What's new

Indian company to drill for gas in BoB

bluesky

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
16,515
Reaction score
-4
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Japan
08 Feb 2017, 00:16:31

Move on gas exploration in Bay
Indian co goes for drilling
M Azizur Rahman

An Indian company will drill an exploratory well in a shallow offshore block in the Bay of Bengal to discover hydrocarbons, on terms that allow third-party sale.

Officials said buoyed by findings of preliminary search, ONGC Videsh Ltd (OVL) has moved to drill the well near Moheshkhali under shallow-depth gas block SS-09.

The Indian firm drew encouragement from the results of two-dimensional (2D) seismic surveys it carried out in two shallow-water bay blocks last year.

"ONGC is set to start the drilling programme within the next several months as it found the 2D survey results encouraging," Petrobangla director for production-sharing contract (PSC) Md Mahbub Sarwar told the FE Tuesday.

Bangladesh currently reels from an acute natural gas crisis while the demand is rising every passing day. The daily average output of the fossil fuel is around 2,700 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) against a known demand for over 3,300 mmcfd, according to Petrobangla.

The entire natural gas production comes from the country's onshore gas fields alone, as exploration in the bay remains a long way off.

Any fresh discovery of hydrocarbons would boost the country's growing economy significantly, said a senior Petrobangla official.

The officials said the Production Sharing Contracts (PSC's) on blocks SS-04 and SS-09 were signed by the government of Bangladesh, Petrobangla, also known as Bangladesh Oil, Gas & Mineral Corporation, the consortium OVL and OIL India Limited (OIL), and Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration and Production Company Limited (BAPEX) on 17 February 2014.

The OVL is the operator of these two blocks having participating interest of 45 per cent, while OIL holds 45 per cent participatory interest and BAPEX 10 per cent carried-over stake.

Block SS-04 covers an area of 7,269 square kilometres (sq km) and block SS-09 7,026 sq kms. Water depths in both the blocks range from 20-200 metres.

The exploration term for both the blocks consists of eight consecutive contract years comprising five years as initial exploration period and three years as subsequent exploration period.

As per the PSC, OVL is set to conduct 2700 full-fold LKM (line kilometre) 2D seismic data acquisition and processing and one exploratory well in block SS-04 and 2700 LKM 2D seismic data acquisition and processing and two exploratory wells in block SS-09.

The OVL has committed to spending around US$58.4 million for block SS-04 and $86.4 million for block SS-09.

The contractors would be allowed to operate and sell oil and gas for 20 years from an oil field and 25 years from a gas field.

The firm has already completed around 3100 LKM 2D seismic surveys for both the blocks. It is also carrying out 3,400 LKM 2D surveys in these two blocks.

Wellhead gas prices in Bangladesh are pegged to high-sulphur fuel-oil (HSFO) prices on the international market, while oil prices are determined on the basis of a 'fair market value' as agreed upon by both contractors and state-owned Petrobangla.

The floor price for HSFO has been fixed at $100 per tonne and the ceiling price at $200 per tonne to fix gas price.

The latter works out to around $5.50 per Mcf (1,000 cubic feet) before a 37.5 per cent corporate tax that has to be paid by the contractor.

Other features of the PSC are: (a) the licenceholder will have the right to full repatriation of profits (b) will not be charged any signature bonus or royalty (c) would not need to pay duty for equipment and machinery imported for operations during the exploration, development and production phases (d) will have 100 per cent cost recovery (e) production bonuses.

The contractor can also sell gas to third parties after Petrobangla's first right of refusal.

Bangladesh started facing natural gas crisis in 2009 with the rapid industrialisation forcing Petrobangla to ration natural gas supplies to gas-guzzling industries, power plants, compressed natural gas (CNG) filling stations and households.
 
.
Bangladesh started facing natural gas crisis in 2009 with the rapid industrialisation forcing Petrobangla to ration natural gas supplies to gas-guzzling industries, power plants, compressed natural gas (CNG) filling stations and households.

Amid a shortage of electricity and natural gas itself, the GoB is trying to build coal-fired power plants. However, not only the ignorant people, but also a group of PDF posters have been talking against the mining of coal fields in the NW as well as the building of a coal-fired power plant in Rampal. Coal produced power is cheaper than any other source. BD being a poor country must depend upon cheap source.
 
.
Amid a shortage of electricity and natural gas itself, the GoB is trying to build coal-fired power plants. However, not only the ignorant people, but also a group of PDF posters have been talking against the mining of coal fields in the NW as well as the building of a coal-fired power plant in Rampal. Coal produced power is cheaper than any other source. BD being a poor country must depend upon cheap source.
There is a thing called sustainable energy.... which I don't think bd's coal reserve can meet. If you want unlimited sustainable energy which is cheaper to produce... its nuclear and then solar and wind.
 
.
There is a thing called sustainable energy.... which I don't think bd's coal reserve can meet.
First we need energy. Once we have energy surplus we should look to shut down coal fired power plants and move towards Sustainable sources. But we need to keep up with our demands. So it is necessary to produce power cheaply which means coal fired power plants.
If you want unlimited sustainable energy which is cheaper to produce... its nuclear and then solar and wind.
Well, no. Solar enegry is not cheaper and it requires too much land. Nuclear energy is cheaper to produce but the cost to build nuclear power plant is huge and there are other factors too. Like Uncle Sam may think we're trying to build nukes and then sanction/drone strikes......I think it's still good that we're building a nuclear power plants. Setting up a couple more would be great but for now we don't have the money and we need to build the fist one and see how things work out.

Our climate wouldn't really allows us to produce Wind power. But I think setting up wind turbines in coastal areas could be good. But still the amount of power produced from that would be negligible.
 
.
Coal is an immediate but transitory step to Hydro and better
but setting up better plants with optimum combustion and a
gasification output will ensure some environmental protection.

Today, the USA still uses coal for 50% of its electricity production.
So Bangladesh needs feel no shame.

Have a good day all, Tay.
 
Last edited:
.
First we need energy. Once we have energy surplus we should look to shut down coal fired power plants and move towards Sustainable sources. But we need to keep up with our demands. So it is necessary to produce power cheaply which means coal fired power plants.

Well, no. Solar enegry is not cheaper and it requires too much land. Nuclear energy is cheaper to produce but the cost to build nuclear power plant is huge and there are other factors too. Like Uncle Sam may think we're trying to build nukes and then sanction/drone strikes......I think it's still good that we're building a nuclear power plants. Setting up a couple more would be great but for now we don't have the money and we need to build the fist one and see how things work out.

Our climate wouldn't really allows us to produce Wind power. But I think setting up wind turbines in coastal areas could be good. But still the amount of power produced from that would be negligible.

Has BD being such a coastal country looked at harnessing tidal energy as well as the offshore wind that you mention?

There is a thing called sustainable energy.... which I don't think bd's coal reserve can meet. If you want unlimited sustainable energy which is cheaper to produce... its nuclear and then solar and wind.

Actually BD should go for coal for the time being....but it shouldn't mine its reserves (if they are even feasbily mine-able) but buy it cheap from the major producers imo. Thats because BD is very densely populated....I dont think opening up a mine and assigning all that land for that purpose (and all related land around it that is affected) would be a good economic balance overall...compared to say farming, residence, industry, tourism etc
 
. .
Has BD being such a coastal country looked at harnessing tidal energy as well as the offshore wind that you mention?



Actually BD should go for coal for the time being....but it shouldn't mine its reserves (if they are even feasbily mine-able) but buy it cheap from the major producers imo. Thats because BD is very densely populated....I dont think opening up a mine and assigning all that land for that purpose (and all related land around it that is affected) would be a good economic balance overall...compared to say farming, residence, industry, tourism etc
First we need energy. Once we have energy surplus we should look to shut down coal fired power plants and move towards Sustainable sources. But we need to keep up with our demands. So it is necessary to produce power cheaply which means coal fired power plants.

Well, no. Solar enegry is not cheaper and it requires too much land. Nuclear energy is cheaper to produce but the cost to build nuclear power plant is huge and there are other factors too. Like Uncle Sam may think we're trying to build nukes and then sanction/drone strikes......I think it's still good that we're building a nuclear power plants. Setting up a couple more would be great but for now we don't have the money and we need to build the fist one and see how things work out.

Our climate wouldn't really allows us to produce Wind power. But I think setting up wind turbines in coastal areas could be good. But still the amount of power produced from that would be negligible.

Over coal power might sound cheap.... but you need more amount of coal to produce a particular amount when compared to for ex nuclear energy. A gram of uranium would produce more electricity than maybe a ton of coal.

Commercial nuclear power reactors and militarized once have different design makeup etc. so no chance of Uncle Sam coming up our bum if we aren't actually seeking to build reactors of that kind.

Btw it takes 0.02$ to produce 1 watt via a nuclear plant. It takes 0.12 for a solar plant. And yes then comes the factors of land which we lack....

I think wind energy can be effectively generated near the coastal areas? I need more insight on that.
 
.
Over coal power might sound cheap.... but you need more amount of coal to produce a particular amount when compared to for ex nuclear energy. A gram of uranium would produce more electricity than maybe a ton of coal.

Commercial nuclear power reactors and militarized once have different design makeup etc. so no chance of Uncle Sam coming up our bum if we aren't actually seeking to build reactors of that kind.

Btw it takes 0.02$ to produce 1 watt via a nuclear plant. It takes 0.12 for a solar plant. And yes then comes the factors of land which we lack....

I think wind energy can be effectively generated near the coastal areas? I need more insight on that.

Yah im talking about the impulse curves of demand BD is facing. Nuclear power takes long time to build, the investment is huge too and it pays itself off over much longer time as a result too.

So for immediate power deficit, there are 3 main options for BD: coal plants, import (and invest into) indian/nepal/bhutan power, microgrid solar (for rural demand)

Can balance those 3 and long term explore the strategic nuclear and also cleaner next gen gas fired plants and wind etc.....and whatever else comes up in future.
 
.
Has BD being such a coastal country looked at harnessing tidal energy as well as the offshore wind that you mention?
Did a quick search in google. Apparently there seems to be some underwater turbines in areas with high tidal waves to capture energy. Not sure how many turbines are there and how much electricity is produced. I think it would be of insignificant amount. Gonna read up a bit more later.
 
.
1) First we need energy. Once we have energy surplus we should look to shut down coal fired power plants and move towards Sustainable sources. But we need to keep up with our demands. So it is necessary to produce power cheaply which means coal fired power plants.
2) Well, no. Solar enegry is not cheaper and it requires too much land. Nuclear energy is cheaper to produce but the cost to build nuclear power plant is huge and there are other factors too. Like Uncle Sam may think we're trying to build nukes and then sanction/drone strikes......I think it's still good that we're building a nuclear power plants. Setting up a couple more would be great but for now we don't have the money and we need to build the fist one and see how things work out.
3) Our climate wouldn't really allows us to produce Wind power. But I think setting up wind turbines in coastal areas could be good. But still the amount of power produced from that would be negligible.

1) Every point agreed with. However, our coal reserves may not be unlimited, but is not also very limited. Our proven gas reserve is about 13 trillion cft, probable reserve is 32 tcf. But, our coal reserve in the NW is about 60 tcf of gas equivalent, which is very large.
2) Solar energy is not a substitute for centralized production of electricity in a power plant. It is less viable for a small densely populated country like BD, but, may be good for vast deserts of ME and Texas with an abundance of land. In another thinking, nuclear power may not also be a suitable option for BD. BD cannot cope with a situation of nuclear fallout from an accident.
3) Wind power has no potentiality for BD. It will not be a cost effective option.

I would like the BD govt of producing electricity in the BoB using the difference in the levels of water due to rise and fall by the tidal waves. I am talking about Spring tides and Ebb tides. The difference is almost 5 m in the BoB and it occurs four times a day, two Spring tides (জোয়ার) and two Ebb (ভাটা) tides. A very big source of energy.
 
Last edited:
.
What's that "polli biddut" thingy in bd. Heard it helped provide electricity to the poor
 
.
What's that "polli biddut" thingy in bd. Heard it helped provide electricity to the poor
Solar I think.

1. Nuclear is good on paper but practicality is a bitch. Each and every part of Nuclear plant is contaminated and disposing it is a bitch. BTW heard that Russia won't be taking our nuclear waste though original plan was they would. Basically you need to keep them deep underground with loads and loads of salt as shield. Still no assurance it won't contaminate the areaa's ground water or anything.

2. BD is flat. So not many place for hydro power.

3. Coastline not that long. So sea turbine power production is negligible I think.

4. Solar requires much space. What we don't have. But govt. could make law that residence building should have solar panels for use as dual source. Solar panel will power low power appliances like light, fan etc. while grid will power high power like oven, fridge etc.

5. Bangladesh also not that windy. Air turbines also negligible. But there's some in Cox's Bazar iirc.
 
.
Polli Biddut is simply the power distribution company for rural areas.
 
.
Seriously though, if there's so many constraints to producing power in BD, yall should just try JVs with India and setup the plants in Indian territory. I'm sure with India BD ties being so good, the Indian govt. would happily oblige.

Win win for both.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom