to enter service in 2010. Sagarika will
be deployed on submarines and very likely on ‘Sukanya’ class naval vessels too.
Description
Shourya is a compact, slender, two-stage, solid fuel missile designed as a wooden
round. The missile development was initiated as project K15 and was first flight tested6
on 27 October 2004 in the guise of solid fueled Prithvi-III.7 It is stored, deployed and launched in a fiberglass composite canister, which is easy to handle mobile and can be
flexibly deployed on different types of surface and sub-surface platforms. Shourya and
Sagarika share a common design. The missile is sealed and can be launched from a
moving submarine at 50 meter depth.
The 6.2 tonne Shourya is 10 meters long, and has two solid fuel stages of 0.74 meters
diameter. The first stage booster is about two meters long and the second about six meters long. The missile supports a range of unitary warhead configurations, weighing
180 to 1,000 kg. High missile accuracy and ability to fly in a highly depressed trajectory
well within atmosphere indicates that it is a weapon for choice to interdict Command &
Control (C&C) and preemptive tactics.The sixth test flight on November 12th, 2008 was a
depressed trajectory flight (at Mach 6 and 50 km altitude) with continuous rolling to
dissipate heat over a larger surface demonstrated the mastery of difficult aspects of rocketry involving sustained hypersonic flight.The wooden round design sealed in a
fiber glass canister with the aero fins folded inside in a clean & controlled environment
makes it maintenance free and tamper proof. The missile is launched by a hot gas
generator developing 15-200 bar pressure using high burn rate HTBP based composite
propellant. The thick dark gas cloud greatly reduces the thermal signature of the missile.
Once out of the launch tube, the first stage booster motor ignites, taking the missile to five km altitude, when, the main second stage motor takes over. The booster debris
reaches a maximum altitude of six km, well below the horizon of radars beyond 330
km. The clean and small diameter missile presents a tiny RCS (radar cross-section). The second stage air fins provide necessary in-flight trajectory control. The main motor
is typically expended at 33 km altitude well within the atmosphere; however the air
fins remain effective beyond post boost phase. The air fins also allow the missile to fly in
a depressed trajectory as well as a cruise and glide in sustained hypersonic regime at 50
km altitude. The payload separation can be done much later after using aerodynamics
for trajectory modification during ascent or descent. The missile is resistant to ABM defense.8
Re-entry Vehicle
Shourya Re-entry Vehicle (RV) supports a wide range of weapons, with total payload
mass ranging from 180 to 1,000 kg. The missile range is a function of payload mass (see
graph below).
The November 2008 test unveiled the new generation RV that is designed and optimized for newer boosted fission and thermonuclear weapon (including those
awaiting confirmatory test). The sharp nose high ‘âeta’ (Ballistic coefficient9) RV design
employs 16 cm diameter blunt nose and half angle of 12° that is mounted on a payload
adapter to interface with the 0.74m diameter mission control module atop the upper
stage. The high ‘âeta’ RV in combination with an all carbon composite body enables
higher re-entry speed even with a light weight payload.10 Mk-4: For light weight 17Kt Fusion Boosted Fission (FBF) warhead11. Mass12: ~180
Kg13.
Mk-5: For 50Kt FBF or 200Kt Thermo Nuclear (TN) warhead14. Mass: ~340 Kg
Mk-6: For 150Kt FBF warhead15. Mass: ~550 Kg.
The all carbon composite re-entry heat shields with multi-directional ablative carbon-
carbon re-entry nose tip make it very light and tough.16 This very light RV mass enables scalable payload and range tradeoff especially for lightweight warhead.
Propulsion
The Shourya has two solid fueled stages of 0.74m diameter. This diameter is compatible
with a recently tested Indian sub-surface launch system that has a 2.4 meter diameter
launch tube17.
First Stage: The first stage solid fuel booster is approximately two meter long and weighs about 1,300 kg including 1,000 kg high density fuel. The booster lifts the missile
to an altitude of five km so that the second stage can operate more efficiently at low
atmospheric pressure. It uses hot gas reaction control for initial control of yaw, pitch
and roll before the air fins unfold and missile gains sufficient velocity for aerodynamic
control surfaces. Second Stage: This six meter long stage weighs about 3.6 tonne and generates 16 tonne
thrust. Case-bonded HTPB-based composite propellant with low burn rate is ignited by a
small pyrogen ignition motor.
The case is made of 250 grade maraging steel to maximize fuel mass fraction that is
critical for scalable payload versus range flexibility. Its nozzle is made of composite
material with metallic backup and carbon phenolic liners. The interstage coupling uses a soft-stage separation mechanism and retro rockets for reliable and safe stage
separation.
Navigation & Accuracy
Shourya largely carries the proven avionics set of Agni-3. However, for more extensive
aerodynamic maneuvering, it is augmented by new sensors and flight control system.
Shourya will also benefit form Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS)23 expected to be ready by 2012, to ensure guaranteed national access to precision
navigation. These systems enable high accuracy required for precision strike.
Range versus Payload
Missile range and payload mass are inversely related. It is interesting to note that press
reports the Shourya’s range for 1,000 kg and 500 kg payload. The former
corresponding to 1980 vintage 200Kt FBF warhead and the latter corresponding to 150Kt FBF that is yet to be field validated.
The official reporting obfuscates the missile’s much higher range corresponding to field
tested 17Kt FBF warhead that is the mainstay of Indian deterrence.
Conclusion
Shourya class of missile is truly a multi-service missile that has desirable attributes of
small size, mobility, stealth, rich set of warhead options, robustness and cost that could make it the most mass produced Indian missile. It complements the long range Agni
class missiles to provide the Indian military commanders the global range necessary to
secure Indian interests.
 
CHANDRAYAAN - 2 EXPLAINED

chandrayaan2.jpg

Introduction

The Chandrayaan-2 is an ISRO mission that aims to place an orbiter around the moon and send a lander with a rover to its surface in 2015.

The mission is being undertaken in collaboration with Roskosmos of Russia.

Under an agreement signed on November 12, 2007 between the space agencies of India and Russia, ISRO and Roskosmos, each agency was to contribute Rs 425 crore towards the cost of the mission.

The spacecraft was to be launched in 2014, with an orbiter made by ISRO and a lander made by Russian Space Agency Roscosmos. The lander was to carry a small Indian built rover to collect and examine lunar soil samples, Russians refer to the project as Luna-Resource.
Roskosmos Dropout?

On January 21, 2013, Dr. S.V.S. Murty of the Planetary Exploration Group of the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), an institution in Ahmedabad under ISRO, announced that India would undertake the Chandrayaan mission all by itself, dropping earlier plans of collaborating with Russia. [via The Hindu]

Dr. Murty was speaking on India’s lunar and Mars missions at a workshop on exoplanets at the laboratory.

ISRO took the decision to go it alone after Russia's Roskosmos expressed its inability to provide the lander for the mission, following the failure of the Russian Phobos-Grunt mission to Mars in November 2011.

ISRO will now make the orbiter, lander and rover all in-house.

SAC has completed the design of the indigenous lander and preliminary configuration study, according to Murty. The mission profile has undergone minor alterations.

The Chandrayaan-2 will be launched using a GSLV powered by an indigenous cryogenic engine in 2015.

The Orbiter will have five primary payloads, two of which will be improvements on instruments that were onboard Chandrayaan-1.

The rover too will carry two additional instruments.

According to PRL director Jitendra Goswami, despite the Russian pull out from the Chandrayaan project, Indo-Russian collaboration in planetary exploration will continue.

Chandrayaan 2 was a component of Roskosmos' Luna-Glob moon exploration program. It is possible the Russian agency would collaborate with ISRO in one of its future lunar missions.

Roskosmos Dropout Denial

On January 22, 2013, Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) Director J N Goswami told the press that Chandrayaan 2 would continue to be a joint Indo-Russian project despite the delay.

"The Indo-Russian mission is going ahead. The project has got delayed. Currently, we are whole-heartedly working for the Mars project scheduled for November. The moon mission, for the time being, has got delayed," Goswami told PTI.

"The failure of Roskosmos Phobos-Grunt mission (in December 2011) has, for the time-being, delayed the moon mission," Goswami said, adding the construction of lander for the combined mission has been delayed.

According to PTI, it made repeated attempts to contact S V S Murty, who had announced the Roskosmo drop out a day earlier, but he was not available for comments on the issue.
At a Glance

Launch Date 2015
Launcher GSLV
Total Weight 2,660 kg
Orbiter Weight 1,400 kg
Lander Weight 1,260 kg (35 kg scientific instruments)
Rover 15kg

Launch Schedule

The launch of the spacecraft is scheduled for 2015, but is dependent on the GSLV launcher becoming operational again well in time.

ISRO Chariman K. Radhakrishnan reconfirmed to the press in July 2012 that the Chandrayaan-2 mission could be on its way in 2014. [via The Hindu]

Following the failure of the Russian Phobos-Grunt mission to Mars in November 2011, there were reports in the Russian press that the mission is likely to be rescheduled to 2016.

Academician Lev Zelyony, the director of the Institute for Space Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences told Interfax in February 2012 that "the technical solutions used in the Phobos-Grunt project need to be revised. Those solutions were used for the lunar projects too. It does not touch upon the equipment – it goes about spacecraft and control systems." [via Red Orbit]

However, ISRO's annual report for 2012, released in April 2012, still gives the launch year as 2014

To begin with, the spacecraft was planned to be launched in 2013 (First Quarter) using a GSLV Mk 3. However, following two consecutive failures of the GSLV launcher on April 15, 2010 and December 25, 2010, ISRO has pushed back the launch by nearly two years, and settled on GSLV Mk 1 as the launcher.

The Mk. 1 carries a lighter payload than the Mk 3. As a result, ISRO is limiting the experiments being carried on board.

Speaking to the press on September 9, 2011 ISRO Chairman K Radhakrishnan said, “We have to go through design review and then move ahead”. This mission is slated for 2013-14, he added.

As in early September 2011, ISRO was poised to start developing the engineering model its rover for testing with the lunar surface simulator.

Division of Responsibility

According to Government of India press release on August 4, 2010:

"The Chandrayaan-II project is envisaged to have an Indian Orbiter module with scientific instruments to go round the moon and a Russian Lander module carrying an Indian Rover and a few scientific instruments.

The Chandrayaan-II project will be launched using the Indian Geostationary Launch Vehicle - GSLV. The costs towards these components will be met by the Space Agencies of the respective countries."

ISRO will launch Chandrayaan 2 using a GSLV Mk-2 rocket and realize the orbiter and rover. Roscosmos will realize the lander that will carry the rover to the moon.

Many other countries (USA, France, Germany, Sweden) are expected to participate in the project by contributing instruments and equipment.

During 2009 ISRO and Russian officials talked of there being two rovers. A large main rover designed in Russia and fabricated in India; and a mini-rover designed and fabricated in India, with both rovers being controlled from India.

Following a cost analysis, the Russians gave up on their rover in May 2010.

“The tasks of the mission are to investigate rock samples at the maximum distance from the landing point and to confirm the presence of water,” Roscosmos Deputy Head Anatoly Shilov said at the Bengaluru Space Expo in August 31.

While the Indian rover will analyze lunar surface soil, the Russian lander is likely to drill into the lunar surface and analyse sub surface soil.

Payload Finalization

The payloads for Chandrayaan-2, as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Space Sciences (ADCOS), was announced by ISRO on Monday, August 30, 2010.

ADCOS is chaired by Prof U R Rao and comprises members are drawn from ISRO centres, academic institutions and R and D laboratories and Chaired by Prof U R Rao, Chairman,

"Inclusion of additional payloads, if possible within the mission constraints, will be considered at a later date following a detailed review", ISRO said in a statement
Project Director

The project is being helmed by Dr Mayilsamy Annadurai.

Mission Profile

According to a presentation made by Dr. Goswami and M. Annadurai, project director for Chandrayaan-2, at 2011 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference:

A GSLV Mk-2 launcher will will place the Chandrayaan-2's orbiter, lander and rover, in a transfer orbit around the Earth. From there, the orbiter's onboard rocket engine will propel both the spacecraft and the lander-rover combo into a trajectory that will take them to the Moon.

Once on the lunar transfer trajectory, the orbiter and lander-rover will separate. The two would then journey independently to the Moon,

Landing Sequence

During the landing, the lander's main engine will bring the spacecraft to hover at approximately 2 kms above the lunar surface and then shut down.

The lander will then free fall under the moon's weak gravity, with small thrusters periodically firing to control the rate of descent.

The lander will use a three beam Doppler radar to avoid large obstacles during its descent to the moon's surface.

The accuracy of the autonomous landing system allows the landing area to be predicted as an ellipse that is 30 km long and 15 km wide.

After the lander touches down on the moon, it will release the rover on the lunar surface.

The rover will be equipped with a robotic arm and two instruments to study the chemical composition and volatiles in the lunar surface material within a kilometre of the landing site.

Landing Site

The Chandrayaan-2 lander and rover are both powered with solar panels and hence cannot operate in an area completely devoid of sunlight.

Additionally, the spacecrafts need to be in direct communication with earth for control.

The main scientific goal of the mission is to confirm the presence of water ice on the moon.

It was earlier believed that ice on the moon is confined to areas permanently in darkness. More recent observations suggest ice is also present below the lunar surface in sunlit areas close to the South Pole.

Two candidate landing sites near the Lunar south pole have reportedly been identified by the Russians, based on data from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and Japanese Selena orbiter, which entered lunar orbit in 2007.

The Russian developed Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector, LEND, installed on LRO was used to identify sunlit areas, potentially with sub surface ice. Imagery from Selena and data from LOLA laser altimeter on NASA’s LRO orbiter was used to profile the terrain in these areas.

To begin with 14 sites in sunlight areas close to the South Pole that possibly have subsurface ice were identified..

Nine of these sites were rejected at the outset by the lander team because the terrain was too rough for the landing system of the spacecraft.

Selected Sites

Based on accuracy of the landing system, two sites have been short listed

Main site: 87.2 deg S, 68 deg E, Shoemaker, Faustini
Backup site: 88.5 deg S, 297 deg E, Gerlach

The sites finalized could change if the accuracy of the landing system is improved or based on other data.

Spacecraft Redesign

Once it became clear that Chandrayaan-2 would have to be launched by GSLV and not GSLV-III, the structure configuration of the spacecraft was changed from I2K to I3K to accommodate a revision in payload lift off capacity. The change will facilitate the use of larger propellant
tanks.

chandrayaan2_Evolution.jpg

The mission strategy was revised to inject the satellite in a lower initial orbit (170 X 16980 km) with a higher lift-off mass of 3200 kg and the Propulsion System Configuration changed to increase fuel carrying capability of the satellite.

Project History

ISRO announced on Wednesday, December 24, 2008, that the design for Chandrayaan II has been completed and it will be launched by 2012.

“The designs for Chandrayaan II have been completed and we hope to launch it by 2012,” ISRO chairperson G. Madhavan Nair told reporters on the sidelines of a function organized by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) to felicitate the Chandrayaan I team.

Annadurai told the press on January 18, 2009 that Chandrayaan 2 will be launched using a GSLV Mk III. The complete spacecraft will weigh 2,700 kg.

In a statement to the press on April 20, 2008, following the launch of RISAT 2, TK Alex, director of the ISRO Satellite Center, said that ISRO is finalizing the test equipment that would go with the two rovers that would soft land on the moon.

On August 16, 2009, ISRO chief G Madhavan Nair announced that a joint review of the design with the Russians had been completed.

"Right now, the design has been completed. We had a joint review with Russian scientists here," he said.

"Next...we will go towards prototype building, which will be taken up next year," Nair said.

On November 7, 2009, while inaugurating the sixth National Student Conference at University Visveswaraya College of Engineering, Annadurai stated that the projected will be completed by 2012-13.

“Chadrayaan-II will consist of the spacecraft and a landing platform with two moon rovers, one from India and one from Russia, which will land on the moon and move on wheels on the lunar surface, pick up samples of soil or rocks, do a chemical analysis a nd send the data to the spacecraft orbiting above,’’ Dr Annadurai said.

Design Change Following Discovery of Water on the Moon

Buoyed by the widespread presence of water on the moon, ISRO decided to tweak its Chandrayaan-2 rover payload to facilitate sub-surface soil analysis.

One of the two rovers onboard the Chandrayaan-2 lander will be equipped with a a drill capable of collecting samples from a few millimetres below the lunar surface.

"We have a good head start," said then ISRO chairman G Madhavan Nair.

"The data we have is really exciting and we will definitely have to re-visit the mission objectives.

"We may go for certain midcourse correction of the objectives."

On May 9 2010, Annadurai spoke to The Hindu after delivering the keynote address at the graduation ceremony of B. Tech and MBA students, organised by the Toc-H Institute of Science and Technology (TIST), Arakkunnam, near Cochine.

"The purpose of Chandrayaan-I was to understand what the entire moon contained. But now, the effort would be to understand it in situ. Originally, we wanted to have chemical-mineral analysis, but now that Chandrayaan-I has shown us traces of water on the moon's surface, the emphasis could also be on confirming the finding," he said.
Orbiter

The orbiter will weigh 1,400 kg.

The five payloads recommended for the orbiter by ADCOS are

Large Area Soft X-ray Spectrometer (CLASS) from ISRO Satellite Centre (ISAC), Bangalore and Solar X-ray monitor (XSM) from Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), Ahmedabad for mapping major elements present on the lunar surface.

L and S band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) from Space Applications Centre (SAC), Ahmedabad for probing the first few tens of metres of the lunar surface for the presence of different constituents, including water ice. SAR is expected to provide further evidence confirming the presence of water ice below the shadowed regions of the moon.

Imaging IR Spectrometer (IIRS) from SAC, Ahmedabad for mapping of lunar surface over a wide wavelength range for the study of minerals, water molecules and hydroxyl present.

Neutral Mass Spectrometer (ChACE-2) from Space Physics Laboratory (SPL), Thiruvananthapuram to carry out a detailed study of the lunar exosphere.

Terrain Mapping Camera-2 (TMC-2) from SAC, Ahmedabad for preparing a three-dimensaional map essential for studying the lunar mineralogy and geology.

The orbiter will circle the moon at an altitude of 200 km and is being designed for a life of 2 years.


The other activities completed are: finalization of all electrical and mechanical interfaces including the payload interfaces; Preliminary Design Reviews (PDRs) of Bus Systems (Power, Attitude Orbit
Control Electronics, Telemetry, Tracking and Command Baseband Systems, RF Systems, Data Handling System, Structure, Thermal Control System, Propulsion System); all systems accommodation studies and initial thermal analysis.

Nuclear Powered Orbiter Considered but Dropped

At one stage ISRO contemplated the use of nuclear power for the lunar orbiter in collaboration with Bhaba Atomic Research Center.

"We are thinking of powering some parts of Chandrayaan II with nuclear power and it will power the spacecraft when it revolves around the dark side of the moon," Madhavan Nair, Chairman, ISRO, told media in early August 2009.

Lander / Rovers

The Chandrayaan 2 will comprise a 1,260 kg Russian designed and developed moon lander carrying a single 15 kg rover developed by ISRO in collaboration with Russia.

Lander

The 1,2060 kg Russian lander will carry a scientific payload of 35 kg, not including the rover.

It will be powered by solar panels

It will focus on the geochemical analysis of the lunar soil and the detection of water, which was first confirmed from observations made using Chandrayaan - 1.

Russia is considering the use of a drill that could penetrate as much as a meter below the surface to possibly make contact with water.

Besides equipment to analyse the lunar soil and detect the presence of water, the lander will carry a seismometer and a laser reflector. Also being considered is a landing beacon that could facilitate future landings.

Russia plans to test the lander in 2011, Roscosmos Deputy Head Anatoly Shilov told AW&ST on August 31, 2010

Twin Rovers Considered at One Stage

Early plans envisaged that the moon lander will carry two rovers: A 50 kg Russian rover that will carry the major exploration instruments, and a 15 kg Indian rover, primarily designed to give Indian space scientists experience in robotics and precise remote control over planetary distances, which will separately undertake chemical analysis of the lunar soil.

The 15-kg. (33-lb.), 10-watt, solar-powered Indian rover will include a laser ablation tool for spectral analysis of rocks and soil, and video cameras for navigation. (AW&ST)

Single Rover Finalized

In May 2010, ISRO and Roskosmos dropped plans for a Russian rover, opting for a 15 kg Indian rover..

Rover Details

The rover has been designed in Russia but is being fabricated to Russians specs by Indian scientists.

Using the rover, ISRO scientists hope to hone their deep space communication technology - transmission of commands to the payloads and reception of data collected by them - for future planetary exploration.

Chemical analysis of the lunar soil is a secondary aim of the Indian rover.

Payload

The 15-kg (33-lb) rover will be powered by solar panels. It will carry up to two kilograms of scientific payload. It could be used to collect soil samples and analyse them.

There will be two payloads on the rover for analysis of lunar soil.

Laser induced Breakdown Spectroscope (LIBS) from Laboratory for Electro Optic Systems ( LEOS), Bangalore. (In English, a laser ablation tool for spectral analysis of rocks and soil.)
Alpha Particle Induced X-ray Spectroscope (APIXS) from PRL, Ahmedabad.

Both instruments are expected to carry out elemental analysis of the lunar surface near the landing site.

Rover Development

A significant part of the rover, including its communication package, is being fabricated in Kerala.

On September 10, 2011, ISRO announced that it is ready to start building an engineering test model of the rover for testing with the lunar surface simulator.

Mobility

IIT Kanpur is developing subsystems to provide mobility to the Indian rover to be placed on the moon by the Chandrayaan-2 lander.

The components being developed are: stereophonic camera based 3D vsion, kinematic traction control, and control and motor dynamics of the rover's six wheels.

The 3D vision component is being developed by Dr. K.S. Venkatesh, Associate Professor of Electrical engineering.

3D vision involves generating structured light based 3D map of lunar terrain, Dr Ashish Dutta, Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at IITK told HT:

“As there is no ready made map of the lunar surface, the focus is to use structured light to generate a map of the lunar terrain after landing. Based on the map the robot is expected to move from one point to another for experiments.

Kinematics and path planning involves using the generated map to move to a desired location, choosing the safest path to travel over the lunar terrain which has craters, rocks and dust.

The path chosen should not only be safe but also involve least energy consumption, Dutta said. The system has to factor in moon's lower (1/6th) gravity and the mandate for zero errors.

The stereo vision cameras will provide the ground team controlling the rovers a 3D view of the surrounding terrain.

The rover will have six wheels each driven by an independent electrical motor. Four of the wheels will also be capable of independent steering. A total of 10 electrical motors will be used for traction and steering.

Kinematic traction control will enable the rover to negotiate the rough lunar terrain using independent steering provided on four of its wheels.

IIT Kanpur reported completing the project in March 2012. [via HT]

The developed systems will now be handed over to ISRO for final testing and evaluation.
Rover and Lander Test Center

ISRO is setting up a center in Bangalore for testing of the Chandrayaan-2 rovers and lander, which will have a test area mimicking the lunar terrain and conditions. The Russian rover too will be tested there before being fitted to Chandrayaan-2.

Because of recent speculation that the dense packing of 11 payloads in the Chandrayaan lunar orbiter led to its overheating and subsequent loss, ISRO scientists are less keen to invite payloads from outside space agencies or universities.

Chandrayaan - 2 - Indian Space Projects

How is a lunar probe defense related`??
 
How is a lunar probe defense related`??

Maybe not now....but soon big powers like US, Russia, China, India etc. will be competing for the resources of moon (in next 30-40 years) than it will be :D

Moon is the Race for Antarctica 2.0 :)

P.S. Pls Don't discuss, just contribute to this thread, i was expecting good support from Indian friends on this thread.
 
Indian Ballistic Glide Re-entry Vehicles




















 
Transfer Of Some Critical Technology Being Negotiated For As Part Of India's MMRCA Contract [Illustration]

The upwards of $10 billion USD deal with France for the acquisition of the Rafale fighter aircraft would involve local assembly, manufacturing offsets & Transfer of Technology [ToT].

This screenshot of the presentation slide, used by HAL's Chairman, during his talk at the Aero India 2013 International Seminar shows some of the critical technologies & sub-systems for which India is negotiating with France to be included as part of its Rafale acquisition.

MMRCA-Technology-Transfer-Offset-01-.jpg


In its mind, India would want France to hand over all the technologies used, with no restrictions on where it applies them subsequently. Realistically, it would start off with a position, whereby some hardware sub-systems could come directly from France, some that would be assembled in the country, sourcing the components & raw materials from original vendors, while some in which France would have to part with sufficient information for India to be in a position to make those components/sub-systems completely independent of French involvement, save for its certification - ToT. This position would be challenged by the French who'd be willing to offer less, asking for more. This back and forth would continue till they reach a mutually agreeable position, upon which the contract would be signed. Even after receiving the ToT, contractual obligation would dictate whether the same tech or manufacturing process could be applied in other projects - the case in point being the ToT received for growing Single Crystal Blades [SCB] used in the twin AL-31FP Turbofan engines powering the IAF's Sukhoi Su-30 MKIs1. While SCBs are being made for the Flanker engines, the Kaveri has not been able to reap the benefits.

MMRCA-Technology-Transfer-Offset-02-%25255B1%25255D.jpg



Notes:

1 = "As HAL will do 80 per cent of the manufacturing, it will acquire new technologies like the directionally solidified blades, which will give us the technology for the future engines. Similarly, from the Sukhoi (Su-30 fighter deal) we acquired the single crystal blade technology, which will be the basis for all future turbine blades. This way, we get to master these technologies and meet our own requirements and exports, which is the thrust at HAL," Mr Mohanty said.

- HAL sees major spin-offs from AJT deal

"The aircraft engine has single crystal blades which are capable of withstanding very high temperatures. Considering that the aircraft is huge and has to operate in hot conditions, and its twin engines have the 11,500kg thrust each, the single crystal blades ensure that the thrust remains optimum. The Russians have given this technology to us for the first time."

- Force Magazine, October 2009

Transfer Of Some Critical Technology Being Negotiated For As Part Of India's MMRCA Contract [Illustration] - AA Me, IN
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some Video Collection:

Brahmos:



Su-30MKI





ALH


N-LCA:



SAM Akash

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom